Basic 3D video FAQs - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 81 Old 03-06-2010, 10:33 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida and West Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,956
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked: 211
November 19, 2010 Update

Here are a few FAQs for 3D video as it applies to home theater (not just limited to video games and other computer graphics) that may help you understand the what's behind this new 3D technology that is being introduced in 2010 and the requirements that it places on a new generation of HDTVs, Blu-ray Disc players and other 3D sources.

Question - How is the 3D effect created?

Answer - Separate images are displayed intended for viewing by the right and left eyes. In a movie theater the right and left images typically are projected with different polarization of the light and the audience must wear glasses with polarized lens to allow the correct stream of images to reach the intended eye

Question - What's different with this 3D technology as compared to previously consumer 3D solutions that used glasses with colored lens?

Answer - Anaglyph images viewed with glasses using colored lens first became popular to the 1950's and is an inexpensive method to display 3D content with existing TV and video sources (virtually all DVD, Blu-ray and broadcasts that are in 3D prior to 2010 have used the anaglyph technology for creating the 3D effect). However, it produces poor results when trying to view video in color and is subject to "crosstalk" between the images intended for the right an left eyes. The new 3D technology introduced for home theater in 2010 is able to provide results on a par with what you will see in your local digital cinema with feature films such as Avatar. Depending on the type of display used, there are two different technologies that may be used to separate the images intended for the right and left eyes. With either of the following alternative technologies, the full color content of the original video program remains unaltered, however the displayed image will appear to not be as bright as when viewing standard 2D television program on that same HDTV. Note these are alternative display technologies and do not directly relate to how the 3D video source (i.e., Blu-ray 3D player, Directv receiver, cable TV box) will output the 3D video information.
  • Sequential imaging will alternate the right and left images on the HDTV's screen with each the right and left image stream displaying as the minimum 48 images per seconds - 48 Hz (i.e., 96 images per second total are being displayed counting both the right and left image streams - while 120 images per second, ie., 60 per eye, is more typical). The viewer must wear special active LCD shutter glasses* that will allow only the images intended for the specific eye to the visible to that eye. The LCD shutter glasses accomplish this by alternating which LCD 'lens' of the glasses is clear vs. opaque. In order to reduce/prevent visible flicker in the displayed image, the image stream for each eye is typically displayed with a refresh rate of 60 Hz, with each LCD 'lens' of the glasses cycled between opaque (to block light) and clear (to pass light) 60 times per second. The vast majority* of consumer 3D HDTVs are expected to use the sequential imaging technique in combination with LCD shutter glasses.
  • The light from the display (e.g., projector) will be polarized different for the right vs. left images and the viewer will wear simple passive glasses with polarized lens. Typically* both the right and left images are displayed at the same time.
*Notes:
1. Although not as common an approach, it is possible to also use sequential imaging with polarized light technology by having the display device switch the polarization for alternating video frames and thus allowing polarized lens glasses to be used by the viewer.

2. While LCD shutter glasses will be used with most consumer 3D displays, LG will be marketing a front projector and a LCD flat panel 3D HDTV that will use polarized glasses with both the right and left images displayed simultaneously. The projector will display full resolution 1080p for each eye while the LCD flat panel HDTV will display only one half of 1080p resolution when operated in the 3D mode.
Question - Can I use my current HDTV for displaying the new 3D movies?

