Official Samsung PNxxF8500 Series Discussion Thread [No Street Price Talk] - Page 411 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #12301 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 04:58 AM
Member
 
ParityBit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked: 10
How is real world gaming on this panel? Xbox/PS gaming that is. I have read/been told Sports looks amazing on it, so I am now interested in the game aspect. I know movies/TV will look great.

I am waffling between the 64 and some 4K TV's. Unfortunatly, there is nowhere I can test/see/play around with the F8500.


Thanks!
ParityBit is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12302 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 09:27 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
Keenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 27,969
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by wxman View Post
Since you are getting a 2014 model, the rising black issue has been fixed. You really don't want that with a plasma. Rising blacks reduce overall contrast and blacks do not look as black.
Can you expand on this? Or is there a posting somewhere that goes into this "issue" in detail?
Keenan is offline  
post #12303 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 09:46 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,316
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Liked: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keenan View Post
Can you expand on this? Or is there a posting somewhere that goes into this "issue" in detail?

Well it was discussed back in the early days of this thread. It was in the first few months or so of release when it was heavily discussed.

Ever since some grey market retailer said there was a 2013/2014 model it seems it has caught on. There are no 2014 models. There are 2013 models built in 2014 however. These 2014 build models since they come with newer software are more than likely to have most of the fixes that were issues early on. One of the biggest was that black level would rise when CS was engaged. This however was fixed awhile ago I believe.


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
Ph8te is offline  
post #12304 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 09:48 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,316
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Liked: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by wxman View Post
The FW would have to be before 1114 and a build date before November 2013. that's what came with the tv I bought in January. Probably have to find out what the initial FW was with the tv. Then you have the issue if you do find one with the initial FW or one prior to 1114, you have rising blacks using cinema smooth.

Not only that l, but then you would need someone to go firmware by firmware to see which one is "the" one. I'm not sure anyone has the time or money for that endeavor here


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
Ph8te is offline  
post #12305 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 09:50 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
Keenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 27,969
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ph8te View Post
Well it was discussed back in the early days of this thread. It was in the first few months or so of release when it was heavily discussed.

Ever since some grey market retailer said there was a 2013/2014 model it seems it has caught on. There are no 2014 models. There are 2013 models built in 2014 however. These 2014 build models since they come with newer software are more than likely to have most of the fixes that were issues early on. One of the biggest was that black level would rise when CS was engaged. This however was fixed awhile ago I believe.


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
Okay, so the later production displays do not have this "rising black level" issue?

I was reading it the other way around I guess, that the later ones were firmware upgraded and the display ended up with worse black levels.
Keenan is offline  
post #12306 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 09:53 AM
Senior Member
 
mightymouseusf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keenan View Post
Okay, so the later production displays do not have this "rising black level" issue?

I was reading it the other way around I guess, that the later ones were firmware upgraded and the display ended up with worse black levels.
Chad B stated over on the other forum that he doubts the variance in light output was due to any firmware update. He's recently calibrated tv's that have output numbers in the 60s. Since he was the one that noted the difference in light output over the models he's calibrated to begin with, I tend to believe him.

Official Samsung PNxxF8500 Owners Thread (No Street Price Talk)
mightymouseusf is offline  
post #12307 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 11:09 AM
Member
 
dusty123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 56
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I got a Question for everybody if these new tv's are coming with a new firmware what is the difference in FW1120 compared to FW1200 that is on these new 2014 made sets Are we ever going to see firmware 1200
dusty123 is offline  
post #12308 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 11:22 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
Keenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 27,969
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightymouseusf View Post
Chad B stated over on the other forum that he doubts the variance in light output was due to any firmware update. He's recently calibrated tv's that have output numbers in the 60s. Since he was the one that noted the difference in light output over the models he's calibrated to begin with, I tend to believe him.

Official Samsung PNxxF8500 Owners Thread (No Street Price Talk)
I confess that while I did start at the beginning of the thread I also skipped ahead when ever the discussion veered off into non-topic areas and I may have missed the brightness discussion. I did see the posts over the last few days but it feels as if there's some crucial information missing that was talked about earlier.

Just so I understand, there appears to be a variance in the brightness levels between different panels of the very same model(F8500)? Is this a critical issue, or something not to worry about? From reading Chad B's post it seems as if they do vary but it's irrelevant as far as the final calibrated image goes. Is this a correct assessment, or is there more to it?

Thanks
Keenan is offline  
post #12309 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 11:34 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ph8te's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,316
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Liked: 270
It depends how much brightness you want/need. Most calibrators calibrate to 35/40 ftL or lower for TVs They can go higher for a "day mode" and that's where it will vary on bwo high it can get.


