Projector Mini-Shootout Thread - Page 341 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2015, 02:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my home theater ( when I'm not rock climbing, cycling or kayaking ) - Sacramento CA area
Posts: 6,855
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 940 Post(s)
Liked: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by d.j. View Post
Again - yes, it looks better, but not significantly better IMO ( depending on how you will describe "significantly" ) - you can see, its better, but not earth shattering better


Sorry I cant describe it better


dj

I switch back and forth from my VW600 to my Sim Lumis, regularly. The VW600 looks better in some ways, and the Lumis looks better in some ways ( I still like motion handling better on the Lumis ).


When I first got my VW600, I didn't tell my regular movie watching friends. One noticed the difference, most did not, with a super good current Blu Ray - might have been Oblivion or Skyfall.

Craig Peer, AV Science Sales. Call me on my direct line - 585-671-2972, 8:30am - 4:30pm PST, Monday - Friday
Email me at craig@avscience.com http://shop.avscience.com/
Yes, we sell Home Theater gear right here at AVS !!
JVC, Sony, Epson, DPI, SIM2, SV Sound, Martin Logan, RBH, and many more!

Last edited by Craig Peer; 01-12-2015 at 02:12 PM.
Craig Peer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-12-2015, 02:13 PM
Member
 
PJC Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Liked: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
You don't want RC off you just want it set to 0. There's a difference and if you turned it off then you missed out on a much better PQ experience the Sony could have given. How did you have this set? Off or zero? Options to do both are available in the menus on the Sony.
You're missing what I'm trying to say. I'm not saying that I only ran the test with RC off. I'm saying that even with RC turned off (which I know is different from having it set to 0), upscaled 1080p on a 4K projector looked better than native 1080p on a 1080p projector.

I ran this test several times with different settings. I ran the projectors with detail enhancement turned way up, and again with middling settings, and again at very conservative settings, and again turned off.
d.j. likes this.

Associate Editor, ProjectorCentral.com | @PJC_Bill
PJC Bill is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 02:21 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC Bill View Post
You're missing what I'm trying to say. I'm not saying that I only ran the test with RC off. I'm saying that even with RC turned off (which I know is different from having it set to 0), upscaled 1080p on a 4K projector looked better than native 1080p on a 1080p projector.

I ran this test several times with different settings. I ran the projectors with detail enhancement turned way up, and again with middling settings, and again at very conservative settings, and again turned off.
This is where I'd have to disagree. After seeing the difference of "off" and "0" on Mark's 1100ES the difference in image quality was pretty substantial. Every once in a while you'll see someone post pictures or comment on "bad" image quality from their 4K machine and completely perplexed as to why the image looks so "awful" and it turns out they have RC turned to off, instead of 0. If I made the mistake (which I almost did until Mark pointed out the error) I would have said the image from the X500 looked "sharper" and more natural than the 1100ES's. Thankfully that changed when I switched RC to on and set at 0.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: JVC DLA-X500 (Current Model) - $3195
FS: Planar PD8150 1080p DLP Projector - With Upgraded DarkChip 4 DLP DMD - $2495
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 02:33 PM
Member
 
PJC Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Liked: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
This is where I'd have to disagree. After seeing the difference of "off" and "0" on Mark's 1100ES the difference in image quality was pretty substantial. Every once in a while you'll see someone post pictures or comment on "bad" image quality from their 4K machine and completely perplexed as to why the image looks so "awful" and it turns out they have RC turned to off, instead of 0. If I made the mistake (which I almost did until Mark pointed out the error) I would have said the image from the X500 looked "sharper" and more natural than the 1100ES's. Thankfully that changed when I switched RC to on and set at 0.
Don't get me wrong -- I think people should definitely leave RC enabled, even if it's at 0. But I could still see a difference when it was off. I should have an X500 showing up in the next week or two (fingers crossed) so I'll be able to run the same test you're talking about.

It's entirely possible that the X500 looks better than the VW350 when RC is off. I wasn't testing against a JVC. We could both be right.

I only replied in the first place so you'd know that we're not basing our conclusions on Reality Creation alone.

