4K monitors - what to get? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 03:59 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
All this hooha about 4K video cameras, but what do we watch 4k on? Those big 4K TV's are really expensive, but us computer geeks can make do with a 4K monitor, some of which have reasonable prices.

Here is one (available really soon) for $699, from Dell:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&sku=1026864&gclid=CI_C6evHmr0CFbTm7Aod-0EABQ&Q=&is=REG&A=details

Worth getting? Anything better<$1000?
markr041 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 04:27 PM
Advanced Member
 
Tugela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked: 65
The Dell monitor has a refresh rate of 30Hz, so it has limitations.
Tugela is online now  
post #3 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 04:50 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tugela View Post

The Dell monitor has a refresh rate of 30Hz, so it has limitations.

Correct for 4K. But is that just right for the 30fps frame rate of all the consumer 4K cameras. So, not great for physics simulations and writing theses on Shakespeare or analyzing spreadsheets, but just fine for 4K viewing and editing consumer 4K camera videos?
markr041 is offline  
post #4 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 04:57 PM
AVS Special Member
 
jogiba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,102
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked: 81
I am interested in a DCI compliant 4K (4096x2160) display .
Quote:
The first is a 4K monitor, a 30-inch display with a 4096 x 2160 resolution. The monitor has 2 HDMI and 2 Thunderbolt ports and is compatible with both Mac and PCs. Pricing and availability is not yet available but expect this to come with a premium price tag.

http://www.rappler.com/technology/video/hands-on/47591-lg-4k-monitor-ultrawide




jogiba is offline  
post #5 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 06:24 PM
AVS Special Member
 
bsprague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the Road
Posts: 3,166
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Liked: 109
39" 4K for $500:

http://www.amazon.com/Seiki-Digital-SE39UY04-39-Inch-Ultra/dp/B00DOPGO2G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1395101976&sr=1-1&keywords=4k+tv

Seems to me that completed videos will ultimately be watched on a TV. So a TV would be the best place to "proof" the output.
bsprague is online now  
post #6 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 06:41 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsprague View Post

39" 4K for $500:

http://www.amazon.com/Seiki-Digital-SE39UY04-39-Inch-Ultra/dp/B00DOPGO2G/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1395101976&sr=1-1&keywords=4k+tv

Seems to me that completed videos will ultimately be watched on a TV. So a TV would be the best place to "proof" the output.

What distinction is there between a "TV" and a "monitor," with, say, the same resolution, other than the absence of a tuner? I don't understand.
markr041 is offline  
post #7 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 08:37 PM
Advanced Member
 
Tugela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked: 65
Image processing. A TV typically has much more flexibility in terms of video display than a monitor.
Tugela is online now  
post #8 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 08:41 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

Correct for 4K. But is that just right for the 30fps frame rate of all the consumer 4K cameras. So, not great for physics simulations and writing theses on Shakespeare or analyzing spreadsheets, but just fine for 4K viewing and editing consumer 4K camera videos?

Although stated contrast ratios by manufacturers are extremely unreliable, the CR stated by Dell is not very good. 1,000:1 in 2014 is really pretty poor, so you can't expect anything approaching good blacks on it.

Almost all monitors I've seen have no local dimming of any sort and therefore black levels are governed by the native CR of the LCD/LED panel. Those are generally pretty poor and that's why good LEDs are assisted by some type of local dimming, either FALD (the best) or edge lit LD.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #9 of 49 Old 03-17-2014, 08:54 PM
Member
 
x3sphere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked: 56

None are worth getting in my opinion, even the high end UltraSharps from Dell. I had the top of the line UP3214Q and it is plagued with issues. Beautiful picture, but it sometimes boots to a half-blank screen due to improper MST implementation at the firmware level, and will sometimes lose connection with the video card on sleep. Happened often enough to me that I got frustrated and shipped the monitor back.

 

The 31.5" IGZO panel also uses low frequency PWM, something you'd see on a cheap $100-150 monitor, extremely disappointing. The UP2414Q has no PWM, which is good, but still suffers from the aforementioned firmware issues. 

 

Once the firmware issues are fixed, I suppose the UP2414Q will be worth a buy, that's too small for me though.

