>>". However, I just can't comprehend how you can rant about the 6.75 test patch on the Faroudja being poor when in fact it is perfect"
That was a reference to Faroudja 3000, not for Faroudja NR. Faroudja 3000 has some problems rendering the 6.75 Mhz pattern without artifacts. You can clearly see that the sharpness of the ROCK+ 6.75 Mhz has improved greatly over what you've previously seen when you probably last saw the ROCK, and it looks far closer to your Faroudja NR 6.75 Mhz photo and the other, older, ROCK photos. Re-read my above posts again.
You challenged me on the other Faroudja products, including Faroudja 3000. You said, "that I feel there is not a single area where the Rock outperforms the Faroudja NR not even the 3000 or 5000, the NR. Please tell me an area or areas where it does. I am requesting information, you are not hawking it, please tell us." (false statement said by ericbee)
... I pointed out something that shattered that statement, because I knew the Faroudja 3000 couldn't do 6.75 Mhz properly. I never said that the Faroudja NR could not do 6.75 Mhz perfectly - I was talking about Faroudja 3000.
Then you reverted to sticking with comparisions only to Faroudja NR. But a few posts before that, you mentioned the Faroudja 3000, in that very statement I pointed out. That was an easy one for me to disprove on, because many people knows of its limitations on 6.75 Mhz patterns. Feel free to do a test on the Faroudja 3000.
No miscommunication has been done. You're just creating miscommunication where none exists, by trying to make me seem like I was pointing out the NR instead of 3000. I have been pointing out which Faroudja product that I have been referring to.All you've shown is to prove that the NR and ROCK+ has similiar ability to resolve the 6.75 Mhz pattern - when my point was to disprove the statement that you made regarding all Faroudja scalers being superior in all ways. You gave me a choice. I chose Faroudja 3000 versus ROCK+ regarding 6.75 Mhz. Your inability to read my posts misinterpreted it as ROCK+ versus NR
You're forgetting it all too easily. You may want to re-read my posts again, since you are obviously misunderstanding them!
Also, you forgot that I do not do ROCK customer service on AVSFORUM anymore! You may want to reword "because of poor customer service" to "because of I disagree with Mark Rejhon" or "because I am upset with Mark Rejhon". http://www.avsforum.com/ubb/wink.gif
Those would be a lot more accurate, because I never did any customer service in this thread. It is of course a valid complaint too, if you also want to say "because Mark Rejhon isn't allowed to ROCK customer service" to ROCK owners on AVSFORUM. But that hasn't changed, since I already announced that quite some time ago.
If you still don't agree with me, you can talk to the many people who have observed problems with the Faroudja 3000 6.75 Mhz pattern, including tommyboy who said "The Faroudja 3000 displayed the Avia 200TVL resolution pattern 6.75Mhz circle as a solid gray circle. If what you've heard is true, I trust this pattern should look much sharper and actually resolve some of the 6.75Mhz pattern?"
] Also, the TK Chan image of the Faroudja 3000 rendering of 6.75 Mhz is pretty soft and gray, worse than the ROCK+.
Perhaps Faroudja fixed it in a newer firmware which I am not presently aware of, which is a valid defense you could have bothered to made, but you never did, because you've misunderstood my post.Since both you and I have been warned by tommyboy, I don't plan to contribute any further to this thread, except everybody can see the errors in your post. We both might as well go silent and agree to disagree. Even if you don't want to re-read my posts that you misunderstood. http://www.avsforum.com/ubb/wink.gif
Mark Rejhonwww.marky.com/hometheaterLead Software Engineer for The TAW ROCK
[This message has been edited by Mark Rejhon (edited 07-13-2001).]