Associate Editor, ProjectorCentral.com | @PJC_Bill
PJC Bill is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 03:11 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Deja Vu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: great white north
Posts: 4,826
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 395 Post(s)
Liked: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC Bill View Post
Don't get me wrong -- I think people should definitely leave RC enabled, even if it's at 0. But I could still see a difference when it was off. I should have an X500 showing up in the next week or two (fingers crossed) so I'll be able to run the same test you're talking about.

It's entirely possible that the X500 looks better than the VW350 when RC is off. I wasn't testing against a JVC. We could both be right.

I only replied in the first place so you'd know that we're not basing our conclusions on Reality Creation alone.
Personally I think you guys do a great job in your reviews -- it's pretty much impossible to please the people on this forum and to some extent that includes me.

O.K. here it comes -- I'm set up for 3D and that means converting 2D into 3D on the fly with a Teranex 3D processor, so obviously how a projector handles 3D (ghosting) is crucial to me. I have never seen any projector outside of DLP projectors handle ghosting in an acceptable manner (yes, I'm extremely fussy when it comes to 3D overall and ghosting in particular). I own quite a few 3D projectors and compare them against one another from time to time. When it comes to 3D my Epsons, for example, are unwatchable in 3D after comparing its 3D against my Sharp, Mits 8000 or Mits 7900's 3D. Of all the 3D projectors I have only the Sharp and Mits DLPs can handle the extreme depth and intensity of the Teranex without missing a beat (no ghosting). For some reason my PT-RZ470 (DLP) has all kinds of trouble with 2D converted by the Teranex to 3D. It can handle BD 3D and sbs 3D without a problem. The Teranex it seems is the acid test for ghosting.

I just wish you guys would run 3D capable projectors through the L/R ghosting test so we could get an objective idea about how well they handle ghosting. I would like to move to a laser or led 3D home theatre projector, however, after seeing the differences between the PT-RZ470 (DLP + laser and led) and the Sharp or Mits (DLP + lamp) with the Teranex I'm a little hesitant to invest a substantial sum in any projector that might get chewed up and spit out -- I suspect the Sim2 led 3D capable projectors wouldn't have a problem with the Teranex but who knows. Yes, I'm a little paranoid.
Deja Vu is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 03:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC Bill View Post
Don't get me wrong -- I think people should definitely leave RC enabled, even if it's at 0. But I could still see a difference when it was off. I should have an X500 showing up in the next week or two (fingers crossed) so I'll be able to run the same test you're talking about.

It's entirely possible that the X500 looks better than the VW350 when RC is off. I wasn't testing against a JVC. We could both be right.

I only replied in the first place so you'd know that we're not basing our conclusions on Reality Creation alone.
Thanks for clearing that up. I have an off-topic question. I'm just curious as to why you guys don't post contrast numbers anymore? You used to post ANSI and on/off contrast numbers for most your reviews. Obviously you have the ability, otherwise we wouldn't be getting brightness numbers. Considering the VW350ES doesn't have "world class" aka immeasurable contrast, I can only speculate that Sony doesn't want you guys to post contrast numbers as it would look bad against most of the competition within it's price range. Is this false?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: JVC DLA-X500 (Current Model) - $3195
FS: Planar PD8150 1080p DLP Projector - With Upgraded DarkChip 4 DLP DMD - $2495
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 05:33 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
darinp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 21,485
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 194 Post(s)
Liked: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deja Vu View Post
I just wish you guys would run 3D capable projectors through the L/R ghosting test so we could get an objective idea about how well they handle ghosting.
Bill mentioned that he would try the patterns if somebody would send them to him:

Epson 4K (enhancement) e-shift laser projector....!!!!!!

If somebody here has the patterns (and maybe instructions) and cares enough, they should email him, if he doesn't have them by now.

--Darin

This is the AV Science Forum. Please don't be gullible and please do remember the saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
darinp2 is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 05:41 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
@zombie10k does. I'd love a copy myself actually.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: JVC DLA-X500 (Current Model) - $3195
FS: Planar PD8150 1080p DLP Projector - With Upgraded DarkChip 4 DLP DMD - $2495
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 08:31 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,416
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked: 611
some interesting new TV's coming out of CES, this LG must look amazing, 77" 4K OLED



it also has 3D, imagine how nice that would look with basically infinite contrast.

