ASUS RT-N53 Review - Affordable Dual-Band Wireless Router - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 Old 03-26-2012, 01:04 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Irishdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
ASUS is looking to raise their visibility in the wireless router space, and offered to send me a unit to test out and provide my feedback. Here is my review of the ASUS RT-N53.

Setup

The last wireless router I had to set up was the cheap Netgear router that Comcast provided me free of charge last year. Setup of the RT-N53 was leagues better than the setup on that Netgear product. (Not a slight of Netgear, but more a reflection on how router setup UIs have improved in general.) All the required settings were very easy to find, and every element had useful scrollover help info to describe any settings I wasn't sure of.

One of the nicest things about the ASUS product is the different modes available. It's easy to switch it from a true router to a wireless access point or signal repeater. In the past, this was always a fairly complicated process, but in the case of the RT-N53, it's a piece of cake.

Another nice feature is the separate SSIDs for the 2.4 and 5GHz bands. I was able to quickly set up separate SSIDs and passwords to make sure that I kept the 5GHz band as clean as possible, and also to ensure I was connecting to the right SSID depending on the capability of the devices in question.

I should add that I did have some minor difficulties in setup, but they were not related to the ASUS product itself, but a consequence of my Uverse gateway setup. I had to jump through a few configuration hoops there for it to work properly.

Connecting

I've had no issues connecting and keeping a connection with any of the many devices in my home. This includes a Boxee Box, a Notebook, 2 smart phones, and a PS3. The router is located on the ground floor in my house and I have no coverage problems whatsoever. In comparison to my previous wireless solution, the Uverse gateway, I am having fewer problems connecting and staying connected. The Uverse gateway had occasional issues with connection, especially with the 2 smart phones in the house. I am seeing solid connections to the ASUS RT-N53.

Streaming Performance

I know on this board, this is the important question. I have approximately 200 DVD ISO rips stored on my Windows 7 PC, and about a dozen BluRay rips on my new UNRAID server currently running through NFS. Connecting my Boxee to the network through its internal wireless adapter to the ASUS RT-N53, I was able to easily stream my DVD ISO rips through SMB. I tested about a dozen of my DVD rips, including the Batman Begins ISO, which has proven to be one of the most demanding SD rips I have available. The ASUS had no problems serving these SD rips wirelessly.

Next, I tested my BD rips from my NFS UNRAID server, including the Dark Knight, Scott Pilgrim, and The Matrix. As I expected, these did NOT perform well wirelessly. The true bottleneck is likely the built-in Boxee Box wireless adapter, which is 2.4GHz single band, and generally considered a poor wireless adapter. Frankly, I did not have any expectations of solid BD streaming through wireless. The consensus is that wireless is rarely capable of streaming high bit-rate HD content. By way of comparison, I can stream the same rips through HPNA networking flawlessly.

I would like to set up a better wireless bridge to test the true strength of the RT-N53, but I currently do not have a second router to do so. If I should get this capability in the future, I will re-test.

General Speed Tests

I also ran a few minor speed tests just to ensure I was getting my fastest possible internet speeds through the ASUS RT-N53. All devices tested had no issues connecting at my normal maximum speed through a wired connection. My internet speed is 18MBps and I averaged around 15-16 on all devices, which matches my usual wired speeds.

I also tested a few file transfers, and the ASUS router did a fine job in this respect as well. A 6 GB file took under 10 minutes to transfer wirelessly through Windows.

Overall Impressions

I must say I am very impressed with the performance of this router given its price point. It can currently be had for around $70 on Newegg. This is an excellent price for a router with these capabilities. Due to its easy setup as a repeater or AP, it's also a sweet price spot to improve coverage in your home or to get wired device onto your network wirelessly. I cannot, however, recommend this as a solution to stream HD content. Most on this board will tell you to avoid wireless if you want to stream such content in any case.

