^However, since this thread became the fact of life even if so prematurely born, one has to underline that the topic of 110"@4K displays is very justified.
This is because calculations show that 110" is necessary for getting full advantage of the 4K in standard living room viewing conditions. The 'standard' meaning here that typical viewing distance is about 10 feet and the 4K full added value shows up at distances in the range of 2 PH (Picture Heights). No wonder then that somebody owning 84" is now craving for the 110"
The 110" size should thus become normal item in the 4K display product lineups. Question is then about its potential market size and price. About the price, it does not have to be exorbitant if one
remembers that 110"@4K=4x55"@2K which shows that 110"@4K is technically no more than four standard 55"@2K displays. Thus, any plant capable of making 55"@2K should be able to make 110"@4K by changing litography masks and saving on the glass cutting steps. At first sight, not being an expert on LCD manufacturing, it seems then that the price of 110"@4K should not be very different from the price of four 55"@2K displays.
Regarding the potential market size, the 110" dimensions prevent its installations in many living rooms. But 110" can make up by cannibalizng the home projector/home theater segment which commonly has screen sizes in this range. There seems thus to be a place for 110"@4K displays at reasonable prices.