mtg90, that's some good lookin' directivity. I think you'll notice that 85hz peak drop once you add enough polyfill. That should also make your low end rolloff a bit more gentle, too. Are you going to use these for stereo listening or home theater?
I'm not sure what I am going to do with these yet, backyard theater comes to mind with the V1's as L&R and the V2 as center. What I am doing now is waiting for the pricing of Erich's CD's becuase I want to try one of those out in this horn.
I had the V2 playing as center channel on a few scenes from Pixar's The Incredibles out in the backyard and WOW. From 200' away the clarity is amazing, if you turned your back to it you would think the speaker was 5' away if not for the echo.
I have some new projects on the drawing board that I would like to try which should come together a bit faster with a whole lot less work. I need to sell some of my older projects though as I am running out of room to put them all.
I have not listened in stereo with the V2 because thats kind of hard to do with only one built. I have with the V1 horns and listening in stereo is so much better then trying to listen with one speaker to stereo music.
That video just helps prove the point of how good a speaker that "starts" together will hold up over distance. Those that don't "start together" tend or fall apart over distance.
Another point that is unimportant to most on this forum (since it is more indoors oriented) is to listen to what it sounds like when the wind is blowing.
If you had a line array outside-and the wind was blowing, you will hear all sorts of "swishing" due to the temp gradients and theinterference within the line array. You don't hear this "moving around sound" inside however.
This is not to say it doesn't happen with the Synergy horn-but the effects are much less noticable (than with a line array). Once the wind gets strong enough it will be noticable-but not in moderate winds. But would be really bad with other loudspeakers
I watched and listened to the new video yesterday and I was hugely impressed with the clarity and resolution without any sibilance. I hope you will build the second one so you can give your impressions of how they sound in stereo. If you decide to do it, would you consider placing the woofer ports in the corners of this one for comparison purposes. With your carpentery skils, it would be a small problem to fill and move the ports of the less good sounding one.
Another Video this time with the V2 in the backyard from yesterday, we all like videos right?
Wow, that was impressive. All these outside videos always sound good though with no room reflections. Have you thought about using better drivers to see what can be done? How big is this speaker? Looks like it maybe my next setup!
amps-5 Adcom 555 in 850 watt monoblock mode
sub amp-Sanway FP14K
LCR-Dual stacked BFM DR-250's
Surrounds- Dual stacked BFM W10's
subs-12 SI 18's ported 6hz.
I have started the second one and am going to put the woofer ports at the sides on this one, moving the ports on the other one will be a hard but I plan to do that also.
I don't know how far I can get on building the second one as I have two vacations coming up so any progress on this (and my other 7 projects I have lined up ) may be on hold until mid july.
MK your right that speakers do sound better when there are no reflections to muddy up the sound. On the subject of other drivers I have not thought about using other drivers besides the HF driver, I don't know how much difference using better drivers could make. I know I could get drivers with higher power handling so it could play louder and with less power compression. But as Paul Spencer pointed out earlier the bandpass design used reduces distortion above the cutoff allowing even cheap drivers to sound really good.
As for the size it is about 26"H 22"D 24"W in front and 8" in back.
Made some progress with this after being put on the sidelines for a while.
The ports on the first horn have been moved to the sides, it was not as hard as I thought it would be and it looks better too.
Also added some more dampening material to all three chambers which helped flatten the low end out alot.
I got the DNA-350 CD from Erich and mounted it up also, it was almost a drop in replacement as far as the crossover goes needing only two resistors changed for this:
I might fix the bump at 250hz if it bothers me, impeadance drops close to 3 ohms at 1000hz but that does not bother me.
The second one is almost done, I still need to apply gasket to all the removable panels and mids. Need to seal up the mids mount all the drivers, run wires for the drivers into all the chambers and build the crossover.
I had the crossover in yesterday but was to lazy to take it outside and measure, also to lazy to hook it up and gice it a listen. Did both today, listened first sounded like the bass was low, brought it outside and sure enough its down by about 4-5dB. I need to double check my crossover and maybe pad the mids/CD a bit more.
I also did a sensitivity test, REW speaker cal pink noise 2.83v/1m 102dB, Wow higher then I expected but if I pad the mid/CD equal to the woofers its going to be in the high 90's
A little update on this, the dip at 200 Hz was a crossover issue, thought I had a 6 mH inductor in there ended being a 9, oops. Finished up the second one today and gave them a listen in stereo for the first time.
Super clear detailed sound, very good imaging, bass needs a little EQ but after it can really hit you in the chest hard, these dont play much below 80hz though. Sensitivity is just under 100dB 2.83v/1m.