Answer - Generally you will need a new generation of HDTV display that has additional features required to support 3D. The recently approved alternative formats for Blu-ray and broadcast 3D (as defined in the HDMI 1.4a specification) requires the 3D capable HDTV to decode the 3D video information then process this video to put it into a format appropriate for that specific display. No pre-2010 HDTV is compatible with any of the new 3D formats and only those 2010 models specifically listed as supporting 3D video will be compatible and even then until models appear that are listed as supporting HDMI 1.4a we cannot be certain the a given 3D HDTV does in fact support all of the 3D formats that may be used by various 3D sources over the next few years. At this point, the only pre-2010 HDTVs that have the potential of being truly "upgradeable" for use with the new 3D technology are recent models of "3D-Ready" DLP rear projection HDTVs manufactured by Mitsubishi and Samsung (the FAQ thread is HERE. Even though these earlier DLP rear projection TVs was sold as being "3D ready" they supported only 3D from a properly equipped PC. As a result, a 3D adapter box is needed to take the 3D signal from the non-PC source device (e.g, Blu-ray 3D player, satellite receiver, cable TV box, etc.) and apply video processing to put the 3D video into a different format that is compatible with these earlier "3D ready" models. Mitsubishi has now released a 3D adapter (Model 3DA-1 at $99), and 3D Starter Pack (Model 3DC-1000 at $399), that will only directly work with their only brand of 3D ready DLP rear projection TVs. Samsung "3D ready" DLP rear projection TV owners cannot simply use the Mitsubishi adapter, but there is now a solution being offered by the small company True 3D that includes the Mitsubishi 3D adapter plus a second box that makes the Samsung DLP appear to be a compatible Mitsubishi model. Another, more limited, option for a 3D source that works with either the Mitsubishi or Samsung 3D-ready DLP rear projection TVs is the Panasonic Blu-ray 3D disc players*. These units offer a user setting to provide the 3D video output in the checkerboard format required by these DLP 3D-ready TVs.------ Even if you have computer display which will accept an input of 1080p at 120Hz, that is compatible with 3D video games and computer graphics, these displays will not be directly compatible with the new 3D video sources for Blu-ray 3D and 3D broadcast video. Most such displays work by either requiring the input to be in the format of alternating right and left image frames (or right and left fields in a 1080i mode). Each 3D source device is only required to support one of the allowed (by the HDMI 1.4a spec.) 3D formats (i.e., the one that is most appropriate for that source). These existing computer displays are simply not compatible with the 3D formats declared as "mandatory" by the HDMI 1.4a spec. for compatible 3D displays. Specifically, such displays would require an external video processor box to accept any of the mandatory 3D formats as the input and the convert these to a format compatible with the specific display device.

Optoma has announced plans to release in early 2011 a 3D converter box for use with their 720p/120Hz DLP projectors. It is expected to carry a $399 retail price. It has two HDMI 1.4a inputs for connection to a Blu-ray 3D player, satellite receiver/DVR, cable TV set-top-box, or other 3D capable sources, and a single HDMI 1.3 output for connnection to a 720p "3D ready" DLP projector, such as the Optoma HD66.
*Note: The Panasonic Blu-ray 3D disc players offer the setup option to provide a 3D video output via HDMI in a 1080p "checkerboard" format that is compatible with the 1080p Mitsubishi and Samsung DLP 3D-ready rear projection TVs. However, these Blu-ray 3D players will not work (for 3D video) with 720p 3D-ready displays, such as the Samsung 3D-ready plasma HDTVs or 720p DLP front projectors being sold as 3D-ready. Question - Do I need HDMI version 1.4 cables or can I use my exiting HDMI cables to connect my new 3D video sources, AV receiver and 3DTV?

Answer - As a result of a recent change in how HDMI cables are now to be labeled, officially there is no such thing as a HDMI 1.4 cable. HDMI cables are either "standard speed" or "high speed" and if your existing HDMI cables were sold as HDMI 1.3 Category 2 then they are "high speed" and will probably work with your 3D video components. If your existing cables were sold as Category 1 they are low speed and most likely will not work with your new 3D components.

Question - Do I need a new AV Receiver (AVR) with HDMI version 1.4a inputs and output if I connect the new 3D sources thru the AVR to my 3DTV display or will my old AVR with HDMI inputs work.

Answer - With only a few exceptions if your existing AVR's HDMI inputs and output support HDMI 1.3a, or an earlier version, then it cannot be used for switching among the connected 3D video sources. The exception is AVRs with HDMI 1.3 inputs that offer a simple HDMI pass-thru mode where the AVR acts as if it were a simple switch that connects the selected HDMI input to the HDMI output. Most pre-2010 AVRs do not offer such an operating mode for their HDMI switching function and as a result are not generally compatible with 3D video. There are cases where a given HDMI 1.3 equipped AVR may be compatible with a specific 3D device (e.g., cable TV box) connected to a specific model of 3DTV, but most such AVRs will not be able to support the HDMI 1.4a "Frame Packing" signal format (see below) used by Blu-ray 3D disc players.

Question - Will the same 3D glasses work with different brands of 3D Displays?

