Da-Lite HP 2.4. Visible streaks/banding. Is it defective? Some JVC rs4910, Mits 7900 3D impressions. - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-13-2014, 06:46 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
conan48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Igloo
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked: 245
So, I got my HP screen and while I love the extra brightness, I have noticed streaks all over the screen. I'm coming from a carada BW screen and it has no texture at all.

Is it common for HP screens to have streaks? It kinda looks like vertical banding you would see on LCD flat panels. I have a model B 109". I thought the HP surface was supposed to be texture free, but the streaks/bands are mostly on the right side and noticeable on mainly light or white coloured backgrounds.

Also, I thought the screen would be smoother to the touch. The carada is very smooth, but the HP has a slight grain to the material. While it is brighter then the Carada, it doesn't seem 2 x brighter. On the box it just said High Gain. Could they have shipped the wrong material? The screen is marked as 109" but rolls down farther then that and if you pull it down all the way to get the black borders, there is a good 12" of just white screen when the image is fit to it. Is that normal on pulldown, to have so much extra actual screen? I thought just the black border would be longer, and now I can't get a black border on all sides of the screen. Almost like it's the wrong aspect ratio. It was marked 16:9 HDTV?

I could easily watch My JVC on this screen and it wouldn't be too bright, and it adds even more "pop" to the highlights during dark scenes. The illusion of perceivable contrast goes through the roof, especially when you close down the iris and maintain nice blacks.

This screen does make a very nice combo with the Mits 7900. The mits is by far a better 3D projector then the Optoma HD25e I had, and has great FI. Still surprised at how good the JVC looks for 3D. The 3D image on the JVC has more contrast, better colours, and is actually brighter then the Mits! However, the image is FAR from ghost free. It's much better then the previous JVC I had but the ghosting is still there. I also get weird motion related ghosting with the JVC, where the ghosting is only visible during motion and then disappears when the motion stops. Anyone else notice it? Of course the JVC falls apart with really hard 3D material like SBS or Top Bottom content. I think the average person will be very pleased with the JVC for 3D.

The Mits is ghost free, and is very solid in 3D and does an amazing job with PC 3D gaming, and I've also been playing 2D games converted to 3D and it works surprisingly well! Playing games like Super Mario bros in 3D is pretty awesome.
conan48 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-13-2014, 07:05 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Deja Vu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: great white north
Posts: 4,559
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Liked: 188
Thank god you like the Mits.!

I would think the streaking you see on the screen is a defect. There is none on the 2.8 material and I wouldn't think that those on this forum with the 2.4 material would recommend the HP if this problem was common. As for brightness -- where are your projectors placed with respect to your seating position and eye height? This does make a difference.

I'm surprised that playing games with the 2D to 3D conversion doesn't increase the lag time to the point that it negatively impacts your play.

With the exception of ghosting (a real deal breaker for me) the JVC should perform better in 3D than the Mits. Why? Well, you did pay five or six times as much for it compared to what you paid for the Mits! What's really annoying about non-DLP projector and 3D is that for the most part they beat the DLPs in all respects except ghosting. When the ghosting comes along it ruins the illusion and that great image completely falls apart -- the great contrast, brightness and colours are overshadowed by an artifact that we know shouldn't be there. At some point the non-DLP manufacturers will get it right. We just haven't got there yet.
Deja Vu is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 08:52 AM
Member
 
kwk2293's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by conan48 View Post

So, I got my HP screen and while I love the extra brightness, I have noticed streaks all over the screen. I'm coming from a carada BW screen and it has no texture at all.

Is it common for HP screens to have streaks? It kinda looks like vertical banding you would see on LCD flat panels. I have a model B 109". I thought the HP surface was supposed to be texture free, but the streaks/bands are mostly on the right side and noticeable on mainly light or white coloured backgrounds.

