2001: First impressions - Page 12 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #331 of 354 Old 04-03-2012, 09:20 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
Art Sonneborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Battle Creek,MI USA
Posts: 22,751
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 298 Post(s)
Liked: 385
I see that 2001 is shown occasionally at various but few sites. How can one find out where ? Chicago or New York are closer for me than LA or Seattle.

Art

...
Art Sonneborn is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #332 of 354 Old 04-03-2012, 10:20 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Kris Deering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,874
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1921 Post(s)
Liked: 3005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Sonneborn View Post

I see that 2001 is shown occasionally at various but few sites. How can one find out where ? Chicago or New York are closer for me than LA or Seattle.

Art

I don't really know how you could. Warner isn't advertising it. It was a total fluke that I saw that it was showing in Seattle. I just happened to look at the Cinemerama site yesterday to see if they had any upcoming events and saw the sci-fi festival thing. They do a 70mm film event every year though where they will show 70mm and Cinerama films for about 1-2 weeks. I wanted to go to 2001 during its run last year but I had work obligations, luckily I missed it since it was not the new print. But they also had stuff like Lawrence of Arabia, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, Sound of Music, Baraka, Tron, Ghostbusters and more. There were a bunch of truly shot 70mm films in the lineup and a few blow ups. They also had How the West was Won in true Cinerama three strip and This is Cinerama.

I would just try to find out what theaters near you (or relatively closer) do occasional 70mm showings and subscribe to their newsletter. Probably give you the best chance.

My Home Theater
Technical Editor/Writer Sound and Vision Magazine
Kris Deering is offline  
post #333 of 354 Old 04-03-2012, 04:54 PM
 
dvdmike007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 8,616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris Deering View Post


I don't really know how you could. Warner isn't advertising it. It was a total fluke that I saw that it was showing in Seattle. I just happened to look at the Cinemerama site yesterday to see if they had any upcoming events and saw the sci-fi festival thing. They do a 70mm film event every year though where they will show 70mm and Cinerama films for about 1-2 weeks. I wanted to go to 2001 during its run last year but I had work obligations, luckily I missed it since it was not the new print. But they also had stuff like Lawrence of Arabia, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, Sound of Music, Baraka, Tron, Ghostbusters and more. There were a bunch of truly shot 70mm films in the lineup and a few blow ups. They also had How the West was Won in true Cinerama three strip and This is Cinerama.

I would just try to find out what theaters near you (or relatively closer) do occasional 70mm showings and subscribe to their newsletter. Probably give you the best chance.

The blow up's in circulation now, are pretty much the best that were out there.
dvdmike007 is offline  
 
post #334 of 354 Old 04-04-2012, 01:42 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Oliver Klohs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 2,540
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris Deering View Post

I don't really know how you could. Warner isn't advertising it. It was a total fluke that I saw that it was showing in Seattle. I just happened to look at the Cinemerama site yesterday to see if they had any upcoming events and saw the sci-fi festival thing. They do a 70mm film event every year though where they will show 70mm and Cinerama films for about 1-2 weeks. I wanted to go to 2001 during its run last year but I had work obligations, luckily I missed it since it was not the new print. But they also had stuff like Lawrence of Arabia, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, Sound of Music, Baraka, Tron, Ghostbusters and more. There were a bunch of truly shot 70mm films in the lineup and a few blow ups. They also had How the West was Won in true Cinerama three strip and This is Cinerama.

I would just try to find out what theaters near you (or relatively closer) do occasional 70mm showings and subscribe to their newsletter. Probably give you the best chance.

I continue to be surprised that almost nobody knows about the excellent site www.in70mm.com.
They exist for a very long time now and have a page that imo is by far the best way to track worldwide screenings of large format prints and other presentations of large format films:
http://www.in70mm.com/now_showing/index.htm

It also shows the screenings at the Seattle cinerama and they have a sidebar with cionemas that show 70mm prints with some regularity.

A caveat with regard to 70mm Blow-Ups: I have found them to be mostly disappointing compared to the real deal which is 70mm prints derived from large format elements. I remember the first 70mm festival I attended and it showed the two biggest Cameron hits that made it to 70mm Blow-Up, Titanic and Terminator 2, and I couldn't help to be disappointed as the resolution just wasn't there.

Regarding movies shot in 65mm 2001 is notorious for having some of the worst 70mm prints out there, so I hope this will be a good print.

And I would definitely try to catch Tron, as it has been shot VistaVision and 65mm and could look really good.
Oliver Klohs is offline  
post #335 of 354 Old 04-04-2012, 01:21 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Kris Deering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,874
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1921 Post(s)
Liked: 3005
I thought about Tron but honestly the movie just does hardly anything for me. And having just seen it after the Blu-ray release, I just don't know if I could sit through it again.

