Originally Posted by RedOctober205
You cannot compare the experience of passive 3D in the theater to passive 3D in the home. The difference in resolution alone is incredible. The loss of resolution, by half, in the home has a substantial effect on PQ. There isn't a single passive 3D display that can compete with the best active 3D displays.
I owned the 65" Vizio passive 3D panel for a while and got to compare it with my friends 65" Panasonic active 3d panel,,,,, I noticed almost no loss of resolution with passive,,,, and Im not the only one to have that opinion.
Both passive and active have their pros and cons,,,, for me active gives me eye strain and a massive headache if I watch active for an extended amount of time,,, Im also not the only one that suffers from eye strain and headaches when watching active.
Headaches and eyestrain aside,,, I happen to like passive 3D more than active, to me it looks better and a hell of alot brighter.
Im sure you love acitve 3D because that what you own, glad your happy with it,,,, but active is not for everyone.
Passive and active can both produce a very good 3D image,,, I dont slam active because it does not work for me, I realize and know they both have a place,,,,,, why are you being so one sided and slamming passive 3D ?
Your comment that passive cannot compete with active is rediculous to say the least.