Why is 4K resolution such a jump over 1080P - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 01-04-2010, 07:44 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Shoujiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hey guys,

Wasn't sure where to put this question, seemed the most logical place (as theirs other 4K chat here).

I was looking at the Cineramax website, at there Superkontrast 4K projector in particular. They have this following comparison posted,



Why is 4K resolution so much bigger than 2K? I don't understand enough about these new resolutions, but i think about what "tv lines" are, 2048 (2k) should be twice as big as 1080, and 4096 (4k) should be twice as big as 2k, not 4 times or more like suggested in the pic? Can someone explain this to me?

|OOO| Sony VPH-1272QM

Regards,
Kurt
Melbourne, Australia
Shoujiki is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 Old 01-04-2010, 09:57 PM
Member
 
kenratboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
4k = 4096 pixels WIDE
2k = 2048 pixels WIDE
1080p = 1920 pixels WIDE

So it is measuring height vs. width, but the graphic is accurate.
kenratboy is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 01-04-2010, 10:15 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Shoujiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Ah of course, width, not TV lines! Seems like 2K though isnt really double that of 1080?

|OOO| Sony VPH-1272QM

Regards,
Kurt
Melbourne, Australia
Shoujiki is offline  
post #4 of 7 Old 01-04-2010, 10:41 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
darinp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 21,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoujiki View Post

I don't understand enough about these new resolutions, but i think about what "tv lines" are, 2048 (2k) should be twice as big as 1080, and 4096 (4k) should be twice as big as 2k, not 4 times or more like suggested in the pic? Can someone explain this to me?

Another way to look at it is how much bigger is a 2"x2" square over a 1"x1" square? The 2"x2" square is twice as wide, but has 4 times the area.

--Darin

This is the AV Science Forum. Please don't be gullible and please do remember the saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
darinp2 is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 01-05-2010, 12:57 PM
 
ChrisWiggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 20,730
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoujiki View Post

Ah of course, width, not TV lines! Seems like 2K though isnt really double that of 1080?

1080p= 1920x1080 (~2.1 million pixels)
2k= 2048x1080 (generally) (~2.2 million pixels)
4K= 4096x2160 (generally) (~8.8 million pixels)

So you can see that 1080p and 2k are more or less equivalent resolutions. There is nothing double about it, and whoever said that is grossly mistaken. 4k is naturally quadruple the resolution of 1080p/2k.

4K is about twice the resolution in each direction horizontally and vertically, than 2k or 1080p, so the drawing is accurate, you could either call it twice as many TV lines or twice the supported maximum spatial frequency in either direction if you think that way, or 4-times the resolution if you think both directions, just depends on your terminology and way of thinking about it.
ChrisWiggles is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 01-05-2010, 02:29 PM
Advanced Member
 
ooms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 568
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
limit of human vision.

http://www.swift.ac.uk/vision.pdf

the chart a few pages down is interesting.
ooms is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 01-05-2010, 10:24 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
Shoujiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 166
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
You know what i thought? That 2K was "xxxx X 2048" and hence doubling that of 1080, that's why i didn't understand the diagram.

Thanks guys for clearing it up! Makes complete sense now. That's why some people refer to 4K as "4Kx2K"!!

Interesting chart ooms!

|OOO| Sony VPH-1272QM

Regards,
Kurt
Melbourne, Australia
Shoujiki is offline  
Reply D-cinema Equipment and Theaters

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off