Turner Classic Movies (TCM) in HDTV! - Page 65 - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the Watchuseek.com newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!


Forum Jump: 
 27Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1921 of 1952 Old 11-09-2015, 03:01 PM
Member
 
Tiernan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 10
WS films NOT aired in OAR?

Was curious if others noticed this: often (maybe even more often recently), TCM has been airing the 4:3 versions of widescreen films, instead of the proper OAR versions. The one that I was especially disappointed to see was IT: TERROR FROM BEYOND SPACE (which should only be 1.85, and which has been aired that way before.) Has anyone else noticed a trend on TCM AWAY from OAR films?
Tiernan is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #1922 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 03:47 AM
Advanced Member
 
R. Aster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 550
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiernan View Post
Was curious if others noticed this: often (maybe even more often recently), TCM has been airing the 4:3 versions of widescreen films, instead of the proper OAR versions. The one that I was especially disappointed to see was IT: TERROR FROM BEYOND SPACE (which should only be 1.85, and which has been aired that way before.) Has anyone else noticed a trend on TCM AWAY from OAR films?
IMDB and the TCM movie page indicate that the original theatrical aspect ratio was 1.37:1. Maybe it was subsequently reframed to make it look more "modern."
gwsat likes this.

R. Aster
R. Aster is offline  
post #1923 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 07:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Gary16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Aster View Post
IMDB and the TCM movie page indicate that the original theatrical aspect ratio was 1.37:1. Maybe it was subsequently reframed to make it look more "modern."
No way in 1958 would this movie have an OAR of 1.37:1. It would have been shot open matte but composed for 1.85 to be cropped when shown.
Gary16 is offline  
post #1924 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 08:17 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
gwsat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 16,174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1215 Post(s)
Liked: 1299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary16 View Post
No way in 1958 would this movie have an OAR of 1.37:1. It would have been shot open matte but composed for 1.85 to be cropped when shown.
Not so, at least according to IMDb. According to IMDb's technical specs page for It! The Terror From Beyond Space the film's "original ratio" was "1.37:1." Also recall that over the years TCM has been obsessive about retaining the OAR of films it showed. TCM was using OAR when virtually every other network cropped the films it showed to fill its screen.
gwsat is offline  
post #1925 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 08:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Gary16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwsat View Post
Not so, at least according to IMDb. According to IMDb's technical specs page for It! The Terror From Beyond Space the film's "original ratio" was "1.37:1." Also recall that over the years TCM has been obsessive about retaining the OAR of films it showed. TCM was using OAR when virtually every other network cropped the films it showed to fill its screen.
IMDb is often wrong and TCM has run many movies in the wrong aspect ratio. Granted they often get them that way from the distributors but they don't seem to go out of their way to correct it.
Gary16 is offline  
post #1926 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 09:06 AM
AVS Special Member
 
bobby94928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 5,052
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary16 View Post
IMDb is often wrong and TCM has run many movies in the wrong aspect ratio. Granted they often get them that way from the distributors but they don't seem to go out of their way to correct it.
I saw this movie in 1958 at the Reseda, CA theater. The movie house was 1:37.1 only....
gwsat likes this.

Bobby 

bobby94928 is online now  
post #1927 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 02:25 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked: 30
It's a widescreen film and 1.85:1 is the correct aspect ratio. TCM is airing an old, open-matte transfer.

More information on the transition to widescreen cinematography and exhibition in the summer of 1953 can be found here.

http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/home/wi...-documentation

http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/the-fir...-of-widescreen
Bob Furmanek is offline  
post #1928 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 09:37 PM
AVS Special Member
 
kucharsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 5,440
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked: 500
TCM's web page cites an original aspect ratio of 1.37:1.

I suspect as was the case with The War of the Worlds, it was shot in 1.37:1 but was later matted to 1.85:1 when theaters went all-widescreen.
kucharsk is offline  
post #1929 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 09:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Gary16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Please see post 1927. Movies went widescreen in 1953. Click the links for the full story from Bob who is THE expert on widescreen movies.
Gary16 is offline  
post #1930 of 1952 Old 11-10-2015, 10:14 PM
AVS Special Member
 
kucharsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, CO
Posts: 5,440
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked: 500
It doesn't really matter that theaters went wide-screen in 1958; it was an independent production and thus anything goes, and just because theaters were widescreen doesn't mean Academy Ratio films weren't screened just the way revival theaters today happily show Casablanca at its original aspect ratio.