I was using my Sony HMZ-T1 the other night, while only 720P, those OLED's are still amazing with the contrast. black is black. 3D is very bright and flawless. it's a shame they aren't more comfortable to wear.

I'm glad to see LG pursuing OLED, it would be great to see one of these @ 100+ inches in a few years from now.
Mr. Hatcher likes this.
zombie10k is online now  
Old 01-12-2015, 08:45 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post
some interesting new TV's coming out of CES, this LG must look amazing, 77" 4K OLED



it also has 3D, imagine how nice that would look with basically infinite contrast.

I was using my Sony HMZ-T1 the other night, while only 720P, those OLED's are still amazing with the contrast. black is black. 3D is very bright and flawless. it's a shame they aren't more comfortable to wear.

I'm glad to see LG pursuing OLED, it would be great to see one of these @ 100+ inches in a few years from now.
How's the ghosting on that 3D headset? When Sony still owned the building in New York City, the ground floor had a display room for most of their current electronics. I got to try out the headset and thought it was pretty neat. Though it never felt like I was "watching a huge screen". I never really felt that illusion like I do with a real projector. How would you rate the contrast?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: JVC DLA-X500 (Current Model) - $3195
FS: Planar PD8150 1080p DLP Projector - With Upgraded DarkChip 4 DLP DMD - $2495
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 09:40 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,416
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked: 611
there is zero ghosting even on the patterns, the 3D is bright to the point of squinting in certain scenes.

I would rate the contrast as an 11 out of a 10. All the dark content i've watched looks remarkable, the blacks are so dark when they need to be but adjacent areas with brighter objects cut through with impressive brightness.

if the room is dark while wearing them, the illusion is a little more convincing but it's definitely a different experience vs a real projector/screen setup.

there's a few hacks out there to make it more comfortable, I may give it a shot so I can use it more often.
zombie10k is online now  
Old 01-12-2015, 10:37 PM
Member
 
PJC Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Liked: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deja Vu View Post
I just wish you guys would run 3D capable projectors through the L/R ghosting test so we could get an objective idea about how well they handle ghosting.
Actually I'm all set on this -- I'm now using patterns from the 2nd edition Spears & Munsil BD and a Minolta LS100 to measure crosstalk. I want to gather some more data before I start publishing numbers, but once I'm set up I will start incorporating it into our reviews. It'll be a percentage number, as in X% of the light intended for your left eye is visible from your right eye with the shutter closed. That kind of thing. But I want to have a baseline of what is good vs. bad, objectively, before I start reporting it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
Thanks for clearing that up. I have an off-topic question. I'm just curious as to why you guys don't post contrast numbers anymore? You used to post ANSI and on/off contrast numbers for most your reviews. Obviously you have the ability, otherwise we wouldn't be getting brightness numbers. Considering the VW350ES doesn't have "world class" aka immeasurable contrast, I can only speculate that Sony doesn't want you guys to post contrast numbers as it would look bad against most of the competition within it's price range. Is this false?
That is false.

Short version: It was a lot of work and very few people got anything out of it, so we stopped doing it. It had nothing to do with any external pressure from anyone.

Also, we stopped doing ANSI contrast measurements years ago. I don't even think Sony was sending us projectors at the time (for a few years there we had to buy any Sony projector we wanted to review, and that got old fast).

Associate Editor, ProjectorCentral.com | @PJC_Bill
PJC Bill is offline  
Old 01-12-2015, 11:17 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC Bill View Post
That is false.

Short version: It was a lot of work and very few people got anything out of it, so we stopped doing it. It had nothing to do with any external pressure from anyone.

