Mark Cuban Wins in Insider-Trading Case Jury Rejects SEC's Charges Related to Sale of Internet Company Stake - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 Old 10-16-2013, 02:21 PM - Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
markrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 23,099
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked: 480
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303680404579139774081561730?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection


By
John Carreyrou
connect
Oct. 16, 2013 4:00 p.m. ET

DALLAS—A federal jury ruled in favor of Mark Cuban after just over three hours of deliberations, handing the billionaire a resounding victory in his five-year quest to defend himself against the government's charges of insider trading.

excerpt: The Securities and Exchange Commission had sued Mr. Cuban in civil court, alleging that he traded on material, nonpublic information when he dumped his investment in Canadian Internet search company Mamma.com DPSI -3.17% in June 2004 before it announced a private offering of shares that caused its stock to drop.

At the crux of the case was an eight-minute phone conversation Mr. Cuban had with Guy Fauré, the former chief executive of Mamma.com, on June 28, 2004. The SEC alleged that Mr. Cuban agreed to keep the information Mr. Faure gave him about the private share offering confidential and not to trade on it. Mr. Cuban steadfastly denied doing so....end of excerpt

please take the high road in every post
if you see a problematic post, please do not quote it or respond to it: report it to the mods to handle
markrubin is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 10 Old 10-18-2013, 06:37 AM
AVS Special Member
 
comfynumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Northeast PA.
Posts: 4,804
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 409
When I first heard of this a few years ago I thought for sure he would be convicted. Not that I knew much about his case just that after the Bernie M conviction I figured he'd go down also.
comfynumb is offline  
post #3 of 10 Old 10-18-2013, 11:01 AM - Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
markrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 23,099
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked: 480
^^^

they really are completely different in most every respect

Mark used to post on AVS and is a big technology buff: he started HDNET and was rumored to have been connected with VOOM

please take the high road in every post
if you see a problematic post, please do not quote it or respond to it: report it to the mods to handle
markrubin is offline  
post #4 of 10 Old 10-18-2013, 11:26 AM
Advanced Member
 
Keith Mickunas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wylie, TX, USA
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Liked: 73
Yes, very different. This was a civil case only. If he had been found to have executed these trades using inside information he would have had to pay a fine based in part on the money he made by selling before the stock dropped. Interestingly enough he has acknowledged spending more on his defense then the fine would have cost him as it was a matter of principle for him. And he won an overwhelming victory against the SEC in this case. Too bad they don't have to cover his legal expenses as a result.
markrubin likes this.
Keith Mickunas is offline  
post #5 of 10 Old 10-18-2013, 12:28 PM
AVS Special Member
 
comfynumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Northeast PA.
Posts: 4,804
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 409
It was a civil case? I thought the govt brought charges against him?

Edit;
I read the Reuters article from a day ago just now and yes it was a civil suit. He was obviously innocent because the jury said so, and I'm glad to see the govt didn't bully him. IMO they are too much in our business to begin with.
comfynumb is offline  
post #6 of 10 Old 10-19-2013, 07:38 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
NetworkTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 15,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked: 458
Honestly, i have no trouble believing Cuban happened to sell at just the right moment. That's how he's made all his real money over the years.

He sold Broadcast.com at just the right time to get the most money and stock from Yahoo! - then sold the Yahoo! stock at it's peak before it all went to hell for them.

If HDNet weren't a pet project for him, he'd likely find the right moment to sell it off for the most profit, too.
NetworkTV is online now  
post #7 of 10 Old 10-21-2013, 05:00 AM - Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
markrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 23,099
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked: 480
excerpts of an article from todays WSJ http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304410204579141760526200476?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_yourmoney

Mark Cuban Calls a Foul on the SEC

Wall Street Regulators Tried to Shake Down the Wrong Celebrity Billionaire.
By
Al Lewis


Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban has berated referees, insulted fans, screamed at players, and once even told Kenyon Martin's mother that her son was a thug.





The Securities and Exchange Commission must have figured him for an easy mark.

When the regulator sued Mr. Cuban for insider trading in 2008, it likely figured he would pay his fine.

The SEC could then score a high-profile headline. And Mr. Cuban, who would not have had to admit guilt, could move on. That is, after all, how these cases usually went.

"Mark Cuban didn't follow that playbook," says Andrew Stoltmann, a Chicago securities attorney and adjunct law professor at Northwestern University. "Instead, he thought he could put the SEC through the wringer, and that's exactly what he did."



Mr. Cuban—an Internet entrepreneur, a celebrity billionaire that average Americans watch on the reality TV series "Shark Tank" and a showman who once competed on "Dancing with the Stars"—spent more money in legal fees fighting the charges than it would have cost to settle them.

"I'm glad I'm able to be the person who can afford to stand up to" the SEC, he said.



The case hinged on a witness who did not even appear in court. SEC lawyers offered recorded testimony from Guy Fauré, former chief executive of Internet search firm Mamma.com. DPSI 0.00%

The SEC alleged that Mr. Fauré gave Mr. Cuban information that Mr. Cuban agreed to keep confidential. Instead, Mr. Cuban dumped his shares in Mamma.com after hearing it.

Unfortunately, Mr. Fauré lives in Canada, where Mamma.com was based. The SEC couldn't force him onto the witness stand. It built its entire case on this one "Guy" who didn't show.


Mr. Cuban was merely accused of trying to avoid a loss—not repeatedly gaming the market. And evidence presented during the trial suggested that the information he acquired may have been publicly available, anyway.



—Al Lewis is a columnist based in Denver. He blogs at tellittoal.com; his email address is al.lewis@tellittoal.com

please take the high road in every post
if you see a problematic post, please do not quote it or respond to it: report it to the mods to handle
markrubin is offline  
post #8 of 10 Old 10-21-2013, 05:34 AM
AVS Special Member
 
comfynumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Northeast PA.
Posts: 4,804
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 409
What a total waste of tax payer money, and I hope the new chairwoman follows through with the reform she promised.
comfynumb is offline  
post #9 of 10 Old 10-21-2013, 10:21 AM
 
vinnie97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nunya
Posts: 11,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Liked: 1011
^Don't count on it.
vinnie97 is offline  
post #10 of 10 Old 10-21-2013, 10:52 AM - Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
markrubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 23,099
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked: 480
I have to agree with Vinnie on this...

please take the high road in every post
if you see a problematic post, please do not quote it or respond to it: report it to the mods to handle
markrubin is offline  
Reply Latest Industry News

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off