Is there a definitive "Fifth Element"? - AVS Forum

AVS Forum > Blu-ray & HD DVD > Blu-ray Software > Is there a definitive "Fifth Element"?

Blu-ray Software

TechnoCat's Avatar TechnoCat
10:07 AM Liked: 10
post #1 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 192
Joined: Feb 2005
I'm aware of the Sony 2006 fiasco-release and the 2007 stealth re-release. I'm considering upgrading from my SuperBit DVD, but had hoped they'd remastered it in the last seven years.

Any luck? Is there a newer or better version than the the stealth re-release?
Scott Simonian's Avatar Scott Simonian
11:05 AM Liked: 1030
post #2 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 14,309
Joined: Oct 2001
The "stealth" re-release is the definitive version. At least for those of us in Region A. I am unaware of any superior versions elsewhere.

You know it's that version as it will have both PCM 5.1 and Dolby TrueHD 5.1 audio listed.

Sure seems like a missed opportunity to have released this in a 'Mastered in 4K', huh? And I would buy it.... for the fifth time. rolleyes.giftongue.gif
LexInVA's Avatar LexInVA
11:59 AM Liked: 46
post #3 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 1,995
Joined: Jun 2007
There will probably be a 4K 20th Anniversary release in three years when 4K starts to take hold in homes.
Fanboyz's Avatar Fanboyz
12:00 PM Liked: 19
post #4 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 2,431
Joined: Dec 2007
I was just thinking this.
The Fifth Element needs a 4k remaster and better color. The Goumant discs have better color but are all blown out detail wise.
Scott Simonian's Avatar Scott Simonian
12:40 PM Liked: 1030
post #5 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 14,309
Joined: Oct 2001
Definitely. I remember when FE was the go-to disc for showing off vibrant colors and such things.

When you look at it today. It looks kinda pale and edgy.
Josh Z's Avatar Josh Z
02:28 PM Liked: 421
post #6 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 20,331
Joined: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexInVA View Post

There will probably be a 4K 20th Anniversary release in three years when 4K starts to take hold in homes.

The CGI in The Fifth Element was rendered at far below 4k resolution. It was 2k at most, maybe not even.
battlefront1990's Avatar battlefront1990
04:11 PM Liked: 11
post #7 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 45
Joined: Jul 2008
What your looking for is the Japan Re-issue of the fifth element with the audio taken from the UK dsic
LexInVA's Avatar LexInVA
05:48 PM Liked: 46
post #8 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 1,995
Joined: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z View Post

The CGI in The Fifth Element was rendered at far below 4k resolution. It was 2k at most, maybe not even.

So was Godzilla and Sony has a 4K master of that gem. A 4K master of Fifth Element would look pretty good even though the CGI is low-rez.
LexInVA's Avatar LexInVA
05:49 PM Liked: 46
post #9 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 1,995
Joined: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by battlefront1990 View Post

What your looking for is the Japan Re-issue of the fifth element with the audio taken from the UK dsic

What's so special about that release?
wuther's Avatar wuther
06:21 PM Liked: 34
post #10 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 1,504
Joined: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexInVA View Post

So was Godzilla and Sony has a 4K master of that gem. A 4K master of Fifth Element would look pretty good even though the CGI is low-rez.

Since it will be down sampled to 1080p the CG will not look so bad. Men in Black had quite a few CG (pretty sure done in 2k) and Sony did a '4K' master anyway.
battlefront1990's Avatar battlefront1990
06:33 PM Liked: 11
post #11 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 45
Joined: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexInVA View Post

What's so special about that release?
See for yourself. The Japan Reissue has the most bitrate and details and personally I think its closer to the original colors but I'm sure someone will hate on me for that.
NORDIC
http://imgbox.com/TmgqSw0c
JPN
http://imgbox.com/quwEuIZ4
USA (2007)
http://imgbox.com/Wkptu77t
GBR
http://imgbox.com/7SiBw8LE
JPN Reissue
http://imgbox.com/ulvCZPYI
Phantom Stranger's Avatar Phantom Stranger
08:38 PM Liked: 103
post #12 of 98
03-13-2014 | Posts: 3,243
Joined: Feb 2008
The 2007 Sony transfer was heralded when it arrived on Blu-ray but a newer transfer would likely blow it out of the water. I'm sure it will be one of the first movies released whenever the 4K format comes to fruition.
pjvader's Avatar pjvader
08:33 AM Liked: 62
post #13 of 98
03-14-2014 | Posts: 200
Joined: Aug 2006
RE: sony 4k discs they are not remastered from the ground up so the fx shots would be ok
all sony do is scan an existing 35mm/70mm print at 4k resolution so as long as it was shot on film or a 4k camera all is ok, the problem comes when movies like the last 2 star wars prequels that were shot digitally at 1080p, they can be scanned at 4k but will only result in an upscale as they have nowhere to go higher than 1080p
problems with fx occur more with tv shows that were shot on film but had their CG fx rendered at (for example) 480p which (i think) may have been the problem with star trek TNG, babylon 5 and firefly (i might be wrong though)
Josh Z's Avatar Josh Z
10:37 AM Liked: 421
post #14 of 98
03-14-2014 | Posts: 20,331
Joined: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjvader View Post

