Sony 65W850a reviews - Page 136 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #4051 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 10:33 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 1
I want to prove my case to them with settings that work versus some program. Thanks
jem102166 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4052 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 10:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Raitzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stoneguy View Post
My screen looks very similar to yours. Yes, let us all know how you make out with the new TV. If Sony considers yours defective they should consider mine defective as well. My bands are not quite as dark as yours but close.
Keep it. They are all more or less the same. Good qualities outweigh the negatives with this one.
Raitzi is offline  
post #4053 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 10:38 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,985
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked: 391
"Work" and accurate are two different things. You may not "like" the more accurate picture that comes from a professional calibration, but the calibrator would almost immediately tell you what wrong with the new settings you are using.

If he puts a meter up and shows you how inaccurate the picture is, it may not matter to you though. It for sure won't deter him from changing what he does.

As long as you're happy in the end that's all that matters.


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
tubetwister likes this.
Ph8te is offline  
post #4054 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 10:42 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 1
I want to prove it to them with setting that work.
jem102166 is offline  
post #4055 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 10:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Raitzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem102166 View Post
I want to prove it to them with setting that work.
You cannot win this. They can measure and you are taking settings from internet. I believe professional calibration is not worth it in most cases without proving with measurements to point the difference compared to "close good basic settings". Of course if you are completely clueless, any calibration/setting sensible change is usually better than presets. I would always start with internet settings or with calibration DVD. And only if I am not happy maybe then buy calibration service if TV is bloody expensive.
Raitzi is offline  
post #4056 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 11:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,985
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raitzi View Post
You cannot win this. They can measure and you are taking settings from internet. I believe professional calibration is not worth it in most cases without proving with measurements to point the difference compared to "close good basic settings". Of course if you are completely clueless, any calibration/setting sensible change is usually better than presets. I would always start with internet settings or with calibration DVD. And only if I am not happy maybe then buy calibration service if TV is bloody expensive.

I still don't think they would be happy. From the sounds of it he doesn't want an accurate picture but a bright picture that "pops". Some people just don't like an accurate calibrated picture and there's nothing wrong with that. Hopefully though they know about the downfalls of having an inaccurate picture.


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
Ph8te is offline  
post #4057 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 12:13 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tubetwister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Sacramento delta N. Cal. US Don't trust any air I can't see ☺
Posts: 2,935
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 522 Post(s)
Liked: 362
Some folks actually like torch mode !

Hires Music formats ..............."Why does it sound like a CD ?" ............. can we make it louder "?
"The wireless music box has no commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?"
- David Sarnoff's associates at RCA the 1920's -
tubetwister is offline  
post #4058 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 12:51 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 1
Sorry no torch mode. 65W850a Sony. It looked like a matte finish white looked grey and black was not black. Washed out color bad! I got the new X10 4K player yesterday and that makes it pop but it changes the settings from what they were set at. That is why I want to get someone to send me their setting so I can try them with my DISH. Thanks
jem102166 is offline  
post #4059 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 01:01 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,985
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked: 391
You got a 4k player for a 1080p set??..."torch mode"=Vivid, it seems you may be her here so you may not understand some of the terms we use. WS has many people happy with his Vivid settings however, although they may not be "accurate" all that matters in
The end is that the owner of the set is happy.


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
tubetwister likes this.
Ph8te is offline  
post #4060 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 02:52 PM
Advanced Member
 
WhiteSands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 761
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem102166 View Post
I want to prove it to them with setting that work.
Actually this set has a fantastic picture right out of the box if you use Picture-Mode, Vivid.

I do think Vivid with the factory settings is a little to bright to watch for night viewing. I sent you a copy of my settings to try.

Last edited by WhiteSands; 07-18-2014 at 03:04 PM.
WhiteSands is offline  
post #4061 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 03:16 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 1
Thanks so much for the setting WS! You are very detailed in your message and have done a wonderful job here!
WhiteSands likes this.
jem102166 is offline  
post #4062 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 03:17 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 1
This is a 4K set XBR65X850A
jem102166 is offline  
post #4063 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 03:40 PM
Senior Member
 
FiloD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SSF Ca
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem102166 View Post
This is a 4K set XBR65X850A
Hmmm, this is the Sony 65W850a forums

Try to join the Sony XBR-55X850A & XBR65X850A , although not a busy forum. You can also try what is a similar panel to yours in the Official Sony [X9] XBR-55X900A / XBR-65X900A Owner's Thread. You will find the X900A forums with a lot of setting discussions. The Cinema settings I am using came from that forum [I know it is a different panel but with little tweaking, I like it]
FiloD is offline  
post #4064 of 4416 Old 07-18-2014, 04:07 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 1
thanks!
jem102166 is offline  
post #4065 of 4416 Old 07-19-2014, 03:43 AM
Advanced Member
 
WhiteSands's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 761
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked: 425
Here are five new screen shots from my TV.





