Official Samsung PNxxF8500 Series Discussion Thread [No Street Price Talk] - Page 184 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #5491 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:34 PM
Advanced Member
 
Pinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

OK, so just back from the shootout and really tired. So if I sound incoherent, that's because I am.

Forgot about apparent sharpness. No surprises there, the Samsung looked the sharpest.

Oh yes, I ordered the F8500. smile.gif

Nighty night.

Thanks for sharing your observations of tonight's portion of the shootout.
And congrats on your order, welcome to the club biggrin.gif
Pinger is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #5492 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:37 PM
 
vinnie97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nunya
Posts: 11,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Liked: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ph8te View Post

Good question to ask tomorrow, it may ahve thrown something else off which is possibly why they chose not to use it....If your watchign the stream and they take questions from the web, make sure to bring it up.....
You took the thought from my brain. biggrin.gif Have to get some work done after all that I missed tonight, but I will try to fit it in.
vinnie97 is offline  
post #5493 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:38 PM
AVS Special Member
 
bargervais's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tampa Bay Florida
Posts: 1,239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 274 Post(s)
Liked: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyrnes View Post

Much better sound too, plus camera and much better input lag.
sound who still uses a TV for sound

My main setup
PN60E8000 Plus evolution 2013Kit + Directv genie + Panasonic 3D blu-ray player + Onkyo TX-NR 818 9.2 Bic F12 subs Onkyo M-5010 2-Channel Amplifier for wides.
MY 10' X 15' DEN
PN51F5500 + Directv Genie + Panasonic 3D blu-ray player + Onkyo TX-NR 737 5.2.2
bargervais is online now  
post #5494 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:39 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
DavidHir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,394
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

OK, so just back from the shootout and really tired. So if I sound incoherent, that's because I am.

For me, the biggest surprises were the effectiveness of the filter on the ZT60. Yes, it really does help that panel in typical room lighting while displaying blacks. But as I said at the shootout, the same filter that's effective in combating room light also robs the panel of a precious 5flt of brightness.

Second surprise, and I'm not sure how it showed up on your screens at home, but the Panasonics seriously clip white. Half the scale was missing on the Panasonics and the entire scale was visible on the Samsung. Kevin Miller told me it was obvious that Panasonic designed this panel for blacks and were very aware they were sacrificing brightness in the process. I asked if it was possible to get more than the 30ftl from the ZT60 or 35ftl from the VT60. The answer was a definitive 'no'. It's already clipping at the levels they calibrated them at. On the flip side, I believe it was David who thought for actual material it probably wouldn't be all the visible.

I agree with what some of you saw regarding color saturation on the 8500. At times it looked a bit less saturated. At other times, such as when they played Skyfall, the colors looked identical to the ZT60 & VT60. I mean identical. I don't know why a few other times it appeared a bit less saturated. I also thought the 8500 was a bit redder than the VT & ZT. But it's important to note that all the calibrators said to me that the 8500 was absolutely tracking properly and was fully in compliance with Rec709. I believe it was D-Nice who said if you turned off the VT & ZT, you'd never see the disparity. Kevin Miller absolutely felt the 8500 was extremely accurate.

At times the black levels of the ZT looked a bit better than the VT, but that was primarily when the room lighting was on. Once off, they looked identical. The big surprise to me was at the end when they played the Kuro demo reel that was designed to highlight blacks. I'm telling you guys, 95% of that demo looked IDENTICAL on all 3 panels. The other 5% of the time I gave the edge to the ZT & VT.

I don't know if it came across on your monitors, but at times the brightness advantage was very obvious on the 8500, but not as often as you might think. I don't believe the material they played, IMO, really highlighted the brightness differences. When was the disparity the most obvious? If you caught the period when they were playing around with Directv, the brightness differences were at times, huge. It was during those times that the screen had the largest % of bright areas. Hello ABL!

