ST60 vs F8500: How much better is the bright room performance? - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!



Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-13-2013, 02:07 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
benz5521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked: 26
I picked up an ST60 a few days ago and it's a great TV. However, it's in my living room in my apartment and I often watch stuff during the day. I'm finding out now that the F8500 gets brighter and has an anti-reflective coating for better bright room performance. How much of a difference is there? I'm contemplating whether it's worth boxing this ST60 up and taking it back to Best Buy to get an F8500. There's also the 900 premium for the 50" versions, but that's ok with me if the performance difference is noticeable.
benz5521 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-13-2013, 03:23 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RWetmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brick, New Jersey
Posts: 3,754
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 323 Post(s)
Liked: 174
Yes, I believe the F8500 can go quite a bit brighter. At least 10 fL. - probably more.
RWetmore is offline  
Old 12-13-2013, 06:23 PM
AVS Special Member
 
fierce_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,956
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1535 Post(s)
Liked: 1465
the f8500 is capable of led-like brightness. I'd estimate it to be about 80-90% as bright as the led's on the market now. quite impressive really!

as for the filter, it's REALLY aggressive, but only vertically. horizontal lighting(like windows beside the tv) basically aren't effected at all. this is necessary to maintain the wide horizontal viewing angle. where the f8500's filter really stands out is with overhead lighting. any pot lights, or other room lighting over head is nearly completed blocked out.

so depending on what the lights source is, it may make a huge difference, or little. I don't think either display is going to cope well with daylight shining through open windows(heck lcd's can't cope with this either) and in that situation blinds go a long way.

as far as brightness is compared, I've read reviews that indicate the f8500 is nearly TWICE as bright. seems like every review site gets different numbers though, so who knows. here's a couple examples of comparable reviews from the same review site.

f8500 ~215: http://televisions.reviewed.com/content/samsung-f8500-review-2/the-science
st60 ~ 132: http://televisions.reviewed.com/content/panasonic-st60-review/the-science

f8500 ~ 188: http://www.flatpanelshd.com/review.php?subaction=showfull&id=1375254254
st60 ~ 93: http://www.flatpanelshd.com/review.php?subaction=showfull&id=1366730214

Displays: Samsung PN64F8500/JVC X35
AVR: Pioneer VSX-1130K, 7.1/5.1.2 audio
Sources: HTPC(Enby), PS3, XBOX360, Wii
Control: Harmony One
fierce_gt is offline  
Old 12-13-2013, 06:42 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
benz5521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked: 26
Hmm, those numbers make it appealing to make the switch.

Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
benz5521 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 

Tags
Panasonic Tc P50st60 50 Inch 3d Smart Plasma Hdtv , Samsung Pn51f8500 51 Inch 3d Smart Plasma Hdtv
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off