Answer - There is no "standard" for the 3D glasses and there will be manufacturer specific variations in the LCD shutter glasses offered by the various manufacturers for use with their 3D displays. Some of the 3D glasses may work with another manufacturer's 3D display but even if it does you may not be getting the optimum performance. There is now at least two 3rd party manufacturers that have announced "universal" 3D shutter glasses that can be configured to work well with the 3D displays from the various display manufacturers. HERE is the link for the first such universal LCD shutter glasses (i.e., Xpand model X103 is now available). Monster has also announced plans to release universal 3D LCD shutter glasses in mid-December 2010). For those few consumer 3D displays that will require polarized lens glasses. there are only a very few configurations possible and while one manufacturer's polarized 3D glasses may not work with another specific manufacturer's 3D display, compatible models from 3rd party manufacturers will be available (some already are - HERE is one example).

Question - Can I use my current Blu-ray Disc (BD) player to play future 3D movies released on Blu-ray?

Answer - The only pre-2010 Blu-ray Disc player upgradeable to support 3D is the Sony Playstation 3 (thru a planned September 2010 upgrade to the PS3's firmware). Existing stand-alone BD players will play back the new 3D discs as standard 2D titles. Thus movies released as 3D titles on Blu-ray will be backward compatible with existing players, but a new player will be required to output the video in 3D. Such movies are identified by the "Blu-ray 3D" trademark on the disc's packaging.

Question - What 3D enabled HDTV displays and 3D video sources are available"

Answer - The final specification of the 3D version for Blu-ray Discs was just completed in December 2009 and the HDMI 1.4a specification was just released (March 2010). The new generation of 3D enabled Blu-ray Disc players and compatible HDTVs (flat panel and projectors) from many of the major consumer electronics manufacturers are expected to be making their way to dealers during 2010.
  • 3DTVs (Displays)- The first models from Samsung (LCD flat panel and later plasma) and Panasonic (plasma) appeared in March 2010. LCD models from Sony and LG were available by June 2010 and many more are expected to become available later in 2010. Mitsubishi and Samsung have sold DLP rear projection HDTVs going back to 2007 that were "3D ready" and with the additional of an external 3D adapter box (see information above) can be made compatible with the new HDMI 1.4a 3D signal formats (see below). See the Buyer's Guide thread for information on currently available 3DTVs (displays) and 3D glasses.
  • Blu-ray 3D - Several consumer electronics manufacturers have introduced 3D enabled Blu-ray Disc players with more coming soon. Samsung and Panasonic were the first to offer Blu-ray 3D players, i.e., starting in March 2010. Sony began selling new 2010 models that included "3D ready" Blu-ray players back in Feb. 2010, but these required a later firmware update (released by Sony in June 2010) that enabled their 3D capabilities. A firmware update (version 3.50) for the Sony PlayStation 3 that added support for Blu-ray 3D playback was released in Sept. 2010.
  • Satellite and Cable TV 3D - Directv and some cable TV companies now offer one or more 3D TV channels. Currently these are offered in a "half resolution" mode due to limitations of existing HDTV satellite or cable set-top-boxes.
  • 3D Games - Sony released a firmware update for the Playstation 3 in June 2010 that added support for 3D games. Also 3D versions of several popular video game titles for the PS3 have been released.

Question - What are the mandatory 3D formats that are defined by the HDMI 1.4a specification and what devices must support them?

Answer - The HDMI version 1.4a specification was released on March 4, 2010 and includes a section on "Extraction of 3D Signaling" that defines the 3D formats that are mandatory for 3D displays. Any 3D display that claims to be certified to HDMI 1.4a must support all of the mandatory 3D signal formats at their HDMI input then internally apply video processing to put the 3D video into a format appropriate for that specific display. The input HDMI format is independent of how the specific display decides to actually display the information. Therefore, the 3D video source (e.g., Blu-ray 3D disc player) is not expected to adapt its output signal format to the capabilities the connected 3D display nor is the 3D source device required to support more than just one of the approved 3D signal formats. Note that the rules for what formats are required to be supported applies only to those sources and displays that claims to be compliant with the HDMI 1.4a specification. The Blu-ray 3D specification (released in December 2009) specifically requires support for the Frame Packing 1080p/24 and 720p/60 formats as defined by the HDMI 1.4 spec. While to be HDMI 1.4a compliant, 3D sources need only support one of the "mandatory" 3D formats, 3D capable displays that claims to be HDMI 1.4a compliant are expected to accept the 3D video in any of the mandatory 3D signal formats allowed by the HDMI 1.4a specification. Below is a brief summary of the mandatory 3D video formats that are defined by the HDMI 1.4a specification. There are 3 basic formats defined (in table 8-15 and associated figures and text of the HDMI 1.4a spec.) and then there are specific resolution and frame rate variations allowed under each.