Also, we stopped doing ANSI contrast measurements years ago. I don't even think Sony was sending us projectors at the time (for a few years there we had to buy any Sony projector we wanted to review, and that got old fast).
ANSI contrast I can understand as, from what I understand, it seems more of an art than a science to get consistent measurements, plus the room conditions are key. But on/off is very easy to measure. The reason why I asked is because, and I mean this in the best way possible even though it sounds mean, reviews without numbers to back up claims seem like "fluff" reviews to me. I read reviews that say "contrast was good" or "contrast was excellent" and no offense but without numbers how am I supposed to weigh that claim against another projector you also claim "contrast was good" or "contrast was excellent"? Like you said, you do these reviews because people who are on the fence need something to nudge them over to one side. If you say each image looks excellent but fail to give us the reason why (in this case with contrast; numbers) how am I supposed to know which is better and by how much in one area over another? This is another reason why so many people are pushing for the L/R 3D image pattern test. It gives us proof to back up a claim that 3D performance is "excellent" when claimed so, which I've seen so many publications say, but fail to show us why. This is one of many reasons many people here favor reviews that give us a more technical breakdown of a product, like cine4home for instance, while many others just give us fluff and say things like, "it's good" or just use hyperbole statements that get us no further to the answers many of us are after before going into the review.

I think the following should be mandatory for a projector review from any serious publication; ootb best mode brightness accompanied by charts to show color/greyscale/gamma, calibrated best mode brightness accompanied by charts to show color/greyscale/gamma, effects on brightness through the zoom range (telephoto, middle, and max zoom) and bulb setting, native on/off contrast and dynamic on/off with a breakdown of how well the dynamic iris implementation is and an explanation as to how the black level with the DI on compares to typical contrast with actual content (with many projectors the dynamic contrast black level is not really a descriptive number to what "typical" contrast will be in a dark scene), if you can swing it ANSI contrast, color uniformity, white field uniformity, mention bright corner issues, dead pixels, 3D performance accompanied with photos of the image pattern many of us have mentioned to show absolute ghosting performance, 3D color calibration from behind the glasses (and mention brightness loss), motion performance without frame interpolation enabled with a lines of resolution number accompanying subjective thoughts on how it compares to reference devices such as plasma, CRT and DLP, lens quality (referencing CA and pixel delineation, soft corners, effects on zoom and lens shift), input lag (Leo Bodnar test and/or CRT test), smart sharpening features and what a recommended setting would be before serious image artifacts occur, menu system (how well it's layed out), a brief sentence or two on the remote (ergonomics and layout), fit an finish of the chassis, decibel reading to show how loud it is in different bulb settings, frame interpolation modes performance (do they support 3D modes too?), and pros/cons to extraneous unique features of that particular model. I'm sure I'm missing a few things but I know of a few publications and specific reviewers who do the majority of these tests and talk about each individually. I think these are the things most people who buy a $3000+ projector care about when deciding what model they want to buy because it answers how much a particular model has an advantage over another. If you just give us bland, non-descriptive sentences about relative performance, people can't really make concrete decisions if they're truly on the fence between two models.

If I were offered to do a legitimate review of a projector I'd want to give people the most comprehensive review out there. Sure it may take longer and be more work, but it would be worth it because I'd know it would be something people REALLY wanted to read. I don't know how much you "hang around" on the forum reading posts, but all of the things posted above are things we talk about regularly and we use them as reasons why to go with a specific model over another when making suggestions to people who are less informed and just want "an answer" because they don't want to do all the work by digging around for those answers. And I think they come here and ask those questions because many reviews out there fail, in the broad sense, to get deep enough into the projector which means they also fail to give us the information wanted in the areas listed above.

This isn't an attack on you personally, but at the projector review industry in general. Many of the things I listed above do get covered in your reviews.
mbw23air, Deja Vu and Ericglo like this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: JVC DLA-X500 (Current Model) - $3195
FS: Planar PD8150 1080p DLP Projector - With Upgraded DarkChip 4 DLP DMD - $2495

Last edited by Seegs108; 01-12-2015 at 11:34 PM.
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 07:13 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Ericglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Just below the US in South Florida
Posts: 6,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked: 62
What Dillon (Seegs) said! Honestly I stopped reading PJC reviews a long time ago. They didn't really tell me a lot. If you are going after a different readership and succeeding, then great and more power to you. Without measurements, I really have no standard for comparison.

Call AVS For the Best Deals!!!


My new favorite game is Stop the Bots
Ericglo is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 09:58 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
zombie10k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,416
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 835 Post(s)
Liked: 611
The spears test pattern is ok but I think the L/R patterns give a better visual representation of how a specific projector will handle tough 3D content.