Really nice result, there. Mine aren't as efficient (my woofers are only 6's) but I'd describe the sound the same way. The point source characteristic provides for excellent and robust imaging, and a very relaxed though dynamic sound. The sound doesn't change as you move like with most other speakers. I don't think there are any other speaker types (SEOS and other Geddes derivatives probably come closest) that do such a good job of not sounding like a speaker is making the sound. The brain doesn't have to work hard at all to suspend disbelief with these.
I really wish there were a way for more people to hear Synergy speakers in home settings, there just aren't many installations out there (and Danley's company is pursuing only the pro market so that leaves only DIYers). I tried at MWAF this year, but with only three minutes of listening in a non-domestic room (and quite lame tracks being played, at that!) I don't think any particular impression was made there. Hey, if anyone around the Cincinnati/Dayton area cares to hear these, drop me a PM!
Well I am cheating using 2.83v, my woofers are in parallel giving a 4 ohm load so in reality they are 3 dB lower, so mid 90's.
I have the woofers moved so far back into the enclosure there is a 1.7ms delay between them and the mids and while I have the phase aligned well they are not time aligned and I am pretty sure it makes a difference. The lower range that the woofers cover seems to sound repressed even though the speaker measures flat. I think it has to do with the sound from the woofers reaching my ears after those from the mids/CD. There are only two options to fix it, EQ the bass until it sound right, easy but not the right way, or go active and add delay onto the mids/CD to bring them in line with the woofers. I heard that PE may be offereing the miniDSP soon I may try that out, run the mids/CD with a passive x-over on one channel and the woofers on another, that way I need only one miniDSP.
I would have loved to get over to the MWAF, meet you and Erich and listen to your synergy's and the SEOS designer 12's not to mention all the other very nice speakers there, but I got back from a two week trip to Italy on Wednesday and felt like crap the whole week, getting up early for a 6 hour drive just was not going to happen.
Consider trying a smooth, down-tilted response like Harmon's top plot...it usually sounds very natural and you don't have to listen at ear-shattering levels for it to sound good. I've experimented with a lot of curves and Harmon's target is pretty darned close to my preference.
Room reflections and speaker directivity play a strong role in the degree of tilt, but smoother always sounds better to me.
Thats almost what the response looks like after I bump up the bass a bit, the response I had a few posts back was before I stated tweeking by ear. I padded the CD and mids some more and also removed some of the top end boost so the response does have a bit of a forward tilt to it. I agree it sounds better then perfectly flat which can often come off sounding dry with the highs a bit bright.
Today was a nice day to go out side relax, 80 degrees a light breeze, perfect for blasting the neighbors with music!
400' away this time with the pair playing, still the same 100 watt/channel old sony receiver. The microphone I was trying out this time is pretty noisy, it causes most the hiss you hear, the rest is the bugs in the field in front of me. The vehicle noise is from the road 40' behind me.
WinISD shows that the woofers will take 200+ watts without exceeding xmax so I am wondering if I should get a bigger amp and crank the annoying neighbor factor up a notch.
I cannot imagine running these indoors at that level, it would be loud enough for the deaf to hear.
I hate you people with your pleasant weather. 100 degrees in the shade here today.
I'm still amazed at how well the sound carries with those.
Keep the video tape rolling when the police show up for the noise complaints. That should be pretty entertaining also.
Seriously, cool video.
100 degrees now but I bet you don't get this when winter comes around:
They are pointed away from most the houses and behind where I was standing Is just a road then more field.
I cut the music before it got the the louder part of the song because It was quite loud aready, you could hear the echo off the houses really well and I did not want to make it worse.
I should record something other then vocals playing through them just to show how they handle more a complex track. Hmm... if it is nice out tomorrow afternoon you might see another video up tomorrow night.
Thanks, that was some sort of paperboard material about 1/16" thick that I had found while looking around the house for somthing to use. I cut it into shape using scissors and used hot glue to attach it. Worked well with no noticeable flexing or resonance.
I don't have room for the Synergy horns, they are currently buried behind other speaker projects in my basement. I meant to redesign the crossover in that second design almost two years ago now but have not had the chance. The first pair of DIY SH's is hanging in my shop and gets used almost daily. I bought some drivers to try and make a compact three way synergy horn using all off the shelf drivers (not buyouts), the total driver cost should be around $100, it will be a 4 ohm nominal design. Sensitivity in the mid/high 90's, capable of 115+dB, uses a pair of 8" woofers, two sealed back 4" mids and the DNA-150. No idea when or if I will ever get to that.