Frame Packing (Blu-ray 3D required full resolution formats)-
  • full 1080p resolution for each right/left images with refresh rates of 23.98/24 Hz
  • full 720p resolution for each right/left images with a refresh rate of 50Hz* or 60Hz.
Note: Frame Packing is capable of placing two full resolution HD images into one "super sized" frame for transmission across HDMI. Frame Packing provides full resolution 3D and when used for 1080p 3D video, the right and left images are placed one above the other into a "super sized" frame that is 2205 pixels vertical by 1920 pixels horizontal with a 45 x 1920 pixel active blanking area separating the two images. More information is HERE) Side-by-Side - (example use - satellite or cable 3D broadcast)
  • half horizontal resolution 1080i (i.e., 960h x 1080v pixels) for each right/left image with refresh rates of 59.94/60 Hz or 50 Hz*.

Top-and-Bottom - (example use - satellite or cable 3D broadcast)
  • half vertical resolution 1080p (1920h x 540v pixels) for each right/left images with refresh rates of 23.98/24 Hz.
  • half vertical resolution 720p (1280h x 360v pixels) for each right/left image with refresh rates of 59.94/60 Hz or 50 Hz*.

* NOTE: All 3D displays conforming to the HDMI 1.4a spec. must accept 3D signals with a 23.98/24 Hz refresh rates as well as 50Hz (e.g., Europe) or 60Hz. (e.g., North America) refresh rates for all of the mandatory 3D signal types as listed above. However, the actual resolution and refresh rate the 3DTV uses to display the 3D images to the viewers is entirely up to the specific 3DTV design.
WEB LINKS for 3D Related Products and Services


3D HDTV Display Info

Satellite 3D Broadcasters and Programming Providers

Blu-ray 3D Players

3D Glasses

Blu-ray 3D Movies

Ron Jones
Blog + Reviews + Articles: projectorreviews.com
Ron Jones is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 81 Old 03-06-2010, 05:03 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
walford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 16,789
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Following is a link covering sequential and side by side formats and one describing frame packing:

http://hd.engadget.com/2010/01/12/hd...de-by-side-3d/

http://hdguru.com/3d-hdtv-and-hdmi-explained/1336/

Two of the Samsung c7000 models 2010 full 3D HDTVs are now avaialble from retailers such as sears and are described at the Samsung Website.

http://www.sears.com/shc/s/c_10153_12605_Computers+%26+Electronics_Televisions?adCell=W F#viewItems=24&pageNum=1&sortOption=ORIGINAL_SORT_ORDER&&filter=Brand|Samsung^Type|LED&lastFilter=Type

Ron has updated his first post to state the available dates from Samsung and Panasonic of their 3D models to March 2010
walford is offline  
post #3 of 81 Old 03-08-2010, 07:03 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida and West Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,956
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by walford View Post

.......
Two of the Samsung c7000 model 2010 full 3D HDTVs are not avaialble from retailers such as sears and are described at the Samsung Website.

http://www.sears.com/shc/s/c_10153_12605_Computers+%26+Electronics_Televisions?adCell=W F#viewItems=24&pageNum=1&sortOption=ORIGINAL_SORT_ORDER&&filter=Brand|Samsung^Type|LED&lastFilter=Type

I've added links to Post #1 for the Panasonic and Samsung 3D websites.

Ron Jones
Blog + Reviews + Articles: projectorreviews.com
Ron Jones is online now  
post #4 of 81 Old 03-09-2010, 11:38 AM
Senior Member
 
HokeySmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Jones View Post

Any display that claims to be certified to HDMI 1.4a must support all of the mandatory 3D signal formats at their HDMI input then internally apply video processing to put the 3D video into a format appropriate for that specific display.

