The Official Canon SX60 Thread - AVS | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 02:31 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Icon Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
In a phrase, this projector has something for nearly everyone except for those who are unyielding 1080p/16:9 purists. It is one heck of a unit that will please the vast majority of forward HT enthusiasts who are not 1080/16:9 brainwashed.

Now on to the preview...

I received my dealer demo SX60 Saturday. It may have been one of the first shipped here in the USA other than ones sent out to trade shows and factory salesman.

Opening the box you find a few cables and a nice carrying case. This is pretty much the same packaging as the SX50 but that is where the similarities end. Inside the foam padded carrying case lies the SX60. It is well packaged to take rough handling.

After taking it out of the case the first task I had was to make a new adapter plate for my ceiling bracket. It is not the same hole placement pattern of the SX50. I use a Sony ceiling bracket with a tripod type flange. This lets me machine an adapter plate for most projectors of reasonable weight. A few hours later it is up on the ceiling. Before I did that I decided to test table mount it to see how noisy it was and to give me an idea of how far back it needed to be. The SX50's fans were noisy enough even in low lamp mode that I placed it about twenty feet back from the screen which is about five feet behind my main viewing sofa. That worked to subdue the SX50's fan noise. However I had mounted my backup DLP projector in that location after selling my SX50 and waiting for the new unit. I have a second open mounting spot directly above the sofa. There was no way I could have placed the SX50 there - not because of the zoom angle but because of the fan noise.

That is all different now. The SX60 has two large slow turning fans. I placed the unit at the front location (about fifteen feet back from my 132" Studiotek 130 screen) and had viewing angle/zoom to spare in or out. But what about the noise level? I have to strain to hear the SX60 even though it is directly overhead. I think it is even more quiet than my Sony LCD CX75 which professes to use the same fan technology in the Qualia. The Sony has two smaller dual fans and is very quiet too. The SX60's fans are far larger. I can not hear much of a db gain even when switching on the normal versus quiet lamp mode.

HDMI/HDCP compatibility? - YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
First test was the Toshiba (Walmart/black) HDD DVD player. No problemo!!! Am setting up an external HDMI switch to test other devices and will try Direct TV's HDMI port later. If it handled the HDD unit, I doubt if others will be a problem. I do not have a Denon DVD anything since I am also an Oppo owner. Have not used that but it should handle Oppo's straight DVI without a hitch.

AUTO SETUP? YEP!!! and it is pretty darn incredible. With the push of one button it auto focuses, auto keystones, auto signal types and (if switched on in the preferences) performs an AUTO SCREEN COLOR ADJUSTMENT. What is that? This is similar to a white balance correction in a digital camera. (Hmm, Canon, camera technology in a projector...cool!). I tested it on my Studiotek screen and it consistently came up with a minor shift in red and green values. But the cool thing about this feature is that it lets the unit shoot onto any color wall - including dark green as in green board "black" boards. In fact green is a fixed setting by itself but this an obviously a very powerful feature - especially for educational and business users but even us outdoor HT fans will find it useful for beaming onto you or your neighbor's house or fence for those backyard or front yard events. This is a big super plus score for Canon and a hint of what Canon can bring to the projector table.

IMAGE Quality?? LCOS!! LCOS!! LCOS!!....
Again literally no screen door effect a few inches back from screen. Pixel alignment? Seems far closer than the SX50 at edges of image even. Black tinted to purple? Cannot say. The SX50's alleged purple black never bothered me. Purple border - did not see one. Have not thoroughly looked for that. Light spill? I need for someone to tell me what to look for. I don't know precisely what bothered some folks who had it on the SX50. It never bothered me. Perhaps it is how I have the projector mounted?

IMAGE TYPES and CR RATIO!! Here is another area where the SX50 shines compared to the SX50. It has the sRGB which is where we SX50 users made our home which, with a minor tick in blue, it was near dead on 6500. But there was that 1000:1 CR issue. Well this unit has two "movie" viewing modes. One is called Movie mode designed to enjoy the atmosphere of a movie theater experience in a "dim" room. It is close to the sRGB setting and has ample brightness to deal with some ambient light in the room.