Feel free to ask any questions, and I'll do my best to answer.
Irishdoom is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 Old 03-27-2012, 07:08 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Great Feedback, I have been using one as a WAP and was running some benchmarks yesterday. Its an impressive unit for the price. Has a ton of features at price point much less than similar products from Netgear. Next up I will try it as a Router like you did and setup some extra guest networks etc. Those features are not available in WAP mode. you're limited to 2 SSID's versus 5 SSID's in router mod because there is not routing gooing on. it simply acts a a dual band transparent bridge. I am seeing speeds of 80mbits on the 5 Ghz channel which is impressive.
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #3 of 19 Old 03-27-2012, 07:28 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Irishdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
That's really what I've found most impressive, how many different features it has at that price point. I expect a "gutted" higher end router at that price, but what you get has a lot nice bells and whistles.
Irishdoom is offline  
post #4 of 19 Old 03-27-2012, 07:10 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Success Streaming 1080P today Cars2 MKV from NAS to VLC.

no walls in the way...
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #5 of 19 Old 03-27-2012, 07:22 PM
FX4
Member
 
FX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Have you tried punching 5GHz through a wall or floors and around ventilation? It's not too good when it's not a straight shot.
FX4 is offline  
post #6 of 19 Old 03-27-2012, 08:25 PM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Irishdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
That's something that might be worth checking out, once I have a secondary router to use as a bridge.
Irishdoom is offline  
post #7 of 19 Old 03-28-2012, 06:16 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by FX4 View Post

Have you tried punching 5GHz through a wall or floors and around ventilation? It's not too good when it's not a straight shot.

Yep, and the results don't align with your opinion. see the next post.
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #8 of 19 Old 03-28-2012, 06:41 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Thanks to Asus for letting me evaluate their RT-N53 wireless router/access point/repeater. I used the RT-N53 firmware version 1.1.1.1.40 to replace an aging Buffalo Router with only B/G support. In this review I will focus on the use of the RT-N53 as a wireless acess point or WAP. This means the routing functions will be disabled and the device will be purely performing as a transparent bridge. In this access mode only 2 x SSID's are available: One for 2.4Ghz and One for 5.0 Ghz. If you use the device in router mode you can setup up to 5 SSID's. 4 at 2.4 Ghz and 1 at 5 Ghz. This allows for dedicated guest networks that allow your guest to access the internet but keep potential prying eyes off your home network. You could also setup a special SSID for whole house audio or video distribution. more on that later.

Unboxing: Nothing unique about the packaging or its contents. The package includes a router, power supply, ethernet cable, quick start guide and an installation CD.
The installation CD includes a setup utility for discovering and configuring the device as well all the documentation for the product in many languages. The most shocking thing about the unboxing was the design. Very modern and different than other wifi routers I have used. I like it. WAF is high.

Product Photo:



Installation:
I installed the router using the more traditional manual approach using a DHCP Table and web browser. I really like that the first choice in the setup is choose the mode you want to use the device in. I chose Wireless Access Point and was able to setup the two WiFi networks within 5 minutes. One great thing about this setup approach is that is simplifies configuration by making all the options that are not valid or irrelevant disappear from the configuration menu. This really reduces confusion for the end user. Bravo!!! This may seem obvious, and I have seen many routers behave this way and I have seen more than a few that do not and are very confusing to configure. Thankfully the RT-N53 gets this right. Firmware for the WAP mode seems quite feature rich with all the normal bells and whistles: popular encryption, wide channel, support, mac filtering, SSID hiding etc. I installed the RT-N53 in the same location as the old WAP which as at the base of the stairs in my living room on the 1st floor. For performance testing I used my laptop in 2 locations. The first location was about 20 feet away in the same room. This location is labelled TV Desk in the accompanying photos. Additionally I tested the performance way up on the 3rd floor in the most remote bedroom I had. Just for grins I thought I would attached a site spectral analysis from my site. This is in a rural area in Utah where everyone is on large lots. I'm surprised I see this much activity but the spectrum is pretty uncongested compared the almost 20 SSID's I pick up at the other house.


Site Spectral Analysis courtesy of inSSIDer



Evaluating the Performance
I used a number of tests to evalute the performance of the RT-53.

First I used the Netstress network throughput meter to measure the throughput of the old WAP and the RT-N53. The RT-N53 performed well. One of the big challenges with WIFI is being able to get consistent and repeatable results. its a real challenge and takes some thought. I shut off all other wifi devices except for my test pair. That means all cellphones, ipads, airport expresses were all turned off. Regardless it was still impossible to get any sort of consistent results with Netsress. The measurements I posted were the most typical and also the slowest. There were a number of times where I saw extended throughput of over 100Mbps on 5 Ghz. There were even a few times where I saw throughput as low as 40M on 5 Ghz but typically they were closer to 60Mbps. I didn't see nearly as much variation on the 2.5G band. All tests were done using WPA-Auto-Personal encryption and default settings for each band. 20Mhz channel on the 2.5Ghz band and 40Mhz channel on the 5Ghz band. NOTE: The router does support 40Mhz wide channels for up to 300 Mbps operation at 2.4Ghz. I decided to leave it 20Ghz mode for compatibility reasons. The Netstress benchmark was set for 300M network and 1 TCP Stream and 1 UDP Stream. All other settings were standard.