Night of the Living Dead was shot in 1968 but was shot in 16mm in an aspect ratio of 1.37:1, though 35mm blow-up prints were made for theatrical distribution with an aspect ratio of 1.85:1.

Manos: The Hands of Fate was shot in 1967 and in an aspect ratio of 1.37:1.

What the original intended aspect ratio is, I suspect few outside the studios know; witness the brouhaha about Shane.

(To quote that article:

Quote:
“I have also spoken to respected archivist Bob Furmanek on this matter, and he agrees with me 100%. Although Shane was projected at the RCMH and other venues at 1.66, he said, ‘the filmmakers’ artistic intent MUST be respected and this film should only be seen in 1.37:1.’
)

I agree Bob is one of the best sources in the world so I will defer to him, though he also knows many films composed for 1.37:1 were shown at 1.66:1 or wider during those early widescreen years not for aesthetic but for commercial reasons.

Thus the question is more properly is which ratio did those who made the film intend?

Last edited by kucharsk; 11-10-2015 at 10:17 PM.
kucharsk is offline  
post #1931 of 1952 Old 11-11-2015, 10:58 AM
Senior Member
 
d3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Furmanek View Post
It's a widescreen film and 1.85:1 is the correct aspect ratio. TCM is airing an old, open-matte transfer.

More information on the transition to widescreen cinematography and exhibition in the summer of 1953 can be found here.

http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/home/wi...-documentation

http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/the-fir...-of-widescreen
Thank you Bob. This is fascinating. It had to take a lot of work to put it all together.

One question: I had always understood that RKO's Cimarron was filmed in a large format. Imdb shows it as using 35mm. Do you have any information on this?
d3193 is offline  
post #1932 of 1952 Old 11-11-2015, 11:20 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
NetworkTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 16,336
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 544 Post(s)
Liked: 859
Quote:
Originally Posted by kucharsk View Post
It doesn't really matter that theaters went wide-screen in 1958; it was an independent production and thus anything goes, and just because theaters were widescreen doesn't mean Academy Ratio films weren't screened just the way revival theaters today happily show Casablanca at its original aspect ratio.

Night of the Living Dead was shot in 1968 but was shot in 16mm in an aspect ratio of 1.37:1, though 35mm blow-up prints were made for theatrical distribution with an aspect ratio of 1.85:1.

Manos: The Hands of Fate was shot in 1967 and in an aspect ratio of 1.37:1.

What the original intended aspect ratio is, I suspect few outside the studios know...
It's further complicated by 3D productions from the 60's, which were not widescreen at that time. That's why "Dial M for Murder" is Academy aspect instead of wide screen.

The same goes for black and white, which is still being used even today, though it's usually created in post, not during shooting. As far as I know, just about all "black and white" films since the 80's (Schindler's List being one exception) have been shot in color and either printed or digitally converted to black and white.
NetworkTV is offline  
post #1933 of 1952 Old 11-11-2015, 02:25 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by d3193 View Post
Thank you Bob. This is fascinating. It had to take a lot of work to put it all together.

One question: I had always understood that RKO's Cimarron was filmed in a large format. Imdb shows it as using 35mm. Do you have any information on this?
Thank you, it's a pleasure.

No, CIMARRON was not a large format production. The only ones produced at that time are mentioned in the article.
Bob Furmanek is offline  
post #1934 of 1952 Old 11-11-2015, 04:07 PM
Member
 
Tiernan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Thank you EVERYONE for the discussion on this apparently murky topic. Unfortunately, it still leaves me questioning whether or not I'm seeing "IT" (as shown by TCM) as it was intended to be seen. I'm tempted to think that, as a modestly (perhaps LOW) budgets B-picture, filmed over such a short period of time (only 2 weeks, according to TCM), it seems more likely that 1.37:1 would be the less-expensive aspect ratio to have filmed it in. Any dissenters?
Tiernan is offline  
post #1935 of 1952 Old 11-11-2015, 05:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked: 30
Tiernan, please read my articles which are based on primary source documents. The aspect ratio data from this period - on both TCM and IMDB - is riddled with errors.

1.37:1 as a compositional ratio was dead by the summer of 1953.

By 1955, the only theaters still running full-frame were in VERY small towns.

