Another approach to matching directivity - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 06:27 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
fakamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I always had a feeling that matching directivity using big woofer (12"-15") and a waveguide has one disadvantage. Running big woofer so high in frequency makes midrange (circa 500hz-1000hz) less clear and detailed than it could be with for example 8" woofer.
So I think got an idea. How about making a simplest and cheapest possible waveguide for woofer, to match it's directivity with bigger waveguide? Any ideas how woofer's response might change?

PS. Dimensions are in milimeters, but I hope you get the picture. Woofer used in projest is Eminence Beta 8a
fakamada is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 09:11 AM
FOH
AVS Special Member
 
FOH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,743
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked: 207
Interesting

I've often thought conventional wisdom would suggest the midband performance of typical 12" or 15" two-way loudspeakers may be an area whereby improvements could be implemented.

However, there's many examples of very high quality designs using such an approach; Gedlee, studio monitors from JBL, TAD, Augsburger, etc, all using 15" two-way designs without issue or need for higher resolution, clarity, or detail. They've employed .5 way approaches to off load excursion and add more capability in the bottom octaves, in some designs.

If one takes an overview of what's out there, the large two way is a solid and well vetted platform from which one can start a design. There's significant advances in materials and measuring capability since this platform began, there's just such inherent advantages with the large piston area (low distortion) combined with the directivity at the crossover region ... that you get with the 15".
I do feel there are possible areas for improvement for greater midband performance like some open back or IB technique that may help non-linearity issues, as the latent energy release thru the cone is no good, if it exists as a problem.
I believe
LTD02 likes this.

------------------------------------
Flat, Deep, Clean, Linear, and Loud
------------------------------------
Active 16.8kw, 7.3 system
(3)Seaton Cat12C up front, (4)QSC K8 sides/rears
(2)Seaton SubM-HP, (4)18" IB
FOH is offline  
post #3 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 03:22 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
noah katz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Mountain View, CA USA
Posts: 20,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)
Liked: 134
Interesting idea, may or may not work with the dimensions shown.

Maybe someone who knows Hornresponse can try it out.

Noah
noah katz is offline  
post #4 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 07:02 PM
Advanced Member
 
Face2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Bill Fitzmaurice has posted a link to a dispersion simulator that displays how partially blocking off front of the woofer can be used to change directivity, I thought I bookmarked it, but can no longer find it.

Mike
Face2 is offline  
post #5 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 08:10 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
noah katz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Mountain View, CA USA
Posts: 20,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)
Liked: 134
I suspect it was widening dispersion, not narrowing it.

Noah
noah katz is offline  
post #6 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 08:14 PM
Advanced Member
 
Face2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 41
It's been a while since I've toyed with it, but I believe you could do either. I very well could be wrong too.

Mike
Face2 is offline  
post #7 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 08:22 PM
Advanced Member
 
Face2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Face2 is offline  
post #8 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 08:25 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
LTD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,926
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked: 836
if i understand you correctly, what you describe is a good idea and is already in wide use.

the challenge is that the midwoofers that cover the 500-1000hz region a little better than 15" drivers just don't have what it take on the low end, so you end up with three way systems. here is an example of a mid-top that you might find in jbl's pro lineup for dance clubs. they have similar products for tour and theater, as do many other companies.


Listen. It's All Good.
LTD02 is online now  
post #9 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 08:28 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
LTD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,926
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked: 836
that is an interesting link face2 and jbl has a speaker out that does just that:

eon615. supposedly it sounds pretty good, but don't all new speakers?

anyway, that one is crossed up pretty high, around 2khz, so that will give it massive power handling and allow for a really cheap compression driver, but i suspect that it is not what most folks around here are looking for.


Listen. It's All Good.
LTD02 is online now  
post #10 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 09:16 PM
Advanced Member
 
Face2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 41
I've thought about doing something similar in place of the passive resistive cardioid enclosure I'm using now. The PRC's bandwidth is limited to 450hz in my application and I haven't had much luck raising it. Plus the aesthetics of this design has more potential than 12 2" holes drilled into the sides of an enclosure for a PRC. Now I have the motivation to experiment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXhwPT0W3Ew

New? In this case of everything old is new again..or just tweaked.

