The Official "I dont have dish or cable" anymore thread - Page 22 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #631 of 1689 Old 11-13-2011, 03:53 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 3,222
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

Everyone claims to hate reality shows yet they are some of the highest rated shows on TV. Here's an idea, stop watching them the ratings will drop and they'll get cancelled. When the network tries to show another one DO NOT WATCH IT. Hopefully they will get the point. As long as people will watch crap that is exactly what the networks will give them.

I'm doing my part.

Now to get the other millions of people to stop watching them.

~Tighr: Not helping the situation since 1983

tighr is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #632 of 1689 Old 11-13-2011, 05:05 PM
Advanced Member
 
lsilvest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 874
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by tighr View Post

I'm doing my part.

Now to get the other millions of people to stop watching them.

You first have to figure out how to elevate their IQs above 50.
lsilvest is offline  
post #633 of 1689 Old 11-13-2011, 05:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
thedeskE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 3,583
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

Obviously my point totally flew over your head. mY point is many peole edxpect 100% free TV with no advetisng what-so-ever. Now tell me how that works in any economical sense? And yes I'm aware the same people don't care if the content producers don't make money or not. The point is the content producers are not charity and no is entitled to anything.

YOU don't work for free do you? Nope. You work of a company. A company exists to make money. That company has customers in which is charges them a fee for services rendered. And some of that money comes back to you in the form of a paycheck. Why this concept is hard to grasp when it comes to TV, movies and music I don't get.

I get you're point. I payed for 20 years and that's enough. I don't need it any more - simple.

You're right, I don't understand the concept of a company. I own one.
thedeskE is offline  
post #634 of 1689 Old 11-13-2011, 05:56 PM
 
BCF68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedeskE View Post

I get you're point. I payed for 20 years and that's enough. I don't need it any more - simple.

You're right, I don't understand the concept of a company. I own one.

Well then you know there is no such thing as a free lunch. Or you should.
BCF68 is offline  
post #635 of 1689 Old 11-13-2011, 07:48 PM
Senior Member
 
borntocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCF68 View Post

Well then you know there is no such thing as a free lunch. Or you should.

The problem with commercials these days is twofold,

First: there are just too many of them. As little as 15 years ago, you could expect to see 10-12 minutes of commercials for every hour of programming. Today, these figures have more than DOUBLED. Some Channels actually show more commercials per hour than program! Is it any wonder people resort to recording a show before they watch it so they can fast-forward through all the advertisments.

Second: What's on those commercials. I cannot fathom WHY many advertisers feel the best way to present their Product is to do so in the most obnoxious and/or offensive manner possible. Some Advertisers don't care WHO is watching their ads when they are shown. There may be a place for commercials for "ED Pills" and other so-called "Adult Products", but 3:30 in the afternoon is NOT that time. Children are most likely watching TV at this time.

It is because of these two factors I no longer pay to watch TV. I have better things to spend $118.00 a month for.
borntocoast is offline  
post #636 of 1689 Old 11-13-2011, 09:07 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 3,222
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by borntocoast View Post

Second: What's on those commercials. I cannot fathom WHY many advertisers feel the best way to present their Product is to do so in the most obnoxious and/or offensive manner possible.

This I will never get. For example: The commercials on the Super Bowl are among the most expensive 30 second time slots ever sold. The majority of the products (Bud Light, Doritos, Pepsi, etc) I already plan to purchase and seeing a $3 million commercial will not get me to switch to a different product. For the other products (Godaddy, financial advisers, etrade, etc) I have no interest in consuming that product in the first place, and even if I did I wouldn't make my decision based on a 30 second spot. Ironically, the companies that CAN spend $3M on a commercial also are already the companies with the market share and brand recognition to not NEED to spend $3M.

The thing that frustrates me the most? I work for one of those corporations that buys Super Bowl ads every year. I see that money as getting pissed down the toilet instead of being sent back to the employees in the form of annual bonuses. Our products sell themselves; they don't need MILLIONS in marketing every year.

~Tighr: Not helping the situation since 1983

tighr is online now  
post #637 of 1689 Old 11-14-2011, 03:40 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jedi Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 1,627
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
I'm doing my part. I paid for TV for 18 years and I've been done since 2008. I don't watch reality shows either. But as long as people do keep watching them the prices of pay TV will keep going up and more cheap crappy programming will appear.