Ron, support of 3D is not required in HDMI 1.4a. Only if the display does support 3D (3D_present=1 in the EDID) then it must support all of the mandatory formats.
HokeySmoke is offline  
post #5 of 81 Old 03-09-2010, 01:56 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida and West Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,956
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by HokeySmoke View Post

Ron, support of 3D is not required in HDMI 1.4a. Only if the display does support 3D (3D_present=1 in the EDID) then it must support all of the mandatory formats.

Thanks - That's certainly correct and to be totally clear I have revised my text in Post #1 above to now read: "Any 3D display that clairms......"
I believe this will make it clear that the context for the statement is for 3D displays, and not all displays.

Ron Jones
Blog + Reviews + Articles: projectorreviews.com
Ron Jones is online now  
post #6 of 81 Old 03-09-2010, 02:13 PM
Super Moderator
 
markrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 23,076
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 122 Post(s)
Liked: 466
Great thread: Thanks to Ron

sticky

please take the high road in every post
if you see a problematic post, please do not quote it or respond to it: report it to the mods to handle
markrubin is offline  
post #7 of 81 Old 03-09-2010, 02:41 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
ANAGLYPH 3D with glasses (top right corner)



COLORCODE 3D




COLORCODE 3D Glasses





STEREOSCOPIC 3D (Over/Under AKA Top/Bottom format) - A depiction - not actual




STEREOSCOPIC 3D (Side By Side format)






STEREOSCOPIC 3D (Frame Sequential AKA Page Flip Format)






STEREOSCOPIC 3D Active Shutter Glasses




STEREOSCOPIC/DLP® 3-D HDTVTechnology (Checkerboard 3D Format)

http://dlp.com/downloads/DLP%203D%20...Technology.pdf


STEREOSCOPIC POLARIZATION FROM AN LCD (Xpol) (Line By Line AKA Hort. Interface 3D Format)






POLARIZED 3D GLASSES (FANCY)

Lee Stewart is offline  
post #8 of 81 Old 03-10-2010, 08:50 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida and West Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,956
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Lee -

Thanks for all of the pics above. It should be noted that the first of the "Stereoscopic 3D" format images shown (from Sony) in your post above (which you qualifed as a depiction) is actually for 'Scope' format (1:2.39 aspect ratio) movies used with 2K digital cinema (2048 horizontal x 858 vertical pixels) (Reference).

Ron Jones
Blog + Reviews + Articles: projectorreviews.com
Ron Jones is online now  
post #9 of 81 Old 03-11-2010, 10:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Bill McNeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Will 3D glasses work for people who already wear glasses, such as for nearsightedness?
Bill McNeal is offline  
post #10 of 81 Old 03-11-2010, 11:16 AM
Senior Member
 
scarabaeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill McNeal View Post

Will 3D glasses work for people who already wear glasses, such as for nearsightedness?

Yes, they fit over your normal glasses. Or, if you think that looks too silly, wear contacts (or dim the lights).
scarabaeus is offline  
post #11 of 81 Old 03-11-2010, 12:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
TrickMcKaha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,018
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Great post. Regarding whether the 3D glasses can work interchangeably with various display systems, I think that all DLPLink glasses will work with any projector using DLPLink, and that will be all of the 3D DLP projectors. So DLP has a standard that allows glasses to work interchangeably on any 3D DLP system.
TrickMcKaha is offline  
post #12 of 81 Old 03-11-2010, 03:11 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
DEG Technology Committee 3D White Paper

http://www.dvdinformation.com/pdfs/D...aper_FINAL.pdf
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #13 of 81 Old 03-12-2010, 08:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Lazarus Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabaeus View Post

Yes, they fit over your normal glasses. Or, if you think that looks too silly, wear contacts (or dim the lights).