Also, I thought the screen would be smoother to the touch. The carada is very smooth, but the HP has a slight grain to the material. While it is brighter then the Carada, it doesn't seem 2 x brighter. On the box it just said High Gain. Could they have shipped the wrong material? The screen is marked as 109" but rolls down farther then that and if you pull it down all the way to get the black borders, there is a good 12" of just white screen when the image is fit to it. Is that normal on pulldown, to have so much extra actual screen? I thought just the black border would be longer, and now I can't get a black border on all sides of the screen. Almost like it's the wrong aspect ratio. It was marked 16:9 HDTV?

I could easily watch My JVC on this screen and it wouldn't be too bright, and it adds even more "pop" to the highlights during dark scenes. The illusion of perceivable contrast goes through the roof, especially when you close down the iris and maintain nice blacks.

This screen does make a very nice combo with the Mits 7900. The mits is by far a better 3D projector then the Optoma HD25e I had, and has great FI. Still surprised at how good the JVC looks for 3D. The 3D image on the JVC has more contrast, better colours, and is actually brighter then the Mits! However, the image is FAR from ghost free. It's much better then the previous JVC I had but the ghosting is still there. I also get weird motion related ghosting with the JVC, where the ghosting is only visible during motion and then disappears when the motion stops. Anyone else notice it? Of course the JVC falls apart with really hard 3D material like SBS or Top Bottom content. I think the average person will be very pleased with the JVC for 3D.

The Mits is ghost free, and is very solid in 3D and does an amazing job with PC 3D gaming, and I've also been playing 2D games converted to 3D and it works surprisingly well! Playing games like Super Mario bros in 3D is pretty awesome.
i would send it back my first 2.4 hp screen had really bad banding on it second one was a lot better
kwk2293 is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 02:50 PM
Advanced Member
 
Jeff J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: chicago
Posts: 679
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Conan,
I have a da-lite contour electrol with 2.4 material that is now just under 3 years old. The streaks/banding have been getting worse as it ages…

I don’t remember any streaks when I first received the screen, then would notice streaks only on bright/high APL material and now it is pretty easily visible on most material. There are two significant bands…about 1/3 from the top and closer to the bottom.

I was thinking that this was just a side effect of the electric screen and that I was out of luck with it being 3 years old. Does DaLite recognize streaks as a known defect?
This page shows a 5 year warranty…anyone have any experience with a warranty claim with DaLite?
Jeff J is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 03:35 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GoCaboNow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,157
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff J View Post

Conan,
I have a da-lite contour electrol with 2.4 material that is now just under 3 years old. The streaks/banding have been getting worse as it ages…

I don’t remember any streaks when I first received the screen, then would notice streaks only on bright/high APL material and now it is pretty easily visible on most material. There are two significant bands…about 1/3 from the top and closer to the bottom.

I was thinking that this was just a side effect of the electric screen and that I was out of luck with it being 3 years old. Does DaLite recognize streaks as a known defect?
This page shows a 5 year warranty…anyone have any experience with a warranty claim with DaLite?

Are the streaks always in the same spot(s)?

Location: Beaverton, Oregon
My Dedicated Home Theater Room
GoCaboNow is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 05:32 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
conan48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Igloo
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deja Vu View Post

Thank god you like the Mits.!

I would think the streaking you see on the screen is a defect. There is none on the 2.8 material and I wouldn't think that those on this forum with the 2.4 material would recommend the HP if this problem was common. As for brightness -- where are your projectors placed with respect to your seating position and eye height? This does make a difference.

I'm surprised that playing games with the 2D to 3D conversion doesn't increase the lag time to the point that it negatively impacts your play.

With the exception of ghosting (a real deal breaker for me) the JVC should perform better in 3D than the Mits. Why? Well, you did pay five or six times as much for it compared to what you paid for the Mits! What's really annoying about non-DLP projector and 3D is that for the most part they beat the DLPs in all respects except ghosting. When the ghosting comes along it ruins the illusion and that great image completely falls apart -- the great contrast, brightness and colours are overshadowed by an artifact that we know shouldn't be there. At some point the non-DLP manufacturers will get it right. We just haven't got there yet.

