as all know i not "always" agree to peters statments
but he was right
about the decrease of picture quality when you use even the
best isco anamorphic lenses.
as i had 1 year ago 2 christie hd6k i can easy test it with the isco lens in front and the other without.
both on the same screen both the same way calibratet and just to
compensate the light one was drop in lamp level 30% down to have
the same lumen at the screen.
who have such a test set up and can see it this way?
its may not day and night but you easy can see that the image with the
isco not looks as good as the pr
i show it to some very knowing people and some
that dont know anything about high end home cinemas but even they can
see the difference.
to prove that may a differece in the 2 pr
. are the reason i switch
the set up and cange the pr
. but the result was still the same.
i play this days a bit with my new jvc rs20 (my new pr
. for my holiday hause)and you can see the decrease there as well but i agree that
the better the pr
. is the more you can see a decrease from such a lens in
front of a pr
for me it was clear.
I WILL NEVER USE A AN ANAMORPHIC LENS IN FRONT OF A PROJCTOR AGAIN AS IT DECREASE VISIBLE THE PICTURE QUALITY IN MANY WAYS.