Upcoming Sony Hx9v as a top camcorder - Page 2 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 05:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Moviemaker4741's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 382
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

Boy, did this thread get sidetracked!

Here is a video showing some of the capabilties of the Hx9v using 108060p. It is also downloadable.

http://www.vimeo.com/22637271

Over 1,600 hits on Vimeo (it seems on Vimeo and Youtube if the title has "Test Video" it attracts more viewers).

What could we expect seeing the Undertaker has chimed into it.
Moviemaker4741 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 01:53 PM
Senior Member
 
guy80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Anyone know if this does true 60p, not interpolation or frame doubling etc?
guy80 is offline  
post #33 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 02:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Paulo Teixeira's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 32
If you download one of the files from Vimeo and play it back on using Splash, 1 frame at a time, you wont see any repeat frames so Sony is not misleading with this camera unlike the Panasonic GF2 for example that has 60 frames per second in the 720p mode but the chip is only capable of outputting 30. That still depends on your definition of 60 frames per second. Unfortunately we don't have the technology to make a camera this small recording to 60p using AVC-Intra as the codec with a bit rate of 200Mbps.
Paulo Teixeira is offline  
post #34 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 02:13 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Same exact chip as the cx700 and 28mps bitrate so should be kosher. I will test with my hx100v
Dave Mack is offline  
post #35 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 02:46 PM
Senior Member
 
guy80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulo Teixeira View Post

If you download one of the files from Vimeo and play it back on using Splash, 1 frame at a time, you wont see any repeat frames so Sony is not misleading with this camera unlike the Panasonic GF2 for example that has 60 frames per second in the 720p mode but the chip is only capable of outputting 30. That still depends on your definition of 60 frames per second. Unfortunately we don't have the technology to make a camera this small recording to 60p using AVC-Intra as the codec with a bit rate of 200Mbps.

THanks for the info; after I posted I thought "I guess I could d/l a raw file & throw it in the timeline", but your method seems easier & more convenient.
guy80 is offline  
post #36 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 02:47 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
You can get great 1920x1080 frame grabs of action, given the progressive video.


markr041 is offline  
post #37 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 03:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Paulo Teixeira's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Something I just noticed is that although you get far more zoom range in the HX100v, at the widest, the lens goes to f/2.8 while the lens of the HX9v goes to f/3.3.

Anyway, here's another native example.
http://vimeo.com/23133280
That guy has more examples.
Paulo Teixeira is offline  
post #38 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 03:13 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
That skiing video is amazing - shows the OIS and good exposure in bright snow conditions.

http://vimeo.com/23133280
markr041 is offline  
post #39 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 03:19 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
That's pretty amazing and shows the usefulness of a good IS
Dave Mack is offline  
post #40 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 03:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ungermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 3,777
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

That skiing video is amazing - shows the OIS and good exposure in bright snow conditions.

http://vimeo.com/23133280

Some jello, though the camera tries its best to compensate. Maybe in a couple of years CMOS sensors will finally become as good as CCD.

In the meantime compare to CCD performance. Sure, the resolution and bitrate are lower (this is 2006 model, 13 Mbit/s) and it is interlaced, so I had to deinterlace and vertical resolution dropped even further, but there is no freaking jello, not a hint, not even in the corners: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnSffcDkbTg

Ungermann is offline  
post #41 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 04:06 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
This is a nice video, but gotcha : big vertical streak from the sun in the middle of the video, which you would not get with CMOS.
markr041 is offline  
post #42 of 419 Old 05-20-2011, 11:35 PM
YLK
Member
 
YLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Has anybody done any test comparing low light, colors and sharpness of HX9V against leading dedicated consumer camcorders (Sony CX700, Pana TM900, Canon HF G10)? I wonder how HX9V would score.
YLK is offline  
post #43 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 07:43 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 23,516
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked: 730
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

This is a nice video, but gotcha : big vertical streak from the sun in the middle of the video, which you would not get with CMOS.

And that's what the CCD advocates always tend to leave out...CCD overloading (as well as other issues). To be that's uglier than some jello in the corners.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #44 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 07:44 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 23,516
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked: 730
Quote:
Originally Posted by YLK View Post

Has anybody done any test comparing low light, colors and sharpness of HX9V against leading dedicated consumer camcorders (Sony CX700, Pana TM900, Canon HF G10)? I wonder how HX9V would score.

When we first got our HX9V, I did test it in low light and it's not as good as the new Canon G10/XA10, but it's a Sony, so it's not bad at all.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #45 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 08:23 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post


When we first got our HX9V, I did test it in low light and it's not as good as the new Canon G10/XA10, but it's a Sony, so it's not bad at all.

Ken my hx100 FINALLY shipped from best buy! Same sensor. And same as in the $1299 cx700

http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_u...?v=xoXBxKQZmbs

I'm psyched.
Dave Mack is offline  
post #46 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 08:50 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
Actually, the Hx100v and Hx9v have the same sensor but it is not the same as the CX700v. In fact, the sensor in the Hx... cameras is larger than in the far more expensive camcorder, but with more pixels.

Specifically:

The Hx9v has a 1/2.3" (7.77mm) sensor.
The CX700v has a 1/2.88 (6.2mm) sensor.

The sensor in the Hx9v is over 25% larger.

However, the Hx9v sensor packs 16.8 Megapixels, while the Cx700v has only 6.65MP.