I've placed the Mits on a stand very close to eye height and it's a nice improvement in brightness but doesn't seem to be 2 times brighter then my Carada. Still, it makes 3D more enjoyable.

The main advantage of the JVC in 3D is the same advantage it has in 2D. The contrast, especially with the iris now in 3D really has an insane amount of contrast that just destroys the Mits in 3D. The Mits has less flicker, zero ghosting, and a more solid looking 3D image. I will do all gaming on the Mits and most difficult 3D material as well. The thing is that hollywood movies have so little separation now a days that the JVC will be fine for many people. The JVC also doesn't have the annoying background ghosting of the Epson. Just don't buy the JVC thinking there is no ghosting, because it's there. It's just less obtrusive then models past.

The Mits has very little lag so adding 2D to 3D definetely adds lag but it's still playable.
conan48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 05:35 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
conan48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Igloo
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCaboNow View Post

Are the streaks always in the same spot(s)?

Streaks are in the same spot and can only be seen when you are getting the full benefit of the gain. I can't see any streaks when my JVC is on because it's ceiling mounted (unless I stand up) but the mits at eye level the banding/streaks can easily be seen. It looks like they applied the gain unevenly. I'll try to take some pics.
conan48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 05:51 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Seegs108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Schenectady, New York
Posts: 4,528
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked: 310
Yes, this is a common problem with the Da-Lite HP 2.4 material and I had a similar problem a few months back and Da-Lite rectified the issue

http://www.avsforum.com/t/1455184/hats-off-to-da-lite/0_50

Many others too had issues and it seems the QC on the screens is poor.
Seegs108 is online now  
Old 02-13-2014, 08:59 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
conan48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Igloo
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked: 245
Thanks Seegs.

Those screenshots are pretty much what I'm seeing. I was kinda annoyed when people said that the screen was so very smooth, only to find it more like sand paper compared to my Carada. Gotta see if I can find some 2.8 material.
conan48 is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 09:01 PM
AVS Special Member
 
AndyN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Had banding I my first screen and DaLite replaced it. Great service. Sadly second screen has developed similar bands. Not sure I'm within the warranty anymore.
AndyN is offline  
Old 02-13-2014, 09:06 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
conan48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Igloo
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked: 245
what is the alternative for a high gain screen with not texture, sparkles, banding, streaks, etc? Why do I always have to notice every single defect with everything I buy mad.gif Ex, I'm seeing specific ghosting related to motion on the JVC in 3D. Nobody has mentioned this yet, but I guarantee you that it's an issue that will be coming up here in the future. LOL. Does't ruin the 3D experience on the JVC but I still have to notice it.
conan48 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 08:46 AM
Senior Member
 
roxiedog13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North 48 °
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by conan48 View Post

what is the alternative for a high gain screen with not texture, sparkles, banding, streaks, etc? Why do I always have to notice every single defect with everything I buy mad.gif Ex, I'm seeing specific ghosting related to motion on the JVC in 3D. Nobody has mentioned this yet, but I guarantee you that it's an issue that will be coming up here in the future. LOL. Does't ruin the 3D experience on the JVC but I still have to notice it.

Vutec is trying to get through some production issues with their 2.2 SilverStar which is ISF certified . My guess is if they can get this product in production it will be a winner. As I understand they made the first prototype by hand which was the one shown at CIDIA and it was also the one tested.
The automated production process has hit some hurdles, if they can get through that it may be a great alternative for those wanting some extra gain for a larger screen and or 3D.

Talking with everyone in the Vutec chain one would believe they could be ready within a month or two. I was on the preorder list in November and was told the exact same thing then, so who knows.