The Panasonic clearly has some issues such as calibration, clipping & 3D resolution. I personally don't care about 3D, but I know some of you guys do.

Although I was initially surprised at how well the ZT handled the room lighting, by the end of the night I came to the conclusion that, IMO, the 8500 has the most versatile qualities and did more things better than the other panels. The black levels are really close and the Kuro demo showed that in spades. But there's no question that if your biggest concern is MLL, than the ZT/VT is your best choice. Personally, if I was choosing between the 2, I'd go for the ZT if you had the extra cash. I really believe that filter does enough in terms of combating room lights and keeping black levels respectable, that it's worth the extra cost. But IMO, it simply is not a versatile panel. It does one thing better than the others, many other things as well as the others and falls woefully short in the brightness department.

Forgot about apparent sharpness. No surprises there, the Samsung looked the sharpest.

Oh yes, I ordered the F8500. smile.gif


Nighty night.

Great feedback, thanks.

DavidHir is offline  
post #5495 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:42 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
DavidHir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,394
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked: 424
Did I hear correctly, early on tonight from the Samsung rep, that one could upgrade the processor to get picture quality improvements that come each year (assuming hardware still the same)? In other words, if next year's F8500 is still the same hardware, but they make software PQ tweaks, can you get those in your 2013 model?

DavidHir is offline  
post #5496 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:44 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 23,978
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1002 Post(s)
Liked: 1084
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHir View Post

Did I hear correctly, early on tonight from the Samsung rep, that one could upgrade the processor to get picture quality improvements that come each year (assuming hardware still the same)? In other words, if next year's F8500 is still the same hardware, but they make software PQ tweaks, can you get those in your 2013 model?

Yes you can Dave. A really wonderful concept.
Ken Ross is offline  
post #5497 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:46 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
DavidHir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,394
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

Yes you can Dave. A really wonderful concept.

Very cool!

DavidHir is offline  
post #5498 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 09:46 PM
Advanced Member
 
Halimali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

OK, so just back from the shootout and really tired. So if I sound incoherent, that's because I am.

For me, the biggest surprises were the effectiveness of the filter on the ZT60. Yes, it really does help that panel in typical room lighting while displaying blacks. But as I said at the shootout, the same filter that's effective in combating room light also robs the panel of a precious 5flt of brightness.

Second surprise, and I'm not sure how it showed up on your screens at home, but the Panasonics seriously clip white. Half the scale was missing on the Panasonics and the entire scale was visible on the Samsung. Kevin Miller told me it was obvious that Panasonic designed this panel for blacks and were very aware they were sacrificing brightness in the process. I asked if it was possible to get more than the 30ftl from the ZT60 or 35ftl from the VT60. The answer was a definitive 'no'. It's already clipping at the levels they calibrated them at. On the flip side, I believe it was David who thought for actual material it probably wouldn't be all the visible.

I agree with what some of you saw regarding color saturation on the 8500. At times it looked a bit less saturated. At other times, such as when they played Skyfall, the colors looked identical to the ZT60 & VT60. I mean identical. I don't know why a few other times it appeared a bit less saturated. I also thought the 8500 was a bit redder than the VT & ZT. But it's important to note that all the calibrators said to me that the 8500 was absolutely tracking properly and was fully in compliance with Rec709. I believe it was D-Nice who said if you turned off the VT & ZT, you'd never see the disparity. Kevin Miller absolutely felt the 8500 was extremely accurate.

At times the black levels of the ZT looked a bit better than the VT, but that was primarily when the room lighting was on. Once off, they looked identical. The big surprise to me was at the end when they played the Kuro demo reel that was designed to highlight blacks. I'm telling you guys, 95% of that demo looked IDENTICAL on all 3 panels. The other 5% of the time I gave the edge to the ZT & VT.

I don't know if it came across on your monitors, but at times the brightness advantage was very obvious on the 8500, but not as often as you might think. I don't believe the material they played, IMO, really highlighted the brightness differences. When was the disparity the most obvious? If you caught the period when they were playing around with Directv, the brightness differences were at times, huge. It was during those times that the screen had the largest % of bright areas. Hello ABL!

