New theater sketchup model - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 16 Old 01-23-2007, 06:50 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I sketched up my proposed theater room.

To the experts:
Will this room make for a good 2-row theater with 3 per row?

Room dimensions are 232" x 117", the ceiling slant starts at 48" from the floor.
LL
quadmasta is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 Old 01-23-2007, 08:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sleeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
It might work, however a row of three theater seats (reclining) will be roughly 7 feet wide, leaving a 3 foot aisle. Don't know if that will be enough in your room with the lower ceiling on the sides.

It really depends on your seating choice.

-Brian
sleeks is offline  
post #3 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 06:23 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I guess it would've helped if I explained my drawing before. The open wall in the drawing is actually a solid wall with a door pretty much directly in the middle. I can't move it because it's what's connected to my upstairs hallway.

The seating would be where the little sketchup guy is and the screen would be on the opposite wall. I just looked at my Berkline seating pamphlet and sleeks is right, it'll be a tight fit. The 088s are the narrowest of the series that I have information on. I could do a row of 4 chairs with armrests on both sides for the back row which would be 112.5" and give a little under 4" of room on the side and a front row of 3 chairs with armrests on both sides are 85.5" wide which would give a little under 3' for an aisle. Since the walls on the side wouldn't be slanted, I think this would work well. I'll try to model the chairs and throw them in the room.
quadmasta is offline  
post #4 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 10:53 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
This is a quick toss-together of what I was thinking of doing with the room. Everything's within an inch of actual dimensions except for the height of the seat and the armrest on the chairs, I didn't have that info so I guessed.
LL
LL
quadmasta is offline  
post #5 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 10:55 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sleeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
That looks pretty good. Your second row will not get the best sound being against a wall. Some of those more knowledgable than me can help you treat it.

-Brian
sleeks is offline  
post #6 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 10:55 AM
Member
 
Tapiozona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Could be that its just not quite to scale or the screen is actually larger than it shoudl be but seems that the screen is rather low. At that height you'll have viewing problems for the back row with the screen so low to the ground.
Tapiozona is offline  
post #7 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 11:19 AM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The screen's probably bigger than it should be. It's currently a 100" diagonal at a 4:3 ratio. What's a better number?
quadmasta is offline  
post #8 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 12:42 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sleeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
You really are going with a 4:3 screen.?

Why not CIH 2.35 or 16:9? 4:3 is only recommended if you watch a lot of SD television IMHO. If this is for movies, video games, HD TV, Widescreen SD Movies, HD DVD, etc, go with 16:9 at a minimum. This will bring the bottom of the screen up.

You will want to check with the riser height calculator sticky that you will good to go from the back row and that you have room for your center channel speaker (preferably above the screen).

-Brian
sleeks is offline  
post #9 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 01:42 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
My current projector is 4:3 so I'm going to do a 4:3 screen. When I get a better projector, I'll just make a new screen. I'm also going to do an adjustable masking system to mask off the top and bottom of the screen during widescreen movies.

Thanks for the advice on the riser height calculator, I'll check it out.
quadmasta is offline  
post #10 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 01:51 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
The riser height calculator says 11.5" inches for my riser height. I bumped it up and added a step. I'll probably knock down the size of the screen a little too.
LL
quadmasta is offline  
post #11 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 01:57 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sleeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by quadmasta View Post

My current projector is 4:3 so I'm going to do a 4:3 screen. When I get a better projector, I'll just make a new screen. I'm also going to do an adjustable masking system to mask off the top and bottom of the screen during widescreen movies.

Thanks for the advice on the riser height calculator, I'll check it out.

Cool. Thats a good reason to go 4:3.

You might want to consider going with a 16:9 screen with side masking so you won't have to buy a new screen when you update the projector. I guess that depends on how soon you will be upgrading the projector.

Make sure to leave space above (preferred) or below the screen for the center channel speaker unless you plan on an AT screen.

-Brian
sleeks is offline  
post #12 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 02:33 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
It'll be at least a year before I get a better projector. I was planning on doing an AT screen but with the cost of that being so high, your idea makes more sense.

Here's a mockup with a 50*89 screen 102" diagonal. I could move it up but I wasn't sure if it should be centered top to bottom.
LL
quadmasta is offline  
post #13 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 04:19 PM
Senior Member
 
BFauska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
As far as the price of AT screens go, you can get an SMX screen for less than the price of most comercially available non AT screens. It seems a shame to waste that space behind the screen by forcing your speakers to be in front.

Looks like it could be a cool project.

Later,
Brian

I love NEW technology, it makes the stuff I can afford even cheaper.
BFauska is offline  
post #14 of 16 Old 01-24-2007, 04:41 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I was planning on putting my subwoofer and left and right channels behind the screen, wasn't sure until now about putting the center behind the screen.

What should I do about placement for the surround speakers? In-walls?
quadmasta is offline  
post #15 of 16 Old 01-27-2007, 12:45 PM - Thread Starter
Member
 
quadmasta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
bump
quadmasta is offline  
post #16 of 16 Old 01-28-2007, 07:50 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Tedd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,904
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked: 63
SandmanX AT 16:9 screen, and an anamorphic lense for the pj, to use the full 4:3 panel?

I would consider inwalls, or dipoles for surround speakers. With all the speakers up front hidden behind the screen, and the inwall surrounds, you'd have a nice clean look to the room.
Tedd is offline  
Reply Dedicated Theater Design & Construction

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off