 

I'd wait for the second wave of 4K monitors.

x3sphere is online now  
post #10 of 49 Old 03-18-2014, 07:59 AM
AVS Special Member
 
brunerww's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked: 31
I really want a monitor or TV with the full 4096x2160 I'll get from the GH4. As of now, the least expensive way to get it in the States is a $4000+ JVC Projector. I guess I'll have to wait for the second wave, as x3sphere suggests frown.gif
brunerww is offline  
post #11 of 49 Old 03-18-2014, 08:09 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
Bill, a word of caution, that JVC is not a native 4K projector. It accepts 4K inputs but uses 'pixel shift' technology to achieve a 'pseudo 4K' effect. I look at a display device like that as a 'half pregnant' 4K solution.

JVC has some odd 4K devices. Their 4K camcorder outputs 4 1080p signal to achieve a 4K resolution. At least this, when properly displayed, is true 4K, but good luck in finding display devices that know how to assemble the 4 1080p quadrants.

Sony has a true 4K projector, but it's very pricey. You may be better off with one of the new 2014 direct view, UHD LEDs. I'm considering one this year. I believe there may be one or two that is a full 4K, but most are technically UHD. I'm not sure you'd actually see any difference to be honest.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #12 of 49 Old 03-18-2014, 11:13 AM
AVS Special Member
 
jogiba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,102
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked: 81
jogiba is offline  
post #13 of 49 Old 03-19-2014, 05:08 AM
AVS Special Member
 
bsprague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the Road
Posts: 3,166
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 153 Post(s)
Liked: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

What distinction is there between a "TV" and a "monitor," with, say, the same resolution, other than the absence of a tuner? I don't understand.
I'm not sure I understand either.

In the 1080p world, oh so long ago, I wanted a second monitor for my 1920x1080 laptop. Costco had a Samsung 22 inch "monitor" and TV combo on sale. Written on the box was that it could be used either as a TV or computer monitor. It seemed perfect for my desk, so I bought it. I found that using it during editing as a preview monitor gave me a better idea what the completed project would look like when played on a full size 1080p HD TV.

It could be that my laptop monitor provides an unrealistic preview or it could be that the Samsung provides a more realistic view. I never found anything in the specs of either that would explain my visual impressions. The experience does suggest to me that the best monitor for video production might be a "real" TV instead of a monitor made for office work.

Note that I could easily be talked out of my theory!

Bill
bsprague is online now  
post #14 of 49 Old 03-19-2014, 06:30 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
Bill, I agree, a TV would probably be better for the reasons I mentioned above. Any reasonably good HDTV would make for a better monitor, given that it probably has a much better CR.

The problem becomes more an issue of size. The larger TVs tend to be the ones that have the better PQ with some form of local dimming to enhance black levels.

Smaller TVs tend to be more like computer monitors with a tuner tacked on. Most people aren't looking for computer monitors in sizes over 42", so quality issues may remain a factor.

I actually use a small JVC CRT monitor designed for editing, since I found it superior to the LCDs that were available. It takes up more desk space, but it gives me a better idea of what the end product will look like. Of course the JVC won't be a 4K solution. For that, it's back to the drawing boards. wink.gif

One thing I've learned over the years, is that although you may know your finished product is color accurate, since you've done your work on a calibrated display, the chances are exceptionally good that the person or company you're giving that finished product to, is viewing it on a display that's poorly adjusted. Such is life.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #15 of 49 Old 03-19-2014, 08:02 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
Ken raises a good point about the fact that if you edit based on a perfect monitor, it could look terrible on most people's TV's, which are far from ideal. We face that in audio - master audio on the best transducers, and then the audience listens on Bose earbuds or with a Dr. Dre headphone or on a car radio. One has to actually check how the audio sounds on popular listening devices, no matter how bad.

There is more than contrast ratio to a good monitor/TV - there is the size of the color gamut - does the monitor show the full range (the Dell UHD monitor is close to 100%)? - and there is color accuracy (the Dell UHD monitor is calibrated to be within a small margin to be perfectly accurate).

There is no reason to expect that a TV with good DR is also color-accurate and showing the full color gamut. The Dell UHD monitor gets two out of three, and the relatively low CR is typical of almost all IPS displays (which have excellent viewing angles (for sharing a screen among multiple viewers at once)). I thought only theDest fixated on dynamic range and blacks smile.gif.

It is not TV versus monitor; it's the specs that count. Professionals edit with monitors, not commercially-available TV's. Top monitors have way more controls than consumer-grade TV's. There are some excellent consumer-grade TV's, of course.
markr041 is offline  
post #16 of 49 Old 03-19-2014, 08:58 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
I agree Mark, but generally speaking, ISF techs will tell you CR and black levels are the #1 thing you look at when buying a display. With color accuracy, most modern displays can be ISF'd to show nearly perfect color. The major difference may be in the range of secondary color adjustments that a manufacturer provides, but you can generally get so close with any of the good, modern displays, that it's generally not an issue.