The Panasonic clearly has some issues such as calibration, clipping & 3D resolution. I personally don't care about 3D, but I know some of you guys do.

Although I was initially surprised at how well the ZT handled the room lighting, by the end of the night I came to the conclusion that, IMO, the 8500 has the most versatile qualities and did more things better than the other panels. The black levels are really close and the Kuro demo showed that in spades. But there's no question that if your biggest concern is MLL, than the ZT/VT is your best choice. Personally, if I was choosing between the 2, I'd go for the ZT if you had the extra cash. I really believe that filter does enough in terms of combating room lights and keeping black levels respectable, that it's worth the extra cost. But IMO, it simply is not a versatile panel. It does one thing better than the others, many other things as well as the others and falls woefully short in the brightness department.

Forgot about apparent sharpness. No surprises there, the Samsung looked the sharpest.

Oh yes, I ordered the F8500. smile.gif

Nighty night.

Thank you for sharing your observation. Very valued
Congratulations and welcome to the club

As of June 2013:
2,712 Bluray movies
1,593 DVD movies
356 bluray+DVD series
1,322 bluray+DVD Anime
Halimali is offline  
post #5499 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 10:10 PM
Senior Member
 
PRBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
So im glad i pull the trigger today for the 60f8500!!!
PRBR is offline  
post #5500 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 10:10 PM
AVS Special Member
 
airgas1998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 42degsN 92degsW
Posts: 2,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

Yes you can Dave. A really wonderful concept.

ken, get to bed. it was great seeing the back of your head again.biggrin.gif hopefully, some day I'll be able to meet you and Robert in person. thx for your evaluation. oh, and welcome to the most versatile panel club.wink.gif

Habit Forming....Wallet Burning Hobby....

64" Samsung F8500 Plasma
55" Samsung B8500 Full Array Lcd
Channel Master Dvr
Onkyo 818
Crown xls-2000
Sony Blu-Ray 790
Svs Ultra Towers/Center, Energy Rc-50 Surround
Svs Pb-13 Ultra Sub
airgas1998 is offline  
post #5501 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 10:11 PM
Advanced Member
 
Halimali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRBR View Post

So im glad i pull the trigger today for the 60f8500!!!

Congratulations, when are expecting it to be delivered?

As of June 2013:
2,712 Bluray movies
1,593 DVD movies
356 bluray+DVD series
1,322 bluray+DVD Anime
Halimali is offline  
post #5502 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 10:27 PM
Senior Member
 
donstim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

OK, so just back from the shootout and really tired. So if I sound incoherent, that's because I am.

For me, the biggest surprises were the effectiveness of the filter on the ZT60. Yes, it really does help that panel in typical room lighting while displaying blacks. But as I said at the shootout, the same filter that's effective in combating room light also robs the panel of a precious 5flt of brightness.

.
.
.
Nighty night.

Thanks Ken. Nice, meaningful, succinct summary.
donstim is offline  
post #5503 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 10:34 PM
Senior Member
 
PRBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halimali View Post

Congratulations, when are expecting it to be delivered?

May 18!! Thanks for asking
PRBR is offline  
post #5504 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 10:35 PM
Senior Member
 
agkss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lima, Perú
Posts: 282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

OK, so just back from the shootout and really tired. So if I sound incoherent, that's because I am.

For me, the biggest surprises were the effectiveness of the filter on the ZT60. Yes, it really does help that panel in typical room lighting while displaying blacks. But as I said at the shootout, the same filter that's effective in combating room light also robs the panel of a precious 5flt of brightness.

