Samsung UN55D6300 vs UN55ES6500 -- which would you choose, and why? - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 Old 03-28-2012, 06:22 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
wrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
The currently available mid-range 55" Samsung LED TVs include the 2011 UN55D6300 and 2012 UN55ES6500. The Samsung website does not have an updated comparison table of 2012 models, so I have had to compare features of these two based on the glossy ad sheets. They mostly line up.

One major difference -- the ES6500 is 3D, whereas the D6300 is 2D. I am "meh" about 3D capability, so that is not a big differentiator for me. Content will mostly be sports and movies. Sources will be FIOS and OTA, perhaps some streaming. Primary goals are best PQ, and good off-axis performance.

The ES6500 is currently about US$100-$200 more than the D6300.

Thoughts on these two models from a comparison standpoint? Which one would you get, and why?

Thanks
Wrooster

wrooster is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 Old 03-28-2012, 02:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Steve S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fresno CA
Posts: 5,356
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 46
Niether if you're really a stickler for good off-angle performance. Plasma is best in this regard, IPS panel led/lcd (LG or Panasonic) second best.

Steve S.
Steve S is offline  
post #3 of 13 Old 03-28-2012, 02:53 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
wrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve S View Post

Niether if you're really a stickler for good off-angle performance. Plasma is best in this regard, IPS panel led/lcd (LG or Panasonic) second best.

Well let me qualify the off-axis need as "moderate" -- I took the picture above at basically the very worst case viewing angle.

Wrooster
wrooster is offline  
post #4 of 13 Old 03-28-2012, 03:17 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Steve S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fresno CA
Posts: 5,356
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrooster View Post

Well let me qualify the off-axis need as "moderate" -- I took the picture above at basically the very worst case viewing angle.

Wrooster

At that angle and that viewing distance I don't think you'd have much if any problem with either set you mentionned. It looks like the set's going to end up being mounted fairly high on the wall so a tilting wall mount is going to be desirable--off angle performance usually deteriorates more on the vertical plane than the horizontal so you want your eyeline to be as close to perpendicular with the screen surface as possible.

Steve S.
Steve S is offline  
post #5 of 13 Old 03-28-2012, 05:46 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
wrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve S View Post

At that angle and that viewing distance I don't think you'd have much if any problem with either set you mentionned. It looks like the set's going to end up being mounted fairly high on the wall so a tilting wall mount is going to be desirable--off angle performance usually deteriorates more on the vertical plane than the horizontal so you want your eyeline to be as close to perpendicular with the screen surface as possible.

The picture is a little deceiving because of the wall/ceiling intersection of the loft; that wall is only about 6.5ft (2m) to the joint. The location of the cable entry and outlet will be along the top edge of the TV, so given the 55" models that I am looking at, the bottom edge of the TV will be about 2.5ft from the floor. Below picture has some painter's tape at the corners. The mount that I have has 15degree adjustability so I will incorporate a slight downward tilt. Moreover, I can if needed mount the TV lower than shown -- as I have easy access in behind the kneewall and can move the electrical receptacle and A/V cable entry downward.

Anyway, now you folks all know all the details about the wall mounting and room layout -- what do you think about the midrange 2011 "D6300" model vs the 2012 "ES6500" model?

Thanks,
Wrooster

wrooster is offline  
post #6 of 13 Old 04-04-2012, 03:34 PM
Newbie
 
rc51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
2011 D6.... NOT FULLHD 3D very bad model

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1362161
rc51 is offline  
post #7 of 13 Old 04-04-2012, 10:34 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
wrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by rc51 View Post

2011 D6.... NOT FULLHD 3D very bad model

Very helpful -- your highly detailed input is much appreciated. Clearly you have an economy with words.

Wrooster
wrooster is offline  
post #8 of 13 Old 04-04-2012, 10:48 PM
Advanced Member
 
maygit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
In general, 3D capable models out perform 2D models in PQ. The 6500 will probably handle motion a little better and give a more accurate/realistic image since it likely has a better processor (to handle the extra processing 3D requires).

I have both in my store and ill check tomorrow if i notice major differences in PQ given i remember to.

maygit is offline  
post #9 of 13 Old 04-08-2012, 08:23 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
wrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by maygit View Post

I have both in my store and ill check tomorrow if i notice major differences in PQ given i remember to.

Any updates?

Thanks
Wrooster
wrooster is offline  
post #10 of 13 Old 04-08-2012, 09:42 PM
Newbie
 
seddon12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
On a very similar note. Could someone tell me if it is worth to spend $400 more on 6500 comparing to Costco's 6450 version on 6400?
seddon12 is offline  
post #11 of 13 Old 04-13-2012, 08:19 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
wrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Below, a UN55ES6500.

Still a lot of work to do...

Wrooster







wrooster is offline  
post #12 of 13 Old 09-11-2012, 12:51 PM
Member
 
Greg Lafayette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
so how do you like the picture? blacks are good? debating on plasma or not
Greg Lafayette is offline  
post #13 of 13 Old 09-12-2012, 11:49 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
wrooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Lafayette View Post

so how do you like the picture? blacks are good? debating on plasma or not

See this thread and post follow-ups there:
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1401438/official-samsung-unxxes6500-owners-thread

Wrooster
Greg Lafayette likes this.
wrooster is offline  
Reply LCD Flat Panel Displays

Tags
Samsung Un55es6500 55 Inch 1080p 120 Hz 3d Slim Led Hdtv , Samsung Un55d6300 55 Inch 1080p 120hz Led Hdtv Black 2011 Model
Gear in this thread

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off