This product is angular reflective, so it may be a good alternative to the HP 2.4. The 2.4 is a good product but like every product sold it has pros and cons. In my opinion there is no "better" or "best" screen just ones
that better fit the users personal preferences or their application.

If you have some Mcgyver skills there is also the DIY SilverFire 2.5 spray on. $200 worth of paint, a 5x10 foot piece of Sintra could be painted flat curved or in a Torus shape . Reasing a lot of user posts and reviews one would believe this
is as good as anything out there if done right. I have a spray paint that will be the BD 1.4 in every way so who knows, maybe the Silverfire is descent.
roxiedog13 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 09:13 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 625 Post(s)
Liked: 587
A hand built sample is the one that get's tested by ISF. Great. An exactly what does an ISF certification mean with respect to anything other than that the manufacturer is paying Joel Silver, whoops sorry about that, ISF a royalty? What are the parameters tested and what levels or metrics must be met? Is there any screen made by any of the screen manufacturers that would fail a certification test other than a material flaw that escaped the nominal level of QC that the test sample was put through by the manufacturer. What? Do you think maybe a hand picked sample might be submitted for testing and not just a production sample with nominal; QC?

I think one thing could be safely said about an ISF certification. It will somewhat artificially make the product more expensive.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 09:30 AM
AVS Special Member
 
airscapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4,734
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Liked: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

A hand built sample is the one that get's tested by ISF. Great. An exactly what does an ISF certification mean with respect to anything other than that the manufacturer is paying Joel Silver, whoops sorry about that, ISF a royalty? What are the parameters tested and what levels or metrics must be met? Is there any screen made by any of the screen manufacturers that would fail a certification test other than a material flaw that escaped the nominal level of QC that the test sample was put through by the manufacturer. What? Do you think maybe a hand picked sample might be submitted for testing and not just a production sample with nominal; QC?

I think one thing could be safely said about an ISF certification. It will somewhat artificially make the product more expensive.

About as useful as saying my tomatoes are organically grown.. yup, put the seeds in organic soil and they grew.. but I can charge a few more bucks for them.. cause I didn't use any chemicals.. just cow **** and fish oil spray..
airscapes is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 09:42 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 625 Post(s)
Liked: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by conan48 View Post

what is the alternative for a high gain screen with not texture, sparkles, banding, streaks, etc? Why do I always have to notice every single defect with everything I buy mad.gif Ex, I'm seeing specific ghosting related to motion on the JVC in 3D. Nobody has mentioned this yet, but I guarantee you that it's an issue that will be coming up here in the future. LOL. Does't ruin the 3D experience on the JVC but I still have to notice it.

There is one several of us have been sworn not to tell you about except in generalities. Actually there are three. Different prices but essentially the same material to address different economic sectors of the market. The engineers started with a clean slate and got a dispensation from the laws of physics. I wish I could share the exact parameters and specifications with you now. Without giving too much away, a gain level in double digits, no hotspotting at any throw ratio, uniformity in gain with a deviation across the screen of less than + /- 1 %. No color shifting. no sparklies, no pixel bleed (tested at 8K on a 100" diagonal screen to keep the pixels small). A half angle that could only exist if the screen were an active light amplifier. Whops. I might be saying too much. I could go on and on. Just one more parameter. Smoother than even Joel Silver. And if you know Joel, that is smooth, really smooth.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 11:27 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
conan48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Igloo
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

There is one several of us have been sworn not to tell you about except in generalities. Actually there are three. Different prices but essentially the same material to address different economic sectors of the market. The engineers started with a clean slate and got a dispensation from the laws of physics. I wish I could share the exact parameters and specifications with you now. Without giving too much away, a gain level in double digits, no hotspotting at any throw ratio, uniformity in gain with a deviation across the screen of less than + /- 1 %. No color shifting. no sparklies, no pixel bleed (tested at 8K on a 100" diagonal screen to keep the pixels small). A half angle that could only exist if the screen were an active light amplifier. Whops. I might be saying too much. I could go on and on. Just one more parameter. Smoother than even Joel Silver. And if you know Joel, that is smooth, really smooth.

