The 2D+depth format - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 Old 02-28-2010, 11:02 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Joe Bloggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 291 Post(s)
Liked: 90
This thread is for discussion of the 2D+depth format.

Do most auto-stereoscopic / multi-view displays usually use it? If so, why?

Wouldn't they be better off using a different better format? Or at least storing multiple 2D+depth maps, not just one for the whole video?

Is 2D+depth the best/most efficient way of broadcasting many-view 3D or would MVC or something like multiple 2D+depth maps be better/more efficient?
Joe Bloggs is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 Old 02-28-2010, 11:17 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
2D-plus-depth

Quote:


2D-plus-depth or also called 2D +'Z' format is a Stereoscopic Video Coding format that is used for 3D displays, such as Philips WOWvx. Philips discontinued work on the WOWvx line in 2009, citing "current market developments."

Next to each 2D image frame a greyscale depthmap indicates if a specific pixel in the 2D image needs to be shown in front of the display (white) or behind the screen plane (black). The 256 greyscales can build a smooth gradient of depth within the image. Processing within the monitor used this input to render the multiview images.

2D-plus-depth has the advantage that is has a limited bandwidth increase compared to 2D (compressed greyscale increases bandwidth 5-20%) so that it can be used in existing distribution infrastructures. Also 2D-plus-depth format offers flexibility and compatibility with existing production equipment and compression tools. Moreover it allows applications to use different 3D display screen sizes and designs in the same system.

2D-plus-depth is not compatible with existing 2D or 3D-Ready displays. The format has been criticized due to the limited amount of depth that can be displayed in an 8-bit grayscale.

There is no way to accurately generate a 2D+Depth Depth Map from a live stereoscopic feed.

It is also very difficult to accurately render a Depth Map from two stereoscopic Left / Right views offline without artifacting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2D-plus-depth
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old 02-28-2010, 11:22 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Joe Bloggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 291 Post(s)
Liked: 90
Are there other manufacturers now working on auto-stereoscopic multi-view 3D displays if Phillips has stopped, and if so who and do they use the 2D+depth format?
Joe Bloggs is offline  
post #4 of 4 Old 02-28-2010, 11:46 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Lee Stewart is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply 3D Tech Talk

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off