Professional Reviews of the 3D Performance of New TVs: Where are they??? - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 Old 10-23-2013, 10:11 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Forum Special Member
Rudy1's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 5,014
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1300 Post(s)
Liked: 1871
I have noticed that the professional reviews of 3D-capable TVs have been completely lacking when it comes informing potential buyers about the 3D performance of these sets. In fact, you can almost count on that aspect of a particular model's performance being completely ignored or, as has become so fashionable these days, being dismissed by the reviewer as "not an important feature." The reviewers at CNET started this trend, and now it has become so widespread that it is practically impossible to find any professional reviews of recent models that don't include some sort of derogatory comment about the 3D format as a whole. I've even had one reviewer respond to my emails with the comment that they "don't have a universally-accepted way of testing 3D performance." I thought the whole purpose of a professional review was to provide an unbiased assessment of a TVs performance. Instead all you hear is the constant whining about the glasses ("too expensive, too uncomfortable, not included with the set, etc., etc."), or the de rigueur "I/We hate 3D so we're not even going to talk about it" nonsense. I don't know about the rest of you, but these people have lost what little credibility they had in my book. If they can't tell me how much crosstalk a set has, or how much viewing time I can expect from a pair of active 3D glasses, they can keep their opinions to themselves.

There are two types of people in this world: People you want to drink with, and people who make you want to drink.
Rudy1 is online now  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 Old 10-27-2013, 04:13 PM
Advanced Member
tory40's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 747
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I don't use CNET reviews because they always seem to lack all kinds of information i need.

Heres some that i use.

Digitalversus (measures pixel response time)
Trusted Reviews
Televisioninfo (not consistent about doing all tests, but great when its there)

As a point of reference, I've played many games on my Samsung ES7500 from 2012 and have not noticed it yet while playing the game. Its there, but its so minimized i don't notice it. If you go to digitalversus and look at the pixel response times of the ES7500, and your current TV. That can help you estimate the crosstalk on others.
tory40 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Reply 3D Displays

Samsung Un60es7500 60 Inch 3d Slim Led Hdtv
Gear in this thread

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off