This is the absolute main reason I will only be supporting 3d when polarized projectors are available below $3k. Thanks to an astigmatism in one eye which has gotten worse over the years I can no longer wear contacts. I can handle wearing the RealD or Imax 3d glasses over my regular glasses once in a while, but longterm, I don't want to do that on a weekly basis at home. So I absolutely must have polarized, so I could then get polarized prescription glasses.
Lazarus Dark is offline  
post #14 of 81 Old 03-13-2010, 10:22 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida and West Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,956
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus Dark View Post

This is the absolute main reason I will only be supporting 3d when polarized projectors are available below $3k. Thanks to an astigmatism in one eye which has gotten worse over the years I can no longer wear contacts. I can handle wearing the RealD or Imax 3d glasses over my regular glasses once in a while, but longterm, I don't want to do that on a weekly basis at home. So I absolutely must have polarized, so I could then get polarized prescription glasses.

I'm not clear on what you are really asking for. The normal type of glasses used by RealD in theaters is circular polarized glasses and for IMAX is linear polarized glasses (at least that is the what they used for showing Avatar). So if you say you "don't want to do that on a weekly basis at home" then I guess that rules out polarized glasses for you. However, this seems contrary to your earlier statement "I will only be supporting 3d when polarized projectors are available below 3K". By the way I also wear eyeglasses to correct a strong astigmatism in both eyes and am forced to wear the 3D glasses over my normal eyesglasses. I've used both polarized and LCD shutter and find both circular polarized and LCD shutter 3D glasses to perform well as long as the 3D glass' frame is made oversized to allow use over normal eyeglasses.

Ron Jones
Blog + Reviews + Articles: projectorreviews.com
Ron Jones is online now  
post #15 of 81 Old 03-13-2010, 11:49 AM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
New 3D BD Logo(s)





New Logo In Use


Lee Stewart is offline  
post #16 of 81 Old 03-13-2010, 04:36 PM
Senior Member
 
scarabaeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Jones View Post

I'm not clear on what you are really asking for.

He wants to have his optician to add polarisation to his perscription lenses, to match the polarisation on the glasses that come with the projector or screen. That would be either opposite circular polarisation, or opposite linear polarisation (usually 45 degrees to the left, and 45 degrees to the right). Then he would only have to wear one pair of glasses to watch 3D TV, instead of two on top of each other.

You can already get linear polarisation, usually horizontal on both eyes, as an option to filter out reflected light. This can improve night vision and outdoor vision, the same way it is used in photography.
scarabaeus is offline  
post #17 of 81 Old 03-14-2010, 12:17 AM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
The Samsung family of Active Shutter Glasses (from Crutchfield)

Battery Adult



Rechargable Adult



Kids version with Blue interchangeable frame accents

Lee Stewart is offline  
post #18 of 81 Old 03-16-2010, 08:37 AM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #19 of 81 Old 03-16-2010, 09:02 PM
Senior Member
 
germanplumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I've tried to do some independent research, and study as much as I can before I ask my few questions.

What brand is offering the best 3d experience? What's the difference between the brands on glasses and how they are shooting the picture to the screen/glasses. Are they all offering FULL 1080p 3D?

Will the glasses require charging or are they using replaceable batteries? How's battery life?

Will you need new HDMI cables? Are any existing HDMI cables fully capable of supporting this much information passing through them? (I answered my own question. It looks like any HDMI cable that can support 10 Gbps data transfer can pass the information no problem.)

I'm aware that only new HDMI 1.4 spec receivers will be able to pass 3D information. Will HDMI selector switchers that are 1.3 be the same? I guess the real question is any HDMI cable running 3D needs to go through only HDMI 1.4 based products to maintain a 3D signal?

Will the PS3 or Sony 3D-ready blu-ray players supporting the full 1080p per eye version of 3D?

I've heard that Panasonic's 3D is supposedly the best out there in terms of picture quality. Is this because it is a plasma display or is it something else?

I'd had some first hand experience with Samsung's 3D TV. The 2D to 3D upconversion didn't actually look too bad suprisingly. What was confusing or weird was that there are options in the TV that you need to turn on and different modes that can be selected. Does anyone have experience with what all these options mean?
germanplumber is offline  
post #20 of 81 Old 03-16-2010, 09:39 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GregLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waimanalo HI
Posts: 3,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by germanplumber View Post

I'm aware that only new HDMI 1.4 spec receivers will be able to pass 3D information.

I have a related question: is it going to be a problem that the new receivers are spec'd HDMI 1.4 and not HDMI 1.4a?

