Dual Titanic Mk III with 1 kW of power - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 12-28-2012, 11:59 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Gibby Travis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I'm building a subwoofer for some friends of mine who own a small art film theater. I'm using two 15 inch Dayton Titanic mark IIIs and two 500 W Bash amps. I was planing on building a box approximately 19-20 ft^3 ported and tuned to 19 Hz.

I noticed on the Q&A section for this driver of Parts Express that a couple people feel that a box this big is too large for the driver. They seem to think that a 5.25 ft^3 per driver ported box is good for this particular woofer. I don't honestly understand why. As far as I can tell the performance looks worse in a box that small. With a smaller box the f3 would be higher and the group delay is higher above 23 Hz. Excursion is higher in the larger box but well within reasonable limits with the 1 kW of power that I'm using. Am I missing something or are these guys up in the night?
Gibby Travis is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 12-29-2012, 12:27 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jay1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 102
10 ft3, 500 watt, 20hz tune per driver is actually ideal. How big is this theater? You might want something with more output capability.
Gibby Travis likes this.
Jay1 is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 12-29-2012, 12:31 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Gibby Travis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
about 450-500 square feet. It's a very small art film theater.
Gibby Travis is offline  
post #4 of 5 Old 12-30-2012, 10:30 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Gibby Travis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 29
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thank you Jay, that's what I thought. I have no idea why they thought 5.25 ft^3 was better.
Gibby Travis is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 12-30-2012, 12:55 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Bill Fitzmaurice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 10,293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 1702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibby Travis View Post

Thank you Jay, that's what I thought. I have no idea why they thought 5.25 ft^3 was better.
One reason could be if you took cabin gain and boundary loading into account that could allow you to use a smaller box without giving up anything. You'd have to confirm with them what their thoughts were.
Gibby Travis likes this.

Bill Fitzmaurice Loudspeaker Design

The Laws of Physics aren't swayed by opinion.
Bill Fitzmaurice is offline  
Reply DIY Speakers and Subs

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off