Every time he says aperture, I thought of Portal. biggrin.gif

Mike
Face2 is offline  
post #11 of 23 Old 02-19-2014, 11:43 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
noah katz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Mountain View, CA USA
Posts: 20,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 87 Post(s)
Liked: 134

As far as I can tell that supports what I siad.

Directivity narrows with larger piston size through self-interference from all its radiating regions.

What's not clear to me and waht I was alluding to in my original comment is what it takes to make the added stationary area effectively radiating.

Noah
noah katz is offline  
post #12 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 02:02 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
fakamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by FOH View Post

Interesting

I've often thought conventional wisdom would suggest the midband performance of typical 12" or 15" two-way loudspeakers may be an area whereby improvements could be implemented.

However, there's many examples of very high quality designs using such an approach; Gedlee, studio monitors from JBL, TAD, Augsburger, etc, all using 15" two-way designs without issue or need for higher resolution, clarity, or detail. They've employed .5 way approaches to off load excursion and add more capability in the bottom octaves, in some designs.

If one takes an overview of what's out there, the large two way is a solid and well vetted platform from which one can start a design. There's significant advances in materials and measuring capability


I already build great sounding SEOS 12 design with 12" Faital 12PR300. In terms of power handling it's in my case a huge overkill. I'll be using 3-4watts for normal music listening. For now I don't have active subwwofers yet so I use Equalisation. Even after +20db of EQ on low bass I don't exeed 5mm xmax !!!!!!

As for advances in materials I don't think it works like that. Every driver at some point stops working as a piston. Then some detail smearing has to occur. The bigger the driver the sooner it happens. So while my 12" woofer based system sounds great I think there is some space for improvement. Therefore 8" woofer but with directivity matching maintained.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LTD02 View Post

if i understand you correctly, what you describe is a good idea and is already in wide use.

the challenge is that the midwoofers that cover the 500-1000hz region a little better than 15" drivers just don't have what it take on the low end, so you end up with three way systems. here is an example of a mid-top that you might find in jbl's pro lineup for dance clubs. they have similar products for tour and theater, as do many other companies.

Exactly. That's what I'm thinking. What I was trying to figure out is how to make ie easy and cheap.
As for low end - yes approach with 8" needs active woofers below 100hz.
fakamada is offline  
post #13 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 02:35 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Martycool007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked: 143
Will a smaller 6.5" mid play the mid-range clearer, more detailed, and extend higher than a typical 15" mid/woofer that is commonly found in many 15" 2-way designs? Is it safe to assume that the small mids will do better in the 600hz to 1000hz area compared to a typical larger mid/woofer? With the draw back to using smaller mids being that the typically do not extend very low? Which will have the better directivity in the 600hz to 1200hz area, a typical 6.5" mid, or a typical 15" mid/woofer?
Martycool007 is offline  
post #14 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 02:53 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
fakamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martycool007 View Post

Which will have the better directivity in the 600hz to 1200hz area, a typical 6.5" mid, or a typical 15" mid/woofer?

That's what the idea is all about. To use smaller woofer with better midrange and simulate directivity behaviour of much bigger woofer by making a simple waveguide around it.
fakamada is offline  
post #15 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 03:29 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Martycool007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by fakamada View Post

That's what the idea is all about. To use smaller woofer with better midrange and simulate directivity behaviour of much bigger woofer by making a simple waveguide around it.

So you are saying that, in concept, a larger mid/woofer, such as a 12" or 15" size, will have better directivity than a smaller mid?

I understand that your trying to come up with a horn/waveguide design for a smaller mid/woofer to give it better directivity, I just was unsure if directivity increases with driver size, or decreases with driver size?

I think this whole concept of using a type of horn/waveguide for a mid is an interesting design theory. I like the mid-horn that Wayne Parham sells that utilizes a 10" Eminence or 10" JBL mid. I personally prefer more hifi type mid drivers from the likes of ScanSpeak, Accuton, and Seas, in more of a 3-way setup with a dedicated woofer, over these large pro-woofer 2-ways.
Martycool007 is offline  
post #16 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 05:01 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
LTD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,926
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked: 836
"Exactly. That's what I'm thinking. What I was trying to figure out is how to make ie easy and cheap."