Thanks for the info on 2D to 3D conversion. Can you tell us any more?

Greg Lee
GregLee is offline  
post #21 of 81 Old 03-16-2010, 09:49 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Florida and West Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,956
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Q. What brand is offering the best 3d experience?

A. I assume you are asking about brand of 3D display. Please remember that as of today only Panasonic and Samsung are shipping (just starting to ship) any 3D solution that can actually display even a Blu-ray 3D demo disc. I'm not talking about 3D displays for video games or PCs since those do not support the new 3D standards or sources. The general consensus going back to CES in January and from the demos that are just now being installed at Best Buy stores is the Panasonic 50" plasma overall produces a cleaner 3D image (with less crosstalk between the right and left images) than the Samsung LCDs. Also the Sony prototype system (Sony production LCD displays won't arrive until this summer) being demoed at SonyStyle Stores also are reported to suffer from crosstalk and flicker issues, but these might be improved in the production models. Finally current Mitsubishi and some recent vintage Samsung DLP rear projection HDTVs will be able to support 3D display from Blu-rays, but only after Mits begins shipping their planned adapter box early this summer. However, there are a lot of other manufactures preparing 3D products for introduction over the next 6 months (or so) and no one can say how they will compare until they become real. Today there is virtually no real 3D video content to view other than a couple of demo discs being provided by Samsung and Panasonic and even by this fall there may still be only a handful of available Blu-ray 3D movie titles actually released for sale.

Q. What's the difference between the brands on glasses and how they are shooting the picture to the screen/glasses. Are they all offering FULL 1080p 3D?

A. Glasses are independent of the display resolution but must be matched to the specific display's refresh and other timing requirements. See Post #1 of this thread for a description of the technologies used by 3D glasses.

Q. Will the glasses require charging or are they using replaceable batteries? How's battery life?

A. Some companies use rechargable and some use replaceable batteries (typically rated at 200 or more hours of use)

Q. Will you need new HDMI cables? Are any existing HDMI cables fully capable of supporting this much information passing through them?

A. Some HDMI 1.3 certified cables may also work for 3D but they are not assured to. Thus the best you can do is to get the 3D hardware, connect it using your existing HDMI cables and it doesn't work then buy new HDMI 1.4 certified cables.

Q. Will the PS3 or Sony 3D-ready blu-ray players supporting the full 1080p per eye version of 3D?

A. Yes and Yes

Q. I've heard that Panasonic's 3D is supposedly the best out there in terms of picture quality. Is this because it is a plasma display or is it something else?

A. The only two choices currently availabe are Panasonic Plasma or Samsung LCD (if you ignore the Mits 3D ready rear projection HDTVs which will require an future adapter box to make them fully 3D capable). The Panasonic plasma appears to have less crosstalk between the right and left images providing a cleaner 3D image as compared to the Samsung LCDs. Current LCD technology (based on the Samsung and prototype Sony 3D LCD HDTVs) seems to have a problem with being able to cleanly display alternating right and left image frame.

Q. I'd had some first hand experience with Samsung's 3D TV. The 2D to 3D upconversion didn't actually look too bad suprisingly. What was confusing or weird was that there are options in the TV that you need to turn on and different modes that can be selected. Does anyone have experience what all these options mean?

A. Haven't tried it on the Samsung and the Panasonic plasma lacks 2D to 3D conversion. I wouldn't expect too much from this feature.

Ron Jones
Blog + Reviews + Articles: projectorreviews.com
Ron Jones is online now  
post #22 of 81 Old 03-16-2010, 10:51 PM
Senior Member
 
germanplumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 212
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregLee View Post

I have a related question: is it going to be a problem that the new receivers are spec'd HDMI 1.4 and not HDMI 1.4a?

Thanks for the info on 2D to 3D conversion. Can you tell us any more?

Yea it just added a depth to the picture that (I'm almost crazy to say this) made the picture look better. It was some Fast & Furious/Bourne Series Blu-ray 2D Demo disc. What's funny is that even though the demo material wasn't made for 3D, it was almost like it was with stuff flying at the screen from cars and what not when 3D upconversion was applied.

