HD Tracks quality? Please share your experience about this download service - Page 5 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!



Forum Jump: 
 25Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #121 of 146 Old 12-07-2015, 10:43 PM
Senior Member
 
hogger129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Dark Side Of The Moon
Posts: 292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichB View Post
I don't make a buying decision based HD versus CD or SACD for inherent quality.
There are many SACD's where the DR metrics are far superior and they sound much better.

I don't think that has anything to do with the recording format.
The DR Database is a good source where you can find differences in compression and at least use it as a data point where a different master is in play.

http://dr.loudness-war.info/

- Rich
I don't either. I aim for getting the best mastering job I can. Usually I get that with the audiophile CDs and SACDs.
hogger129 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #122 of 146 Old 12-08-2015, 06:21 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Gooddoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,491
Mentioned: 105 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked: 1430
I've found a lot of the high resolution stuff to sound like crap. I often listen to stuff streaming on Deezer or Rhapsody that's sounds absolutely amazing. It's the mastering that is key IMO, not the resolution.
Gooddoc is offline  
post #123 of 146 Old 12-08-2015, 09:54 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 184
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gooddoc View Post
I've found a lot of the high resolution stuff to sound like crap. I often listen to stuff streaming on Deezer or Rhapsody that's sounds absolutely amazing. It's the mastering that is key IMO, not the resolution.
+1,000,000 (if i could vote a million times)
pablolie is offline  
post #124 of 146 Old 12-09-2015, 05:53 PM
Advanced Member
 
BufordTJustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 692
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by CruelInventions View Post
You held it together remarkably well.





Oh wait. Well you almost made it to the end!

I know it's off topic, but CruelInventions, your commentary on his post just slayed me.

Arcam AVR300, Adcom GFA-5500 (Main L+R), Panny BDT-500 Media Transport, Toshiba SD-9200 CD Transport, Vizio XVT 55" LED/LCD (full direct-backlit w/ local dimming), Arx A5 & A3rx-c Mains, Arx A2rx-c center, HSU VTF-15h, BJC ten white w/ ultrasonically welded connectors.
BufordTJustice is offline  
post #125 of 146 Old 12-09-2015, 06:17 PM
AVS Special Member
 
CruelInventions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago-ish
Posts: 5,204
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 352 Post(s)
Liked: 481
Thanks. I try to amuse. At least myself if no one else!


CruelInventions is offline  
post #126 of 146 Old 12-18-2015, 06:34 PM
Member
 
rdeyoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Somewhere in Los Angeles
Posts: 179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 74 Post(s)
Liked: 61
Any Star Wars fans here want to try out the new Force Awakens soundtrack on HDTracks for us? http://www.hdtracks.com/star-wars-th...ndtrack-274441

Comes in 96/24 and 192/24. It would be interesting to see (graphs?) how the 96/24 compares to the regular cd version.

I also have a question - there was an album I was interested in getting in HD (London Grammar - If You Wait) - but the only "HD" version is 44.1/24-bit... is 24 bit going to even provide a better sound when the samplerate is still 44.1?


Forgive my ignorance :P

Lighting Artist for Walt Disney Animation Studios
Current Setup:
Pioneer Elite VSX-92TXH AVR
Klipsch RF-7ii, RC-64ii, RS-62ii
Samsung UNC558000 3DTV
PS3, XBone, X360
rdeyoung is online now  
post #127 of 146 Old 12-19-2015, 12:03 PM
Oppo Beta Group
 
RichB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 9,458
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyoung View Post
Any Star Wars fans here want to try out the new Force Awakens soundtrack on HDTracks for us? http://www.hdtracks.com/star-wars-th...ndtrack-274441

Comes in 96/24 and 192/24. It would be interesting to see (graphs?) how the 96/24 compares to the regular cd version.

I also have a question - there was an album I was interested in getting in HD (London Grammar - If You Wait) - but the only "HD" version is 44.1/24-bit... is 24 bit going to even provide a better sound when the samplerate is still 44.1?

Forgive my ignorance :P
I find the inclusion of 192 and 96 at different price-points confusing:

If the 192 is the source resolution, then the 96 is down-sampled.
If the 96 is the source resolution, then the 192 is up-sampled.

If HDTracks is not upsampling, the "native" resolution, then on this track $2 pays for bandwidth and storage.
Still that seems high.
IMO, all formats should be the same price.