I take it your being sarcastic? LOL. Can't tell with you Mark wink.gif

Also, Isn't Silver Star glass beaded and has visible sparkles? Or is this some new material?
conan48 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 11:54 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 625 Post(s)
Liked: 587
"(D)ispensation from the laws of physics". And you are staing that you can't tell whether I am joking and asking whether my post is factual? LOL

Silver Star is one of the worst screens I have ever seen. I'd take a streaking HP over that.
The gain of HP (other than a defective HP) tends to trump its faults. My problem is that many just are unwilling to recognize its faults which if one needs the gain or really is willing to overlook its faults as a trade off of having a really bright picture is to me an acceptable trade of for them. To me, it would not be..

Your screen is defective. Request a replacement. It won't cost you any thing.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 11:54 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
darinp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 21,229
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by roxiedog13 View Post

Vutec is trying to get through some production issues with their 2.2 SilverStar which is ISF certified,
I wonder what gain it will have. I have a sample of their SilverStar that has a rated gain of 6.0. I measured against a 2.8 gain HP. According to my measurements and some measurements from Stewart the peak gain of the HP is about 3.1 (measuring from right by the projector). With the SilverStar sample I measured from every reasonable angle and couldn't find one that measured as high as the HP's highest value. Not sure how they determined their gain that time or this time.

I also hope this new screen is a lot less visible than their one with the 6.0 rating. That one has lots of sparklies to my eyes.

--Darin

This is the AV Science Forum. Please don't be gullible and please do remember the saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
darinp2 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:13 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
conan48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Igloo
Posts: 2,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Liked: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

"(D)ispensation from the laws of physics". And you are staing that you can't tell whether I am joking and asking whether my post is factual? LOL

Silver Star is one of the worst screens I have ever seen. I'd take a streaking HP over that.
The gain of HP (other than a defective HP) tends to trump its faults. My problem is that many just are unwilling to recognize its faults which if one needs the gain or really is willing to overlook its faults as a trade off of having a really bright picture is to me an acceptable trade of for them. To me, it would not be..

Your screen is defective. Request a replacement. It won't cost you any thing.

Sorry, the word Dispensation is above my grade level biggrin.gif

I heard that for example Elunevision 2.4 is the same material as HP 2.4 material. Some of your post sounded legit, and I would love to know which material can be had that is high gain without sparkles.

I'm gonna contact Da lite on Monday for replacement.
conan48 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:16 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 625 Post(s)
Liked: 587
I once spoke to the owner of Vutech about the 6.0 gain rating of the old Silverstar. I said the have angle would really have to be very very small if the gain was 6.0 and I had measured it at about 3.0. he said that what his engineers told him and was sticking to that. He gave me a free gift of a flash light or something like that. years ago. To me, it looked like viewing an old CRT rear projection set with a renticular screen.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:20 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 625 Post(s)
Liked: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by conan48 View Post

Sorry, the word Dispensation is above my grade level biggrin.gif

I heard that for example Elunevision 2.4 is the same material as HP 2.4 material. Some of your post sounded legit, and I would love to know which material can be had that is high gain without sparkles.

I'm gonna contact Da lite on Monday for replacement.

Probably HP has the least. Possibly a silver screen but that has so many fleas for 2D and requires a really long throw.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:21 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
darinp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 21,229
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

I once spoke to the owner of Vutech about the 6.0 gain rating of the old Silverstar. I said the have angle would really have to be very very small if the gain was 6.0 and I had measured it at about 3.0. he said that what his engineers told him and was sticking to that.
I'm pretty sure I upset him when I told him their demonstration with their screen next to the Firehawk that basically showed the Firehawk couldn't do white was pretty much an optical illusion as it wouldn't apply if each screen was used by itself. I think he pretty much just walked away. I wonder if he would be willing to demonstrate the new 2.2 gain screen next to the "6.0" gain screen in the same way. smile.gif

--Darin

This is the AV Science Forum. Please don't be gullible and please do remember the saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
darinp2 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:32 PM
AVS Special Member
 
blee0120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Merillville, IN 46410
Posts: 3,732
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deja Vu View Post

Thank god you like the Mits.!