Let's look at 3 different projectors ranging from below average, very good and excellent.

Mitsubishi HC5 - this projector's 3D performance was not great (I am being generous..) Relatively poor x-talk performance and also dim with the shutter glasses. Even more so than would be expected from other models.



Sony VW600 - definitely better than the HC5, this with the glasses set to high (vs normal). X-talk can be reduced further with the glasses setting but lumen output will drop a good amount. Still OK on my HP screen but I doubt it would be bright enough though on low gain screens with that setting.




the infamous Grand Canyon documentary. Damn that tree...




This actually quite good for a non DLP, MvA is a great 3D test, many difficult scenes in this movie.



then a DLP like the Sharp 30K which is just flawless with X-talk, there is no real way to trip up this projector with 3D content. It even kills on SBS which is usually below average on most non-DLP's.



so the DLP's are the benchmark in this area for 3D. I'd like to see how well the LS9600 and LS10000 handle these patterns and various content. Given the new models are compatible with the current RF glasses for the Epson LCD models, I am not expecting a miracle. More likely similar to the Epson LCD models.


All of this is better than the typical review comment 'projector has great 3D with minimal crosstalk'. it's the 1 time a screenshot can actually be useful.
Deja Vu and d.j. like this.
zombie10k is online now  
Old 01-13-2015, 11:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Deja Vu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: great white north
Posts: 4,826
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 395 Post(s)
Liked: 269
Zombie -- when it comes to 3D you are the go to person. Great post above! Keep it coming.
Deja Vu is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 11:10 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Deja Vu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: great white north
Posts: 4,826
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 395 Post(s)
Liked: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJC Bill View Post
Actually I'm all set on this -- I'm now using patterns from the 2nd edition Spears & Munsil BD and a Minolta LS100 to measure crosstalk. I want to gather some more data before I start publishing numbers, but once I'm set up I will start incorporating it into our reviews. It'll be a percentage number, as in X% of the light intended for your left eye is visible from your right eye with the shutter closed. That kind of thing. But I want to have a baseline of what is good vs. bad, objectively, before I start reporting it.
Thanks for this. I appreciate that you're listening (seems like you're one of the few) to our concerns about the subject evaluation of 3D ghosting. I look forward to your reviews.
Deja Vu is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 11:42 AM
AVS Special Member
 
d.j.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
How's the ghosting on that 3D headset? When Sony still owned the building in New York City, the ground floor had a display room for most of their current electronics. I got to try out the headset and thought it was pretty neat. Though it never felt like I was "watching a huge screen". I never really felt that illusion like I do with a real projector. How would you rate the contrast?



Sorry Seegs , but the headset has a separate screen for each eye..............


dj
d.j. is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:05 PM
AVS Special Member
 
d.j.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
You don't want RC off you just want it set to 0. There's a difference and if you turned it off then you missed out on a much better PQ experience the Sony could have given. How did you have this set? Off or zero? Options to do both are available in the menus on the Sony.



Really ? - why not 2 or 3 ( are there then ringing IYO ?) and what about the "C" ? Have you tried a lot of combinations with that ? ( and with the sharpness control at the same time and even contrast setting, which do change, how the RC behave )


But of couse, maybe you have a lot more experience ( hours playing with all the controls, and on different materiel ) then the rest of us




Short story , you shouldnt speak and makes firm conclusions, so much about this projector, before you have had a lot more time to play with one, then you did have at Marks´place ( and yes, I know that it was "calibreted" - but that has nothing to do with most of these settings ) .


Just my humble opinion


dj
d.j. is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by d.j. View Post
Sorry Seegs , but the headset has a separate screen for each eye..............


dj
I knew that before asking. What's the point you're tying to make?