You are right about the color gamut, but of course I don't think we have much source material that would challenge a display that's capable of displaying a 100% gamut. That may well change in the not too distant future...hopefully.

As for sharing a fixation with my buddy, that's more than a bit scary! biggrin.gif

I actually do feel strongly about blacks and CR for my displays. The reason is simple. There's such a huge amount of broadcast material that is challenging to both the CR and black levels (the two are obviously intertwined) of our HDTVs, it's a huge benefit to have a display that can show that as well as possible. That's why I've had a Pioneer Elite plasma, the Sharp Elite LED and Samsung F8500 plasma. They all have excellent CRs and deliver great black levels.

I deviated a bit with the Samsung since slightly better black levels can be achieved with the Panasonic ZT/VT60 but those don't provide the brightness that the Samsung can. The Samsung is also better at taming the ABL (auto brightness limiter) that's inherent in all plasmas.

But I just don't get nearly as excited, as you know, about DR in today's better cameras. A camera like the RX10 provides ample DR for my use.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #17 of 49 Old 03-30-2014, 04:58 AM
Advanced Member
 
Sgt_Strider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 701
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tugela View Post

The Dell monitor has a refresh rate of 30Hz, so it has limitations.

Base on my understanding of refresh rates, it shouldn't be an issue for non-gamers. I mostly edit photos, browse the web, use Microsoft Office, and soon edit 4K 30p videos. For that kind of intended usage, I don't see any limitations with 30hz.
Sgt_Strider is offline  
post #18 of 49 Old 03-30-2014, 05:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Philip_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 320
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Hi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt_Strider View Post

Base on my understanding of refresh rates, it shouldn't be an issue for non-gamers. I mostly edit photos, browse the web, use Microsoft Office, and soon edit 4K 30p videos. For that kind of intended usage, I don't see any limitations with 30hz.

But then it will also limit all video to 30fps whether that is 60i or 60P, if it accepts a 1080P signal you can get back 60fps again by changing resolution, but then you are stuck with the monitors scaling, and often they aren't good, although 1080P should scale easily to 4K.

In a few months time you will be kicking yourself at why you didn't hold off when true 4K UHD monitors appear.

30fps should have been consigned to history with 4K as interlacing has been, and it has as far as the UHD standard is concerned, although if H264 at 4K resolutions had supported interlacing I think we'd still have it on these early 4K camcorders to get up to 60fps. We'd then have everyone saying how good de-interlacing is these days and it didn't matter rolleyes.gif

Regards

Phil
Philip_L is offline  
post #19 of 49 Old 03-30-2014, 07:00 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
^ Well, 30fps is working just fine in the current AX100 and GH4 4K camcorders, so most of us are very grateful it wasn't 'consigned to history'. Oh, and if you hate 30fps, you must really love 24 & 25fps that are also in the UHD standard. wink.gif

Now, with that said, a 4K monitor with HDMI 2.0 would make the display more compatible with the inevitable 4K 60p cameras that will eventually arrive. HDMI 2.0 was the reason I didn't get a 4K UHD TV in 2013, it hadn't yet arrived.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #20 of 49 Old 03-30-2014, 01:27 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Chevypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 39
Hopefully HFR comes sooner rather than later. It's always bugged me watching camera pans and everything just goes blurry.
Chevypower is offline  
post #21 of 49 Old 03-31-2014, 05:37 PM
Senior Member
 
SD90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked: 18
In mid-April Samsung will be launching a 28" 4K monitor with a $699.00 price tag: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=18944865#post18944865
SD90 is offline  
post #22 of 49 Old 03-31-2014, 05:47 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD90 View Post

In mid-April Samsung will be launching a 28" 4K monitor with a $699.00 price tag: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=18944865#post18944865

It's a TN panel, so bad viewing angles. No mention of refresh rate at 4K - is it 60Hz? Color accuracy? Color gamut?
markr041 is offline  
post #23 of 49 Old 04-03-2014, 07:07 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
I am trying the Dell 23.8" 4K monitor, which will work (using a Display Port) at 60p Hz. A key feature of this monitor is that it is calibrated for color accuracy, has a 100% gamut, and is IPS. It comes with its own specific factory spec sheet (attached) that shows its performance. Hooked up using HDMI it delivers (given the appropriate graphics card) 4K (UHD) at 30Hz. This works just fine with Sony AX100 videos.

