Lane 103 vs Berkline 12000 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 Old 12-15-2013, 01:26 PM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
ch1sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 363
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Can anyone give their experience or thoughts with these two seats? Just looking for the differences if anyone knows.
ch1sox is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 3 Old 12-15-2013, 02:13 PM
rsh
AVS Special Member
 
rsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Lane 103 is Berkline Reno - 12003. It has slightly taller back - 44" vs. 42.5" on the Berkline 12000.

The Berkline 12003 has more neutral look. The 12000s have more contemporary look with rounded armrests.

The 12003 has straight armrests. The 12003s have storage and square plastic tray that you can mount on top of the armrest. The Berkline 12000s do not have those features.

The 12003 will be a cushier chair. The 12000s are very comfortable as well, but will feel just slightly firmer. Although the Lane version of the 12003s may not be as cushy as the Berkline 12003 used to be.

I hope this helps.

Roman
rtheaters.com
Fusion Collection Seating
Ultimate Home Entertainment
rsh is offline  
post #3 of 3 Old 12-15-2013, 02:21 PM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
ch1sox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 363
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
Yes, thank you. I'm seeing that a lot of the Lane's are remakes of the Berklines.
ch1sox is offline  
Reply Theater Room Items & Accessories

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off