- Rich

Oppo BDP-105D | Oppo HA-1 | Emotiva XMC-1 | Oppo PM-1 | ATI Signature AT6002 x 2 + AT6006 | Revel Salon2s, Voice2, Studio2s | Velodyne HGS-15

Last edited by RichB; 12-19-2015 at 12:15 PM.
RichB is online now  
post #128 of 146 Old 12-29-2015, 05:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
kucharsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 5,629
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1084 Post(s)
Liked: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdeyoung View Post
I also have a question - there was an album I was interested in getting in HD (London Grammar - If You Wait) - but the only "HD" version is 44.1/24-bit... is 24 bit going to even provide a better sound when the samplerate is still 44.1?
In theory yes, because of the greater sample depth. At the very least there's the possibility of better sound.
kucharsk is offline  
post #129 of 146 Old 02-04-2016, 09:49 AM
Member
 
cameronreddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Why is no one talking about how the music was RECORDED?

Matters not how large the word depth or sampling rate if the studio was horrible acoustically, if the microphones were junk or poorly placed, if the engineer had no idea how to double mic a snare or a kick, if the boob setting microphones for the acoustic guitar had only one near the sound hole, or pointed it just a bit off.

And this is to say nothing of the quality of the preamps into which the microphones were plugged. Or the quality of the sound board. Or the quality of the compressor/limiters, the attack and sustain settings, the quality of the EQ and it's settings... And for goodness sake, what about the vocal mic? Is it a POS or a top-shelf Neumann? What kind of pop filter was used in front of it, or was one used at all? Did the singer know to pull her face away a bit on a hard-hit note and thereby necessitate less compression? Tell me the names of the gear used and I can give you an idea if at least the equipment had the capability to make a great recording.

Diana Krall sounds so dang good on her studio recordings because (this is obvious to me though i have no direct knowledge) the people involved had great equipment and used it well. Listen carefully and you can hear her piano bench creak under her derriere on some recordings. I can hear the saliva in her mouth because the mic was so good, sensitive, and close (and likely used with no pop filter).

This all takes place BEFORE any mastering and bit depth business...

I'm trying to get my head around all this high-def music format stuff, and I'm disappointed that there is so little discussion of the recording process. It starts there...
BufordTJustice likes this.
cameronreddy is offline  
post #130 of 146 Old 02-04-2016, 11:17 AM
AVS Special Member
 
MSmith83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,156
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked: 191
I’ve bought a lot of high-resolution classical recordings that were mastered brilliantly. As for the more popular stuff, the ZZ Top, Van Halen, Tom Petty, Donna Summer, Rush (2015 masters done by Sean Magee), Miles Davis and Herbie Hancock high-resolution offerings were mastered marvelously as well.

Recording quality is obviously most important, but that is out of an engineer's control for these reissues.
MSmith83 is offline  
post #131 of 146 Old 02-04-2016, 03:10 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thehun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Drought and flood at the same time. CA
Posts: 8,524
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichB View Post
I find the inclusion of 192 and 96 at different price-points confusing:

If the 192 is the source resolution, then the 96 is down-sampled.
If the 96 is the source resolution, then the 192 is up-sampled.

If HDTracks is not upsampling, the "native" resolution, then on this track $2 pays for bandwidth and storage.
Still that seems high.
IMO, all formats should be the same price.

- Rich
Agreed, not to mention the fact that a large portion of the tracks comes from analog masters, that can't even reach CD "resolution", so using larger buckets are completely useless and superfluous for these sources, and not worth any premium price IMO. I can only imagine if they converted them to DSD they would charge even more, like some other vendors do, but lots of suckers would pay nonetheless.

De sagittis Hungarorum libera nos, Domine!

The Hun
thehun is offline  
post #132 of 146 Old 02-04-2016, 05:37 PM
Advanced Member
 
BufordTJustice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 692
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Liked: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehun View Post
Agreed, not to mention the fact that a large portion of the tracks comes from analog masters, that can't even reach CD "resolution", so using larger buckets are completely useless and superfluous for these sources, and not worth any premium price IMO. I can only imagine if they converted them to DSD they would charge even more, like some other vendors do, but lots of suckers would pay nonetheless.
Eh, you'd be fairly shocked what one can accomplish on a quality reel-to-reel, using good tape stock, and running a high IPS....assuming the upstream stuff is in order, as others have stated.

Arcam AVR300, Adcom GFA-5500 (Main L+R), Panny BDT-500 Media Transport, Toshiba SD-9200 CD Transport, Vizio XVT 55" LED/LCD (full direct-backlit w/ local dimming), Arx A5 & A3rx-c Mains, Arx A2rx-c center, HSU VTF-15h, BJC ten white w/ ultrasonically welded connectors.
BufordTJustice is offline  
post #133 of 146 Old 02-04-2016, 07:27 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thehun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Drought and flood at the same time. CA
Posts: 8,524
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by BufordTJustice View Post
Eh, you'd be fairly shocked what one can accomplish on a quality reel-to-reel, using good tape stock, and running a high IPS....assuming the upstream stuff is in order, as others have stated.
No I wouldn't be shocked at all, the tape itself can be easily quantified in digital terms and no sorcery can change that, at best they would be around 15 bit resolution. Since I have lots DVD-A that was mastered from analog I know how well they can sound, which in some cases excellent indeed, but at the end of the day they are not true HI Rez.