In the Samsung TV, when you go to the regular picture menu mode, scroll down and there is something named 3D. It has an ON/OFF option (from what I understand from my Samsung rep will not be required to manually turn it on or off to enable or disable 3D when it detects a 3D Blu-ray Movie). It also had a depth adjustment from 1 to 10. It had an 2D to 3D ON/OFF option. In the 3D menu, once 3D is turned on it gives you little icons to select.

One is a single person icon, the 2nd is a side by side icon, the 3rd was a top/bottom icon, and there was 3 other icons blurred out.


OH and Ron thanks for the speedy replies. It offered major clarification on a lot of confusion.
germanplumber is offline  
post #23 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 07:13 AM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregLee View Post

I have a related question: is it going to be a problem that the new receivers are spec'd HDMI 1.4 and not HDMI 1.4a?

No issue with the 1.4 versus 1.4a. HDMI is now recommending that the revision letter be dropped entirely and just 1.4 be used.
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #24 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 12:38 PM
Senior Member
 
scarabaeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregLee View Post

I have a related question: is it going to be a problem that the new receivers are spec'd HDMI 1.4 and not HDMI 1.4a?

Just posted this in the 1.4 receiver thread:

The challenges for the receivers are the new HDMI InfoFrames, the EDID tags for 3D and the "Frame Packing" timings. All of which have been specified in HDMI 1.4

HDMI 1.4a added some more mandatory 3D formats, but they use timings that are compatible with the 2D formats. The extensions to the EDID tags and the InfoFrame content are mostly within the limits specified by 1.4. If the receiver just passes through all the 3D tags from the display's EDID, and also passes through the HDMI InfoFrames from the player to the TV, without making any changes, then the receiver would work for both, HDMI 1.4 and 1.4a.

In the worst case, the 1.4 receiver would not understand the new 1.4a top-bottom format tags and will ignore them. This still allows you to play 3D blu-rays in frame packing modes. You only might have problems with set top boxes that try to do top-and-bottom, and maybe also side-by-side.
scarabaeus is offline  
post #25 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 12:50 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
High-Definition Multimedia Interface

Specification Version 1.4

Extraction of 3D Signaling Portion


http://www.hdmi.org/download/2010_02...c1.4_Final.pdf
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #26 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 01:25 PM
Senior Member
 
scarabaeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post

High-Definition Multimedia Interface

Specification Version 1.4

Extraction of 3D Signaling Portion


http://www.hdmi.org/download/2010_02...c1.4_Final.pdf

HDMI 1.4a 3D extraction:
http://www.hdmi.org/download/2010_03...I_Spec1.4a.pdf
scarabaeus is offline  
post #27 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 06:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GregLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waimanalo HI
Posts: 3,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post

No issue with the 1.4 versus 1.4a.

That's great, if it's true. But why do you think it's true?

Greg Lee
GregLee is offline  
post #28 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 07:44 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregLee View Post

That's great, if it's true. But why do you think it's true?

Because it's part of the "family" of HDMI is 1.4. The receiver doesn't decode video - it just passes it on to the display. 1.4a is an extension of 1.4. The 3D formats for SAT and CBL still only take up the same bandwidth as an HD signal. If there is any issue - it will be with the display. And Comcast isn't even doing a firmware upgrade to their latest STB's for the Masters in 3D. They said you will be able to watch it with the new 3DTVs.

What does that tell you?
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #29 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 09:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GregLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waimanalo HI
Posts: 3,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post

What does that tell you?

It lets me guess that Comcast knew before 1.4a became official that their boxes would need to pass the 3D TV signals that various TV source providers were going to be sending, and that they prepared appropriately. What does it tell me about whether HDMI 1.4 receivers will be processing and passing along the additional signals of 1.4a? Not a thing. Am I just being dense? What's the relationship?

Greg Lee
GregLee is offline  
post #30 of 81 Old 03-17-2010, 10:25 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregLee View Post

It lets me guess that Comcast knew before 1.4a became official that their boxes would need to pass the 3D TV signals that various TV source providers were going to be sending, and that they prepared appropriately. What does it tell me about whether HDMI 1.4 receivers will be processing and passing along the additional signals of 1.4a? Not a thing. Am I just being dense? What's the relationship?

Why would a receiver process 3D video? What is it going to do with it?
Lee Stewart is offline  
Reply 3D Displays

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off