craig john's theater - Page 13 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!



Forum Jump: 
 9Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #361 of 387 Old 10-10-2014, 10:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,703
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 909 Post(s)
Liked: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIkeDuke View Post
Hey Craig, price not withstanding, would you have to give up your sides and heights simply because the more affordable preamps don't have enough speaker outputs? In theory, you could do both if you were willing to spend the money right? I mean Atmos and your wide/height setup are not mutually exclusive are they? You could keep your 9 speaker setup as is and just add the four if you wanted to couldn't your? Or would the Atmos layout requirements make you move those to other spots.


Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post
Hi Mike,

TBH, I haven't really looked that closely at all the options for Atmos. Nor have I looked at all the different processors and receivers. At this point, I know I would have to sacrifice at least my Wides to run Atmos, (unless I spent a ridiculous amount of money on a processor that will likely be obsolete in short order.) Sacrificing Wides just to add Overheads doesn't seem like a significant upgrade to me, and it certainly doesn't justify the huge investment I would need to make. In addition, I think there are still some issues with the HDMI spec and HDCP, (although admittedly I am not fully informed of all those details.)

At this point, IMO, it's not a mature enough technology, (yet), to warrant an investment, at least not from me. I will sit out the first round and wait to see how much better the 2nd generation processors are. In addition, I would like to see what DTS comes up with. For now, I'm quite content with 9.3 and Wides using DTS NeoX in my Marantz 8801.

How about you? Are you considering Atmos? It would probably be difficult to implement in your room with your LP against the back wall and your surrounds mounted up high on the side walls. But... where there's a will...

Craig

Currently, you can either do 7.x.4 or 9.x.2 with atmos receivers released thus far. So only 2 ceiling speakers with a 9 channel step. The most effective is with 4 ceiling speakers get the panning effect of any sound overhead.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
asoofi1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #362 of 387 Old 10-10-2014, 11:40 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by asoofi1 View Post
Currently, you can either do 7.x.4 or 9.x.2 with atmos receivers released thus far. So only 2 ceiling speakers with a 9 channel step. The most effective is with 4 ceiling speakers get the panning effect of any sound overhead.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I guess I should have also mentioned... I want to continue to use Audyssey XT32.

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #363 of 387 Old 10-10-2014, 12:27 PM
AVS Special Member
 
MIkeDuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post
Hi Mike,

TBH, I haven't really looked that closely at all the options for Atmos. Nor have I looked at all the different processors and receivers. At this point, I know I would have to sacrifice at least my Wides to run Atmos, (unless I spent a ridiculous amount of money on a processor that will likely be obsolete in short order.) Sacrificing Wides just to add Overheads doesn't seem like a significant upgrade to me, and it certainly doesn't justify the huge investment I would need to make. In addition, I think there are still some issues with the HDMI spec and HDCP, (although admittedly I am not fully informed of all those details.)

At this point, IMO, it's not a mature enough technology, (yet), to warrant an investment, at least not from me. I will sit out the first round and wait to see how much better the 2nd generation processors are. In addition, I would like to see what DTS comes up with. For now, I'm quite content with 9.3 and Wides using DTS NeoX in my Marantz 8801.

How about you? Are you considering Atmos? It would probably be difficult to implement in your room with your LP against the back wall and your surrounds mounted up high on the side walls. But... where there's a will...

Craig
Got you on all that. I have never heard it so I can't say how fantastic it is or what the differences would be with speakers over your head instead of wides and heights like you have. As for me, I don't think it would happen for a number of reasons. One, is that it seems like for a setup that I have, you need 4 overhead speakers. Right now I have enough space for two amps. Even if I replaced my one 3ch with a 5ch that would only give me 7ch total. That's not enough. I would have to replace both with a 5ch then I could do it with 10ch of amplification. I really don't feel like doing that. The other thing to do would be to replace both my racks with other racks that would allow me to place another amp in addition to the ones I already have. But that would be a major undertaking and I could not do that myself.

Then there is the placement of the speakers over head. They would probably not be in the right spots. I admit that I am not as much as a stickler as you are with regards to knowing listening and viewing angles. But they would not be over head. They would be just outside of my main listening position. So I don't know if that would be an issue.