Cayloe and Fairfax-Franko like this.
WhiteSands is offline  
post #4066 of 4416 Old 07-19-2014, 10:42 AM
Advanced Member
 
bodean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 566
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ph8te View Post
I still don't think they would be happy. From the sounds of it he doesn't want an accurate picture but a bright picture that "pops". Some people just don't like an accurate calibrated picture and there's nothing wrong with that.

Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
Never really understood why someone would not want an accurate picture, instead going with pop......

I would think if you are watching something (movie/sports) you want the picture to look real, as if you were there at the game or on the movie set......
FiloD likes this.

Sony KDL65W850A 65" LED HDTV 
Denon AVR-2113CI
Polk Monitor 65T (Fronts)
Polk Monitor 50's (Rears)
Polk CS2 (Center)
Acoustech PL-200
bodean is offline  
post #4067 of 4416 Old 07-19-2014, 11:37 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,985
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodean View Post
Never really understood why someone would not want an accurate picture, instead going with pop......



I would think if you are watching something (movie/sports) you want the picture to look real, as if you were there at the game or on the movie set......

When you've been looking at inaccurate pictures for so long, the transition can be jarring for some. I usually recommend people love with the settings for at least a week before doing an A/B comparison otherwise you won't have time to get used to the picture.


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
tubetwister likes this.
Ph8te is offline  
post #4068 of 4416 Old 07-19-2014, 11:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Raitzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 29
The whole point of triluminous screen is to give deeper colors than on the disc aiming for more realistic picture and richer colors.
Raitzi is offline  
post #4069 of 4416 Old 07-19-2014, 01:23 PM
Advanced Member
 
skriefal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodean View Post
Never really understood why someone would not want an accurate picture, instead going with pop......

I would think if you are watching something (movie/sports) you want the picture to look real, as if you were there at the game or on the movie set......
I agree with you. My preference is for an accurate picture. White whites (not bluish), black blacks (not purplish or greenish), accurate skin tones, grass that looks like real grass, sky shots that look like real sky, and proper contrast (no blown-out whites, and with shadow detail where it is intended). Obviously there is an exception if the content being viewed was intended to look surreal.

The W850A with stock settings is better than most LCD TVs at providing an accurate picture.
bodean likes this.
skriefal is offline  
post #4070 of 4416 Old 07-19-2014, 07:08 PM
AVS Special Member
 
*UFO*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodean View Post
Never really understood why someone would not want an accurate picture, instead going with pop......

I would think if you are watching something (movie/sports) you want the picture to look real, as if you were there at the game or on the movie set......
You do realize that the current standard (rec709), is no where near "accurate" to real life right? There's a difference between over saturating colors and extending the color gamut.
Raitzi likes this.
*UFO* is offline  
post #4071 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 01:17 AM
AVS Special Member
 
teckademic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 1,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodean View Post
Never really understood why someone would not want an accurate picture, instead going with pop......

I would think if you are watching something (movie/sports) you want the picture to look real, as if you were there at the game or on the movie set......
some people like the initial wow factor with vivid settings, but for me, it gets old after you start noticing that things don't really look like that in real life. Things like the grass on a golf course or the sky are some of the things that pushed me away from vivid. The movie that did it for me was Oblivion and remembering what it looked like in theaters, which had a grayish overcast, but using WS settings gave me clear blue skies like they were in Miami and didn't fit the picture at all. It was fun using his settings the first time, but I prefer accuracy over pop.
teckademic is offline  
post #4072 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 01:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Raitzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckademic View Post
some people like the initial wow factor with vivid settings, but for me, it gets old after you start noticing that things don't really look like that in real life. Things like the grass on a golf course or the sky are some of the things that pushed me away from vivid. The movie that did it for me was Oblivion and remembering what it looked like in theaters, which had a grayish overcast, but using WS settings gave me clear blue skies like they were in Miami and didn't fit the picture at all. It was fun using his settings the first time, but I prefer accuracy over pop.
In my opinion Vivid setting is the only one that does not work well of those Whitesands settings but I this setting is more for 3D anyway . Detail is lost in bright scenes with vivid when details burns away. Live color on low gives the all push I need with color setting in 60 range.
Raitzi is offline  
post #4073 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 02:32 AM
Member
 
Shaun.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Hi guys, are the banding/clouding/flashlight issues common to all sets or just a few? What about the vignetting (darker edges)? I can see the darker edges even on some of white sand's screenshots.