My Home Theater
Technical Editor/Writer Sound and Vision Magazine
Kris Deering is offline  
post #336 of 354 Old 04-04-2012, 07:50 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 606 Post(s)
Liked: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver Klohs View Post

I continue to be surprised that almost nobody knows about the excellent site www.in70mm.com.

Doh! I missed 2001 70mm in my area that was a couple of months ago. Have no idea if it was a new print.
wuther is offline  
post #337 of 354 Old 04-05-2012, 07:45 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Oliver Klohs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 2,540
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuther View Post

Doh! I missed 2001 70mm in my area that was a couple of months ago. Have no idea if it was a new print.

That's the problem with 2001 - you never know if you get a good or a not so good print. Things get more complicated by prints that might look very sharp but that have other issues like scratches and other mechanical damage and those that are in excellent mechanical condition but still flat and soft for whatever reason.
Oliver Klohs is offline  
post #338 of 354 Old 04-05-2012, 08:01 AM
AVS Forum Addicted Member
 
DavidHir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 13,226
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1848 Post(s)
Liked: 1487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver Klohs View Post

I continue to be surprised that almost nobody knows about the excellent site www.in70mm.com.

Thanks for posting that! but how is anyone supposed to know of it as I've never seen it advertised.
DavidHir is online now  
post #339 of 354 Old 04-05-2012, 08:10 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
spectator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,024
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHir View Post

but how is anyone supposed to know of it as I've never seen it advertised.

Often, an interest in a subject can prompt the internet searching thereof.

I don't feel special...
spectator is offline  
post #340 of 354 Old 04-05-2012, 08:29 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Kris Deering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,874
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1921 Post(s)
Liked: 3005
The Cinerama in Seattle is advertising it as the new print, that's the only reason I knew.

My Home Theater
Technical Editor/Writer Sound and Vision Magazine
Kris Deering is offline  
post #341 of 354 Old 04-05-2012, 11:03 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Jarod M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Sonneborn View Post

I see that 2001 is shown occasionally at various but few sites. How can one find out where ? Chicago or New York are closer for me than LA or Seattle.

Art

I wouldn't advise traveling very far to go to a 70mm showing in Chicago. The only theater that shows 70mm in the Chicagoland area, afaik, is The Music Box, but its screen is way too small to be able to appreciate the full benefits of 70mm. And those showings are very rare, once or twice a year in a good year.

It also seems that the availability of 70mm films has really dried up. Studios are all about digital now. It seems like the same few big films are floating around, and that's it. For example, Ebertfest has shown Oklahoma!, 2001, Patton, Playtime, My Fair Lady, LOA, Baraka, and Hamlet. But the last three festivals have been without a 70mm film, and I suspect it is because they haven't been able to track down a quality print of a film that hasn't already been at the festival. Three or four times they have scheduled 70mm blowups, but it has never worked out.
Jarod M is offline  
post #342 of 354 Old 04-06-2012, 08:10 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Oliver Klohs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Posts: 2,540
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHir View Post

Thanks for posting that! but how is anyone supposed to know of it as I've never seen it advertised.

I thought 70mm screenings might be of interest for members of this forum, after all for years good 70mm prints were undisputedly the best way to watch many films. But it doesn't matter much as now you know and maybe there soon will be a 70mm screening you can attend and you too can spread the knowledge about in70mm.com to other forum members
There is also a lot to read on the site by the way for people who are interested in large format processes.
Oliver Klohs is offline  
post #343 of 354 Old 04-06-2012, 11:16 AM
AVS Forum Club Gold
 
Art Sonneborn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Battle Creek,MI USA
Posts: 22,751
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 298 Post(s)
Liked: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarod M View Post

I wouldn't advise traveling very far to go to a 70mm showing in Chicago. The only theater that shows 70mm in the Chicagoland area, afaik, is The Music Box, but its screen is way too small to be able to appreciate the full benefits of 70mm. And those showings are very rare, once or twice a year in a good year.

It also seems that the availability of 70mm films has really dried up. Studios are all about digital now. It seems like the same few big films are floating around, and that's it. For example, Ebertfest has shown Oklahoma!, 2001, Patton, Playtime, My Fair Lady, LOA, Baraka, and Hamlet. But the last three festivals have been without a 70mm film, and I suspect it is because they haven't been able to track down a quality print of a film that hasn't already been at the festival. Three or four times they have scheduled 70mm blowups, but it has never worked out.



I guess it's west coast or bust.


Art

...
Art Sonneborn is online now  
post #344 of 354 Old 04-19-2012, 01:33 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ChuckZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,071
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I think this movie could significantly benefit from a restoration/remastering.

Kubrick was meticulous about his filming process and wanted to get the highest resolution image on this production. You can read more about it on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A...pecial_effects
ChuckZ is offline  
post #345 of 354 Old 04-19-2012, 02:08 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
MovieSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gothenburg
Posts: 6,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckZ View Post

I think this movie could significantly benefit from a restoration/remastering.