Here comes this groups crowd pleaser - the Home Cinema mode. This to is where Canon again has done it different. It is not an Auto Iris. An internal filter is dropped into the light path (you can hear it "click") and the image is dimmed down considerably. The CR is reputed to be 2000:1 on live images. In other words this is not on/off CR. Now at first I was not sure if I liked it being of the big and bright fan club but then I watched some movies with dark scenes. Well the blacks are way blacker than in the other modes and yes, the overall picture is lower in lumens too. It does require a dark room to be effective. In this mode the lamp by default drops into the quiet mode and the lamp life is alleged to be 4000 hours. If you want to cheat the system you can put the lamp in normal mode to get more lumens for a larger, brighter image but of course you will shorten the lamp life which is rated at 2500 hours or longer. Bulb costs are about $500.

I have not had a chance to do a DVD based calibration. But the image in Movie or sRGB mode is as startling as the one from the SX50. It is great for sports and watching network TV in SD or HD mode. The SX60 is 4:3 but it 16:9 720P "subset image is spectacular and will now please those that have to view movies in near absolute dark and who have to have the blacker blacks. The SX60 gives that. How does it stack up to a DLP or SXRD? I can say subjectively that the non-image area of the screen is as "black" as my DLP 2000:1 rated unit. In other words, the blacks are pretty darn black.

I should mention that unlike the SX50, it has remote focus and zoom which does make it easier to stand at the screen for that perfect adjustment however the Auto Setup mode had the focus nearly dead on perfect. When manually adjusting focus it throws a cool grid pattern in standard and reverse black and white making it very easy to get it perfect.

With this units SDE effect free image of lush rich deep LCOS/SXRD/DILA class color, with its ability to adjust its color balance to any "screen" material, with its ability to give a big bright image for the some lights on crowd and then do the dark, higher CR image types for the absolute dark cave dwellers among us, Canon has indeed in its second effort given the projector community something to please nearly everyone from HT enthusiast, to educator and on to the business community. At its $4999 MAP price it has a versatility not found in any other projector at any price with a picture quality that can match units costing twice its price and well more. But it isn't 1080p? So what. All broadcast TV now is 720P. Frequently debated here has been the issue of can you tell the difference between the two on the screen? I've seen the Ruby and it might be a tad sharper but if you can sit on top of the SX60's image from inches away and still it looks like film with no screen door, then the advantage of 1080p putting more info on the screen with smaller pixels is not really noticeable and even less so if the extra info is upscaled from 480 or 720 sources. It will be a long time before 1080p is the prime source even from Blue Ray. How long will it take for a serious number of titles to be out there in 1080p Blue Ray. So why should you pay the extravagant price of a 1080P projector now when there will only be a minimal difference if any to see on the screen?

The SX60 may have flaws that I have yet to find. But for its price, just likes it SX50 predecessor, it is a whole lot of projector for not too many bucks and it has addressed all of the SX50's issues. It is quiet, has HDMI/HDCP, dust blob free and with it various modes it has upped the CR of LCOS without a fussy auto iris to mess with and tweak all day long. It has a long life, "cheap" (by comparison to SXRD and DILA) bulb and has lumens to spare for the lights on party or sporting event showing.

The SX60 has a number of unique color correction controls. They surpass even those on the SX50 by far.

Send your questions and I will attempt to answer them if I have the time or expertise. I do not have any measuring equipment or a PC either since I am a Mac guy.

Icon Master
Icon Master is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 03:44 AM
Senior Member
 
raneil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Icon: I have to admit your arguements have been rather persuasive and considering the problem with the Sony and comments concerning the Cinetron, I ordered an Sx60 yesterday although, it may be two weeks before I receive it. I got it for a rather good price. I am wondering, do these projectors have some sort of built in processor? If not, what would happen if you inputed a 1080i signal and you have the projector in the widescreen mode? I ask this because apparently according to online review at Ultimate AV, the Toshiba A1 downconverts 1080i to 480 and then linedoubles up to 720p if you set this as your output. I do want to correct you on one mattter, 720p is not the set broadcast standard. Only Fox and ABC are using it . Broadcasters in your local may be doing something else.
raneil is offline  
post #3 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 05:28 AM
Senior Member
 
Diarmuid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 486
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
"The CR is reputed to be 2000:1 on live images. In other words this is not on/off CR."

