Which national HD channels distort 4:3 content and which ones don't? - Page 11 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #301 of 310 Old 04-16-2010, 11:53 PM
Member
 
nu77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
We sat down to watch a movie we had tivoed a few weeks ago -- Heidi on AMCHD (oldie, but yeah, whatever) -- and the annoying this was that it was broadcast in that "distorto" mode where a 4:3 picture is stretched to fit a 16:9 screen. I find this really annoying -- practically nauseating. Why can't broadcasters can't even get this aspect ratio stuff right?

We had the same problem with a show on IFC a few months ago, and checking around online it seems that they were getting their feed from some Canadian satellite and their broadcast was misconfigured, and there was supposedly no way IFC could compensate.

Same thing with News Hour on PBS -- lots of video segments are often in the wrong aspect ratio -- can't they see when it's wrong?!

I guess I just need to vent... but this continually drives me nuts. And why can't tv manufacturers give you an ability to reverse compensate for these annoyances. I wonder if we'll ever get out of this 16:9 vs 4:3 hell-hole.
nu77 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #302 of 310 Old 04-17-2010, 06:22 AM
Newbie
 
jtarheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
TNT does the same thing with some old re-broadcasts.
jtarheel is offline  
post #303 of 310 Old 04-17-2010, 09:04 AM
Senior Member
 
d3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 313
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
This has become a very annoying problem. AMC HD and IFC HD are frequently unwatchable because of this.
And many editors of news items seem to be unable to spot whether an image is intended to be 4x3 or 16x9, so we see far too many tall and skinny images as well as short and fat ones.
A recent documentary on TCM about the Brothers Warner was filled with anamorphic images that should have been stretched, but were not. I cannot believe they got past the editor of the program, or past the quality control people at TCM. It feels as though no-one really cares.
d3193 is offline  
post #304 of 310 Old 04-17-2010, 01:04 PM
Member
 
nu77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I don't think it's that they don't really care, but it seems that understanding aspect ratios is a little beyond the average person's abilities. Whoever designed this widescreen thing should be shot for not making a broadcast flag that automatically adjusts your display whenever an aspect ratio change is encountered. And whoever the engineer at the tv station that applies stretcho-distorto mode to the broadcast so that granny doesn't see black bars on the sides should be fired!
nu77 is offline  
post #305 of 310 Old 04-17-2010, 01:06 PM
AVS Special Member
 
ABCTV99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by d3193 View Post

This has become a very annoying problem. AMC HD and IFC HD are frequently unwatchable because of this.
And many editors of news items seem to be unable to spot whether an image is intended to be 4x3 or 16x9, so we see far too many tall and skinny images as well as short and fat ones.
A recent documentary on TCM about the Brothers Warner was filled with anamorphic images that should have been stretched, but were not. I cannot believe they got past the editor of the program, or past the quality control people at TCM. It feels as though no-one really cares.

I would suspect the editors or quality control people may not be aware of the difference. 4:3 stretched to 16:9 is absolutely unexcusable these days, but I can easily see an unexperienced editor not quite sure how to take a 2.35 image and make it work for 16:9 or 4:3, especially since 'scope' images are delivered either anamorphic on SD tape or anamorphic HD tape this can get confusing if you aren't aware of the OAR and if the network is convoluted as to how to rebroadcast widescreen images.
ABCTV99 is offline  
post #306 of 310 Old 04-17-2010, 02:24 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Ken H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 45,876
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Topics merged.

'Better Living Through Modern, Expensive, Electronic Devices'

Ken H is offline  
post #307 of 310 Old 04-17-2010, 07:04 PM
AVS Special Member
 
kjbawc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by nu77 View Post

I don't think it's that they don't really care, but it seems that understanding aspect ratios is a little beyond the average person's abilities. Whoever designed this widescreen thing should be shot for not making a broadcast flag that automatically adjusts your display whenever an aspect ratio change is encountered. And whoever the engineer at the tv station that applies stretcho-distorto mode to the broadcast so that granny doesn't see black bars on the sides should be fired!

I hate what I call the fun house mirror effect as much as anyone, but I doubt the engineer makes the decision. He is only doing what he is told to do.

I, too, see squeezed anamorphic, and stretched 4x3, segments in news broadcasts, and in documentaries, although rarely on PBS. I'm not so sure that these are accidents. Rather, I think they are often done to avoid shifting aspect ratios in one piece. I still don't like it, though.
kjbawc is offline  
post #308 of 310 Old 04-18-2010, 09:18 AM
Senior Member
 
d3193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 313
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABCTV99 View Post

I would suspect the editors or quality control people may not be aware of the difference. 4:3 stretched to 16:9 is absolutely unexcusable these days, but I can easily see an unexperienced editor not quite sure how to take a 2.35 image and make it work for 16:9 or 4:3, especially since 'scope' images are delivered either anamorphic on SD tape or anamorphic HD tape this can get confusing if you aren't aware of the OAR and if the network is convoluted as to how to rebroadcast widescreen images.

Many posters here, including yourself I assume, are professionals in the TV broadcast business - as I was until recently. I think you are letting people off the hook too easily.
If an editor is inexperienced then he/she should not be working on nationally broadcast material without supervision. In the case of news, we understand that there are often severe time constraints, and that occasional errors can get through. But once is enough; after that it shouldn't happen again. In the case of programs without these time pressures, there is no excuse. All networks put their programs through a quality control process, and these sorts of errors should not make it to air.
d3193 is offline  
post #309 of 310 Old 04-20-2010, 03:00 PM
Advanced Member
 
wmcbrine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 671
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by nu77 View Post

Whoever designed this widescreen thing should be shot for not making a broadcast flag that automatically adjusts your display whenever an aspect ratio change is encountered.

That exists. It's called Active Format Description (AFD). But not everyone is using it... in fact, some outfits are intentionally ignoring it even when it's available, in order to avoid black bars.

57 channels and nothing on
wmcbrine is offline  
post #310 of 310 Old 04-20-2010, 03:13 PM
AVS Special Member
 
nickdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,488
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by nu77 View Post

Whoever designed this widescreen thing should be shot for not making a broadcast flag that automatically adjusts your display whenever an aspect ratio change is encountered.

NBC does that with their OTA distribution, even for commercials. And it's annoying as hell!! I really wish I woulda taped and dumped that SNL special that was on last Thursday to show some of the die hard black bar supporters here. Between every. Single. Clip. that was a different format/size, it would change. I did a dramatic account of it on the local news thread:

Quote:


They've been showing clips from 2000, 2001; obviously 4x3 mixed with new "in studio" 16x9 interviews. So I decided to take my DTV converter off of perma-crop and see how "Set By Program" would handle it. What a &*#^@^$ mess!! The picture "changes size" (which consists of flashing and jumping) every other minute. And on top of that there's a delay where you have either a windowbox 4x3 or cropped 16x9 picture. There's no way in hell I could stand to watch that for 2 hours.

Quote:


And apparently it does that during commercial breaks too. Between every other commercial it goes from a 16x9 commercial to a windowboxed 4x3 commercial back to 16x9 then to 16x9 inside a 16x9 frame and eventually dumps to windowbox 4x3 during local commercials. And it has that transition that is jarring between it. I mean jesus christ, there's absolutely no need to change between full screen and letterbox for a commercial that has 4x3 safe text anyway. Absolutely pointless. Funny that "TV's number one network" hasn't adopted this horrid technology.

nickdawg is offline  
Reply HDTV Programming

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off