Another issue is replacing a working preamp with something else. I think you why that would be an issue . Those are just a few things that I can come up with now. The only thing I could see myself doing is trying to set up a 7.1 system. But I don't know where the other two speakers would go. Also, that would require me to get the 5ch and replace my 3ch amp. I think in my room, 7 speakers are probably enough. I would like to get the matching SR1000be speakers and see if I could put them on my back wall but they are A LOT of money. I need to see where they can go and how they would needed to be setup. But keeping what I have and trying to just add two more for a 7.1 setup is probably the easiest. Plus, let's not forget that we are going to try and get a FP system in my room. That will take some skill as well, if you know what I mean. So that's it. Your room is already outstanding and if it's not worth the effort, it's not like you will be slumming it with your current 9.3 setup .

P.S check out post 1057 in my thread regarding a link you wanted me to show you about the Panny and what I think are its limitations.

It ain't easy being green.
My System

Last edited by MIkeDuke; 10-10-2014 at 03:59 PM.
MIkeDuke is offline  
post #364 of 387 Old 10-23-2014, 02:31 PM
Member
 
randallhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chicago Suburb
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Hi Craig John,


Curious...what RTA software, computer, and OS did you use that is shown on post #1 , page #1 ...I'd like to measure my subs FR individually (like you), before and after Audyssey XT32.


Thanks!

AVR: Onkyo TX-NR3009 - Audyssey XT32
BD: Oppo BDP-103 - NAS - LenovoEMC - px2-300d 6TB
HDTV: Panasonic Plasma TC-P50G10
Speakers: Infinity Interlude - IL40 Fronts, IL30 Surrounds, IL36C Center
Subs: Dual JBL - ES250P 12" 400W RMS
Turntable: B&O Beogram 1600 - REW Mic - UMIK-1 USB
randallhill is offline  
post #365 of 387 Old 10-23-2014, 05:48 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by randallhill View Post
Hi Craig John,


Curious...what RTA software, computer, and OS did you use that is shown on post #1 , page #1 ...I'd like to measure my subs FR individually (like you), before and after Audyssey XT32.


Thanks!
I use XTZ Room Analyzer. Here is the "official" thread: The "Official" xtz Room Analyzer Thread

The current US distributor for XTZ Room Analyzer is Acoustic Frontiers:
http://store.acousticfrontiers.com/X...er-II-Pro.html
http://store.acousticfrontiers.com/X...-Standard.html

The graphs posted on Page 1 were done with RA Standard. I have since switched to the Pro version, and greatly prefer it. It works with most any PC running most any version of Windows.

Good luck.

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #366 of 387 Old 10-28-2014, 01:21 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Spanglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,250
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Liked: 425
Great job on the room. The reviews I've been reading here are beyond excellent. I have yet to read a single criticism, which is rare for forums, but obviously a testament to the total quality of your HT. Extra props for achieving such a high level experience without a ultra high-end price tag - very impressive.

In many ways I've tried to emulate your system, and you have definitely influenced a number of my HT decisions. One of more recent was to rearrange my room and go with a 2.35 screen, so thanks a ton for that one. You've also played a significant role in my HT education. Over the years I've paid especially close attention to the advice you give others, and you're one of the few who's information always seems be on point. So again thank you, and congrats on the nice HT.
Archaea likes this.

 


PSN - Hapi_Kilmore_v3
My 6.4.4 Living Room HT
Spanglo is offline  
post #367 of 387 Old 10-28-2014, 07:18 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanglo View Post
Great job on the room. The reviews I've been reading here are beyond excellent. I have yet to read a single criticism, which is rare for forums, but obviously a testament to the total quality of your HT. Extra props for achieving such a high level experience without a ultra high-end price tag - very impressive.

In many ways I've tried to emulate your system, and you have definitely influenced a number of my HT decisions. One of more recent was to rearrange my room and go with a 2.35 screen, so thanks a ton for that one. You've also played a significant role in my HT education. Over the years I've paid especially close attention to the advice you give others, and you're one of the few who's information always seems be on point. So again thank you, and congrats on the nice HT.
Wow! I almost don't know what to say... other than... Thank you for the kind words. I'm humbled. Truly.