With an antenna and OTA I still watch football all weekend. But come Sunday night I'm so tired and aggravated by the most obnoxious and/or offensive commercials and the amounts of them. I'm ready to get back to watching DVDs during the week.

Broadcast TV - a vital national public resource
Jedi Master is offline  
post #638 of 1689 Old 11-14-2011, 07:32 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Thomas Desmond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX, USA
Posts: 2,334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDon View Post

On a similar note, I noticed while editing down shows that the last three episodes of "Person of Interest" were 44 minutes long.... compared to "NCIS," "Castle" and just about everything else I cut up. They're roughly 41-42 minutes per episode. I've gone back a couple of times to see if I missed anything and I haven't. Remove the promos and the local news break and that's only about 12 minutes of actual commercial time.

It's a bit more than that -- typically, an hour of broadcast network TV will contain 11 minutes of national advertising and 3 minutes of local advertising, for a total of 14 minutes. Add in the promos and local newsbreaks, and you hit anywhere from 16 to 19 minutes of non-program material depending on how much of that other stuff they lard in.

For a bit of a historical comparison, if you went back to the seventies, that break down would have been 6 minutes of national ads and 2 minutes of local ads. Then you would have had the network promos (typically adding up to 1:20 in an hour -- four twenty second promos) plus a couple of six second local station IDs, and the network IDs (ie "This is...CBS!"). All of that would come in under 10 minutes per hour.

And related to that -- I'm not aware of any older shows that had two minute opening sequences, although there were some that ran over a minute ("The Invaders" and "Star Trek: The Next Generation" both come to mind).
Thomas Desmond is offline  
post #639 of 1689 Old 11-14-2011, 07:52 PM
 
scorpiontail60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
The only thing I hate about commercials is that I have to spend a minute chopping them out of everything I want to watch in VideoReDo prior to viewing the program
scorpiontail60 is offline  
post #640 of 1689 Old 11-14-2011, 08:14 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
NetworkTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 15,457
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by borntocoast View Post

The problem with commercials these days is twofold,

First: there are just too many of them. As little as 15 years ago, you could expect to see 10-12 minutes of commercials for every hour of programming. Today, these figures have more than DOUBLED. Some Channels actually show more commercials per hour than program! Is it any wonder people resort to recording a show before they watch it so they can fast-forward through all the advertisments.

15 years ago, the average length of an hour show was 48 minutes. Now, it's 42. That's not anywhere close to double, much less more than double.

Quote:


Second: What's on those commercials. I cannot fathom WHY many advertisers feel the best way to present their Product is to do so in the most obnoxious and/or offensive manner possible. Some Advertisers don't care WHO is watching their ads when they are shown. There may be a place for commercials for "ED Pills" and other so-called "Adult Products", but 3:30 in the afternoon is NOT that time. Children are most likely watching TV at this time.

Well, some of those aren't sent out by the networks. 3:30 in the afternoon, you're likely seeing syndicated programming, which means those spots were already placed within the show from the syndicator.

When I worked for a local station, we'd roll only about half the spots for syndicated shows still in production, with the rest already being within the show. We only ran the full spot load for syndicated shows out of production that we received on tape to run.

On cable, sometimes the cable company will roll in spots they've sold. Those usually roll over promos run by the network. Those are usually those 2:00 spots for "The Best of..." some reject recording artist by Time Life or some product hawked by Billy Mays (even in death).

So, it's not always the network running those ads.

Quote:


It is because of these two factors I no longer pay to watch TV. I have better things to spend $118.00 a month for.

I wouldn't pay $118 a month, either.
NetworkTV is online now  
post #641 of 1689 Old 11-14-2011, 08:31 PM
 
scorpiontail60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Am I the only one who doesn't have a problem with shows being shorter?

There is soooo much entertainment out there that it better be a damn good 42 minutes to warrant watching. All too often, it's just filler taking up most of the time anyways. Most of the OTA network programs are unwatchable because they are dragged out to 20+ episodes a season with so. Much. Filler. The cable networks like AMC and HBO are better about this with their 13 episode seasons that consist of non-stop interesting content.