Thanks for the review, but what on earth do you mean by that contrast ratio comment?
Diarmuid is offline  
post #4 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 06:00 AM
Senior Member
 
guptown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 264
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Icon Master,

Thank you for the first review of this long awaited projector! I want a big, bright pixel free image....but I also want to do a 2.35:1 CIH setup. Is it possible to to do this type of setup with the 4:3 SX60 and an outboard scaler?

thanks

Gup
guptown is offline  
post #5 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 06:39 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Erik Garci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Durham, NC, USA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
What frame rates does it support? In particular, can it show any film-based frame rates, such as 48Hz? In other words, if you connect a 48Hz signal, will it be displayed at 48Hz, without any tearing or other temporal artifacts?
Erik Garci is offline  
post #6 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 06:58 AM
Senior Member
 
MikLoyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Birthplace of DLP
Posts: 226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
and does it still tear at native like the SX50?
MikLoyD is offline  
post #7 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 07:08 AM
AVS Special Member
 
drpp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik Garci View Post

What frame rates does it support? In particular, can it show any film-based frame rates, such as 48Hz? In other words, if you connect a 48Hz signal, will it be displayed at 48Hz, without any tearing or other temporal artifacts?

Judging by the manual the SX60 frame rates range from 50 Hz to 100 Hz, so I doubt that 48 Hz will work. But 72 Hz might do, so if you have a HTPC or an appropriate scaler at hand...

--Peter
drpp is offline  
post #8 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 07:16 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Erik Garci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Durham, NC, USA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpp View Post

Judging by the manual

Is the manual available online?
Erik Garci is offline  
post #9 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 07:33 AM
AVS Special Member
 
drpp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Sorry, I meant spec sheet, manual is not yet online, one should not do two things simultanously---but the SX6* family command codes are online:

http://downloads.canon.com/cpr/softw...command_06.pdf

Obviously Canon put a little more effort into this projector family than into the SX50...

BTW according to Canon Germany the SX60 has 1500:1 on/off CR with activated colorfilter, not 2000:1...

--Peter
drpp is offline  
post #10 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 07:35 AM
AVS Special Member
 
drpp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Ah forget the above link, you have to go to the Canon SX60 product page, where you will find the codes...

--Peter
drpp is offline  
post #11 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 07:40 AM
AVS Special Member
 
KenLand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sugar Land, TX, USA
Posts: 3,629
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Nice review Icon.

The choice of very bright or good CR sounds just about perfect.

If anyone wants to send me one (or make me an upgrade offer I can't refuse ) I'll measure it.

Ken
KenLand is offline  
post #12 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 08:25 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Gary Lightfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 4,668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diarmuid View Post

"The CR is reputed to be 2000:1 on live images. In other words this is not on/off CR."

Thanks for the review, but what on earth do you mean by that contrast ratio comment?

I asked the same question more or less in the HS50 thread, but didn't get an answer. In fact it has to be on/off since no display panel can achieve that number for ANSI contrast which is the contrast between white and black when present in the same frame at the same time. DLPs can achieve over 600:1 but LCoS is closer to 200 to 300:1 IIRC. A typical good room will allow about 200:1 btw. I've no idea what 2000:1 on live images means and I don't think anyone outside of Canons marketing does either.

It's a step in the right direction and the price is good, but we don't know how well it scales SD or HD yet and that is quite important too, especially as the panel isn't a native resolution for any sources we have right now.

It seems the issues the SX50 had have been fixed, so that's a good thing, and I like the flexibilty it has with the brightness now - too bright will often increase image noise visibilty so being able to dim it down to match your screen (and get better blacks and contrast) will be useful. Being able to go brighter for even bigger screens will be useful too, so that is a plus point IMHO (albeit at the detriment of overall contrast). I'll be interested in the calibrated numbers and it's ability to be set to D65. The SX50 was limited to just adjustments in the gains IIRC.

Gary

Quote:
Originally Posted by elmalloc
Who says Cameron is "right" and why do we care about him so much - lol!

I trust Gary Lightfoot more than James Cameron.
Gary Lightfoot is offline  
post #13 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 08:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Diarmuid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Posts: 486
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Yeah I kinda figured that Gary, I thought an answer could prove amusing though
Diarmuid is offline  
post #14 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 08:33 AM
AVS Special Member
 
drpp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
According to the command codes *.pdf above RGB gain and offsett controls are now available... Let's wait and see.

--Peter
drpp is offline  
post #15 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 08:36 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Gary Lightfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 4,668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diarmuid View Post

Yeah I kinda figured that Gary, I thought an answer could prove amusing though

I'm sure it will.

Gary

Quote:
Originally Posted by elmalloc
Who says Cameron is "right" and why do we care about him so much - lol!

I trust Gary Lightfoot more than James Cameron.
Gary Lightfoot is offline  
post #16 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 10:23 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Raul GS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,196
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 24
Is it using the same scaler, or is it a better one?

