Sony at CEDIA 2013 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 16 Old 09-30-2013, 11:14 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Scott Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,137
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Liked: 864

 


Scott Wilkinson
AVS Editor
Scott Wilkinson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 Old 09-30-2013, 06:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Lazarus Dark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Sony video removed... why does this not surprise me...
edit: working now
Lazarus Dark is offline  
post #3 of 16 Old 09-30-2013, 06:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Orbitron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 407
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Liked: 100
Scott, do a pretend interview with Sony and voice both parts.smile.gif
Orbitron is offline  
post #4 of 16 Old 09-30-2013, 06:24 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
Scott Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,137
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 198 Post(s)
Liked: 864

Sorry...the video had to be re-edited, and I forgot to post the new one. It's available now.


Scott Wilkinson
AVS Editor
Scott Wilkinson is offline  
post #5 of 16 Old 09-30-2013, 07:18 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mtbdudex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Liked: 190
at 2:20 in the video what aspect ratio did he say? Could not make it out clearly. Not 2.35:1, not 16:9 (1.78), did he say 2.85??
mtbdudex is offline  
post #6 of 16 Old 09-30-2013, 07:32 PM
Senior Writer @ AVS
 
imagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,562
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1044 Post(s)
Liked: 2200
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbdudex View Post

at 2:20 in the video what aspect ratio did he say? Could not make it out clearly. Not 2.35:1, not 16:9 (1.78), did he say 2.85??
Yes he said 2.85

Find out more about Mark Henninger at www.imagicdigital.com
imagic is online now  
post #7 of 16 Old 10-01-2013, 09:03 AM
AVS Special Member
 
mtbdudex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Liked: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by imagic View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbdudex View Post

at 2:20 in the video what aspect ratio did he say? Could not make it out clearly. Not 2.35:1, not 16:9 (1.78), did he say 2.85??
Yes he said 2.85

That's what I thought, so did some aspect ratio 101 during my lunch break.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(image)#Previous_and_currently_used_aspect_ratios
300px-Filmaspectratios_svg.svg.png

The aspect ration of the VPL-VW600ES 4096 x 2160 gives 1.89:1 as it's native, slightly wider than the 1080p pj's 16:9 1.78.
So, I'm scratching my head at his saying "2.85" and the significance of him stating that.....
mtbdudex is offline  
post #8 of 16 Old 10-01-2013, 09:09 AM
Member
 
boguspomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 33
I believe we can all agree that, yes he said 2.85:1, but really meant 1.85:1. After around 300 interviews it is understandable that people start to mix up numbers at times.

Those 2 interviews were - and now all together - FANTASTIC. (just a little reference to your 11 fantastic in 6 minutes)
boguspomp is offline  
post #9 of 16 Old 10-01-2013, 05:39 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mtbdudex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Liked: 190
So a "normal" anamorphic lens designed for 16:9 PJ with 1.33 expansion will stretch this image then to 2.52:1?
Hmmm, what have those with the 1000 been doing on their existing scope screens?


Sent from my iPad2 64GB using Tapatalk
mtbdudex is offline  
post #10 of 16 Old 10-01-2013, 06:28 PM
Senior Member
 
RevelMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
With the 1000 in normal mode the aspect ratio is 1.78 (16:9) so the anamorphic stretch is correct.
RevelMN is offline  
post #11 of 16 Old 10-01-2013, 06:43 PM
AVS Special Member
 
mtbdudex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 4,262
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Liked: 190
So what usage is the full panel mode 1.85 for?
As screens are currently either 16:9 or scope (2.37:1, 2:39:1, 2.40:1, close enough).
mtbdudex is offline  
post #12 of 16 Old 10-02-2013, 07:24 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 19,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Liked: 375
I can't believe the babble on this thread about the guy making a typo in the form of a misspeak re an aspect ratio. And Scott going positive gaga at the $15K price. Maybe he should have said well a lot of my audience thinks that's a little high and why is it so much more here in the US than in Europe and Canada? These are questions a AV reporter should ask. smile.gif

The real thing the first guy screwed up and you guys let him completely off was his reference to the server as a being a box. A box? A box! Well time to get the box out of here said this old hockey player. smile.gif

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
post #13 of 16 Old 10-02-2013, 07:28 AM
Senior Writer @ AVS
 
imagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,562
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1044 Post(s)
Liked: 2200
Quote:
Originally Posted by mark haflich View Post

I can't believe the babble on this thread about the guy making a typo in the form of a misspeak re an aspect ratio. And Scott going positive gaga at the $15K price. Maybe he should have said well a lot of my audience thinks that's a little high and why is it so much more here in the US than in Europe and Canada? These are questions a AV reporter should ask. smile.gif

The real thing the first guy screwed up and you guys let him completely off was his reference to the server as a being a box. A box? A box! Well time to get the box out of here said this old hockey player. smile.gif

 

Hatbox, actually. Feel free to follow this google images search link, to see what that means.

 

As for the price, the audience includes folks who do think it is a good deal—and for that level of performance it is a bargain at this point and time.

Can you please supply evidence of a pricing disparity. I am not aware of one.
 


Find out more about Mark Henninger at www.imagicdigital.com
imagic is online now  
post #14 of 16 Old 10-02-2013, 07:31 AM
AVS Special Member
 
turls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Central IL
Posts: 4,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked: 36
You can just basically ignore the fact that the Sony projectors are the 1.9ish ratio. Depending on content ratio, you just plan on not using the full panel (in most cases, and this is what I do with my motorized masking CIH screen). You get more panel than UHD, and much more than 1080p, so it is a moot point.

Matt
turls is offline  
post #15 of 16 Old 10-02-2013, 07:35 AM
Senior Writer @ AVS
 
imagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,562
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1044 Post(s)
Liked: 2200
Quote:
Originally Posted by turls View Post

You can just basically ignore the fact that the Sony projectors are the 1.9ish ratio. Depending on content ratio, you just plan on not using the full panel (in most cases, and this is what I do with my motorized masking CIH screen). You get more panel than UHD, and much more than 1080p, so it is a moot point.

 

Indeed, that is one of the best things about a 4K projector, essentially lossless rendering of any aspect ratio from a 2K source. It's called an "economy of abundance."


Find out more about Mark Henninger at www.imagicdigital.com
imagic is online now  
post #16 of 16 Old 10-02-2013, 07:36 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
mark haflich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: brookeville, maryland, usa
Posts: 19,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Liked: 375
It maybe in the shape of a hatbox but its not a box within the commonly accepted meaning with the AV trade and its consumer base. Nice box can mean many many things but Sony's hockey puck is not a box. I'd be banned if I posted about some of the nicest boxes I have even seen. But I would never violate a NDA.

Mark Haflich
markhaflich@yahoo.com
call me at: 240 876 2536
mark haflich is offline  
Reply Latest Industry News

Tags
Cedia 2013 , Sony , Projectors

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off