IT is a widescreen film and was composed and intended for 1.85:1.
Bob Furmanek is offline  
post #1936 of 1952 Old 11-11-2015, 07:48 PM
AVS Special Member
 
nathan_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: O.A.S.I.S
Posts: 5,944
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 520 Post(s)
Liked: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Furmanek View Post
It's a widescreen film and 1.85:1 is the correct aspect ratio. TCM is airing an old, open-matte transfer.

More information on the transition to widescreen cinematography and exhibition in the summer of 1953 can be found here.

http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/home/wi...-documentation

http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/the-fir...-of-widescreen

Thanks so much for the links. I hadn't seen your site before. It's awesome.
Bob Furmanek likes this.

____________________

Current theater & gear: "Nathan's Theater in Search of....".
nathan_h is offline  
post #1937 of 1952 Old 11-12-2015, 01:04 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Liked: 30
Thank you, Nathan. If you want to see IT in widescreen as the filmmakers intended, don't go by an old pan and scan standard definition transfer from the 1990's. Get the Olive Blu-ray. http://www.amazon.com/Terror-Beyond-...+space+blu+ray

The important fact to remember is that by the summer of 1953, no one in Hollywood was composing for the standard ratio any longer. By the fall of 1956, 1.85:1 had become the domestic non-anamorphic widescreen standard ratio for both production and exhibition.

This is not opinion; it is factual data based on documentation from primary source materials.
Bob Furmanek is offline  
post #1938 of 1952 Old 11-12-2015, 08:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
nathan_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: O.A.S.I.S
Posts: 5,944
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 520 Post(s)
Liked: 245
Thanks for the bluray link.

I have to admit: I have a couple of shelves of film noir DVDs I collected during the DVD era and that will probably be the last time I do an extensive collecting of physical media.

But I like to make sure when I find stuff to rent or watch online, it is as close as possible to the intended original theatrical presentation.

Although I must admit, it took me a long time to accept the 1.85:1 version of Touch Of Evil after having lived with the open matte 1.37:1 version for so long. I really got the impression that while it might have been show in theaters as 1.85:1, they filmed it to work VERY WELL in 1.37:1 too, and I got used to see it that way. Other Welles films from the 60's still leave me feeling that way:

Arkadin, and Chimes at Midnight, in particular both feel right at 1.37:1. The Trial less so.

I'm intending to update my projector to a 3D capable one for the first time in the next few months. I suspect I'll have to pick up some choice items on physical media due to lack of availability any other way. First in the queue is Dial M For Murder.

____________________

Current theater & gear: "Nathan's Theater in Search of....".
nathan_h is offline  
post #1939 of 1952 Old 11-25-2015, 11:38 PM
Advanced Member
 
Luke M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 673
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked: 58
Is it just me or is the audio slightly out of sync? Never had this problem before. I'm on Comcast.
Luke M is offline  
post #1940 of 1952 Old 11-28-2015, 04:07 AM
AVS Special Member
 
RobertR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California
Posts: 6,562
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 362 Post(s)
Liked: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke M View Post
Is it just me or is the audio slightly out of sync? Never had this problem before. I'm on Comcast.
Very noticeable lip sync issue watching Lost Horizon last night.
RobertR is offline  
post #1941 of 1952 Old 11-28-2015, 07:14 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Mr.G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sconi
Posts: 4,366
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Liked: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan_h View Post

Although I must admit, it took me a long time to accept the 1.85:1 version of Touch Of Evil after having lived with the open matte 1.37:1 version for so long. I really got the impression that while it might have been show in theaters as 1.85:1, they filmed it to work VERY WELL in 1.37:1 too, and I got used to see it that way.
Indeed. In the 1950's during the widescreen film craze Touch of Evil was projected in some theaters in 1:85:1 in spite of Orson Welles' wishes. Anyone who has seen both versions knows that Welles' original 1:37:1 screen composition is the preferred version.

I recently watched the streaming version of Touch of Evil on VUDU. It offered yet another aspect ratio 1:77:1 (16:9).