I just looked at your WYSC thread. Setup For a Small Apartment I really like the evolution of your HT. You did a serious overhaul, with some big improvements, not just in equipment, but in room configuration and layout. You've certainly integrated many of the important principles of proper HT design: proper subwoofer placement optimized with measurements, proper seating placement, proper surround speaker placement, acoustic treatments, etc. I'm sure the new configuration looks and sounds a lot better. If I had some small part in that, I'm certainly happy to have helped.

Thanks for stopping by my thread, and please continue to enjoy your HT.

Craig
Archaea and Spanglo like this.

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System


Last edited by craig john; 10-28-2014 at 07:35 PM.
craig john is offline  
post #368 of 387 Old 01-17-2015, 05:00 PM
AVS Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 5,379
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1665 Post(s)
Liked: 1064
I had an opportunity to visit Craig's room today. He's a great guy; great host and fellow addict!!

His system is EXCELLENT (both audio and video). The Triad Platinum LCR's are a serious HT speaker - but hang in there with the best for music as well. He played some great concert videos (Steely Dan being on top of the list) that, in his room, are just over the top. In addition to the concert/music videos, we played some 2 channel, some movie clips and a few other cuts as well. The Plats have a wonderful midrange, dynamics up the ying yang and do everything you would want a speaker to do - at least for a speaker that cost less than a nice SUV!

I sat immersed in the sweet spot all afternoon and loved every minute of it. Even on those occassions where the volume creeped north of reference, there was never any listener fatigue -just a floating sonic image from floor to ceilng and from behind the listener to behind the speakers. Certainly one of the top 3 or 4 best HT audio experiences I have ever enjoyed (the best costing about 10x what Craig has invested).

The room is appropriatley treated to extract the max out of the system. Really, really well done. I thorougly enjoyed myself. And did I say his system was EXCELLENT !!

PS. And this is the first time I have ever experienced a seat acutator system that actually increased the listening experience instead of taking me out of it.

Great system and thanks for your hospitality.
Spanglo likes this.
audioguy is offline  
post #369 of 387 Old 01-19-2015, 07:49 AM
AVS Special Member
 
MIkeDuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked: 173
Glad you got to experience it first hand Chuck. Yep, Craig's system is probably the best I have heard to date. Only one other system that I experience years ago could come close, but that was many times more expensive when compared to Craig's system, and I am still not convinced it was better.

Yep, his audio and video are just too damn good. It is also because of him that I bought a Crowson for my system. Craig is a great guy and very willing to share his knowledge. That is why my system sounds as good as it does. So again, glad you got to experience it.

It ain't easy being green.
My System
MIkeDuke is offline  
post #370 of 387 Old 01-19-2015, 01:20 PM
Advanced Member
 
mankite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chambersburg, PA
Posts: 791
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked: 61
My condolences on Green Bay. Never seen such a thing in my life.

Mankite
mankite is offline  
post #371 of 387 Old 01-20-2015, 06:35 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post
I had an opportunity to visit Craig's room today. He's a great guy; great host and fellow addict!!

His system is EXCELLENT (both audio and video). The Triad Platinum LCR's are a serious HT speaker - but hang in there with the best for music as well. He played some great concert videos (Steely Dan being on top of the list) that, in his room, are just over the top. In addition to the concert/music videos, we played some 2 channel, some movie clips and a few other cuts as well. The Plats have a wonderful midrange, dynamics up the ying yang and do everything you would want a speaker to do - at least for a speaker that cost less than a nice SUV!

I sat immersed in the sweet spot all afternoon and loved every minute of it. Even on those occassions where the volume creeped north of reference, there was never any listener fatigue -just a floating sonic image from floor to ceilng and from behind the listener to behind the speakers. Certainly one of the top 3 or 4 best HT audio experiences I have ever enjoyed (the best costing about 10x what Craig has invested).