Kubrick was meticulous about his filming process and wanted to get the highest resolution image on this production. You can read more about it on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A...pecial_effects

Were did you find that he wanted the highest resolution? The text you linked refered to the special effects and not the live action footage.
MovieSwede is offline  
post #346 of 354 Old 04-22-2012, 04:32 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
Milt99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Of California
Posts: 5,469
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 267 Post(s)
Liked: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckZ View Post

I think this movie could significantly benefit from a restoration/remastering.

You know, after just coming home from viewing 2001 at the Seattle Cinerama from what was advertised as a new 70mm print, I'm not so sure that the current transfer is all that lacking.
I took a lot of notes while watching the film and I will be watching it again at home tonight.
I can you that the film I just saw looked damn close to the screenshots Grubert posted earlier in this thread, specifically the red rocks and Floyd shaking hands at the space station.
The film also varied dramatically in detail from shot to shot.
Overall, I would not characterize the film I saw as consistently sharp.

 

It ain't ignorance causes so much trouble; it's folks knowing so much that ain't so

Milt99 is offline  
post #347 of 354 Old 04-22-2012, 09:40 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
MovieSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gothenburg
Posts: 6,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked: 85
Thanks Milt for your input. The lighting for 2001 doesnt seem to really be there for demoquality. As I wrote earlier Kubrick seem to have aimed for realistic lighting of the movie over fancy hollywood style. The downside is that its very flat in most shoot.

As for sharpness, people should remember that 70mm gives greater resolution then 35mm, but it also demands more of the lenses since they must produce sharpness over a bigger surface area.

Add this 2 togheter and it partly explain the PQ of 2001.

On the other hand, we can be happy that we have a homevideo presentation that gives us the look of the 70mm version.
MovieSwede is offline  
post #348 of 354 Old 05-19-2017, 10:59 AM
Member
 
CJackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked: 13
2001: A Space Odyssey

What does everyone think of the quality of the current blu ray? Will there be anything done for the 50th anniversary of the film in 2018?
CJackson is online now  
post #349 of 354 Old 05-19-2017, 11:08 AM
Member
 
Foundation42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJackson View Post
What does everyone think of the quality of the current blu ray? Will there be anything done for the 50th anniversary of the film in 2018?
I have wondered about that too. An immersive soundtrack could be a great addition. Not so much pin-point effects as much as atmosphere throughout the movie, although the final journey could be interesting if really done well.

Hallowed ground, but I'm on board if done well. I'd re-buy it. Again.
Foundation42 is offline  
post #350 of 354 Old 05-19-2017, 04:58 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 606 Post(s)
Liked: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJackson View Post
What does everyone think of the quality of the current blu ray? Will there be anything done for the 50th anniversary of the film in 2018?
I saw the new (at the time) 70mm film print the 2nd time it came to town and I viewed the disc right before and afterwards and the film print had none of the rings and sharpening artifacts on the disc plus the film print's detail level exceeded the disc detail by a lot. I am not saying that just because it was 70mm, I saw a 70mm of Playtime around the same time and it was beat up and the detail level looked like a 2k.
wuther is offline  
post #351 of 354 Old Yesterday, 10:45 AM
ADU
AVS Forum Special Member
 
ADU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,009
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 355 Post(s)
Liked: 567
A remastered 2K/4K version of Kubrick's Space Odyssey would certainly be nice.

The current version is not the worst-lookin BD I've ever seen (the original Spartacus BD would be one of the top contenders for that "honor"), but there is room for improvement in the detail as wuther mentioned. Maybe it can be streamed in better PQ though?

The remastered 2K/4K version of Independence Day is completely devoid of edge-enhancement btw. And the 2K is often quite cheaply priced.

ADU
ADU is offline  
post #352 of 354 Old Yesterday, 03:07 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris Deering View Post
I thought about Tron but honestly the movie just does hardly anything for me. And having just seen it after the Blu-ray release, I just don't know if I could sit through it again.
Yes...
dvrw3 is online now  
post #353 of 354 Old Yesterday, 04:03 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
wuther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 606 Post(s)
Liked: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADU View Post
A remastered 2K/4K version of Kubrick's Space Odyssey would certainly be nice.

The current version is not the worst-lookin BD I've ever seen (the original Spartacus BD would be one of the top contenders for that "honor&quot, but there is room for improvement in the detail as wuther mentioned. Maybe it can be streamed in better PQ though?
Streamed?
wuther is offline  
post #354 of 354 Old Today, 09:16 AM
AVS Forum Special Member
 
LexInVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,128
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
Liked: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJackson View Post
What does everyone think of the quality of the current blu ray? Will there be anything done for the 50th anniversary of the film in 2018?

WB has revealed nothing about the anniversary plans, but the film's restoration 4K DCP has been screened over the past few years, so it's ready to be released on UHD and a new Blu-Ray.
LexInVA is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Blu-ray Software



Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off