PS Icon, you are still a little confused about CR.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence, than it does knowledge. Charles Darwin
Raul GS is offline  
post #17 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 11:26 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
darinp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 21,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon Master View Post

It will be a long time before 1080p is the prime source even from Blue Ray.

Others have covered the CR issue and your confusion there, so I'll leave that one. But you seem to be just as confused here. The vast majority of HD DVDs are 1080p and Blu Ray will be the same way. Although some get confused and think that 1080p film transported with a 1080i signal isn't 1080p material.

Sounds like a nice projector.

--Darin

This is the AV Science Forum. Please don't be gullible and please do remember the saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
darinp2 is offline  
post #18 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 11:53 AM
Member
 
Janusinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Icon,

Thanks for your review....we look forward to more info as you get time to play with this new unit.

Quick questions regarding install.....since you ceiling mounted your unit, did you install it inverted?

Did you have to drop the top of the lens about 7" below the top of your screen in order to get the projector at a 90 degree right angel to the screen so that you can avoid any keystone correction? I want to make sure I read the Canon brochure correctly.


Anyone interested in putting together a possible powerbuy?


Jason
Janusinc is offline  
post #19 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 01:25 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thirdkind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Icon, you keep referring to the projector as having "HDMI/HDCP". Doesn't this model have a DVI input though, not HDMI? HDMI is the connector; HDCP is for digital content protection and is exclusive of the transport method.

The only thing I'd like confirmed is the ability for the SX60 to accept 1080p via DVI. The Canon web site only lists 1080i, and with BluRay and future HD-DVD players outputting 1080p directly, I'd like to avoid the whole 1080i deinterlacing/scaling mess. Somehow, I doubt the Canon is doing it properly.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Janusinc View Post

Anyone interested in putting together a possible powerbuy?

Get somebody to arrange a SX60/Panamorph powerbuy, and I'd probably jump at it. Throw in an external scaler with proper 1080i deinterlacing and a selectable 1400x1050 resolution, and I don't think I could say no.

As much as I've enjoyed the various 1-chip DLPs I've owned over the last few years--some of them quite pricey--I still look back at my SX21/Panamorph/HD Leeza days with the most fondness. No rainbows, no screen door, no dithering...no contrast

I'd like the give the SX60 a try though. Perhaps the combination of acceptable contrast with the perception of better blacks in HD material* will be satisfying enough to forget the inky blacks of DLP.

Then again, with all that stuff piled together, the price would probably be pretty close to Ruby street prices...


* Anyone else notice this? For some reason, HD material appears to have better blacks than SD material. I know this isn't technically possible because digital black is digital black, but maybe the extra shadow detail and color detail/gradations are improving perceived contrast/black level?
thirdkind is offline  
post #20 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 03:35 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Gary Lightfoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 4,668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked: 84
I know what you mean about the blacks thirdkind - I noticed something similar with 3chip DLP too. I wonder if the better compression algorithm with HD (less mpg artefacts?) and less dithering with 3chip means a more solid black and the illusion of being blacker? Screendoor also seems less with HD - at least that was the impression we got on the Sony HS61 and I'm not sure why either.

Gary

Quote:
Originally Posted by elmalloc
Who says Cameron is "right" and why do we care about him so much - lol!

I trust Gary Lightfoot more than James Cameron.
Gary Lightfoot is offline  
post #21 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 03:48 PM
Senior Member
 
baileyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chadds Ford, PA
Posts: 273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Other than lumens, any big difference between this and the SX6?
baileyler is offline  
post #22 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 07:03 PM
AVS Special Member
 
William Mapstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked: 53
Quote:


Originally posted by Icon Master
It is one heck of a unit that will please the vast majority of forward HT enthusiasts who are not 1080/16:9 brainwashed.

This seems like an odd statement, with blu-ray and HD-DVD supporting 1080i/p. Canon better have a damn good internal scaler...

PSN: UndeadREDD


My Racing Seat

William Mapstone is offline  
post #23 of 448 Old 05-23-2006, 08:27 PM
Member
 
t.glinos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toronto, ONT, Canada
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by baileyler View Post

Other than lumens, any big difference between this and the SX6?

Price. Lack of the magical contrast filter. I suspect that the filter
is nothing more than a ND filter. The real question is what is the
difference in firmware between the SX6 and SX60.

Anyone care to speculate?

