Excellent. That's what I wanted to know. Just a couple of years ago I had my system optimised for MCH SACD and was using identical towers at every speaker position including the center. The sound was outstanding not just with SACD but movies as well so I've experienced the SQ advantages of identical towers at every position. The much larger 2.3C is much closer to a tower than the 2.2C. I know alot of towers that aren't as big, size and sonic wise, as it is. I just wasn't sure if with the F2.2C having been designed for use with the F2.2Fs was a overall better blend than the F2.3C though. Thanks for the info.
Anything new to report on your HT's evolution?