Samsung vs Samsung vs Sony vs Vizio? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 11:45 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
SiliGoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I'm about to make a LCD purchase and wanted to check for opinions of this respective group before I drop cash. The TV will be placed in a dedicated media room with blacked out windows. Usage will be 50% on gaming / 50% movie/DirecTV watching.

Here is my assembled list of candidates:

Samsung LNA750 - $2000

Samsung LNA650 - $1800 - To my eyes it looks like the exact same TV as the A750 save for the added DLNA features in the A750. Is that accurate?

Sony KDL-52W4100 - $1700 - The image quality appears to be on par with the Samsung models (though perhaps the blacks aren't quite as good to my eyes?). Great price/value.

Vizio VF550XVT - $1800 - A 55" for $1800 is quite the value. It's an ugly, ugly TV but that's of small concern. I have only seen this one running in a Costco and it looks OK but lacks the "holy, crap...wow!" factor of the Samsung & Sony models.

I know you guys get this kind of post all the time. I really do appreciate your expert opinions.
SiliGoose is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 12:36 PM
Advanced Member
 
saturation's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kwajalein
Posts: 924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The 750 is a PCMag best buy and Editor's Choice, FWIW.
saturation is offline  
post #3 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 03:02 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
BillP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 13,702
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked: 38
Many here recommend Vizio as a great value, and many others (including myself) would never consider a Vizio. I'd go Samsung.
BillP is offline  
post #4 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 03:07 PM
Member
 
john44a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
I talked to a couple of techs before buying my TV they told me
that Samsung is making superior electronics right now.
So thats what I bought , all though I would have settled for
the higher end Sony also.
john44a is offline  
post #5 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 03:23 PM
Advanced Member
 
woodyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
You should also consider the toshiba xv545u. The 52xv545u is consumer reports best buy.
woodyjoe is offline  
post #6 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 04:12 PM
Advanced Member
 
Big L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I just got a Sony KDL52W4100 and love it, so I'm totally biased.
Having said that, I was looking at the same sets (except the Vizio). What did it for me was seeing a 52A650 next to a 52V4100. The Sony looked better in every way. Blacker blacks, whiter whites, more vibrant colors and a nice, sharp HD picture. Checked out the 46"ers and the same story.
So I was all set to get the V but the place I went to didn't have any in stock so I ended up getting a crazy deal on a W.
I will say the Samsungs had a good picture but the Sony's was just better, IMO. You really can't go wrong either way.

Don't know anything about Vizio so I can't help you out there.

My gallery

XBL: A CLAN OF ONE
PSN: A_CLAN_OF_ONE
Big L is offline  
post #7 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 05:20 PM
Member
 
k9jdk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I purchased a Vizio last year. No problems. No regrets. I'd buy another. IMO its a great value for goods received. Sure there are others out there that are better, but you're gonna pay for that (something just a little) better. For me, that little better wasn't worth it.
k9jdk is offline  
post #8 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 06:44 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
SiliGoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:


You should also consider the toshiba xv545u. The 52xv545u is consumer reports best buy.

Looks like a nice TV but it's roughly $2200. I really want to keep the price under $2k.
SiliGoose is offline  
post #9 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 08:03 PM
Advanced Member
 
woodyjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiliGoose View Post

Looks like a nice TV but it's roughly $2200. I really want to keep the price under $2k.

You can find them for less at other online sellers. Cleveland plasma shows it on his website delivered for less than that. You can just click on the cp link above.
woodyjoe is offline  
post #10 of 10 Old 03-13-2009, 08:27 PM
Senior Member
 
kazm899's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 339
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I would take the sony, in my opinion sony's picture is slightly better than samsung's, but the samsungs are good too!
kazm899 is offline  
Reply LCD Flat Panel Displays

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off