All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten Movies
Mr.G is offline  
post #1942 of 1952 Old 11-29-2015, 11:40 AM
Advanced Member
 
Luke M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 673
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR View Post
Very noticeable lip sync issue watching Lost Horizon last night.
Are you on Comcast too or something else?
Luke M is offline  
post #1943 of 1952 Old 11-29-2015, 12:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Gary16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertR View Post
Very noticeable lip sync issue watching Lost Horizon last night.
No lip sync issues watching via DirecTV.
Gary16 is offline  
post #1944 of 1952 Old 11-29-2015, 02:34 PM
AVS Special Member
 
bruin95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Recorded a few movies, in the past week, with no sync issues via Directv.
bruin95 is offline  
post #1945 of 1952 Old 11-29-2015, 02:54 PM
AVS Club Gold
 
Keenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 30,736
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1727 Post(s)
Liked: 1365
Sounds like a problem with Comcast's CMC.
Keenan is offline  
post #1946 of 1952 Old 11-29-2015, 03:51 PM
AVS Special Member
 
RobertR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California
Posts: 6,562
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 362 Post(s)
Liked: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke M View Post
Are you on Comcast too or something else?
Century Link in Denver. I think it's their issue.
RobertR is offline  
post #1947 of 1952 Old 03-22-2016, 05:24 PM
AVS Special Member
 
PiratesCove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Homestead, FL
Posts: 4,261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked: 167
The Apartment on TCM is like Wow in HD


TCMHD has truly come a long way.....
PiratesCove is offline  
post #1948 of 1952 Old Yesterday, 06:14 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
dad1153's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 44,845
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1341 Post(s)
Liked: 832
Send a message via Yahoo to dad1153
From the "Hot Off the Press" thread (top of 'HDTV Programming' page).

Media Notes (Streaming)
Turner, Criterion team up for movie service
By Mike Snider, USA Today - Apr. 26, 2016

There's a new movie-streaming service in the works that will surely catch the eye of cinephiles.

Turner Classic Movies and The Criterion Collection this fall plan to launch their own subscription service, FilmStruck, which will have an emphasis on art house, independent, foreign and cult films. Pricing of the service, which will be available on several devices, is still being determined but will be competitive with other services.

FilmStruck is expected to have more than 500 titles from Warner Bros. and other major Hollywood studios and independent studios, as well as more than 1,000 Criterion films on its Criterion Channel within the service, which is managed by TCM. Among titles planned to be part of the service are Seven Samurai, A Hard Day’s Night, A Room With A View, Blood Simple, My Life As A Dog, Mad Max, Breaker Morant and The Player.

"FilmStruck is a terrific example of our strategy to meet consumer demand for great content across all screens," said Turner CEO and Chairman John Martin. "It's tailor-made for the die-hard movie enthusiast who craves a deep, intimate experience with independent, foreign and art house films. And it takes advantage of TCM's powerful curation capabilities, as well as its proven track record in building a long-term relationship with passionate film fans."

When the service goes live this fall, FilmStruck and its Criterion Channel will be the exclusive streaming home for the Criterion Collection. Currently, some Criterion films can be found on Hulu and Fandor.

"Hulu's been a great home for the past five years, but FilmStruck is being built from the ground up exclusively for film lovers and will allow us to present films with the kind of robust curation and supplemental features that Criterion fans have come to expect from our Blu-ray and DVD releases," Peter Becker, president of Criterion and partner in Janus Films, told USA TODAY. "The addition of the Criterion Channel is also a huge plus, because it finally gives us a streaming platform all our own, where we'll be able to create original content and surface archival materials never available anywhere else, to connect our audience with the films and filmmakers they love in a whole new way."

The service will constantly rotate films that are available. Criterion's involvement includes access to more than 1,000 films in the Janus Film library. Its releases include works by filmmakers including the work of Michelangelo Antonioni, Sergei Eisenstein, Ingmar Bergman, Federico Fellini, Akira Kurosawa, François Truffaut, and Yasujiro Ozu.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/n...vice/83546764/
dad1153 is offline  
post #1949 of 1952 Old Yesterday, 06:39 AM
AVS Special Member
 
pittsoccer33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,972
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 597 Post(s)
Liked: 409
Hey thats pretty cool. Someone hacked together a really nice Kodi add-in using TCM's site, but an API change broke it.

I probably wouldn't subscribe to this year round, but I could see myself doing it during Halloween and the winter months.

My basement media room and bar
Epson 2030, Onkyo TX-NR626, and Kodi based system

Mironto's Panasonic plasma black level restoration guide
Restore the initial MLL on a 2009 Panasonic plasma
pittsoccer33 is online now  
post #1950 of 1952 Old Yesterday, 04:17 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tomhunter8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,179
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Liked: 413
Quote:
Turner, Criterion team up for movie service
I can't wait to check this out! I'm a huge fan of both Criterion and TCM.
tomhunter8 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply HDTV Programming

taboola here


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off