Second surprise, and I'm not sure how it showed up on your screens at home, but the Panasonics seriously clip white. Half the scale was missing on the Panasonics and the entire scale was visible on the Samsung. Kevin Miller told me it was obvious that Panasonic designed this panel for blacks and were very aware they were sacrificing brightness in the process. I asked if it was possible to get more than the 30ftl from the ZT60 or 35ftl from the VT60. The answer was a definitive 'no'. It's already clipping at the levels they calibrated them at. On the flip side, I believe it was David who thought for actual material it probably wouldn't be all the visible.

I agree with what some of you saw regarding color saturation on the 8500. At times it looked a bit less saturated. At other times, such as when they played Skyfall, the colors looked identical to the ZT60 & VT60. I mean identical. I don't know why a few other times it appeared a bit less saturated. I also thought the 8500 was a bit redder than the VT & ZT. But it's important to note that all the calibrators said to me that the 8500 was absolutely tracking properly and was fully in compliance with Rec709. I believe it was D-Nice who said if you turned off the VT & ZT, you'd never see the disparity. Kevin Miller absolutely felt the 8500 was extremely accurate.

At times the black levels of the ZT looked a bit better than the VT, but that was primarily when the room lighting was on. Once off, they looked identical. The big surprise to me was at the end when they played the Kuro demo reel that was designed to highlight blacks. I'm telling you guys, 95% of that demo looked IDENTICAL on all 3 panels. The other 5% of the time I gave the edge to the ZT & VT.

I don't know if it came across on your monitors, but at times the brightness advantage was very obvious on the 8500, but not as often as you might think. I don't believe the material they played, IMO, really highlighted the brightness differences. When was the disparity the most obvious? If you caught the period when they were playing around with Directv, the brightness differences were at times, huge. It was during those times that the screen had the largest % of bright areas. Hello ABL!

The Panasonic clearly has some issues such as calibration, clipping & 3D resolution. I personally don't care about 3D, but I know some of you guys do.

Although I was initially surprised at how well the ZT handled the room lighting, by the end of the night I came to the conclusion that, IMO, the 8500 has the most versatile qualities and did more things better than the other panels. The black levels are really close and the Kuro demo showed that in spades. But there's no question that if your biggest concern is MLL, than the ZT/VT is your best choice. Personally, if I was choosing between the 2, I'd go for the ZT if you had the extra cash. I really believe that filter does enough in terms of combating room lights and keeping black levels respectable, that it's worth the extra cost. But IMO, it simply is not a versatile panel. It does one thing better than the others, many other things as well as the others and falls woefully short in the brightness department.

Forgot about apparent sharpness. No surprises there, the Samsung looked the sharpest.

Oh yes, I ordered the F8500. smile.gif

Nighty night.

Congrats for your choice and thanks for info...i think i will wait for 2014 models for both brands.
agkss is offline  
post #5505 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 11:13 PM
Advanced Member
 
Halimali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRBR View Post

May 18!! Thanks for asking

Wonderful. Expecting mine on 16th
It will be a long long week for both of us frown.gif

As of June 2013:
2,712 Bluray movies
1,593 DVD movies
356 bluray+DVD series
1,322 bluray+DVD Anime
Halimali is offline  
post #5506 of 12514 Old 05-10-2013, 11:16 PM
Advanced Member
 
Halimali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
These threads are moving way fast.
I guess you just need to put F8500 in the title and the thread will move and move with posts eek.gif

As of June 2013:
2,712 Bluray movies
1,593 DVD movies
356 bluray+DVD series
1,322 bluray+DVD Anime
Halimali is offline  
post #5507 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 01:48 AM
Member
 
Top_Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

OK, so just back from the shootout and really tired. So if I sound incoherent, that's because I am.

For me, the biggest surprises were the effectiveness of the filter on the ZT60. Yes, it really does help that panel in typical room lighting while displaying blacks. But as I said at the shootout, the same filter that's effective in combating room light also robs the panel of a precious 5flt of brightness.