I would expect better low-light performance from the CX700v for two reasons:

1. Larger pixels (lower pixel density - this is the "trick" used by the Canon G10, which also has an even smaller sensor than the Hx9v).

2. Larger aperture at the wide end: f1.8 on the CX700v versus f3.3 on the Hx9v.

Similarly, the G10 has even bigger pixels and a wide-aperture lens.
markr041 is offline  
post #47 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 08:57 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

Actually, the Hx100v and Hx9v have the same sensor but it is not the same as the CX700v. In fact, the sensor in the Hx... cameras is larger than in the far more expensive camcorder, but with more pixels.

Specifically:

The Hx9v has a 1/2.3" (7.77mm) sensor.
The CX700v has a 1/2.88 (6.2mm) sensor.

The sensor in the Hx9v is over 25% larger.

However, the Hx9v sensor packs 16.8 Megapixels, while the Cx700v has only 6.65MP.

I would expect better low-light performance from the CX700v for two reasons:

1. Larger pixels (lower pixel density - this is the "trick" used by the Canon G10, which also has an even smaller sensor than the Hx9v).

2. Larger aperture at the wide end: f1.8 on the CX700v versus f3.3 on the Hx9v.

Similarly, the G10 has even bigger pixels and a wide-aperture lens.

Gotcha mark

Dvinfo people assumed they were the same. I think on the 100 the lens only goes to like f2.8 so should be better than the hx9v. the 700 is what, 1.7?

But for 1/3 the cost, I'll give up the lowlight. The 30x optical zeiss zoom is nuts though
Dave Mack is offline  
post #48 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 09:09 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
Correct: Hx9v f3.3, Hx100v, f2.8.

The usual trade-off: with the Hx9v you get compactness, with the Hx100v, much longer zoom and slightly larger aperture.

Both are amazing bargains as camcorders shooting 108060p!
markr041 is offline  
post #49 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 09:14 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Paulo Teixeira's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Paulo Teixeira is offline  
post #50 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 09:16 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

Correct: Hx9v f3.3, Hx100v, f2.8.

The usual trade-off: with the Hx9v you get compactness, with the Hx100v, much longer zoom and slightly larger aperture.

Both are amazing bargains as camcorders shooting 108060p!

Agreed. I had the cx700 for about 4 days, returned it as it was defective bit I was underwhelmed and felt it was a big step down in quality from the cx550.
The fact that you can get such quality from these little cams means either they are very underpriced or the 700 is very overpriced
Dave Mack is offline  
post #51 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 09:20 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulo Teixeira View Post

Did you get the HX100v for $400 rather than $450?
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sony+-+C...100v&cp=1&lp=1

Yep. That's why I waited because I had the price locked in
Dave Mack is offline  
post #52 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 09:37 AM
YLK
Member
 
YLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

When we first got our HX9V, I did test it in low light and it's not as good as the new Canon G10/XA10, but it's a Sony, so it's not bad at all.

Ken, I believe your wife has one and brought it with her to Italy, and I wonder whether you watched the videos she took (provided she did) and compared to yours with G10? What about sharpness?
YLK is offline  
post #53 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 09:56 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Dave Mack is offline  
post #54 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 10:08 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ungermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 3,777
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

And that's what the CCD advocates always tend to leave out...CCD overloading (as well as other issues). To be that's uglier than some jello in the corners.

You cannot be serious saying that a light streak is uglier than jello. But I am not going to argue. The HX9V indeed has much less jello that some other cameras. I hope that global shutter with CMOS is possible and we will see it in consumer/prosumer products soon. If not, then CMOS will never become a clear improvement of CCD, it will remain a side step at best.
Ungermann is offline  
post #55 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 10:21 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_u...?v=Pc6uB9MUSFc

http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_u...?v=UIrDPaaTHPQ

These links do not show anything of interest - something's wrong. Here is what I get for both links:
LL
markr041 is offline  
post #56 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 10:24 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
Somebody downloaded the Hx9v original video from Vimeo and then processed it to show in slow motion, posting an excerpt to Youtube:

http://youtu.be/mkG1HkImFwI?hd=1

This is another advantage of the 108060p (progressive) setting.
markr041 is offline  
post #57 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 10:33 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_u...?v=Pc6uB9MUSFc

http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_u...?v=UIrDPaaTHPQ

These links do not show anything of interest - something's wrong. Here is what I get for both links:

Whoops. Stupid iPhone. Linked mobile version by accident. Fixed now
Dave Mack is offline  
post #58 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 10:36 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dave Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 11,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

Somebody downloaded the Hx9v original video from Vimeo and then processed it to show in slow motion, posting an excerpt to Youtube:

http://youtu.be/mkG1HkImFwI?hd=1

This is another advantage of the 108060p (progressive) setting.

That would be even smoother if the shutter speed hadn't been so fast due to the amount of light.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fuLnXGJkLU&sns=em
Dave Mack is offline  
post #59 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 10:55 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ungermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 3,777
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

Somebody downloaded the Hx9v original video from Vimeo and then processed it to show in slow motion, posting an excerpt to Youtube:

http://youtu.be/mkG1HkImFwI?hd=1

This is another advantage of the 108060p (progressive) setting.

You can do exactly the same with interlaced footage.
Ungermann is offline  
post #60 of 419 Old 05-21-2011, 11:39 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,074
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked: 113
Yes, it just won't look as good.
markr041 is offline  
Reply Camcorders

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off