Sent from my Flip Phone using DOS
Chad B likes this.
Ph8te is offline  
post #12310 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 12:37 PM
Senior Member
 
mightymouseusf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keenan View Post
I confess that while I did start at the beginning of the thread I also skipped ahead when ever the discussion veered off into non-topic areas and I may have missed the brightness discussion. I did see the posts over the last few days but it feels as if there's some crucial information missing that was talked about earlier.

Just so I understand, there appears to be a variance in the brightness levels between different panels of the very same model(F8500)? Is this a critical issue, or something not to worry about? From reading Chad B's post it seems as if they do vary but it's irrelevant as far as the final calibrated image goes. Is this a correct assessment, or is there more to it?

Thanks
I'm not sure. Chad, if you're reading, could you clarify?

I suspect it's much the same reason why one person's calibration settings won't necessarily be spot on (or even close for that matter) for someone else' panel of the same model. Just panel variation in manufacturing.
mightymouseusf is offline  
post #12311 of 12314 Old 07-23-2014, 02:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Chad B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 2,038
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked: 310
See Ph8te's response above. The light output variation that I have seen on the F8500 may or may not be a limitation for a Day mode, depending on the environment and owner's tastes.

Yes, required settings also vary widely from set to set. There are some settings, like sharpness, that don't vary at all from one set to the next. Other settings, like CMS, brightness, contrast, etc vary somewhat but show strong family traits. Finally, you have the 2 and 10 point white balance controls that vary significantly from one set to the next. One interesting aspect of this is that even though CMS controls tend to be similar (though not identical) from set to set, unless the white balance is correct they will be thrown off. In other words, many of the controls are dependent on others being right in order for them to be right.
Keenan, Ph8te, chunon and 4 others like this.
Chad B is offline  
post #12312 of 12314 Old Yesterday, 07:42 AM
Member
 
jpdyson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 44
I've read through most of this thread, but I'm trying to get a grasp on the current input lag situation (sorry if the numbers are off; this is based on what I can glean from disparate sources).

It seems like at one point you had to enable Game Mode AND rename your input to PC in order to get the best lag scores (around 60ms); is that still the case? Some of the more recent posts seem to suggest that the PC re-name no longer matters; does that mean that:

A: the minimum input lag is the same as before (60ms), but available with Game Mode no matter what you name the input, or

B: the minimum input lag is now higher than before (80ms), as has always been available to Game Mode and some other input name?

If 60ms if input lag is still achievable, I'm currently planning to replace an older Samsung plasma (PN50B860) with the 51". I'm already a believer in the plasma master race, but what kind of PQ boost am I looking at here?
jpdyson is offline  
post #12313 of 12314 Old Yesterday, 09:57 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
Keenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 27,969
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 152 Post(s)
Liked: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad B View Post
See Ph8te's response above. The light output variation that I have seen on the F8500 may or may not be a limitation for a Day mode, depending on the environment and owner's tastes.

Yes, required settings also vary widely from set to set. There are some settings, like sharpness, that don't vary at all from one set to the next. Other settings, like CMS, brightness, contrast, etc vary somewhat but show strong family traits. Finally, you have the 2 and 10 point white balance controls that vary significantly from one set to the next. One interesting aspect of this is that even though CMS controls tend to be similar (though not identical) from set to set, unless the white balance is correct they will be thrown off. In other words, many of the controls are dependent on others being right in order for them to be right.
Thanks!

Given that 95% of my viewing is at night with the balance being almost exclusively sports broadcasts which are usually brightly lit images anyway it sounds like this "quirk" will be a non-issue for me.


(BTW, as you may already know, the links in your signature are broken. I posted in the forum op center about broken links and was directed to another thread on how to fix them. That thread is at The reason links in AVS Do/Don't Work Why this can not be done by the forum software people is unknown to me. )

Last edited by Keenan; Yesterday at 12:11 PM.
Keenan is offline  
post #12314 of 12314 Old Yesterday, 02:27 PM
Member
 
markus46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdyson View Post
...I'm currently planning to replace an older Samsung plasma (PN50B860) with the 51". I'm already a believer in the plasma master race, but what kind of PQ boost am I looking at here?
I replaced a 50B850 with a 60F8500. Certainly the F8500 has far better black levels and more 'pop'. I am continually amazed by the PQ. Caveats:
  • I am not a gamer
  • I had the F8500 professionally calibrated whereas the B850 was calibrated by eye using the Spears & Munsil disc.

Good luck!
markus46 is offline  
Reply Plasma Flat Panel Displays

Tags
Samsung Pn51f8500 51 Inch 3d Smart Plasma Hdtv
Gear in this thread

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off