AVS | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews

AVS | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews (http://www.avsforum.com/forum/)
-   Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP (http://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-digital-hi-end-projectors-3-000-usd-msrp/)
-   -   Is the Epson 5020UB right for me? (http://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-digital-hi-end-projectors-3-000-usd-msrp/1441401-epson-5020ub-right-me.html)

ERuiz 11-26-2012 12:15 AM

I currently have an Epson 8350 with almost 2K hours on the lamp and it's time for me to upgrade and jump in the world of 3D content.

I will be projecting onto a 140" diag., 1.0 gain, 16:9 screen from a distance of about 13'-7" on a rear shelf. According to the online calculator, this will yield 41 FL at that distance and screen size.

Would this be a good PJ for me in the $2,500 +- price range?

My theater is 100% light controlled and the wall behind the screen and ceilings are painted matte black with the walls painted dark burgundy.

What you guys think?

AV Science Sales 5 11-26-2012 06:16 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERuiz View Post

I currently have an Epson 8350 with almost 2K hours on the lamp and it's time for me to upgrade and jump in the world of 3D content.
I will be projecting onto a 140" diag., 1.0 gain, 16:9 screen from a distance of about 13'-7" on a rear shelf. According to the online calculator, this will yield 41 FL at that distance and screen size.
Would this be a good PJ for me in the $2,500 +- price range?
My theater is 100% light controlled and the wall behind the screen and ceilings are painted matte black with the walls painted dark burgundy.
What you guys think?

Some thing is wrong. You will not get anything close to 41 FL with that screen size. It will be closer to half that number in high lamp short throw. 3D will be around 8.5 FL. Hard to light up a large low gain screen in 3D.

ERuiz 11-26-2012 06:39 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AV Science Sales 5 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERuiz View Post

I currently have an Epson 8350 with almost 2K hours on the lamp and it's time for me to upgrade and jump in the world of 3D content.
I will be projecting onto a 140" diag., 1.0 gain, 16:9 screen from a distance of about 13'-7" on a rear shelf. According to the online calculator, this will yield 41 FL at that distance and screen size.
Would this be a good PJ for me in the $2,500 +- price range?
My theater is 100% light controlled and the wall behind the screen and ceilings are painted matte black with the walls painted dark burgundy.
What you guys think?

Some thing is wrong. You will not get anything close to 41 FL with that screen size. It will be closer to half that number in high lamp short throw. 3D will be around 8.5 FL. Hard to light up a large low gain screen in 3D.

My bad, it was a typo on my part. Here are the correct numbers according to the projector central calculator:

132" diag 16:9 image
13'- 7" throw distance
2.03x zoom
1.0 gain
42 FL

That is what the calculator is saying.

- Sent from my rooted, Verizon Samsung Galaxy Nexus LTE smartphone via Tapatalk because haters gonna hate.

AV Science Sales 5 11-26-2012 07:23 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ERuiz View Post

My bad, it was a typo on my part. Here are the correct numbers according to the projector central calculator:
132" diag 16:9 image
13'- 7" throw distance
2.03x zoom
1.0 gain
42 FL
That is what the calculator is saying.
- Sent from my rooted, Verizon Samsung Galaxy Nexus LTE smartphone via Tapatalk because haters gonna hate.

I agree that is what the calculator on projector Central gives you. I am just telling you that is not what to expect. it takes 2,200 lumens to give you 42 FL for that size and gain screen (132" 1.0 gain). In your setup I would expect 1,200 to 1,300 lumens max and still be able to throw a decent image. This is not best mode lumens. Best mode is not bright enough. With 1,200 lumens, you are looking at 23 FL.

ERuiz 11-26-2012 07:36 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AV Science Sales 5 View Post

I agree that is what the calculator on projector Central gives you. I am just telling you that is not what to expect. it takes 2,200 lumens to give you 42 FL for that size and gain screen (132" 1.0 gain). In your setup I would expect 1,200 to 1,300 lumens max and still be able to throw a decent image. This is not best mode lumens. Best mode is not bright enough. With 1,200 lumens, you are looking at 23 FL.

I see, Mike, and I appreciate you taking the time to help me out here.

Ok, with my current Epson 8350 when it was brand new, calculator was saying it was 21 FL. That is half of what the calculator is saying for the 5020 and even then, I thought the 8350 image was extremely bright for my room, considering the real output was much much less, probably in the low teens for FL levels.

With this being said, is the 5020 still a good option for my room specs when it comes to 3D? I know 2D will be no issue at all.

Special FX_45 11-26-2012 01:13 PM

Just wanted to comment that I purchased my Epson 5020 this morning from Mike at AVS and it was an easy and super smooth transaction. His customer service is awesome! I'm also in the same boat as you as I'll be doing a 140" screen as well. Mike at AVS is currently finalizing my Da-Lite HP 2.35:1 specs. I highly recommend purchasing your 5020 and many other things from him. You're in good hands!

ERuiz 11-27-2012 06:04 AM

I would love to know if lag is not an issue with the 5020. Reviews don't say much about this.

- Sent from my rooted, Verizon Samsung Galaxy Nexus LTE smartphone via Tapatalk because haters gonna hate.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.