I see.


"As for low end - yes approach with 8" needs active woofers below 100hz."

that depends how loud you wish to run them and how much you wish to stress the midhorn driver, which is why you will typically see a pair of 15's rolled in around 300hz or so with most of these designs.

another approach is of course to build a horn around a coaxial driver like the danley sm60m:
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/products/loud-speakers/molded-synergy-horns/sm60m/

Listen. It's All Good.
LTD02 is online now  
post #17 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 05:02 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
LTD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,926
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked: 836
marty, the larger the driver, the lower in frequency that it will start to beam and thus the lower in frequency you can get a good match to a horn. all other things equal.

Listen. It's All Good.
LTD02 is online now  
post #18 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 05:06 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
fakamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTD02 View Post

"Exactly. That's what I'm thinking. What I was trying to figure out is how to make ie easy and cheap."



another approach is of course to build a horn around a coaxial driver like the danley sm60m:
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/products/loud-speakers/molded-synergy-horns/sm60m/

I'd love to hear those but unfortunately it's far from easy and cheap smile.gif

There's a program that simulates waveguides. I'll see what it shows:

http://www.randteam.de/_Software/AxiDriver_Demo/Download-AxiDriverDemo.html
fakamada is offline  
post #19 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 05:23 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
LTD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,926
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked: 836
i was only suggesting that as a model. for easy and cheap, something like this might work: http://www.parts-express.com/eminence-beta-8cx-8-coaxial-driver--290-500

Listen. It's All Good.
LTD02 is online now  
post #20 of 23 Old 02-20-2014, 09:17 AM
AVS Special Member
 
coctostan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,960
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 127
AxiDriver is probably your best bet for simulating the directivity of horn and baffle profiles. There is a learning curve if you haven't used it prior.

The interactions between a driver that is 6-8" in diameter and its surrounding baffle is not as simple as a 1" driver and a similar horn. Horns are really just complex baffles...or maybe baffles are just very simple horns. Ultimately, the "gain" of a horn is simply boundary loading, no different than how any driver acts on a baffle. We just assume that a baffle is flat with squared off edges. Even rounding the edges impacts the directivity of a baffle.

It is more straightforward if the horn throat is smaller. Look at the simple conical horn in the 7Pi speaker. I believe it is a 4" square throat on a 10" driver. It also relies on wall proximity to control directivity lower.

What FOH said above is correct. Many excellent speakers use large drivers up to higher frequencies. How high is too high? It depends partly on the driver, but I wouldn't assume that a 6" driver is better at the mid frequencies than a 12" driver in the typical DI matched 2-way use. Much of that will depend on the drivers being compared and the crossover used. Remember also that putting the smaller driver on the angled baffle or horn will impact its response as well.

I do think there is a legitimate case for splitting a 2-way 12/15" woofer/horn speaker into 3-way with a horn midrange, but it is far tougher to pull off and the benefits are small.

LTD, that EON woofer aperature is interesting. It is clear that it allows JBL to get more SPL per $ out of their speaker without sacrificing pattern control. In the dirt cheap PA speaker market those are the only two criteria. They can use a $25 CD and a $25 woofer but still hit 125db+ with nice pattern control. All because of what is probably a $2 piece of plastic.
Face2 likes this.
coctostan is offline  
post #21 of 23 Old 02-21-2014, 09:23 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
fakamada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I've ran some tests and indeed it is more complicated. It's doable but complicated. Profile and depth have to be CAREFULLY designed to work properly.
fakamada is offline  
post #22 of 23 Old 02-21-2014, 09:31 AM
AVS Special Member
 
zamboniman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL - Far NW Burbs
Posts: 1,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Danley does something like this with at least one or two of their products.
zamboniman is offline  
post #23 of 23 Old 02-21-2014, 09:34 AM
Advanced Member
 
Face2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamboniman View Post

Danley does something like this with at least one or two of their products.
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/products/loud-speakers/molded-synergy-horns/

Mike
Face2 is offline  
Reply DIY Speakers and Subs

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off