Can someone send me an email on stocking dealers.

tom
t.glinos is offline  
post #24 of 448 Old 05-24-2006, 03:06 AM
Senior Member
 
raneil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Projector reviews.com has announced that they will be conducting a review before the end of this month, of the sx60, at the request of Canon as a home theater projector! I don't know of any manufacturer making such a request unless they believe they're going to get raves for their product.
raneil is offline  
post #25 of 448 Old 05-24-2006, 04:43 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Icon Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
I'll try to answer the SX60 questions brought up so far however some I cannot answer since I do not have the information or abilty to measure or provide various input frequencies to see the results.

For one the unit will not handle 1080p input - only 1080i. I cannot answer the question of how it down and up converts. What I have seen however is that from my HiDef Direct TV receiver the output looks a tad sharper in 1080i than 720p. In fact the HDNET test pattern has a line that says if you can read this you have a 1080 capable display and I can read it in 1080i mode and that tiny bottom resolution testing line is fuzzy in 720p mode. I'll let the experts here figure out what that means. Does this mean it has a "darn good internal scaler?"

I know I seem confused over CR and perhaps I am because I do not know how to categorize what Canon said in the sales training material I received and this info is not on the Canon web site. I did see where the German site say 1500:1 but the American literature and even the manual say 2000:1 in Cinema mode. In the dealer sales brochure it also clearly states "that unlike the methods used by other manufacturers to measure CR we do it by measuring it simultaneously on screen at the same time." You guys will tell me what this means. Does any other manufacturer measure CR in this way and what would you call it?

I can say with certainty that the area outside the lit up wide screen image yet in the 4:3 projected field is as dark as that of my 2000:1 DLP. Again I'm talking about Cinema mode only.

I'm not up on the 2.35:1 approach. The SX60 has an auto mode that does well to fit the image with no edge clipping loss across the width of the image. Depending on what is being fed in HiDef mode I have seen the height of the image vary considerably. I'm not sure I get why you would want to squeeze an image down and distort it so it fits a certain ratio. I guess I am confuse on this too. But on the other had since this is a 4:3 unit and it is capable of dealing with images from 4:3 on down to 2.35:1 and all those in between why in the heck do you want to mess around and either loose image or distort it? At the movie theaters of today different flicks have the different height to width ratios and the better theaters mask the edges to fit. You'll see the curtain move as they switch from the previews to the feature film. In general I don't recall seeing a distorted image - just custom masking to suit each particular flick. Thus having a 4:3 unit is an advantage over 16:9 since you will see all there is to see without distortion.

On the tearing issue, I never saw it on the SX50. I think that only happened using a PC to feed the unit at certain frequencies and in my case I am using with component or DVI and now HDCP to link to the SX60. I do have to make a correction. THe unit has a DVI type port that handles HDCP via a HDMI to DVI adapter cable. You guys are darn sharp and I was loose in my terminology there.

Along those lines I just tested the Oppo's DVI output ant is looked great and I also fed it HDMI/HDCP->DVI from my Dish Net receiver and it handled that output as well. My Direct TV's HDMI port may be broken since it did not work with either projecotr or perhaps I have missed a setup setting there but it will not sync up with either of my projectors unless it is a too long of a cable issue. The other units I have have all worked fine using their HDMI or DVI outputs to both of my projectors. If anyone knows if cable length is an issue with the Direct TV HiDef Tivo unit let me know. For now it word fine via component.

There are several approaches to adjusting color values not. Beside the six point old way which had RGB and the CMY, there is another screen and there is also the RGB screen to which is where the auto setup tweaks color balance values for your particular screen (or wall or chalkboard).

When I ceiling mounted the unit I did invert it. The screw holes for the factory available ceiling mount kit are on the bottom of the projector. Canon's ceiling kit sells for about $900. I used my $175 Sony ceiling kit and made an adapter "plate" with about $10 worht of material and about three hours of my time. I saved enough money there to buy myself a spare bulb.

The big difference between the SX60 and the SX6 besides 2500 lumens to 3500 lumens is the Cinema mode. It drops an internal filter into the light path to get the reported 2000:1 CR. The other LCOS Canon units do not have this. Cannot say if there is s firmware difference .

Ken - you need to come to New Orleans with your measuring tools. Even with our widespread devistation the food and music here s still great here. I live out in the quiet 'burbs in an area that was not badly damaged by Katrina. Everyone on this web site including the folks outside the USA should come visit New Orleans, not to see the SX60, but to see what a powerful hurricane can do. The damage is so widespread it is almost unconceivable. I have only seen a fraction of it myself and it still has me shaking my head when I drive through vast areas of New Orleans that remain uninhabitable. Hopefully in your lifetimes this never happens again here or anywhere but t is something that has to be seen first hand to comprehend.