Last edited by Seegs108; 01-13-2015 at 12:33 PM.
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:13 PM
Member
 
PJC Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Liked: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
I don't know how much you "hang around" on the forum reading posts, but all of the things posted above are things we talk about regularly and we use them as reasons why to go with a specific model over another when making suggestions to people who are less informed and just want "an answer" because they don't want to do all the work by digging around for those answers. And I think they come here and ask those questions because many reviews out there fail, in the broad sense, to get deep enough into the projector which means they also fail to give us the information wanted in the areas listed above.
I do as much testing as I can reasonably accomplish given the constraints I'm working with, but I do understand that most folks on this forum would prefer reviews with more data and less subjective discussion. I try to include as much of that as I can -- I made sure to get us a Bodnar tester as soon as I became aware that it existed, and we're going to start doing crosstalk tests as I mentioned above. But the folks on this forum comprise a relatively small fraction of our audience, and I have to consider the rest of them as well.

I don't agree that people come to this forum because reviews are falling short. I say this because I constantly (as in, several times a day) get email from people who want answers to questions I've already answered. Some people just want an answer and don't want to do any work, and "finding the answer that's already been given" counts as work. So they email me, or they come to the forum. Some do both -- I've definitely seen posts here that were word-for-word copies of emails I received.

You can see evidence for this in the under-$3000 forum, where there are multiple threads asking whether someone should get the W1070/HT1075 or one of the Optoma HD26 variants. That's an answered question and has been for quite some time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zombie10k View Post
The spears test pattern is ok but I think the L/R patterns give a better visual representation of how a specific projector will handle tough 3D content.



[...]

All of this is better than the typical review comment 'projector has great 3D with minimal crosstalk'. it's the 1 time a screenshot can actually be useful.
Zombie, I sent you a PM a month or two ago asking about those test patterns and never heard back. If you can tell me where to find them, I'll see about incorporating them as well.

For the record, though, I'm not using the test pattern that you screenshotted above (the visual crosstalk check). I'm using the measurement pattern and performing the following checks using a calibrated Minolta LS100 on a tripod:

Left Eye:
black reading through glasses
white/red/green/blue readings through glasses
white/red/green/blue readings through glasses w/ shutter closed
repeat all readings for right eye.

From this, I do a little math and get a percentage that I can report. I won't be posting a screenshot of the S&M pattern.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deja Vu View Post
Thanks for this. I appreciate that you're listening (seems like you're one of the few) to our concerns about the subject evaluation of 3D ghosting. I look forward to your reviews.
Thanks for the feedback. I started coming to this forum because I noticed that a few people had some weird ideas about how we operated, and I thought having an actual person to talk to would allay some of that. So far it's been a pretty positive experience and I appreciate the feedback I've been getting.
Deja Vu, mariob33 and d.j. like this.

Associate Editor, ProjectorCentral.com | @PJC_Bill
PJC Bill is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:16 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by d.j. View Post
Really ? - why not 2 or 3 ( are there then ringing IYO ?) and what about the "C" ? Have you tried a lot of combinations with that ? ( and with the sharpness control at the same time and even contrast setting, which do change, how the RC behave )


But of couse, maybe you have a lot more experience ( hours playing with all the controls, and on different materiel ) then the rest of us




Short story , you shouldnt speak and makes firm conclusions, so much about this projector, before you have had a lot more time to play with one, then you did have at Marks´place ( and yes, I know that it was "calibreted" - but that has nothing to do with most of these settings ) .


Just my humble opinion


dj
That quote has nothing to do with ringing but more to do with general picture quality. If you actually understood the context of my post then maybe your remark would sound a little less harsh on me. Bill was talking about doing the review with as much "post processing" turned off to get a general understanding of how each projector looks in it "native" state. With the Sony 4K model this makes it difficult because you need to enable scaling to get the content to fit the general frame of the display. With it off the image looks much worse than with the setting at zero. I was just making sure he was aware of the huge difference it made. This would give the Sony 4K units a MUCH better advantage in terms of "relative" performance compared to the others. And leaving it at zero instead of 1, 2, or 3 introduces the least amount of post-processing but still ups the PQ substantially over having RC off. But I'm glad you were able to make the distinction between the two.

And why did you put calibrated in quotes? Are you trying to insinuate Mark's unit isn't calibrated? You know, for someone who gets upset because you think I cross line without enough information to make points on the forum, you sure as heck do it yourself a lot. Did you ever get an official word back from JVC on the "huge" difference in MPC processing? Mike's contact at JVC was pretty clear when he said there's never been a change that was outside the firmware update files. Because I know I wouldn't be making claims, referencing production line changes, on an open forum like this without getting confirmation first.

