Official Sony VPL-VW500ES / VW600ES 4K Projector Thread - Page 133 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
Thread Tools
post #3961 of 3973 Unread 11-25-2014, 11:10 PM
Advanced Member
 
Michael9009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV Science Sales 5 View Post
It definitely was a Black Diamond electric, but from what you are saying, it might have been the 0.8 gain.
Would a low gain hotspot that badly? From the seating position the middle was very bright and the edges and corners were dark. Typical vignetting like in the old photographs. It was a very 'directional' screen.
Michael9009 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #3962 of 3973 Unread 11-26-2014, 07:48 AM
AVS Club Gold
 
AV Science Sales 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: A beautiful view of a lake
Posts: 8,336
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 642 Post(s)
Liked: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael9009 View Post
Would a low gain hotspot that badly? From the seating position the middle was very bright and the edges and corners were dark. Typical vignetting like in the old photographs. It was a very 'directional' screen.

If the throw is too short it certainly will. The 0.8 gain requires 1.5 screen widths minimum and I would not use the minimum.

Added
Actually the screen is most likely not a low gain, even though it ends up being a low gain screen by the final number. It depends on where it's starting point is. If it started at .5 gain and then by the time SI is done with their process, it moves the gain up to .8, then that is a 160% increase in gain. Same goes for the Stewart FireHawk. Everyone thinks of it as low gain, since it is 1.1, but it also requires a 1.5 screen width throw. The FireHawk starts at something like 0.8 gain base and then optical coating are applied to bring the gain up to 1.1.

Mike Garrett, AV Science Sales Call Me: 585-671-2968
Email Me: Mike@AVScience.com
Brands we sell: http://avscience.com/brands/ 
Call for B-stock projectors
Stewart, Seymour, SE, SI, Falcon, DNP & more.
RBH, Martin Logan, Triad, Atlantic Tech., MK Sound, BG Radia, SVS & Def Tech, Denon, Marantz & Yamaha .

Last edited by AV Science Sales 5; 11-26-2014 at 10:30 AM.
AV Science Sales 5 is offline  
post #3963 of 3973 Unread 11-26-2014, 09:53 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my home theater ( when I'm not rock climbing, cycling or kayaking ) - Sacramento CA area
Posts: 5,417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Liked: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael9009 View Post
Would a low gain hotspot that badly? From the seating position the middle was very bright and the edges and corners were dark. Typical vignetting like in the old photographs. It was a very 'directional' screen.

That doesn't sound like it was set up correctly. I think Mike hit the nail on the head.

Craig Peer, AV Science Sales. Call me on my direct line - 585-671-2972, 8:30am - 4:30pm PST, Monday - Friday
Email me at craig@avscience.com http://shop.avscience.com/
Yes, we sell Home Theater gear right here at AVS !!
JVC, Sony, Epson, DPI, SIM2, SV Sound, Martin Logan, RBH, and many more!
Craig Peer is offline  
post #3964 of 3973 Unread 11-26-2014, 10:40 AM
Advanced Member
 
Michael9009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Peer View Post
That doesn't sound like it was set up correctly. I think Mike hit the nail on the head.
I remember, years ago when I was testing screen samples for my first Sony projector (VPL-VW50 - the Pearl), that I saw this high directionality from two Stewart grey screens. I believe it was the Firehawk G3 (?) - not sure - but one of them was specifically designed for the Pearl projector (SST?). Due to strong hotspotting, I decided they were not suitable for my HT - 133 inch diagonal, 16:9 format, 15 feet throw, seating at 12 feet - and went with Da-Lite Cinema Vision (and later with the HD Progressive 1.3). I am pretty happy with my current screen but what I saw Saturday - intense hotspotting and horrendous sparkling - reminded me that grey screens may not work for certain application. It was certainly looking bad at that dealer and did not present the 1100ES in a good light (pun intended).
Michael9009 is online now  
post #3965 of 3973 Unread 11-26-2014, 11:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Craig Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my home theater ( when I'm not rock climbing, cycling or kayaking ) - Sacramento CA area
Posts: 5,417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Liked: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael9009 View Post
I remember, years ago when I was testing screen samples for my first Sony projector (VPL-VW50 - the Pearl), that I saw this high directionality from two Stewart grey screens. I believe it was the Firehawk G3 (?) - not sure - but one of them was specifically designed for the Pearl projector (SST?). Due to strong hotspotting, I decided they were not suitable for my HT - 133 inch diagonal, 16:9 format, 15 feet throw, seating at 12 feet - and went with Da-Lite Cinema Vision (and later with the HD Progressive 1.3). I am pretty happy with my current screen but what I saw Saturday - intense hotspotting and horrendous sparkling - reminded me that grey screens may not work for certain application. It was certainly looking bad at that dealer and did not present the 1100ES in a good light (pun intended).
The wrong screen / screen set up does a good projector a complete disservice.