The room is appropriatley treated to extract the max out of the system. Really, really well done. I thorougly enjoyed myself. And did I say his system was EXCELLENT !!
Thanks Chuck. It was a really fun weekend.*

*(For those reading along, it turned out to be a full weekend instead of a 1-day visit. As I was driving Chuck back to the airport on Sunday morning, we ran into the ice storm that blanketed the northeast on Sunday. One second the road was fine... and the next second we were skating on a sheet of ice. I was standing on the brakes and the car was not stopping! Fortunately, we were able to get to the shoulder and stopped without spinning, without hitting anything and without anything hitting us. However, up ahead we could see that some other drivers were not so lucky. We sat for almost 3 hours while they worked to clear the road and get it de-iced, at which point we turned around and came back to my house. Chuck got to watch the Packers/Seahawks game with us and some of my local Packer fan friends... and share in our agony. He then got home on Monday, all safe and sound. Quite an adventure. )

Anyway, thanks for your kind words about my system. It's been a lifelong work-in-progress, and those are real compliments coming from a guy who has also spent a lifetime in audio. The ultimate compliment is that it looks like you are going to buy a full set of Triad speakers:
Triad Owner's Thread
It'll be really interesting to see how they work in your room, and what you do to optimize/integrate them. I can't wait for you to get them setup and dialed in so I can get your impressions of them in your room and system. I know I'll be taking a trip to Atlanta sometime in the future!

The music DVD we listened to first was Steely Dan's Gaucho in 5.1 hi-rez DVD-Audio. We listened to it with DTS Neo:X applied, which added the Wides and Rears, thus making it a 9.1 experience. In my experience, this combination of a multichannel recording with DTS Neo:X extracting the Wides and Rears is the most seamless, immersive and holographic listening experience I've ever had, which is the reason I played it for you first. It puts you in the middle of the soundstage, and literally surrounds you with dynamic and fluid music. The 2-channel stuff we listened to later was good, (and even better when we upscaled it to multichannel), but it just can't compare to content that is native multichannel. It's really sad that DVD-A and SACD died a premature death, and that BluRay Music has not taken off as an alternative.

Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post
PS. And this is the first time I have ever experienced a seat acutator system that actually increased the listening experience instead of taking me out of it.
Thanks Chuck. The Crowsons are the real deal, and I'm glad you liked them. Seat actuators are not easy to integrate into an audio system, and I've spent an enormous amount of time getting them to "*add* to the experience without taking the listener out of the moment. As with anything in AV, it's all about setup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by audioguy View Post
Great system and thanks for your hospitality.
I really enjoyed the weekend too, (except for the driving and the end of the Packer game.)

Craig
Spanglo likes this.

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #372 of 387 Old 01-20-2015, 06:39 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIkeDuke View Post
Glad you got to experience it first hand Chuck. Yep, Craig's system is probably the best I have heard to date. Only one other system that I experience years ago could come close, but that was many times more expensive when compared to Craig's system, and I am still not convinced it was better.

Yep, his audio and video are just too damn good. It is also because of him that I bought a Crowson for my system. Craig is a great guy and very willing to share his knowledge. That is why my system sounds as good as it does. So again, glad you got to experience it.
Mike, meeting you and your family is one of the best benefits I've realized from being an AVS Forum member. Thanks for being my friend.

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #373 of 387 Old 01-20-2015, 07:05 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by mankite View Post
My condolences on Green Bay. Never seen such a thing in my life.
I am still in a state of shock and disbelief. I literally can't believe we went from being 4 minutes from going to the Superbowl... to going... home.... season over... done.

We were clearly the BEST team for 56 of the 60 regulation minutes. We dominated every aspect of the game. How we could collapse at the end like that is just unthinkable.

It will take Packer fans a long time to get over this loss. Our best hope is that Aaron Rodgers uses this to put (another) chip on his shoulder and make it a motivation.

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #374 of 387 Old 01-20-2015, 07:47 PM
Advanced Member
 
mankite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chambersburg, PA
Posts: 791
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked: 61
When you think of how many things had to happen for that outcome it doesn't seem like real life. The first thing was why in gods name did the defender go to the ground on the interception instead of trying to score or at least get more yards. There was still 4 min left. Then I kept saying to myself if they can keep them from scoring until under 2 min left its over, they score with 2:07 left. Then the 2 point conversion which was a joke. Then a guy that was supposed to be a blocker tries to field the ball on the onside kick when if he just blocked like he was supposed to Jordy Nelson would have definitely snatched it up.