This also applies to video games too - I'd rather have a 6 hour non-stop action fest instead of a 60 hour game filled with tedious filler content. I actually did the math on Dragon Quest VIII - most people complete the game in around 75 hours. I used cheat codes the entire time to skip random encounters and I finished it in about 25 hours. At least half to 2/3 of that game's play time consists of monotonous, boring random battles. Wow.
scorpiontail60 is offline  
post #642 of 1689 Old 11-15-2011, 01:01 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jedi Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 1,627
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
In TV shows that I like I want 22 episodes are more a season. Its more new material and less repeats. If the show is 48 minutes long you get less commercials. Its called getting more bang for your buck.

I video games I want a long single player campaign. Some of the video games today you pay $60 for and the single player campaign is over in 6 hours.

Broadcast TV - a vital national public resource
Jedi Master is offline  
post #643 of 1689 Old 11-15-2011, 09:34 AM
Senior Member
 
borntocoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 18
In the 1950s TV Shows often had as much as 40 Episodes a Season , today you are lucky to get 20 . Does anybody remember when the "Sweeps" Periods each November, February and May meant you'd get Blockbuster Movies and Elaborate, Well-Produced Made-For-TV Movies and Miniseries ? Nowadays you just get new Episodes of whatever Series they're showing, and as soon as the "Sweeps" are over it's back to reruns.
borntocoast is offline  
post #644 of 1689 Old 11-15-2011, 01:46 PM
Member
 
zarg7883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Van Nuys CA
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 15
^ Yeah. They'd give us A Very Special Episode of "Blossom." But back in the 70's we'd get "Roots" or "Centennial."
zarg7883 is offline  
post #645 of 1689 Old 11-16-2011, 12:21 AM
Advanced Member
 
Desert Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bakersfield California
Posts: 979
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
If I remember correctly, Centennial was made during the 80s and it originally ran on cable ((W)TBS).

How can we say "the digital transition is complete" when thousands of low power stations are still broadcasting in analog?
LOW POWER ANALOG NEEDS TO DIE NOW!!!
Desert Hawk is offline  
post #646 of 1689 Old 11-16-2011, 04:00 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jedi Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 1,627
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert Hawk View Post

If I remember correctly, Centennial was made during the 80s and it originally ran on cable ((W)TBS).

Centennial is a 12-episode American television miniseries that aired on NBC from October 1978 to February 1979. I recently bought Centennial and the North and South miniseries (broadcast on the ABC network in 1985, 1986, and 1994) on DVD. They were both great. You won't find them on any channel these days.

Broadcast TV - a vital national public resource
Jedi Master is offline  
post #647 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 04:09 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jedi Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 1,627
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Local viewers are tuning in to free TV again

Quote:
Irked by the growing number of reality shows, Minneapolis salesman Jay Weberling considered tossing his six television sets out the window. But lately, he's been soothed by old episodes of "The Beverly Hillbillies" and "Perry Mason," as well as a steady stream of music videos.

He's not getting them through his computer, cable system or Netflix. They're all coming through his rooftop antenna.

More and more, beloved sitcoms, classic films, weather reports and even hip-hop showcases are being offered on free TV, as Twin Cities programmers experiment with subchannels -- additional feeds that became available in 2009 when the country switched from analog to digital...

Subchannels could play a significant role in the Twin Cities because 333,000 households have no interest in coughing up $100 a month for cable or satellite. That number represents 19 percent of the population, the highest share for any major metro in the United States...

Glynn believes that companies will want to advertise on both subchannels because of the people expected to be watching. According to USA Market Research, 46 percent of over-the-air households in the Twin Cities earn more than $50,000 a year and 18 percent of those viewers have a college degree. Adults 18-34, the demographic most coveted by advertisers, make up 34 percent of antenna or rabbit-ears users.

http://www.startribune.com/entertain...133660073.html


Broadcast TV - a vital national public resource
Jedi Master is offline  
post #648 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 06:11 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Tom Wellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I can understand the reasoning for subchannels since they offer viewers more choice for free, thus a better chance at earning more revenues for the local station, however there is a cost associated with it. Degraded picture quality on the main HD channel of the local station.

And the FOUL!
Tom Wellman is offline  
post #649 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 08:22 AM
Senior Member
 
gruven42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chi-burbs
Posts: 497
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Wellman View Post

I can understand the reasoning for subchannels since they offer viewers more choice for free, thus a better chance at earning more revenues for the local station, however there is a cost associated with it. Degraded picture quality on the main HD channel of the local station.