Second surprise, and I'm not sure how it showed up on your screens at home, but the Panasonics seriously clip white. Half the scale was missing on the Panasonics and the entire scale was visible on the Samsung. Kevin Miller told me it was obvious that Panasonic designed this panel for blacks and were very aware they were sacrificing brightness in the process. I asked if it was possible to get more than the 30ftl from the ZT60 or 35ftl from the VT60. The answer was a definitive 'no'. It's already clipping at the levels they calibrated them at. On the flip side, I believe it was David who thought for actual material it probably wouldn't be all the visible...................................................................................................................................................................................

As usual a very interesting read. Much appreciated. BIG THANKS smile.gif
Quote:
Wonderful. Expecting mine on 16th
It will be a long long week for both of us

Congrats! Lucky Halimali, lucky Ken, lucky owners and future owners (including me biggrin.gif, waiting for prices but hopefully in a few weeks my oldie but more or less goodie C8000 will be resting in the bedroom).

Best Regards smile.gif
Top_Cat is offline  
post #5508 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 03:00 AM
AVS Special Member
 
gmarceau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked: 58
Samsung really made a revolutionary leap in brightness and considering the kind of light output it's capable of, even with it's strong filter, that makes you think it could be brighter than an LED if that filter wasn't on the panel.

Did anyone catch D-Nice saying he calibrated an ST60 with a light output of 60fL?

I wouldn't be surprised if people decide to go ST60 or F8500.

"If you weren't such an ignorant troll, you'd be adorable" -rogo
gmarceau is offline  
post #5509 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 03:20 AM
Senior Member
 
floridaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmetto, Florida
Posts: 262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

OK, so just back from the shootout and really tired. So if I sound incoherent, that's because I am.

For me, the biggest surprises were the effectiveness of the filter on the ZT60. Yes, it really does help that panel in typical room lighting while displaying blacks. But as I said at the shootout, the same filter that's effective in combating room light also robs the panel of a precious 5flt of brightness.

Second surprise, and I'm not sure how it showed up on your screens at home, but the Panasonics seriously clip white. Half the scale was missing on the Panasonics and the entire scale was visible on the Samsung. Kevin Miller told me it was obvious that Panasonic designed this panel for blacks and were very aware they were sacrificing brightness in the process. I asked if it was possible to get more than the 30ftl from the ZT60 or 35ftl from the VT60. The answer was a definitive 'no'. It's already clipping at the levels they calibrated them at. On the flip side, I believe it was David who thought for actual material it probably wouldn't be all the visible.

I agree with what some of you saw regarding color saturation on the 8500. At times it looked a bit less saturated. At other times, such as when they played Skyfall, the colors looked identical to the ZT60 & VT60. I mean identical. I don't know why a few other times it appeared a bit less saturated. I also thought the 8500 was a bit redder than the VT & ZT. But it's important to note that all the calibrators said to me that the 8500 was absolutely tracking properly and was fully in compliance with Rec709. I believe it was D-Nice who said if you turned off the VT & ZT, you'd never see the disparity. Kevin Miller absolutely felt the 8500 was extremely accurate.

At times the black levels of the ZT looked a bit better than the VT, but that was primarily when the room lighting was on. Once off, they looked identical. The big surprise to me was at the end when they played the Kuro demo reel that was designed to highlight blacks. I'm telling you guys, 95% of that demo looked IDENTICAL on all 3 panels. The other 5% of the time I gave the edge to the ZT & VT.

I don't know if it came across on your monitors, but at times the brightness advantage was very obvious on the 8500, but not as often as you might think. I don't believe the material they played, IMO, really highlighted the brightness differences. When was the disparity the most obvious? If you caught the period when they were playing around with Directv, the brightness differences were at times, huge. It was during those times that the screen had the largest % of bright areas. Hello ABL!

The Panasonic clearly has some issues such as calibration, clipping & 3D resolution. I personally don't care about 3D, but I know some of you guys do.