Mankite
mankite is offline  
post #375 of 387 Old 01-20-2015, 08:33 PM
AVS Special Member
 
audioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not far from Atlanta - but far enough!
Posts: 5,379
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1665 Post(s)
Liked: 1064
That may have been the most disastrous final 5 minutes in the history of pro football playoffs. It was very difficult to watch. It gives new meaning to the expression: "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory".
audioguy is offline  
post #376 of 387 Old 01-21-2015, 04:36 AM
AVS Special Member
 
MIkeDuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post
Mike, meeting you and your family is one of the best benefits I've realized from being an AVS Forum member. Thanks for being my friend.

Craig
Thanks Craig. The same to you. I mean that.
But on to that GB game. I can not believe that it finished like that. That onside kick was like out of a circus. I am so upset that they lost.

But what can you do. It will probably be a good super bowl in which I want neither team to win.

It ain't easy being green.
My System
MIkeDuke is offline  
post #377 of 387 Old 01-21-2015, 05:47 AM
AVS Special Member
 
asoofi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,703
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 909 Post(s)
Liked: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by mankite View Post
When you think of how many things had to happen for that outcome it doesn't seem like real life. The first thing was why in gods name did the defender go to the ground on the interception instead of trying to score or at least get more yards. There was still 4 min left. Then I kept saying to myself if they can keep them from scoring until under 2 min left its over, they score with 2:07 left. Then the 2 point conversion which was a joke. Then a guy that was supposed to be a blocker tries to field the ball on the onside kick when if he just blocked like he was supposed to Jordy Nelson would have definitely snatched it up.
There was someone on the field who waved the defender to actually go down...it was weird...being conservative at the wrong time.
asoofi1 is offline  
post #378 of 387 Old 03-23-2016, 02:23 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 3,120
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1037 Post(s)
Liked: 263
Hi Craig,

Few questions for you...

1. If I am not mistaken, you had the Catalyst 12C speakers prior to your current Triad speakers. Any comments/opinions on how the two compare?

2. You sit about 11 ft from your AT screen. Do you see any screen artifacts during bright scenes? Do you think roughly 8 ft would be too close to sit from an AT woven screen?
Kain is offline  
post #379 of 387 Old 03-23-2016, 08:28 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kain View Post
Hi Craig,

Few questions for you...

1. If I am not mistaken, you had the Catalyst 12C speakers prior to your current Triad speakers. Any comments/opinions on how the two compare?
I never owned the Cat's. Prior to the Triads, I owned some Atlantic Tech 8200e's. However, I have heard the Cat's several times. They're great speakers. They'll get VERY loud. I prefer the sound quality of the Triads, but have nothing bad to say about the Cat's.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kain View Post
2. You sit about 11 ft from your AT screen. Do you see any screen artifacts during bright scenes? Do you think roughly 8 ft would be too close to sit from an AT woven screen?
I have the Seymour AV xD screen material. I see no screen artifacts at 11 ft, and I don't see any as I approach he screen until I get to about 4 ft. However, if I was concerned about screen artifacts, I would consider the Enlightor 4K screen material. http://www.seymourscreenexcellence.com/materials.asp

Good luck and thanks for looking at my page! (I really should update this. It hasn't been done in a while.)

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #380 of 387 Old 03-25-2016, 11:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 3,120
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1037 Post(s)
Liked: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post
I never owned the Cat's. Prior to the Triads, I owned some Atlantic Tech 8200e's. However, I have heard the Cat's several times. They're great speakers. They'll get VERY loud. I prefer the sound quality of the Triads, but have nothing bad to say about the Cat's.


I have the Seymour AV xD screen material. I see no screen artifacts at 11 ft, and I don't see any as I approach he screen until I get to about 4 ft. However, if I was concerned about screen artifacts, I would consider the Enlightor 4K screen material. http://www.seymourscreenexcellence.com/materials.asp

Good luck and thanks for looking at my page! (I really should update this. It hasn't been done in a while.)

Craig
Thanks!