De sagittis Hungarorum libera nos, Domine!

The Hun
thehun is offline  
post #134 of 146 Old 02-05-2016, 03:45 AM
Oppo Beta Group
 
RichB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 9,458
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked: 435
Somehow, I think the industry is missing the point.

Adele 25 has a DR rating of 5 and is a case when the mastering is atrocious:

http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...adele&album=25

The CD has a DR rating of 5 and the vinyl is 11.
I suppose the best option is to find a rip from a LP.

The CD sounds every bit as bad as it looks in Audition.

- Rich
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	AdeleHello.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	450.4 KB
ID:	1231177  
BGLeduc and DaverJ like this.

Oppo BDP-105D | Oppo HA-1 | Emotiva XMC-1 | Oppo PM-1 | ATI Signature AT6002 x 2 + AT6006 | Revel Salon2s, Voice2, Studio2s | Velodyne HGS-15
RichB is online now  
post #135 of 146 Old 02-05-2016, 05:02 PM
Senior Member
 
hedrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 383
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I doubt my ability to hear anything better than CD quality. But I have still started using HD tracks and another site or two rather than iTunes where possible. Simply because iTunes doesn't even give full CD quality. So I'd be happy if they just give clean copies of what's on the CD.
DaverJ and oryan_dunn like this.
hedrick is offline  
post #136 of 146 Old 02-10-2016, 12:18 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thehun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Drought and flood at the same time. CA
Posts: 8,524
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichB View Post
Somehow, I think the industry is missing the point.

Adele 25 has a DR rating of 5 and is a case when the mastering is atrocious:

http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...adele&album=25

The CD has a DR rating of 5 and the vinyl is 11.
I suppose the best option is to find a rip from a LP.

The CD sounds every bit as bad as it looks in Audition.

- Rich
The previous album was not much better either. Typical pop fare.
Here is Dream Theater: The Astonishing with 0 difference between the "high res" and the CD releases.

http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...he+Astonishing
One of the flattest sounding album I've heard recently, a disaster really. Don't waste your money on the HD Track or Pono versions.
DaverJ likes this.

De sagittis Hungarorum libera nos, Domine!

The Hun
thehun is offline  
post #137 of 146 Old 02-10-2016, 03:54 PM
AVS Special Member
 
MSmith83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,156
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked: 191
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehun View Post
The previous album was not much better either. Typical pop fare.
Here is Dream Theater: The Astonishing with 0 difference between the "high res" and the CD releases.

http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/li...he+Astonishing
One of the flattest sounding album I've heard recently, a disaster really. Don't waste your money on the HD Track or Pono versions.
Damn. No power cable is fancy enough to fix that mess. Putting the HDtracks download in a folder titled "Audiophile" might help. Perhaps not, since such folders cannot be sold (or can they?).

With my juvenile-level joke out of the way, I must say that it's a shame that so many modern recordings sound so flat. The sound is so difficult to enjoy that I cannot appreciate the artistry of the music itself.

Last edited by MSmith83; 02-10-2016 at 04:41 PM.
MSmith83 is offline  
post #138 of 146 Old 02-10-2016, 11:38 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thehun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Drought and flood at the same time. CA
Posts: 8,524
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSmith83 View Post
Damn. No power cable is fancy enough to fix that mess. Putting the HDtracks download in a folder titled "Audiophile" might help. Perhaps not, since such folders cannot be sold (or can they?).

With my juvenile-level joke out of the way, I must say that it's a shame that so many modern recordings sound so flat. The sound is so difficult to enjoy that I cannot appreciate the artistry of the music itself.
I can still appreciate the artistry as long as the music is good, but in the case of above mentioned The Astonishing, no amount of dynamics would resurrect that dead turkey. YMMV.

De sagittis Hungarorum libera nos, Domine!