Although I was initially surprised at how well the ZT handled the room lighting, by the end of the night I came to the conclusion that, IMO, the 8500 has the most versatile qualities and did more things better than the other panels. The black levels are really close and the Kuro demo showed that in spades. But there's no question that if your biggest concern is MLL, than the ZT/VT is your best choice. Personally, if I was choosing between the 2, I'd go for the ZT if you had the extra cash. I really believe that filter does enough in terms of combating room lights and keeping black levels respectable, that it's worth the extra cost. But IMO, it simply is not a versatile panel. It does one thing better than the others, many other things as well as the others and falls woefully short in the brightness department.

Forgot about apparent sharpness. No surprises there, the Samsung looked the sharpest.

Oh yes, I ordered the F8500. smile.gif

Nighty night.
Completely agree about the Panasonic clipping the whites. It clips nearly 50% of the whites which was just another reason I returned the VT60. Panasonic IMO took a step backwards with the exception of the black levels. I suspect a lot of people will be canceling the ZT60 pre orders. Samsung truly stepped it this year and I am overly impressed with the F8500. You could say it is one of the best plasma sets ever!
floridaman is offline  
post #5510 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 03:55 AM
Member
 
Plutotype's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Watched the DVR stream. My first impressions from the shootout:

I think, the F8500 is different from all 3 ZT, VT and KURO. D-Nice confirmed they calibrated it to 40ftl, while the Panasonics couldnt go higher than 35ftl. The max standard is 35ftl and that is why its a standard = going higher can crush whites. Regarding Panasonics whites - there was a white pattern, where I think it showed, Panasonics cant be pushed to 35ftl peak whites = they crush the whites then. The winning whites of the F8500 caused the captured stream I observe as "too much white". Maybe Ken ( attended the shootout ) can confirm, the white details on F8500 ARE NOT LOST in any way as the F8500 is much brighter and "whiter" as the other sets. Are the yellow whites on other Panasonics correct and F8500 is wrong?
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/F8500whites_zpse9cde3d3.jpg.html

ZT max is at 30ftl, VT can go higher. But there is a issue. I did a snapshot from the 2013 VE Shootout and recommend you to watch the day 1 replay at the 1hour 26min mark.
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/WhitespatternZTvsF8500_zps7c556f06.jpg.html
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/WhitespatternZTvsF8500-2_zpsd07df1eb.jpg.html

Colors on the F8500 looked too luminant to me or better said less saturated than the other 3 sets. But who confirms, which TV adds colors saturation on the top and what if F8500 is the reference and other 3 are a little oversaturated?

I liked the colors and whites on KURO though smile.gif

Hmm..
Plutotype is offline  
post #5511 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 04:29 AM
Advanced Member
 
Halimali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top_Cat View Post

As usual a very interesting read. Much appreciated. BIG THANKS smile.gif
Congrats! Lucky Halimali, lucky Ken, lucky owners and future owners (including me biggrin.gif, waiting for prices but hopefully in a few weeks my oldie but more or less goodie C8000 will be resting in the bedroom).

Best Regards smile.gif

Thank you cat. I hope you will be an owner very soon smile.gif

As of June 2013:
2,712 Bluray movies
1,593 DVD movies
356 bluray+DVD series
1,322 bluray+DVD Anime
Halimali is offline  
post #5512 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 04:34 AM
Advanced Member
 
Halimali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plutotype View Post

Watched the DVR stream. My first impressions from the shootout:

I think, the F8500 is different from all 3 ZT, VT and KURO. D-Nice confirmed they calibrated it to 40ftl, while the Panasonics couldnt go higher than 35ftl. The max standard is 35ftl and that is why its a standard = going higher can crush whites. Regarding Panasonics whites - there was a white pattern, where I think, Panasonics cant be pushed to 35ftl peak whites = they crush the whites then. The winning whites of the F8500 caused the captured stream I observe as "too much white". Maybe Ken ( attended the shootout ) can confirm, the white details on F8500 ARE NOT LOST in any way as the F8500 is much brighter and "whiter" as the other sets. Are the yellow whites on other Panasonics correct and F8500 is wrong?
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/F8500whites_zpse9cde3d3.jpg.html