Sorry for hijacking your thread, but I have just one more question. If I cannot build a baffle wall for the AT screen and I can't (or more like don't want) to hang the screen from the ceiling in front of the LCR speakers because the ceiling is quite high at 9.5 ft, what options do I have to place (or suspend) the AT screen in front of the LCR speakers? I am guessing I could place it on a stand? If you view the following video and skip to 1:22, I like the stand they are using. Could I use something similar even for an AT screen?

Kain is offline  
post #381 of 387 Old 03-25-2016, 11:42 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kain View Post
Thanks!

Sorry for hijacking your thread, but I have just one more question. If I cannot build a baffle wall for the AT screen and I can't (or more like don't want) to hang the screen from the ceiling in front of the LCR speakers because the ceiling is quite high at 9.5 ft, what options do I have to place (or suspend) the AT screen in front of the LCR speakers? I am guessing I could place it on a stand? If you view the following video and skip to 1:22, I like the stand they are using. Could I use something similar even for an AT screen?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvQWU-7FLb0
Certainly you could use a stand like that. However, I would try to design it so that the legs and side braces do not sit in front of the speakers. You don't want to have the sound diffracting off a hard solid object close to the speakers. How wide is the screen you're planning to use? Depending on the size of the screen, you could potentially place the L/R's outside the screen edges. This gives a slightly wider soundstage.

Also, if you use a stand, be sure it is well-braced so it can't tip over. I don't know if Seymour AV sells the stand shown in that video, or if it's just a one-of that they use for shows. If they sell it, ask Chris S about it.
Good luck.

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #382 of 387 Old 03-25-2016, 12:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 3,120
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1037 Post(s)
Liked: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by craig john View Post
Certainly you could use a stand like that. However, I would try to design it so that the legs and side braces do not sit in front of the speakers. You don't want to have the sound diffracting off a hard solid object close to the speakers. How wide is the screen you're planning to use? Depending on the size of the screen, you could potentially place the L/R's outside the screen edges. This gives a slightly wider soundstage.

Also, if you use a stand, be sure it is well-braced so it can't tip over. I don't know if Seymour AV sells the stand shown in that video, or if it's just a one-of that they use for shows. If they sell it, ask Chris S about it.
Good luck.

Craig
Thanks.

Here's a rough drawing of my new proposed setup.



Viewing distance will be roughly 8 ft. I want the largest 16:9 screen I can "appropriately" have. I want a 16:9 screen instead of a CinemaScope screen because the width of the two screens, in my room, will be the same. So why not get a 16:9 screen and have an even bigger image for 16:9 movies.
Kain is offline  
post #383 of 387 Old 03-25-2016, 03:09 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
The door next to the left speaker is an issue. Is it "open" or is there an actual door there? Which way does the door swing?

Is the long red thing on the front wall a screen or a CC speaker? If it's a screen, I don't see any space for the CC behind the screen? You'll need to move the screen forward so you can place the CC behind it.

If it's a CC speaker, and you're using an AT screen, I suggest you forgo a horizontal CC and get a 3rd matching, vertical speaker, the same as your L/R's. This will give you the very best chance possible to have an ideal timbre-match for your front 3 speakers. Both Seaton and Triad will sell 3 identical speakers for the front soundstage... and I'm sure both companies will tell you a 3rd identical speaker, vertically depolyed is the best option.

With a 12 ft. front wall, you could probably go with a 92" to 106" screen at an 8 ft. seating distance. I myself would probably go with a 100" screen, especially if your going 16:9. a 100" diagonal screen is 87" wide x 49" tall. That should leave you about 28" on either side of the screen for the L & R speakers. In the Triad line, with that listening distance, I would suggest the Gold LCR's, or if you want to spend the money, the Gold Monitors. Platinums would be way overkill in your room at your listening distance, as would Seaton Cat 12c's. In the Seaton line, I would use the 8c's.

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #384 of 387 Old 03-25-2016, 04:10 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 3,120
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1037 Post(s)
Liked: 263
There is an actual door there and it opens into the room. I will be reversing the door to open outwards to the room. That long red thing is the center speaker. When I made this drawing, I had an actual TV in mind but now I'm considering a projector. The main goal of using an AT screen is to have identical LCR speakers. I'll most likely be going for Alcons Audio speakers with Seaton Sound subwoofers. I was thinking of getting a 110" 16:9 screen and having all three of the LCR speakers behind the screen. Hope the screen won't too overwhelmingly big from an 8 ft or so viewing distance? If it won't be, could I go even bigger?

