Official 110" Samsung UHDTV110 Owner's Thread - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 Old 10-06-2013, 03:24 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Kenneth Tong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I will be buying this 110" Television.
Kenneth Tong is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 Old 10-06-2013, 07:12 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
anthonymoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: ny, ny usa
Posts: 5,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 58
Lulz Kenneth I have a feeling this thread will become lots of people coming here to ask you for pix and impressions, but probably not too many other owners!

Anyway - I'll be the first! Glad you're pulling the trigger and I look forward to your impressions...

Stuck up, half witted, scruffy looking, nerf herder.
Double True!
anthonymoody is offline  
post #3 of 10 Old 10-06-2013, 08:09 AM
AVS Special Member
 
irkuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 3,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth Tong View Post

I will be buying this 110" Television.

....since my 84" is way too small for 4K ??? If so, I fully agree biggrin.gif.

Anyway, in good old times owner threads were made by actual owners. They were preceded by anticipation threads when it was known the product is in the pipeline. For now even anticipation thread would be premature as the 110" displays were barely demonstrated with manufs refusing to tell about actual productivisation and thus one can only talk about their appearances at shows.

irkuck
irkuck is offline  
post #4 of 10 Old 10-06-2013, 10:22 AM
Member
 
GPtimes2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 168
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Also, irkuck, I bet you remember something else from the "Good Old Days". When things like this were called "Vaporware".
GPtimes2 is online now  
post #5 of 10 Old 10-07-2013, 08:01 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
anthonymoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: ny, ny usa
Posts: 5,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 58
Irkuck I too remember those days - note our respective sign up dates smile.gif

Stuck up, half witted, scruffy looking, nerf herder.
Double True!
anthonymoody is offline  
post #6 of 10 Old 10-07-2013, 11:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
irkuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 3,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 60
^However, since this thread became the fact of life even if so prematurely born, one has to underline that the topic of 110"@4K displays is very justified.

This is because calculations show that 110" is necessary for getting full advantage of the 4K in standard living room viewing conditions. The 'standard' meaning here that typical viewing distance is about 10 feet and the 4K full added value shows up at distances in the range of 2 PH (Picture Heights). No wonder then that somebody owning 84" is now craving for the 110" smile.gif.

The 110" size should thus become normal item in the 4K display product lineups. Question is then about its potential market size and price. About the price, it does not have to be exorbitant if one
remembers that 110"@4K=4x55"@2K which shows that 110"@4K is technically no more than four standard 55"@2K displays. Thus, any plant capable of making 55"@2K should be able to make 110"@4K by changing litography masks and saving on the glass cutting steps. At first sight, not being an expert on LCD manufacturing, it seems then that the price of 110"@4K should not be very different from the price of four 55"@2K displays.

Regarding the potential market size, the 110" dimensions prevent its installations in many living rooms. But 110" can make up by cannibalizng the home projector/home theater segment which commonly has screen sizes in this range. There seems thus to be a place for 110"@4K displays at reasonable prices.

irkuck
irkuck is offline  
post #7 of 10 Old 10-07-2013, 11:58 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Kenneth Tong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 16
FYI, the television is at $63,000USD.
Kenneth Tong is offline  
post #8 of 10 Old 10-08-2013, 05:05 AM
Member
 
congster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by irkuck View Post

^However, since this thread became the fact of life even if so prematurely born, one has to underline that the topic of 110"@4K displays is very justified.

This is because calculations show that 110" is necessary for getting full advantage of the 4K in standard living room viewing conditions. The 'standard' meaning here that typical viewing distance is about 10 feet and the 4K full added value shows up at distances in the range of 2 PH (Picture Heights). No wonder then that somebody owning 84" is now craving for the 110" smile.gif.

The 110" size should thus become normal item in the 4K display product lineups. Question is then about its potential market size and price. About the price, it does not have to be exorbitant if one
remembers that 110"@4K=4x55"@2K which shows that 110"@4K is technically no more than four standard 55"@2K displays. Thus, any plant capable of making 55"@2K should be able to make 110"@4K by changing litography masks and saving on the glass cutting steps. At first sight, not being an expert on LCD manufacturing, it seems then that the price of 110"@4K should not be very different from the price of four 55"@2K displays.

Regarding the potential market size, the 110" dimensions prevent its installations in many living rooms. But 110" can make up by cannibalizng the home projector/home theater segment which commonly has screen sizes in this range. There seems thus to be a place for 110"@4K displays at reasonable prices.

LCD pricing is about yield. It is more difficult to find a continuously perfect 110" panel vis a vis a 55" so on and so forth as a matter of probability. Definitely not 4x 55".
tlwiz1 likes this.
congster is offline  
post #9 of 10 Old 10-08-2013, 07:09 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
anthonymoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: ny, ny usa
Posts: 5,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 58
This is my projector screen size - 110". Still don't have a place to install it given room lighting, but a flat panel...yum. Wake me when they're $5k wink.gif

Stuck up, half witted, scruffy looking, nerf herder.
Double True!
anthonymoody is offline  
post #10 of 10 Old 10-08-2013, 08:59 AM
AVS Special Member
 
irkuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 3,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenneth Tong View Post

FYI, the television is at $63,000USD.

Which channel is offering/selling it? This must be introductory price for the oligarch/mogul segment, after some time it should be getting down to the masses.... speed of it depends if the panels will be available to other TV manufacturers to get healthy competition rolling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by congster View Post

LCD pricing is about yield. It is more difficult to find a continuously perfect 110" panel vis a vis a 55" so on and so forth as a matter of probability. Definitely not 4x 55".

Yield is currently not a problem in the LCD manufacturing. One can even find incredibly cheap smaller size 4K LCDs which could have more yield problems due to a smaller pixel pitch. Manufacturing of 110"@4K can be done on the same lines as the 55"@2K and using the same process, there is no new investment required. Thus, the estimate of price as not very different from 4x55" should hold and obviously the fact it is made in China helps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonymoody View Post

This is my projector screen size - 110". Still don't have a place to install it given room lighting, but a flat panel...yum. Wake me when they're $5k wink.gif

You penny-pincher, this beast will be a bargain even at $10K smile.gif.

irkuck
irkuck is offline  
Reply LCD Flat Panel Displays

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off