ZT max is at 30ftl, VT can go higher. But there is a issue. I did a snapshot from the 2013 VE Shootout and recommend you to watch the day 1 replay at the 1hour 26min mark.
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/WhitespatternZTvsF8500_zps7c556f06.jpg.html
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/WhitespatternZTvsF8500-2_zpsd07df1eb.jpg.html

Colors on the F8500 looked too luminant to me or better said less saturated than the other 3 sets. But who confirms, which TV adds colors saturation on the top and what if F8500 is the reference and other 3 are a little oversaturated?

I liked the colors and whites on KURO though smile.gif

Hmm..

In your first picture (face of a woman) I can't say the brand of the TVs as it is not visible but what I can say is that I'm liking the middle TV most followed by the one in the right then the one in the left

So what are these TVs?

As of June 2013:
2,712 Bluray movies
1,593 DVD movies
356 bluray+DVD series
1,322 bluray+DVD Anime
Halimali is offline  
post #5513 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 04:43 AM
AVS Special Member
 
airgas1998's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 42degsN 92degsW
Posts: 2,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halimali View Post

In your first picture (face of a woman) I can't say the brand of the TVs as it is not visible but what I can say is that I'm liking the middle TV most followed by the one in the right then the one in the left

So what are these TVs?

that would be: 8500,vt,zt in the order that you chose.

Habit Forming....Wallet Burning Hobby....

64" Samsung F8500 Plasma
55" Samsung B8500 Full Array Lcd
Channel Master Dvr
Onkyo 818
Crown xls-2000
Sony Blu-Ray 790
Svs Ultra Towers/Center, Energy Rc-50 Surround
Svs Pb-13 Ultra Sub
airgas1998 is offline  
post #5514 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 04:53 AM
Advanced Member
 
Halimali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by airgas1998 View Post

that would be: 8500,vt,zt in the order that you chose.

So it is THE F8500?
looks GORGEOUS. I'm liking its white very much. It looks like the white of LED
I'm in love tongue.gif

As of June 2013:
2,712 Bluray movies
1,593 DVD movies
356 bluray+DVD series
1,322 bluray+DVD Anime
Halimali is offline  
post #5515 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 04:56 AM
Advanced Member
 
Pinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by agkss View Post

Congrats for your choice and thanks for info...i think i will wait for 2014 models for both brands.

Agkss I have to say you have great willpower being able to hold off with this years choices smile.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHir View Post

Did I hear correctly, early on tonight from the Samsung rep, that one could upgrade the processor to get picture quality improvements that come each year (assuming hardware still the same)? In other words, if next year's F8500 is still the same hardware, but they make software PQ tweaks, can you get those in your 2013 model?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

Yes you can Dave. A really wonderful concept.

That's incredible, I take it it's in the Evolution Kit? Damn if that's the case and with the 4 year upgrade window on the Evolution Kits you can practically have a new TV every year for the next 4 years fit $299 biggrin.gif
I myself would prob upgrade the E Kit every 2 years...
Pinger is offline  
post #5516 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 05:06 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Chad B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 2,069
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

We're OT but what am I missing in regards to the 96 hz mode of the VT where blacks went below 0.001 fL? Does this alter the picture to the extent that it throws off one's calibration?
No, it didn't throw it off significantly. There were tiny differences, but then with the quirky calibration there were tiny differences between runs no matter what.

touring calibrator
Jeti 1211

Latest reviews:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Chad B is online now  
post #5517 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 05:53 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,985
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plutotype View Post

Watched the DVR stream. My first impressions from the shootout:

