Phantom center with constant direcitivty speakers - Page 2 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 35 Old 07-23-2012, 08:12 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
noah katz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Mountain View, CA USA
Posts: 20,499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 196 Post(s)
Liked: 153
Roger Dressler retired from Dolby

Noah
noah katz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 35 Old 07-23-2012, 11:20 PM
AVS Special Member
 
A9X-308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia; now run by adults.
Posts: 5,270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Liked: 70
i'd never seen that post from Roger Dressler - makes sense and I was confident (not sure) the previous AVR didn't compress, but had never tried it with this one. What he said makes sense, and I could never see a valid reason for having compression in all DD decoders. Why hobble really capable systems when smaller systems could benefit from it, so having the choice downstream of the decoder made sense where it's inclusion or not could be decided based upon the expected end user.
A9X-308 is offline  
post #33 of 35 Old 07-24-2012, 06:48 AM
AVS Special Member
 
desertdome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Elkhorn, NE
Posts: 1,730
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by A9X-308 View Post

i'd never seen that post from Roger Dressler - makes sense and I was confident (not sure) the previous AVR didn't compress, but had never tried it with this one. What he said makes sense, and I could never see a valid reason for having compression in all DD decoders. Why hobble really capable systems when smaller systems could benefit from it, so having the choice downstream of the decoder made sense where it's inclusion or not could be decided based upon the expected end user.
Roger just recently said that in response to a question from Noah to clarify the issue. However, he also said something similar a few years ago:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Dressler 
Downmixing in the DD chip turns on the DRC. But no self-respecting AV processor does the phantom mode inside the DD chip, since it would then not be available for all the other sources, like PCM, DTS, etc. The bass management stage is also where the "speaker management" is performed, thus easily avoiding DRC. If "many" means rarely, then I agree.
desertdome is offline  
post #34 of 35 Old 07-24-2012, 04:56 PM
AVS Special Member
 
riverwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 23
When "forced DRC" with a phantom center was first brought to light and tested 5-6 years ago, the downmix implementation of activating DRC in the decoder appeared to be more the rule than the exception. For Roger to be so matter of fact about the rarity of this option now, maybe Dolby has been quietly encouraging the mfgs to switch to digitally reducing the channel levels before downmixing as DTS has always done.

AVS thread on the topic. (including participation from Roger and pointers to Dolby spec documents)

HTS thread on the topic.
riverwolf is offline  
post #35 of 35 Old 01-12-2013, 07:42 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Eyleron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 1,838
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 34

What's the current thought on the Dolby Digital forced-DRC in receivers?

 

I tested Master & Commander BluRay on my Pioneer 1014 and it didn't force DRC on.

Eyleron is offline  
Reply DIY Speakers and Subs

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off