What graphics cards are needed? I discovered that the current-generation of Intel CPUs with graphics have 4K capability; previous generations do not. So if you just got an Intel computer/laptop you can just plug in the monitor using HDMI and view 4K!

VLC plays the Sony AX100 videos in 4K on the monitor, and they look great. The videos are sharper than we see in 1080, but no odd artifacts are revealed (or halos). And the Sony colors look even more realistic on this monitor.

DellMonitorr.pdf 203k .pdf file
Attached Files
File Type: pdf DellMonitorr.pdf (203.3 KB, 82 views)
markr041 is offline  
post #24 of 49 Old 04-03-2014, 08:56 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
Very impressive calibration report, Mark. Deltas all below 2 with most hovering around 1 spells excellent color accuracy. Color temperature is also very linear. I can see it must be an impressive picture.

The only thing not addressed in the cal report is black level readings or MLL. However seeing as computer monitors don't have any form of local dimming, it's probably not something that any monitor manufacturer would state. At least I've never seen one. It's unusual enough to just get a hand calibration report.

Good luck with it. I'll have to look in to this monitor. How does a windows desktop or something like IE or Firefox look on it? Do they scale or do you find typical things like icons and text very tiny at this resolution?
Ken Ross is offline  
post #25 of 49 Old 04-04-2014, 08:04 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

Very impressive calibration report, Mark. Deltas all below 2 with most hovering around 1 spells excellent color accuracy. Color temperature is also very linear. I can see it must be an impressive picture.

The only thing not addressed in the cal report is black level readings or MLL. However seeing as computer monitors don't have any form of local dimming, it's probably not something that any monitor manufacturer would state. At least I've never seen one. It's unusual enough to just get a hand calibration report.

Good luck with it. I'll have to look in to this monitor. How does a windows desktop or something like IE or Firefox look on it? Do they scale or do you find typical things like icons and text very tiny at this resolution?

Thanks. Desktop icons and folders etc. scale very well in Windows 8.1, and you can control text size nicely. I have not explored different programs, but what I understand is that some scale well and others (Adobe) do not. Right now I am using the Dell as a second monitor for the purpose of video editing, 4K and not, since the colors should be correct.
markr041 is offline  
post #26 of 49 Old 04-04-2014, 10:12 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
markr041's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 230 Post(s)
Liked: 147
This is a review of the Dell 24" monitor (which is now selling for <$1000):

http://us.hardware.info/reviews/5100/dell-ultrasharp-up2414q-review-24-inch-uhd--4k-monitor

This is a review of the 32" Dell, which seems similar in all respects to the 24" version except for size (and price!):

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ultrasharp-32-up3214q-review,3744.html
markr041 is offline  
post #27 of 49 Old 04-04-2014, 10:25 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
So Mark, do you think the Dell is a keeper at this point?
Ken Ross is offline  
post #28 of 49 Old 04-17-2014, 08:47 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 25,269
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked: 1889
So I joined Mark in the Dell 23.8" 4K monitor adventure. It is quite a treat seeing the AX100 videos in true UHD resolution.

The color and clarity are really stunning. The colors appear quite a bit more saturated than when viewed on a standard HD monitor and I'm not sure if that's due to the Dell presenting 100% of the color gamut or seeing the 4K colors that the AX100 has always been recording, for the first time on a calibrated 4K monitor.

Aside from the added saturation, the Dell seems to show hues from the Sony that were previously unseen. This just makes me lust more for a large screen UHD TV. I should never have done this! biggrin.gif
Ken Ross is offline  
post #29 of 49 Old 04-17-2014, 09:32 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Blasst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: So.California
Posts: 3,513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 27
Congrats Ken on the 4k monitor. I almost pulled the trigger on the Dell when it first came out, yet held off and need to decide one of these days.

Lots of info on the linked forum on monitors 4k etc: http://hardforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=78

Here is the thread on your Dell: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1795614
Blasst is online now  
post #30 of 49 Old 04-18-2014, 03:20 AM
Advanced Member
 
Tugela's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Liked: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by markr041 View Post

It's a TN panel, so bad viewing angles. No mention of refresh rate at 4K - is it 60Hz? Color accuracy? Color gamut?

The product page can be read here: http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/monitors/LU28D590DS/ZA

It runs at 30Hz from HDMI, and 60Hz from the displayport interface.

You can watch a review of it here:
Tugela is online now  
Reply Camcorders

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off