Originally Posted by Mongoose
Asking you to support your claims and implications is not really asking you to prove a negative. You make pervasive statements regarding the motives and abilities of respected audio reviewers and designers.
If its not a negative, it is a very nebulous positive. I don't know who you think are "respected audio reviewers and designers". Am I supposed to do a CV review of the thousands of them that might exist to please you?
It is clear that you believe them to be true.
Actually, I believe many of them to be untrue, depending on who we are talking about.
You challenge the things that my experience has taught me are valid by asking me to offer you proof that they are so.
You vastly diminish what I have done. I have primarily explained to you why a few of the things that your experiences have taught you need to be reconsidered in the light of additional scientific knowledge.
I think we are once again at the same impasse that we reached early on in this conversation.
I dunno. Did you slip off into a river of denial once before in this thread? Sorry for missing it.
I say again, clearly we are each satisfied by what we hear and enjoy.
No, I am not completely satisfied by what I hear and enjoy. I'm still looking for better answers.
I see no purpose in continuing this dialogue.
That is a choice you get to make! ;-)