Craig Peer, AV Science Sales. Call me on my direct line - 585-671-2972, 8:30am - 4:30pm PST, Monday - Friday
Email me at craig@avscience.com http://shop.avscience.com/
Yes, we sell Home Theater gear right here at AVS !!
JVC, Sony, Epson, DPI, SIM2, SV Sound, Martin Logan, RBH, and many more!
Craig Peer is offline  
post #3966 of 3973 Unread 11-26-2014, 01:49 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 613 Post(s)
Liked: 583
As has been stated, the color of the screen does not have much to do with anything under discussion here. The gain of a screen is simply the multiplication process of the various gain layers the screen consists of. with a non white screen and in effect many white screens, the gain of the substrate layer is less than unity (Unity is one). Gain layers can be printed on or spayed on. The best screen material out there for a non acoustically transparent screen PQ wise is in my opinion Stewart Snomatt 100. The substrate material for this screen is just under 1.0 and a very tiny amount of gain material is sprayed on this fabric to bring it up to one. Even for this material, a minimum throw distance should be about 1.25. For screen like Studeotec130, the sprayed on gain is about 1.3 and a throw minimum is 1.3. more is better. For screen materials where the substrate material is substantially less than 1.0, the final gain divided by the substrate gain will closely approximate the sprayed on gain. The sprayed on gain will represent the minimum throw multiplier. let's take Firehawk G3 or LS. The final gain is about 1.25 and the substrate gain is about. 0.8. conservatively, a minimum throw for this material is 1.6. the new firehawk has a gain of 1.1 and starts with a 0.8 gain substrate. Conservatively this gives a minimum throw multiplier of 1.4.




Why is any of this? It has to do with the angle of the light coming from the projector lens and hitting the screen. this angle is not constant of course but depends on a variety of factors. The longer the throw multiplier one uses for set up, the less the worst case angle will be. In olden days, commercial theaters were much longer than they were wide and the projector was mounted in the rear. High gain screens were and are still used. No problem with long throws.


For home use, err on the long side to minimize screen material induced artifacts.


All this of course is for angular reflective screens. Retro reflective screens, the only real example is Da-lite HP of whatever gain and rebranded uses of this material. Throw is not really relevant though this material has its own weaknesses which thankfully most don't see because they are happily blinded by the light.




The screen industry has become like the older days of speaker manufacturing. Anyone can easily enter the screen manufacturing business without knowing very much. Many screen manufacturing companies do not specify very much re the fabrics they use and recommended minimum throws.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536

Last edited by mark haflich; 11-26-2014 at 01:53 PM.
mark haflich is offline  
post #3967 of 3973 Unread Yesterday, 01:34 AM
Advanced Member
 
Michael9009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Mark, I am assuming that, since the screen diagonal subtends the largest projection angle, the minimum throw distance ratio relates to the diagonal. In other words, the throw ratio equals the throw distance divided by the screen diagonal. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

What would then be the minimum throw distance ratio for my screen, the Da-Lite HD Progressive 1.3? It's a white screen so it should also be 1.3. In this case, for my 133 inch diagonal screen, the minimum throw distance would be 133 x 1.3 = 173 inches, or 14.4 feet. My throw distance, measured from the front lens of the 500ES is 15.3 feet. So I'm just okay. I actually see some mild hotspotting on the screen but it's nothing too bothersome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post
All this of course is for angular reflective screens. Retro reflective screens, the only real example is Da-lite HP of whatever gain and rebranded uses of this material. Throw is not really relevant though this material has its own weaknesses which thankfully most don't see because they are happily blinded by the light.
You simply nailed it here dead on. I once evaluated a sample of Da-Lite HP screen fabric and I hated it. It reminded me of traffic signage when driving at night. Also, for best results one would have to hold the projector in their arms.
Michael9009 is online now  
post #3968 of 3973 Unread Today, 10:35 AM
Senior Member
 
clausdk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 401
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Finally got my 500es installed. Shooting onto a gain 0,05 dark fabric wall at the moment! Waiting on screen delivery:-)