Lastly, you recommended the Seymour Enlightor-4K screen. Does it have a requirement for a minimum distance between the LCR speakers and the screen?

Thanks a lot for your input!
Kain is offline  
post #385 of 387 Old 03-25-2016, 05:22 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kain View Post
There is an actual door there and it opens into the room. I will be reversing the door to open outwards to the room. That long red thing is the center speaker. When I made this drawing, I had an actual TV in mind but now I'm considering a projector. The main goal of using an AT screen is to have identical LCR speakers. I'll most likely be going for Alcons Audio speakers with Seaton Sound subwoofers. I was thinking of getting a 110" 16:9 screen and having all three of the LCR speakers behind the screen. Hope the screen won't too overwhelmingly big from an 8 ft or so viewing distance? If it won't be, could I go even bigger?
This is a personal preference thing. Do you like to sit in the front row in the movie theater? Personally, I don't like to sit that close. I find it overwhelming and I don't like having to move my head to look side to side or up and down. I prefer an image size I can take in with little to no head movement. So, I personally would not go that big. However, if you peruse the forum, you'll find people who like even bigger screens for that close a distance. It's just personal preference, and I can't tell you what yours is. The best way to figure it out is to hang a white sheet and a projector with a zoom feature. Zoom it in and out until you find the image size you feel most comfortable with. This may be a PIA, but it's a very important decision, (in fact, it's probably the FIRST decision you should make in your HT design),so it's worth the effort. Otherwise, you'll end up doing what I did... having 4 screens over a few years:

* 92" 16:9, (not big enough)
* 110" 16:9 (too big)
* 100" 16:9 (just right, but not 2.35:1)
* 120" 2.35:1 with Panamorph lens (perfect)



Quote:
Originally Posted by Kain View Post
Lastly, you recommended the Seymour Enlightor-4K screen. Does it have a requirement for a minimum distance between the LCR speakers and the screen?

Thanks a lot for your input!
I honestly don't know the minimum distance for the Enlightor 4K screen material. If it's similar to the xD material, you can be as close as 2". I suggest you ask Chris Seymour: chris.seymourscreenexcellence@gmail.com

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
post #386 of 387 Old 03-26-2016, 07:00 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Kain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 3,120
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1037 Post(s)
Liked: 263
Thanks again.

Say you are deciding between a 16:9 and a CinemaScope screen. The max horizontal width potential of both screens is the same (in this room), so the only difference will be the height difference each aspect ratio offers. Any reason to go for a CinemaScope screen? I mean displaying a CinemaScope movie on a 16:9 screen (in this room) will offer a CinemaScope image size that will be equal to what you'd experience with a CinemaScope screen.
Kain is offline  
post #387 of 387 Old 03-26-2016, 09:10 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Club Gold
 
craig john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 10,930
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 511 Post(s)
Liked: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kain View Post
Thanks again.

Say you are deciding between a 16:9 and a CinemaScope screen. The max horizontal width potential of both screens is the same (in this room), so the only difference will be the height difference each aspect ratio offers. Any reason to go for a CinemaScope screen? I mean displaying a CinemaScope movie on a 16:9 screen (in this room) will offer a CinemaScope image size that will be equal to what you'd experience with a CinemaScope screen.
If you don't find the black bars distracting when you when you watch Scope content on a 16:9 screen, then a 16:9 screen would be fine. I have several friends who do this. A high contrast projector can help in this regard, but anything with a dynamic iris will cause the black bars to "bloom" as the average in-scene light level changes. I personally find that very distracting.

The other alternative would be a masking system to mask off the black bars, but that adds expense, and I'm not sure it would work when mounted on a stand like the one you are considering. Screen Excellence has a number of masking options, so again, Chris Seymour will be your best resource for answers.

Craig

Lombardi said it:
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence."

My System

craig john is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply What's Your System Configuration

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off