I would think the streaking you see on the screen is a defect. There is none on the 2.8 material and I wouldn't think that those on this forum with the 2.4 material would recommend the HP if this problem was common. As for brightness -- where are your projectors placed with respect to your seating position and eye height? This does make a difference.

I'm surprised that playing games with the 2D to 3D conversion doesn't increase the lag time to the point that it negatively impacts your play.

With the exception of ghosting (a real deal breaker for me) the JVC should perform better in 3D than the Mits. Why? Well, you did pay five or six times as much for it compared to what you paid for the Mits! What's really annoying about non-DLP projector and 3D is that for the most part they beat the DLPs in all respects except ghosting. When the ghosting comes along it ruins the illusion and that great image completely falls apart -- the great contrast, brightness and colours are overshadowed by an artifact that we know shouldn't be there. At some point the non-DLP manufacturers will get it right. We just haven't got there yet.

The Mit 7900 is a great second/combo projector for just 3D because of the price. Since, the Mit HC8000 is a better 2D projector, that would be the best under $1500 projector IMO
blee0120 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:36 PM
Senior Member
 
roxiedog13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North 48 °
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by conan48 View Post

I take it your being sarcastic? LOL. Can't tell with you Mark wink.gif

Also, Isn't Silver Star glass beaded and has visible sparkles? Or is this some new material?

Well, if ISF is not a standard to which we can believe in who then is the quintessential voice of standards I wonder ? Really though, without actually being sarcastic , how can we do we gauge a product ?
When I mentioned the Vutec Silverstar 2.2 to Mike Garret just the other day his comment was that indeed if it is ISF certified it should be a good product. I have no idea what ISF standards are or who
are the individuals involved. At some point I have to put some trust in these systems, otherwise the average person has no ability to make an informed decision. Many major manufacturers go through
great lengths to make it known which products have ISF certification , if this does not have any credibility, I guess we are all on our own .

In the last two months I have tried at least a dozen samples from various screen manufactures. What I have learned from this process is NEVER, NEVER buy a screen unless you have tested a sample
first. With the exception of one or two products most were not even close to my expectations. The only product that was close to being everything it advertized was the DA-Lite HP 2.4. I am not here to berate
the other manufacturers , they were courteous and confident enough to send me samples without question or condition.

The ONLY manufacturer that refused to send me samples was Stewart. Apparently their philosophy is not to have their product judged by a lesser product by people who don't know
the difference. That is exactly what the factory told me and the rep in Canada agrees. He told me to tell him what I want and they will sell me what I need, that was it. So, to the most expensive manufacturer
I say " I don't think so!!" If you actually think you have "the best" product and charge accordingly, at least have the cahones to prove it.

I have no idea if the new SilverStar 2.2 is glass bead, all I know is that is was displayed at CIDIA, some positive reviews reported and the material supposedly had ISF certification . For those of
us looking at a second or primary screen for certain applications, this was shaping up to be a viable alternative. Whether or not the production product ever makes the grade or even to market remains to be
seen. Only time will tell, we shall see .
roxiedog13 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 12:47 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 20,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 625 Post(s)
Liked: 587
Ask your dealer for Stewart samples. He or she will send them to you.

Re ISF, I have been around way too long and know way too much. ISF is a business, pure and simple. I would trust THX a lot more re a product meeting a set of standards although THX standards are based on what is the current practicable rather than what might be truly needed. THX charges royalties too. ISF primarily trains and certifies calibrators. many of which who have been certifies are not really qualified to do a quality calibration. Some are and I mean no disrespect to them.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 01:00 PM
Advanced Member
 
RickAVManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 712
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by conan48 View Post

So, I got my HP screen and while I love the extra brightness, I have noticed streaks all over the screen. I'm coming from a carada BW screen and it has no texture at all.