I think, the F8500 is different from all 3 ZT, VT and KURO. D-Nice confirmed they calibrated it to 40ftl, while the Panasonics couldnt go higher than 35ftl. The max standard is 35ftl and that is why its a standard = going higher can crush whites. Regarding Panasonics whites - there was a white pattern, where I think it showed, Panasonics cant be pushed to 35ftl peak whites = they crush the whites then. The winning whites of the F8500 caused the captured stream I observe as "too much white". Maybe Ken ( attended the shootout ) can confirm, the white details on F8500 ARE NOT LOST in any way as the F8500 is much brighter and "whiter" as the other sets. Are the yellow whites on other Panasonics correct and F8500 is wrong?
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/F8500whites_zpse9cde3d3.jpg.html

ZT max is at 30ftl, VT can go higher. But there is a issue. I did a snapshot from the 2013 VE Shootout and recommend you to watch the day 1 replay at the 1hour 26min mark.
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/WhitespatternZTvsF8500_zps7c556f06.jpg.html
http://s1281.photobucket.com/user/Plutotype/media/WhitespatternZTvsF8500-2_zpsd07df1eb.jpg.html

Colors on the F8500 looked too luminant to me or better said less saturated than the other 3 sets. But who confirms, which TV adds colors saturation on the top and what if F8500 is the reference and other 3 are a little oversaturated?

I liked the colors and whites on KURO though smile.gif

Hmm..

Pluto, the stream was "killing" the white samples you were showing. Once the cameraman zoomed in on the set and the autofocus came in you were actually able to see where the clipping was (partially) at any distance it was not visable.

I should mention that you should take what you see via the stream with a HUGE grain of salt as the camer is introducing things you will never see in person.

Looking forward to seeing the results (calibration) and Q&A today.....
KMFDMvsEnya likes this.
Ph8te is online now  
post #5518 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 05:54 AM
 
pieandchips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,944
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 169
There's no way cell light was at 20 for that 35 fL F8500.
pieandchips is offline  
post #5519 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 05:58 AM
AVS Special Member
 
mbyrnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Media, PA (outside Philly)
Posts: 3,415
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Liked: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by pieandchips View Post

There's no way cell light was at 20 for that 35 fL F8500.

I don't think it was at 35 fL. I thought at the beginning they said that they calibrated to 40 fL if possible (Pannys couldn't) and that they let the others get as bright as they could without ruining the picture. I think the F8500 was at something like 56 fL. Maybe someone else will remember the exact number.

One question I have is what mode was the F8500 in? The one setting lowers blacks but then it loses shadow detail right? Hopefully someone can chime in who was there.

Xbox Live: TheRealMaxPower --- PSN: TheRealMaxPower

 

Panasonic TC-P65VT60    Vienna Acoustic Mozart Grands    Onkyo TX-SR805   Sony BDP-S790

Astro Mixamp 2013   Schiit Modi    AKG K702 65th Anniversary   Antlion ModMic    Sennheiser PC360

Theater- Benq W1070    Elite 120" projection...

mbyrnes is offline  
post #5520 of 12514 Old 05-11-2013, 06:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,985
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by pieandchips View Post

There's no way cell light was at 20 for that 35 fL F8500.

It was at 16 for most of the night....
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyrnes View Post

I don't think it was at 35 fL. I thought at the beginning they said that they calibrated to 40 fL if possible (Pannys couldn't) and that they let the others get as bright as they could without ruining the picture. I think the F8500 was at something like 56 fL. Maybe someone else will remember the exact number.

One question I have is what mode was the F8500 in? The one setting lowers blacks but then it loses shadow detail right? Hopefully someone can chime in who was there.

All of the sets were calibrated for 40ftL except for the 2 Panasonics which were not able to be calibrated that high....

The set was in movie mode...After the update I do not believe it looses shadow detail with the black optimizer on. If tt was crushing blacks it would have come up during the black pattern display.....
Ph8te is online now  
Reply Plasma Flat Panel Displays

Tags
Samsung Pn51f8500 51 Inch 3d Smart Plasma Hdtv
Gear in this thread - Pn51f8500 by PriceGrabber.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off