Icon Master
Icon Master is online now  
post #26 of 448 Old 05-24-2006, 05:01 AM
Newbie
 
vwatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
IconMaster --- How 'bout the image? If you had a SX50 and didn't need HDCP and didn't mind the loudness -would you still get the SX60?

In the non-cinema mode do you see any difference?

When the filter is dropped do you see any color change or just brightness?

Thanks
vwatch is offline  
post #27 of 448 Old 05-24-2006, 07:42 AM
AVS Special Member
 
DanHouck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Lake Chapala, old Mexico
Posts: 4,098
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Icon, great review! Now find me a great trade up deal!!

Question--is the blue halo problem gone? I made a masking frame that is positioned in front of the projector that deals with it nicely but I wouldn't mind not having to use that.

Second Question--does it use a different lamp than the SX50?

Again, thanks for an excellent review.

My HT is an oldie but goodie!
DanHouck is offline  
post #28 of 448 Old 05-24-2006, 09:59 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Icon Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHouck View Post

Question--is the blue halo problem gone? I made a masking frame that is positioned in front of the projector that deals with it nicely but I wouldn't mind not having to use that.

Second Question--does it use a different lamp than the SX50?

Dan - I don't recall seeing a blue Halo but thinking back I don't know if the later model SX50 w/o dust blobs had it as well. Tell me what I should do to make it show up and I will run a test for you. Also what was the issue with light leakage and under what conditions did it show up?

This unit has an entirely different lamp than the SX50. It is actually a lower wattage bulb but appears to be just a "bright" in the sRGB, Movie, Standard and Presentation mode. Perhaps that is why it is called an advanced AISYS design since it is more efficient.

If you have an SX50 and don't need HDCP (unfortunately the handwriting is on the wall that at some point in time you will need it or a fake-out black box), and you don't feel the need for the Cinema 2000:1 CR mode, and the fan noise level of the SX50 is not bothering you nor does yours have any dust blobs then stay with the SX50.

I'm on the fence about the CR mode myself but here's a "blind" test I ran. I had the unit in Cinema mode and started playing "Munich" DVD for my wife. (Remember my wife is a gifted professional graphic artist who has a great eye for color, etc and who was NOT impressed by the Ruby in a showroom demo of suspect calibration). Anyway, the room was totally dark although not hermetically sealed. Tinkering with the settings, I flipped the unit into Movie mode (Darin will love this) and my wife's reaction was "Put it back, its too bright." Indeed the blacks in the image were more gray and the light areas were more faded too. Granted that I have not calibrated the unit using one of the DVD's. I'll try to do that this weekend and see if I can pull another sneak attack test on the wife afterwards.

The really cool thing about the SX60 is that it does give you the choice of how you want to use the unit. With the standard below 1000 lumen (and usually way more expensive) projectors, it always has to be lights out. With the SX60 we now have a unit that gives you a great picture both ways - with some lights on or all totally off. And let us not diminish the potential value of the Auto Screen color balance feature - especially for those who give those outdoor parties or who take the RV out for road trips. You don't have to have a white house or RV anymore to use either as your outdoor screen, however it will have to be all one color.

Icon Master
Icon Master is online now  
post #29 of 448 Old 05-24-2006, 10:37 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
darinp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 21,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon Master View Post

In the dealer sales brochure it also clearly states "that unlike the methods used by other manufacturers to measure CR we do it by measuring it simultaneously on screen at the same time." You guys will tell me what this means. Does any other manufacturer measure CR in this way and what would you call it?

I would like to see them show us what test pattern they use. There are 2 main kinds of CR in specs, ANSI CR and on/off CR. ANSI CR is done simultaneously and is a 4x4 checkerboard, but there is very little chance that they get anywhere near their 1500:1 or 2000:1 claims with that test. Measuring ANSI CR, claiming that they measure simultaneously and then publishing on/off CR (which can't be done simultaneously) would be misleading, so I would like to see their pattern for their claim, as I said.

--Darin

This is the AV Science Forum. Please don't be gullible and please do remember the saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
darinp2 is offline  
post #30 of 448 Old 05-24-2006, 10:45 AM
AVS Special Member
 
drpp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
This would need to be an almost completely black screen with a small white square in one of the outer corners or something similar, and even then I would doubt that you get anywhere near 2000:1 or 1500:1 with a three chip LCOS projector...

--Peter
drpp is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply Digital Hi-End Projectors - $3,000+ USD MSRP

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off