RE: sony 4k discs they are not remastered from the ground up so the fx shots would be ok
all sony do is scan an existing 35mm/70mm print at 4k resolution so as long as it was shot on film or a 4k camera all is ok, the problem comes when movies like the last 2 star wars prequels that were shot digitally at 1080p, they can be scanned at 4k but will only result in an upscale as they have nowhere to go higher than 1080p
problems with fx occur more with tv shows that were shot on film but had their CG fx rendered at (for example) 480p which (i think) may have been the problem with star trek TNG, babylon 5 and firefly (i might be wrong though)

Even though The Fifth Element was shot on film, any shot with CGI in it (and there's a tremendous amount of CGI in the movie) had to be composited digitally and will be locked to the resolution of the DI used at the time.
Will2007's Avatar Will2007
01:56 PM Liked: 143
post #15 of 98
03-14-2014 | Posts: 1,938
Joined: Sep 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z View Post

Even though The Fifth Element was shot on film, any shot with CGI in it (and there's a tremendous amount of CGI in the movie) had to be composited digitally and will be locked to the resolution of the DI used at the time.

+1. Thanks for the concise explanation, Josh!
wuther's Avatar wuther
08:22 PM Liked: 34
post #16 of 98
03-14-2014 | Posts: 1,504
Joined: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by battlefront1990 View Post

See for yourself. The Japan Reissue has the most bitrate and details and personally I think its closer to the original colors but I'm sure someone will hate on me for that.

Well going by the frame you point too I see old school home video colors, not film colors in the 'reissue'. No visible detail increase in the Japan image and quite a bit less film grain then the USA version has, probably partly due to the brightness boosting. The one thing this does reveal is using bitrate alone to judge a encode better is dubious at best.
battlefront1990's Avatar battlefront1990
08:49 PM Liked: 11
post #17 of 98
03-14-2014 | Posts: 45
Joined: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

Well going by the frame you point too I see old school home video colors, not film colors in the 'reissue'. No visible detail increase in the Japan image and quite a bit less film grain then the USA version has, probably partly due to the brightness boosting. The one thing this does reveal is using bitrate alone to judge a encode better is dubious at best.
Or that the US release is way oversharpened
thirdkind's Avatar thirdkind
12:50 AM Liked: 19
post #18 of 98
03-15-2014 | Posts: 2,514
Joined: Mar 2002
I have the French release and think it's outstanding, even with occasional blown-out highlights (which are minimal and only distracting if you think they're not supposed to be there). The color is amazing, as is the level of detail. Very film-like.
Dougofthenorth's Avatar Dougofthenorth
06:20 AM Liked: 42
post #19 of 98
04-20-2014 | Posts: 597
Joined: Nov 2002
Would be nice to have some identifier as a reference to see what exact release of the BDs are available

In Canada the bilingual 2007 BD (Eng/Fr) has Barcode= 43396 21524 5
Eng =(uncompressed)PCM, Dolby TrueHD, French 5.1. 1920X1080p, 2.40:1 125 minutes
"true to the original source master" Mastered in HD
Subtitles: Eng, Eng SDH, Fr., Chinese, Portuguese, Spanish, Thai
Special Features: feature length trivia track


How can the other BD releases be identified??
Socio's Avatar Socio
02:41 PM Liked: 17
post #20 of 98
04-23-2014 | Posts: 2,268
Joined: May 2002
There are a lot of versions and from what I have read in various places, the ones I understand that get the highest ratings are the French version, the German version (the one I have on order) and the Japanese version with the DTS HD MA 5.1 audio.

Main differences are;

French Version: MPEG-4 AVC, DTS HD 5.1,2.39:1 ratio and region free.

German version: VC 1, DTS HD 6.1, 2.39:1 ratio and region free.

Japanese version: MPEG-4 AVC, DTS HD MA 5.1, 2.35:1 ratio and region A.


So far I have not been disappointed with the German Blu Ray imports that I have purchased previously, so I went the German version, I will know if I made a good decision in a few days.
Geoff D's Avatar Geoff D
03:29 PM Liked: 249
post #21 of 98
04-23-2014 | Posts: 2,486
Joined: Mar 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdkind View Post

I have the French release and think it's outstanding, even with occasional blown-out highlights (which are minimal and only distracting if you think they're not supposed to be there). The color is amazing, as is the level of detail. Very film-like.

I like the French one too. The Sony version is still filtered and has dull colour. The Gaumont has sharper detail and punchier colour, although the jacked-up contrast won't be to everyone's tastes. Still, it's not as bad as what Besson did to Leon re: contrast.
Buurke's Avatar Buurke
05:00 PM Liked: 12
post #22 of 98
04-23-2014 | Posts: 36
Joined: Jun 2010
There is no definitive release, you have to choose between the old Sony master and the new Gaumont master.
Both have their strengths and weaknesses and with so many releases worldwide it's hard to keep track.