Is it common for HP screens to have streaks? It kinda looks like vertical banding you would see on LCD flat panels. I have a model B 109". I thought the HP surface was supposed to be texture free, but the streaks/bands are mostly on the right side and noticeable on mainly light or white coloured backgrounds.

Also, I thought the screen would be smoother to the touch. The carada is very smooth, but the HP has a slight grain to the material. While it is brighter then the Carada, it doesn't seem 2 x brighter. On the box it just said High Gain. Could they have shipped the wrong material? The screen is marked as 109" but rolls down farther then that and if you pull it down all the way to get the black borders, there is a good 12" of just white screen when the image is fit to it. Is that normal on pulldown, to have so much extra actual screen? I thought just the black border would be longer, and now I can't get a black border on all sides of the screen. Almost like it's the wrong aspect ratio. It was marked 16:9 HDTV?

Conan, I have the same screen HP 2.4 but model C and I am pretty sure you have a defect.

My HP dont have any streaks or banding at all.
RickAVManiac is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 01:02 PM
Advanced Member
 
RickAVManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 712
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Liked: 29
On another note, I read that you seem to really like your JVC.

This week-end my dealer loan me a RS4910, I will test it side by side with my Sony VW500 just for the curiosity wink.gif
RickAVManiac is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 01:03 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
noah katz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Mountain View, CA USA
Posts: 20,777
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
Liked: 183
So you're saying there's no difference between pesticides and no pesticides...
Quote:
Originally Posted by airscapes View Post

About as useful as saying my tomatoes are organically grown.. yup, put the seeds in organic soil and they grew.. but I can charge a few more bucks for them.. cause I didn't use any chemicals.. just cow **** and fish oil spray..

Noah
noah katz is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 01:14 PM
Senior Member
 
roxiedog13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North 48 °
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

Ask your dealer for Stewart samples. He or she will send them to you.

Re ISF, I have been around way too long and know way too much. ISF is a business, pure and simple. I would trust THX a lot more re a product meeting a set of standards although THX standards are based on what is the current practicable rather than what might be truly needed. THX charges royalties too. ISF primarily trains and certifies calibrators. many of which who have been certifies are not really qualified to do a quality calibration. Some are and I mean no disrespect to them.

Tried the Stewart head office and the Stewart rep at least three times maybe more . Both refused to send me samples and both reiterated exactly what I said in my last post. Their Philosophy is NOT to send samples for the reasons THEY stated .

I don't make it up, I'm just stating exactly what I experienced on three separate occasions. I certainly tried to get samples as I have no access to a dealer within a reasonable distance. Too bad because I believe they have some descent products
that may have worked for my application . I don't mind spending more money for a product if I believe it is worth the investment but I am also a realist too. Without a sample I would not make any investment in a product ,certainty one that is atop
the heap price wise. If I'm going to spend this kind of money I want to make an informed decision myself, Stewart believes I am not capable apparently , but I also know I am certainly capable of spending my money where I feel appropriate. ALL of the
other manufacturers,so far,see it this way too.
roxiedog13 is offline  
Old 02-14-2014, 01:15 PM
Advanced Member
 
Bigham16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked: 50
I just went through this exact same issue with my 100" Dragonfly screen (matte white, 1.25 gain). It was unwatchable for the most part. I had the hardest time trying to explain what was going on. In the end I got the screen replaced and so far the new screen is perfect. This was also just this week.

If it starts again then I will look at other options.



______________________
9.2.4 Home Theater Thread
Bigham16 is offline  
 

Tags
Mitsubishi Hc7900dw Home Theater 3d Projector
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off