These aspect ratios are driving me crazy :) - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 10-06-2000, 10:15 AM - Thread Starter
JP
AVS Special Member
 
JP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 10
First, the simple question. Is 1.85:1 the same as 16:9? If they are different which one is mostly used on dvd's? I know full widescreen (2.35:1) is used as well on dvds. Is 52"x92" 16:9, 1.85:1, or both?

I am very confused why so many people use so many different aspect ratios for their screens. I know there is a personal preference issue here but bare with me why I explain why I think only one aspect ratio should be used (and please tell me if I am wrong in my thinking). That is, 16:9 seems like the only real option. I think most dvds use 16:9 with some 2.35:1. However, I believe 16:9 is still the most popular and I believe this is the format for hdtv as well. So wouldn't it make sense to only get this size since you can fill the screen for most dvd's and hdtv as well as at this size you can still use 4:3 which is always going to come from an inferior source (comparatively) so by having the black bars on the right and left of the screen and shrinking the size you are actually allowing the inferior image (again comparatively) to be tightened a bit. So smaller screen size for bad sources and larger screen sizes for good sources. Does that make sense or am I really missing something here?
JP is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 10-06-2000, 10:24 AM
Advanced Member
 
Andrew Low's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
16:9 is 1.78:1

A 16:9 screen is a very good choice if you are primarily watching movies, or wish to "optimize" your movie viewing. Its amazing how quickly you become a widescreen snob.

1.85:1 fits into a 1.78:1 screen with very small bars top and bottom. It still looks good.

Roo
Andrew Low is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 10-06-2000, 11:50 AM
AVS Special Member
 
William's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 8,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked: 39
JP,

92 divided by 52 is 1.77. So it is a 16x9(1.78) screen. HDTV is 16x9 (1.78), about half way between 4x3 (1.33 standard TV) and 2.35: scope film.

William
William is offline  
post #4 of 5 Old 10-06-2000, 11:51 AM - Thread Starter
JP
AVS Special Member
 
JP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thanks Andrew and William. Thanks to you I finally have this straight now.
JP is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 10-06-2000, 11:53 AM
Member
 
sstieferman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 145
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
This information is from Sony's PJCalc utility measured in inches.

69x92 1.33:1,4x3, NTSC
52x92 1.78:1, 16x9, HDTV
50x92 1.85:1
39x92 2.35:1

sstieferman is offline  
Closed Thread Screens

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off