Control4 vs hai or pc based? - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 8 Old 10-07-2012, 12:40 PM - Thread Starter
Newbie
 
rkillah1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
mainly i want whole home audio, 8 to 10 speakers in 2 or 3 zones (mainly in the livingroom/ kitchen/ dining) as well as the office.
some lighting control, maybe 15 lights or more (not sure there yet)
and thermostat controls.

anyone have any ideas what route i should be taking?
im budgeting for about $5000 to $7000 to start,
i know the c4 system is costly, but its complete and turn key.
hai can be turn key ready (post install) but i would rather self install to save money anyone gone this route that could lend some install advice?
thanks everyone
rkillah1123 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 Old 10-07-2012, 12:48 PM
Senior Member
 
has7738's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North America
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkillah1123 View Post

mainly i want whole home audio, 8 to 10 speakers in 2 or 3 zones (mainly in the livingroom/ kitchen/ dining) as well as the office.
some lighting control, maybe 15 lights or more (not sure there yet)
and thermostat controls.
anyone have any ideas what route i should be taking?
im budgeting for about $5000 to $7000 to start,
i know the c4 system is costly, but its complete and turn key.
hai can be turn key ready (post install) but i would rather self install to save money anyone gone this route that could lend some install advice?
thanks everyone

They all can work, none you listed would be my choice, but as I'm an installer I probably shouldn't make a recommendation as the forum may think I'm breaking a rule or something.

PM me if you want specifics outside of this thread.

In that budget range you should probably not try to DIY. The learning curve is way to steep.
has7738 is offline  
post #3 of 8 Old 10-07-2012, 02:29 PM
Member
 
HCCDesignGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 88
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 11
I must say, the budget is a bit on the tight side but given that you're interested in doing as much as possible yourself, I think you can likely pull it off.

I'd be more than happy to chat with you further. Please send me a message through Private Message or through my web site or facebook page. I don't subscribe to the AVF threads as and I only check AVS about once every week to 10 days.
HCCDesignGuy is offline  
post #4 of 8 Old 10-08-2012, 10:14 PM
Senior Member
 
has7738's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North America
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 24
My comment on the budget would be, not tight at all! In fact, for what you're doing, more than adequate, but of course, more detail is needed to pin it down. I'll also offer you consultation via PM.
has7738 is offline  
post #5 of 8 Old 10-15-2012, 10:29 AM
Member
 
Chassmain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
How technical are you? i.e. are you willing to put in the tinkering to bring it all together yourself, or would you prefer a turnkey solution?

I think this could be quite doable with HAI and UPB lighting. If you don't need the security panel stuff you could also consider a platform like CQC or Elve.

Definitely willing to offer my suggestions depending on how dirty you'd like to get your hands.

http://www.quadomated.com/
I am the Quad in Quadomated.   Come read about life and technology through the eyes of a quadriplegic.

Chassmain is offline  
post #6 of 8 Old 10-15-2012, 12:06 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dean Roddey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,823
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Liked: 187
Actually lots of people use CQC on top of an Elk or Omni panel as well, so it's not an either/or thing. They are fairly complementary, though most of what the panel can do CQC can do. It's just that, if you need a lot of sensors and contacts and such, you have to have some way to get them into the automation system, and if you are going to buy something that can do that, you probably might as well get an Elk or Omni and get security in the deal, I guess?

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems, Ltd

www.charmedquark.com

 

Dean Roddey is offline  
post #7 of 8 Old 10-15-2012, 12:11 PM
Member
 
Chassmain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Yeah, totally agree, was just thinking if all he wanted was lighting/whole house audio then there probably wouldn't be a need for security panel and he could get away with just a software solution like CQC, Elve, Homeseer, etc.

http://www.quadomated.com/
I am the Quad in Quadomated.   Come read about life and technology through the eyes of a quadriplegic.

Chassmain is offline  
post #8 of 8 Old 10-15-2012, 12:36 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Dean Roddey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,823
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Liked: 187
Sure, and certainly with CQC a lot more than that. There's little that CQC can't do really. There's I guess two scenarios. One is you just specifically want to have a hardware foundation for the core stuff, or two you need a substantial amount of sensors and such coming back to the closet, in which case you'd need something like an Omni or Elk to convert those signals and make them available to CQC. Otherwise, CQC by itself would be quite doable and talk directly to all the hardware itself, and often exposes more of the hardware's functionality as well. If you use the Elk/Omni just because you want to have a hardware foundation for the core stuff, it's still a big win to layer CQC over it because it can talk to far, far more stuff than a panel can (two-way I mean, with full feedback), it's inherently able to provide serious media management, and it provides vastly more flexibility to create sexy looking touch screens.

So, anyhoo, there's various arguments for either scenario I guess, just depending on what you want.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems, Ltd

www.charmedquark.com

 

Dean Roddey is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Home Automation

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off