The Hun
thehun is offline  
post #139 of 146 Old 02-14-2016, 09:11 AM
Senior Member
 
hogger129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Dark Side Of The Moon
Posts: 292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked: 74
What's the point in paying for sound you can't even hear? All they need to do is master CD and digital downloads from places like Google Play, iTunes and Amazon, correctly and faithful to the original recording.
hogger129 is offline  
post #140 of 146 Old 02-14-2016, 10:05 AM
AVS Special Member
 
DaverJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 8,029
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked: 3097
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogger129 View Post
What's the point in paying for sound you can't even hear? All they need to do is master CD and digital downloads from places like Google Play, iTunes and Amazon, correctly and faithful to the original recording.
That would be great! Unfortunately, the Loudness War continues.

But until the industry stops targeting the mixing of album masters to sound best on phone, car, computer speakers, and cheap earbuds, we have hi-rez files to listen to.

"My advice: don't spend money on therapy. Spend it in a record store." – Wim Wenders
DaverJ is online now  
post #141 of 146 Old 02-14-2016, 11:03 AM
Senior Member
 
hogger129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Dark Side Of The Moon
Posts: 292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaverJ View Post
That would be great! Unfortunately, the Loudness War continues.

But until the industry stops targeting the mixing of album masters to sound best on phone, car, computer speakers, and cheap earbuds, we have hi-rez files to listen to.
A lot of times those high-resolution files are the exact same master from which the MP3, M4A and others are sourced. Therefore you gain nothing once again. You're paying for sound you cannot hear.
thehun likes this.
hogger129 is offline  
post #142 of 146 Old 02-14-2016, 11:22 AM
AVS Special Member
 
DaverJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 8,029
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked: 3097
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogger129 View Post
A lot of times those high-resolution files are the exact same master from which the MP3, M4A and others are sourced. Therefore you gain nothing once again. You're paying for sound you cannot hear.
Sometimes, yes (the latest Dream Theater release). Other times, great care has been taken to the hi-rez versions (the latest Tom Petty re-masters).

This is the point of these threads - sharing info on what's worth the extra money for the higher resolution files, and what would be better served with a lossless CD rip or other alternative.

"My advice: don't spend money on therapy. Spend it in a record store." – Wim Wenders
DaverJ is online now  
post #143 of 146 Old 02-16-2016, 06:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thehun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Drought and flood at the same time. CA
Posts: 8,524
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogger129 View Post
A lot of times those high-resolution files are the exact same master from which the MP3, M4A and others are sourced. Therefore you gain nothing once again. You're paying for sound you cannot hear.
Yup, more often than not at least as far as popular music goes. Jazz, and Classical have a much better track record in this regard.But more importantly if the recording itself wasn't done in "HI RES"[capturing, recording, mixing] there is no reason to pay for "upsampling", which has zero benefit.

De sagittis Hungarorum libera nos, Domine!

The Hun
thehun is offline  
post #144 of 146 Old 02-17-2016, 07:40 AM
Senior Member
 
hogger129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Dark Side Of The Moon
Posts: 292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked: 74
I have had my hearing tested and I can't hear frequencies past ~18khz. I'm 29 years old. I'm not sure if that is normal deterioration for my age or if I have had some abnormal hearing loss. Therefore, "HD audio" at 24/88, 24/96, 24/192, etc, etc, is useless to me. You're paying for sound you can't hear. I am still going to stick to buying CDs as they usually offer the best potential sound at the best price; but again, it all goes back into how it is mastered. You can have a really crap sounding CD and a really great sounding low-bitrate MP3 if the mastering is done the right way. Those high-res files make more sense for mastering where you want to keep the source pure as possible, rather than for playback.
thehun likes this.

Last edited by hogger129; 02-17-2016 at 07:44 AM.
hogger129 is offline  
post #145 of 146 Old 02-18-2016, 07:23 AM
AVS Special Member
 
thehun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Drought and flood at the same time. CA
Posts: 8,524
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 533 Post(s)
Liked: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogger129 View Post
I have had my hearing tested and I can't hear frequencies past ~18khz. I'm 29 years old. I'm not sure if that is normal deterioration for my age or if I have had some abnormal hearing loss. Therefore, "HD audio" at 24/88, 24/96, 24/192, etc, etc, is useless to me. You're paying for sound you can't hear. I am still going to stick to buying CDs as they usually offer the best potential sound at the best price; but again, it all goes back into how it is mastered. You can have a really crap sounding CD and a really great sounding low-bitrate MP3 if the mastering is done the right way. Those high-res files make more sense for mastering where you want to keep the source pure as possible, rather than for playback.
Agreed.

De sagittis Hungarorum libera nos, Domine!

The Hun
thehun is offline  
post #146 of 146 Old 02-19-2016, 05:55 AM
Member
 
Airsculpture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked: 16
This has been a very interesting read as I have recently downloaded some 24/96 tracks
Airsculpture is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply 2-Channel Audio

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off