The projector itself is very good looking I think. Can't wait to watch the first movie. Using downtime to set up my htpc with some 4k eye candy.
clausdk is offline  
post #3969 of 3973 Unread Today, 01:24 PM
Advanced Member
 
Decadent_Spectre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 990
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked: 37
I could not find the answer so hope someone can answer it here.

What is the ANSI contrast of this projector?
Decadent_Spectre is offline  
post #3970 of 3973 Unread Today, 02:04 PM
Advanced Member
 
Andreas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 982
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by Decadent_Spectre View Post
I could not find the answer so hope someone can answer it here.

What is the ANSI contrast of this projector?
Around 450:1.

Regards
Andreas

My Homecinema

Andreas21 is offline  
post #3971 of 3973 Unread Today, 05:14 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 613 Post(s)
Liked: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael9009 View Post
Mark, I am assuming that, since the screen diagonal subtends the largest projection angle, the minimum throw distance ratio relates to the diagonal. In other words, the throw ratio equals the throw distance divided by the screen diagonal. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

What would then be the minimum throw distance ratio for my screen, the Da-Lite HD Progressive 1.3? It's a white screen so it should also be 1.3. In this case, for my 133 inch diagonal screen, the minimum throw distance would be 133 x 1.3 = 173 inches, or 14.4 feet. My throw distance, measured from the front lens of the 500ES is 15.3 feet. So I'm just okay. I actually see some mild hotspotting on the screen but it's nothing too bothersome.



You simply nailed it here dead on. I once evaluated a sample of Da-Lite HP screen fabric and I hated it. It reminded me of traffic signage when driving at night. Also, for best results one would have to hold the projector in their arms.



Throw distance first depends on the aspect ratio of the projection chip or chips. Here we are dealing with chips of 1.78 (rounded) aspect. However wide you project an image from such chip(s) on your screen (it makes no difference what the actual aspect ratio of the screen width is) is the dimension you multiply by the throw ratio to get the throw distance.

Or the throw distance divided by the image width gives the throw ratio. Assuming you are filling the screen width, the image width is 116 inches. Converting your throw distance to inches, the throw distance is 183.6 inches. 183.6 divided by 116 inches is about 1.58 or your throw ratio. That should be quite adequate for your screen material.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536

Last edited by mark haflich; Today at 06:40 PM.
mark haflich is offline  
post #3972 of 3973 Unread Today, 09:33 PM
Advanced Member
 
Michael9009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post
Throw distance first depends on the aspect ratio of the projection chip or chips. Here we are dealing with chips of 1.78 (rounded) aspect. However wide you project an image from such chip(s) on your screen (it makes no difference what the actual aspect ratio of the screen width is) is the dimension you multiply by the throw ratio to get the throw distance.

Or the throw distance divided by the image width gives the throw ratio. Assuming you are filling the screen width, the image width is 116 inches. Converting your throw distance to inches, the throw distance is 183.6 inches. 183.6 divided by 116 inches is about 1.58 or your throw ratio. That should be quite adequate for your screen material.
Thanks, Mark. I just wasn't sure if you used the screen width or the screen diagonal in your calculations.

Last edited by Michael9009; Today at 09:43 PM.
Michael9009 is online now  
post #3973 of 3973 Unread Today, 09:52 PM
Member
 
WIKED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by clausdk View Post
Finally got my 500es installed. Shooting onto a gain 0,05 dark fabric wall at the moment! Waiting on screen delivery:-)

The projector itself is very good looking I think. Can't wait to watch the first movie. Using downtime to set up my htpc with some 4k eye candy.
You will love every minute when your screen is up.
Every person who has watched anything on mine can't believe the quality of the picture. Enjoy!

Sent from my GT-N7105T using Tapatalk
WIKED is online now  
Reply Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP

Tags
Sony Vpl Vw500es , Sony Vpl Vw1000es Projector , Sony Fmp X1 4k Ultra Hd Media Player
Gear in this thread



Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off