Releases that use the old Sony master:
- US
- US (remastered)
- German

Releases that use the new Gaumont master:
- Nordic/Scandinavian
- French
- UK
- Japan
- Japan (re-issue)

If you like the old Sony master the US (remastered) and German release are nearly identical video-wise, but the US (remastered )release has lossless English audio (LPCM 5.1 and TrueHD 5.1).
The German release only has English DTS-HD High-Res 6.1 and the initial US release is just awful.

If the new Gaumont master is your cup of tea the UK, Japan, Japan Re-issue and Nordic release are almost indistinguishable video-wise.
Only the French release falls behind with weaker grain preservation and significant lower video bitrate in comparison to the other releases and only having English DTS-HD High-Res 5.1.
All the other releases have lossless English audio (DTS-HD MA 5.1 or TrueHD 5.1).
nathanddrews's Avatar nathanddrews
01:00 PM Liked: 77
post #23 of 98
04-24-2014 | Posts: 946
Joined: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buurke View Post

Releases that use the old Sony master:
- US
- German

Releases that use the new Gaumont master:
- Nordic/Scandinavian
- French
- UK
- Japan
- Japan Re-issue

I thought there was a US re-issue after some uproar over the PQ. Did that not happen? confused.gif
Josh Z's Avatar Josh Z
01:45 PM Liked: 421
post #24 of 98
04-24-2014 | Posts: 20,331
Joined: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanddrews View Post

I thought there was a US re-issue after some uproar over the PQ. Did that not happen? confused.gif

Sony released the movie as one of its initial wave of Blu-rays in 2006. The disc had a terrible transfer and looked like garbage. Sony later remastered and re-released the movie on Blu-ray in 2007. That disc looked vastly better. This is what people are calling the "old Sony master," because it dates back to the prehistoric days of 2007, around the same time that mankind first stopped drawing animal paintings on cave walls.

Gaumont in Europe later released a completely different transfer that jacked up the contrast and added a yellow tint to everything. Some people like that one better. Others think the 2007 Sony transfer is better. I fall in the latter camp, personally.
Buurke's Avatar Buurke
06:34 AM Liked: 12
post #25 of 98
04-25-2014 | Posts: 36
Joined: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanddrews View Post

I thought there was a US re-issue after some uproar over the PQ. Did that not happen? confused.gif

That's right, like Josh Z explains.

It was so bad that I didn't even include it in my list.
With US release I meant the remastered version.

I've updated my post to avoid confusion.
nathanddrews's Avatar nathanddrews
03:49 PM Liked: 77
post #26 of 98
04-25-2014 | Posts: 946
Joined: Jun 2012
I see, thanks. I had no idea Gaumont had a newer transfer... Looks like they finally got rid of the edge enhancement on the US version which is a real bonus, but I don't know how I feel about the extreme boosting. Definitely strips away the 90s griminess - which is how I remember it. Hmm...
nathanddrews's Avatar nathanddrews
04:17 PM Liked: 77
post #27 of 98
04-25-2014 | Posts: 946
Joined: Jun 2012
Ordered. $24 total including global priority shipping isn't the worst thing in the world. We love this movie, so it's worth quintuple dipping (2 DVDs, 3rd Blu-ray).
eric.exe's Avatar eric.exe
04:25 PM Liked: 15
post #28 of 98
04-25-2014 | Posts: 2,344
Joined: Feb 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanddrews View Post

Ordered. $24 total including global priority shipping isn't the worst thing in the world. We love this movie, so it's worth quintuple dipping (2 DVDs, 3rd Blu-ray).
I had no idea the JPN release was that cheap shipped from Japan. Definitely the definitive release for region A players.
Buurke's Avatar Buurke
08:17 AM Liked: 12
post #29 of 98
04-26-2014 | Posts: 36
Joined: Jun 2010
Not entirely complete but here's a comparison between the DVD, US (remastered), German, French, UK and Japanese release (select two releases to compare them).

http://www.caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleiche/multi_list.php?hd_multiID=211
paku's Avatar paku
11:05 AM Liked: 10
post #30 of 98
04-26-2014 | Posts: 1,618
Joined: Sep 2005
I bought the remastered US release way back, but should have waited. Colors are dull, it has edge enhancement and despite being remastered just generally looks like an electronic and dated master. Like most others not a fan of the boosting on the newer Gaumont master but I vastly prefer that with a nice filmlike scan underneath, to what was released in the US.

Also I remember comparing the French Pathe disc (think it's the same as the German) to the Nordic one, and the Pathe disc had some additional noise reduction. It wasn't an offensive amount, but you could notice some trailing grain.

UK or JP releases seem to be the best options.

Reply Blu-ray Software

Subscribe to this Thread

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3