I was checking out the 60w850b today and thought it looked pretty good (cnet review also says the black level is close to the W900A but not quite), no banding or clouding that I could see and noticed there was a 65w850a nearby. Immediately saw the vignetting and googled it to find this thread. Both were the same price so I'm trying to decide whether to go with the 850b which seems to have better uniformity (other than the radial banding on some sets) or try out the 850a (which on paper is superior with triluminos, local dimming and 5" bigger screen).

Your input is appreciated, TIA!
Shaun. is offline  
post #4074 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 04:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Raitzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun. View Post
Hi guys, are the banding/clouding/flashlight issues common to all sets or just a few? What about the vignetting (darker edges)? I can see the darker edges even on some of white sand's screenshots.

I was checking out the 60w850b today and thought it looked pretty good (cnet review also says the black level is close to the W900A but not quite), no banding or clouding that I could see and noticed there was a 65w850a nearby. Immediately saw the vignetting and googled it to find this thread. Both were the same price so I'm trying to decide whether to go with the 850b which seems to have better uniformity (other than the radial banding on some sets) or try out the 850a (which on paper is superior with triluminos, local dimming and 5" bigger screen).

Your input is appreciated, TIA!
This set has some issues mostly related to DSE but I won't bother me a bit in movies. Contrast performance is so unreal with local dimming. I have not tested w850b but It is safe to assume that that some problems all also possible with that set. It is still LCD. Here is a picture of black performance of w850b: http://www.rtings.com/images/reviews...ity-medium.jpg
Local dimming helps with clouding issues but w850b does not have it. Rest of the review: http://www.rtings.com/reviews/tv/lcd-led/sony/w850b
WhiteSands likes this.
Raitzi is offline  
post #4075 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 08:05 AM
Member
 
Mr. Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raitzi View Post
It seems like they really like the w850b, maybe even more than the w950b. Local dimming is nice but it comes with its own set of problems.
Mr. Kong is offline  
post #4076 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 08:52 AM
Senior Member
 
Raitzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Kong View Post
It seems like they really like the w850b, maybe even more than the w950b. Local dimming is nice but it comes with its own set of problems.
w950b is been reviewed worse than w8 series this year in all major sites with both TVs tested. Plan to move to IPS backfired for Sony
tubetwister likes this.
Raitzi is offline  
post #4077 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 09:34 AM
Advanced Member
 
skriefal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raitzi View Post
Live color on low gives the all push I need with color setting in 60 range.
I'm at Color = 53, Brightness = 50, Warm2, Live Color = Low, Black Corrector = Low, Adv. Contrast = Low. I do think it's more accurate with Live Color set to Off, even though that's not where I leave it. So I guess I'm okay with a little bit of color push.
skriefal is offline  
post #4078 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 10:11 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 0
WhiteSands - Please send me all of your current settings. Thanks!

Mike
michpall is offline  
post #4079 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 10:23 AM
Member
 
Mr. Kong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raitzi View Post
w950b is been reviewed worse than w8 series this year in all major sites with both TVs tested. Plan to move to IPS backfired for Sony
W850Bs are IPS too though aren't they? Later reviews & hands-on (at least in threads here) have warmed up to the 950Bs but for my money the W850Bs are just as good or better. Some of what I've read (RTINGS being one example) seems to suggest the newer tech has kind of made up for the panel switch, at least when it comes to black & contrast. I'll see, if I end up bringing one home and getting it calibrated.
Mr. Kong is offline  
post #4080 of 4416 Old 07-20-2014, 10:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Raitzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Kong View Post
W850Bs are IPS too though aren't they?
W850B Has SPVA panel (Samsung technology)
Raitzi is offline  
Reply LCD Flat Panel Displays

Tags
Sony Xbr65x850a 65 Inch 4k Ultra Hd 3d Led
Gear in this thread

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off