Just my humble opinion.

Last edited by Seegs108; 01-13-2015 at 01:15 PM.
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:40 PM
AVS Special Member
 
d.j.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
That quote has nothing to do with ringing but more to do with general picture quality. With it off the image looks much worse than with the setting at zero. ( that we agree on ) I was just making sure he was aware of the huge difference it made. I'm glad you were able to make the distinction between the two.


I'm sorry , but you have a bad habit, silent pretty solid and "expert" like most things even if you are not always right (IMO at least) - and it is not always, some bother correcting it (especially us, who do not speak / write English as the main language because it requires a lot of time to write it correctly so it will not be misunderstood or direct misunderstood).


I / and others ( I think !? ) do like to read your post in generel and do think you are a big help / benefit for a lot in here - so please do not take it the wrong way


dj




I can see you have edited the post( while I write a answer ) , but have not readed the edited version for now..... ( and being a little naughty now )

Last edited by d.j.; 01-13-2015 at 12:56 PM. Reason: adding fun
d.j. is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:43 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my home theater ( when I'm not rock climbing, cycling or kayaking ) - Sacramento CA area
Posts: 6,855
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 940 Post(s)
Liked: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by d.j. View Post
Really ? - why not 2 or 3 ( are there then ringing IYO ?) and what about the "C" ? Have you tried a lot of combinations with that ? ( and with the sharpness control at the same time and even contrast setting, which do change, how the RC behave )


But of couse, maybe you have a lot more experience ( hours playing with all the controls, and on different materiel ) then the rest of us




Short story , you shouldnt speak and makes firm conclusions, so much about this projector, before you have had a lot more time to play with one, then you did have at Marks´place ( and yes, I know that it was "calibreted" - but that has nothing to do with most of these settings ) .


Just my humble opinion


dj

One thing I like about the VW600's remote, is the ability to toggle various settings on and off. It's pretty easy to go into the menu, change the RC setting, then toggle it on and off. I think I have mine set around 8 or so. RC off definitely looks bad though !

Craig Peer, AV Science Sales. Call me on my direct line - 585-671-2972, 8:30am - 4:30pm PST, Monday - Friday
Email me at craig@avscience.com http://shop.avscience.com/
Yes, we sell Home Theater gear right here at AVS !!
JVC, Sony, Epson, DPI, SIM2, SV Sound, Martin Logan, RBH, and many more!
Craig Peer is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:54 PM
AVS Special Member
 
d.j.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
That quote has nothing to do with ringing but more to do with general picture quality. If you actually understood the context of my post then maybe your remark would sound a little more harsh on me. Bill was talking about doing the review with as much "post processing" turned off to get a general understanding of each projector looks in it "native" state. With the Sony 4K model this makes it difficult because you need to enable scaling to get the content to fit the general frame of the display. With it off the image looks much worse than with the setting at zero. I was just making sure he was aware of the huge difference it made. This would give the Sony 4K units a MUCH better advantage in terms of "relative" performance compared to the others. And leaving it at zero instead of 1, 2, or 3 introduces the least amount of post-processing but still ups the PQ substantially over having RC off. But I'm glad you were able to make the distinction between the two.

And why did you put calibrated in quotes? Are you trying to insinuate Mark's unit isn't calibrated? You know, for someone who gets upset because you think I cross line without enough information to make points on the forum, you sure as heck do it yourself a lot. Did you ever get an official word back from JVC on the "huge" difference in MPC processing? Mike's contact at JVC was pretty clear when he said there's never been a change that was outside the firmware update files. Because I know I wouldn't be making claims, referencing production line changes, on an open forum like this without getting confirmation first.

Just my humble opinion.




Sorry, but Seegs108, I think you confuse me with somebody else ( Andreas21 maybe ? )


I have never talk about JVC / MPC processing in here ever ( or would you please show me a post - thanks )




No, I wasnt ( besides that, Mark is to old and to wise to get upset - I think ), I just mentioned it, because it has very little to do with the projector being calibreted !




dj
d.j. is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 12:58 PM
AVS Special Member
 
d.j.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post
One thing I like about the VW600's remote, is the ability to toggle various settings on and off. It's pretty easy to go into the menu, change the RC setting, then toggle it on and off. I think I have mine set around 8 or so. RC off definitely looks bad though !