Since when have most people cared about picture quality?
gruven42 is online now  
post #650 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 08:33 AM
Advanced Member
 
lsilvest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 874
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Wellman View Post

I can understand the reasoning for subchannels since they offer viewers more choice for free, thus a better chance at earning more revenues for the local station, however there is a cost associated with it. Degraded picture quality on the main HD channel of the local station.

It's true. I had an antenna and HDTV when the locals first started broadcasing in HD and before they put in the subs the pictures were pristine. They are still better than cable/sat but have lost a little luster.
lsilvest is offline  
post #651 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 02:53 PM
Advanced Member
 
greaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 709
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 29
I have DishNet satellite tv,but i recently bought a DB2 in/outdoor antenna just so i could watch ME-TV,which one of my local stations started carrying on one of its subchannels(26.2). I love being able to watch shows like "PERRY MASON","THE UNTOUCHABLES"and now,the very rare 1hr."TWILIGHT ZONE" episodes,i am recording them to disc.The PQ is very good,but i won't be giving up my satellite service any time soon. Love my TCM tooo much, and ME-TV's programming is the only OTA programming that, IMO is worth watching.
greaser is offline  
post #652 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 03:37 PM
 
8traxrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 746
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 14
Me-TV has a BUG, so automatic fail there.

I've seen an unacceptable amount of compression on HD stations even with no subchannels.
8traxrule is offline  
post #653 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 03:47 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Rammitinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 17,437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by lsilvest View Post

It's true. I had an antenna and HDTV when the locals first started broadcasing in HD and before they put in the subs the pictures were pristine. They are still better than cable/sat but have lost a little luster.

Most of them here look no better than very good SD-DVD now.
Rammitinski is offline  
post #654 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 03:51 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Rammitinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Des Plaines, IL
Posts: 17,437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by gruven42 View Post

Since when have most people cared about picture quality?

Well, the majority that posted here in the "HDTV" area of AVS forum did, up until all those "the more subchannels the better, at any cost" DTV USA Forum'ers swooped down upon us (they used to direct all the pro-subchannel talk over to the "CECB" sub-forum - somewhere along the line that changed).
Rammitinski is offline  
post #655 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 03:51 PM
Advanced Member
 
tomhunter8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8traxrule View Post

Me-TV has a BUG, so automatic fail there.

I've seen an unacceptable amount of compression on HD stations even with no subchannels.

Bug or no bug, Me-TV is awesome.
tomhunter8 is offline  
post #656 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 04:10 PM
Advanced Member
 
greaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 709
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomhunter8 View Post

Bug or no bug, Me-TV is awesome.

I have no trouble with ME-TV's bug either,it's not at all obnoxious,it's pretty much opaque,and not very large.And i agree,ME-TV is awesome,where else can you find "PERRY MASON",and "THE UNTOUCHABLES" + the rare 1hr."TWILIGHT ZONE" episodes???
greaser is offline  
post #657 of 1689 Old 11-17-2011, 04:32 PM
Advanced Member
 
tomhunter8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked: 101
Agreed. Me-TV has a LOT of great shows on throughout the week. I've had DirecTV since 1997 and right now I watch more of Me-TV using my OTA than any single channel on DirecTV.
tomhunter8 is offline  
post #658 of 1689 Old 11-18-2011, 12:01 AM
 
scorpiontail60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
What the hell are you doing watching "The Twilight Zone" on some standard definition subchannel loaded with channel bugs and commercials when the complete series has been released on Blu-ray?
scorpiontail60 is offline  
post #659 of 1689 Old 11-18-2011, 12:44 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jedi Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 1,627
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8traxrule View Post

Me-TV has a BUG, so automatic fail there.

I feel that way about stations you have to pay for. But I can accept it on a free OTA station. That is why the only programming I pay for is on DVD.

Broadcast TV - a vital national public resource
Jedi Master is offline  
post #660 of 1689 Old 11-18-2011, 12:48 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Jedi Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 1,627
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpiontail60 View Post

What the hell are you doing watching "The Twilight Zone" on some standard definition subchannel loaded with channel bugs and commercials when the complete series has been released on Blu-ray?

MeTV is a free channel if you watch it OTA with antenna. But if you were paying for that channel I would agree.

Broadcast TV - a vital national public resource
Jedi Master is offline  
Reply HDTV Programming

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off