I agree
d.j. is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 01:07 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
darinp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 21,485
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 194 Post(s)
Liked: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post
One thing I like about the VW600's remote, is the ability to toggle various settings on and off. It's pretty easy to go into the menu, change the RC setting, then toggle it on and off. I think I have mine set around 8 or so. RC off definitely looks bad though !
Not sure if we are talking about the same thing, but a Sony rep showed a test mode for RC where it automatically toggles it on and off every second or so (doesn't require using the remote to toggle it). This was just a normal feature in the RC menu with a name like "test" IIRC.

--Darin

This is the AV Science Forum. Please don't be gullible and please do remember the saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
darinp2 is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 01:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 6,168
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1631 Post(s)
Liked: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by d.j. View Post

Sorry, but Seegs108, I think you confuse me with somebody else ( Andreas21 maybe ? )


I have never talk about JVC / MPC processing in here ever ( or would you please show me a post - thanks )




No, I wasnt ( besides that, Mark is to old and to wise to get upset - I think ), I just mentioned it, because it has very little to do with the projector being calibreted !




dj

Yes, confusing you with DJ Dee. Prior statements still apply though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FS: JVC DLA-X500 (Current Model) - $3195
FS: Planar PD8150 1080p DLP Projector - With Upgraded DarkChip 4 DLP DMD - $2495
Seegs108 is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 01:15 PM
Member
 
PJC Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 160
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Liked: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by darinp2 View Post
Not sure if we are talking about the same thing, but a Sony rep showed a test mode for RC where it automatically toggles it on and off every second or so (doesn't require using the remote to toggle it). This was just a normal feature in the RC menu with a name like "test" IIRC.

--Darin
I love this feature. I'm not sure why.

However I think Craig is talking about the relatively high number of direct-access buttons on the Sony remote, so you can do things like adjust Reality Creation without digging through the menu. It also lets you switch image modes with one button press -- which is good, because switching modes on Sony projectors has a little bit of lag to it, and having to scroll through the list can be aggravating.

Associate Editor, ProjectorCentral.com | @PJC_Bill

Last edited by PJC Bill; 01-13-2015 at 01:16 PM. Reason: Confused Craig with Seegs. Whoops.
PJC Bill is offline  
Old 01-13-2015, 01:27 PM
AVS Club Gold
 
AV Science Sales 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: A beautiful view of a lake
Posts: 10,421
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Liked: 945
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seegs108 View Post
I knew that before asking. What's the point you're tying to make?
You asked about ghosting. With a separate screen for each eye, there can't be ghosting.
d.j. likes this.

Mike Garrett, AV Science Sales Call Me: 585-671-2968
Email Me: Mike@AVScience.com
Brands we sell: http://avscience.com/brands/ 
Call for B-stock projectors
Sony, JVC, Stewart, Seymour, SE, SI, Falcon, DNP & more.
RBH, Martin Logan, Triad, Atlantic Tech., MK Sound, SVS & Def Tech, Denon, Marantz, Yamaha & MiniDSP.
AV Science Sales 5 is offline  
 

Tags
Benq W7000 Home Projection System , Jvc Dla Rs55 Bundle , Jvc Dla Rs45 Home Theater Projector 1080p Hdmi , Epson V11h502020 Powerlite Home Cinema 3020e 2d And 3d 1080p Wireless Home Theater Projector , Sony Vpl Hw50es 3d Projector , Epson 5010 Powerlite Home Cinema 3d Front Projector , Epson Powerlite Home Cinema 3010 2d And 3d Projector V11h421020 , Panasonic Ptae8000u Hd Projector , Mitsubishi Hc7900dw Home Theater 3d Projector , Mitsubishi Hc8000dbl Dlp 3d Home Theater Projector With Spare Lamp 1300 Ansi 12 6 Lbs , Darbeevision Darblet Hdmi Video Processor , Epson 5020ub Powerlite Home Cinema 3d Front Projector
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off