Living room test: 20 feet away line of sight to WAP

The first chart shows the performance of the old WAP using the Netstress at ~20Mbps with 1.5mbps variation.

Throughput over WIFI to existing Buffalo WAP from TV Desk using 2.4Ghz Band


Now we examine the performance of the RT-N53 in this application. It doubled the peformance of the old router at 2.4 Ghz and
even better at 5.0 Ghz

2.4 Ghz: ~ Average 44Mbps +/- 4Mbps
5.0 Ghz: ~ Average 52 Mbps +/- 4Mbps

Not only is the throughput excellent but its consistent with only 4mbps variation over a many minute test with no dropouts.

Throughput over WIFI to ASUS RT-N53 from TV Desk using 2.4 ghz Band


Throughput over WIFI to ASUS RT-N53 from TV Desk using 5.0ghz band


NOTE: Again, I saw a lot of variation on this test from different runs within hours and days of each other. Max over 120Mbps and as low as 40Mbps. One thing we can conclude from this is that 802.11N at 5ghz and 40Mhz wide channel is very sensitive to changes in the RF environment.

Router is located in first floor living room. Next throughput tests move the laptop to much harder to reach location that is up two floors and over several rooms. Several walls and floors/ceilings are involved. Notice the throughput remains outstanding and consistent.

3rd Floor Performance Test: Through a couple of walls and floors/ceilings

In this next test I moved the laptop upstairs to the farthest point away from the access point while still remaining indoors. The results were both expected and surprising. The results were expected in that I didn't expect to see too much degradation based on my previous usage. The results were unexpected in that they were even better than I would have guessed.

At the 2.4 Ghz band: Nearly no reduction in throughput. 44Mbp sdrops 42Mbps but again no significant variations or blackouts.
At the 5.0 Ghz band: ~20% reduction in throughput from 52Mbps to 43Mbps average but we do see an expected rise in variability due to the distance and barriers in the way.

Still an excellent performance. We can some degradation on the 5Ghz channel which is to be expected due to higher frequencies but overall it did very well in a difficult test. For those users with ultra long range requirements being able to run 4 SSID's at 2.4 Ghz will be a very useful feature.

Throughput from Laptop in 3rd floor bedroom to Asus RT-N53 2.5 Ghz Band


Throughput from Laptop in 3rd floor bedroom to Asus RT-N53 5.0 Ghz Band


The next phase of the benchmarking was the file copy tests: I used Lan Speed Test (LST) to measure file copy throughput. The following tests used 1 Gigabyte test file size.

File Copy Performance using Lan Speed Test 1.X:

Code:
Band        Write to NAS:   Read from NAS:
2.5Ghz      56 Mbps           45 Mbps
5.0Ghz      65 Mpbs           46 Mbps
Ethernet*    89 Mbps           83 Mbps
*Ethernet is 100M and provided as a reference.

Asus RT-N53 to NAS from TV Desk 2.5 Ghz Band


Asus RT-N53 to NAS from TV Desk 5.0 Ghz Band


Ethernet to NAS from TV Desk


I also wanted to show that what you see in windows might actually be here: Note here you see the 9.1 megabytes/sec from windows explorer but once you add in the overhead of the various protocols your looking at more like 10.3 megabytes/sec on the wire/air.

File Copy using Windows on 5.0 Ghz at night


The next morning I run the same test and am getting ~5 megabytes/second. I added a second stream copy in the opposite direction and expected to see 1/2 the performance but the performance on the first stream barely went down. Wifi weirdness.

File Copy using Windows on 5.0 Ghz the next morning



Audio Streaming Test
The most important test for me was my audio streaming test. Our house has a 24 port GigE managed switch in the basement server room and most of the house is wired for GigE so WiFi is delegated for iPhones, iPads, laptops, and music streaming. I use an Apple based whole house audio system using iTunes,Spotify, & Firefox to drive 6 zones. Each of thes zones are comprised of either Apple airport expresses or Apple TV's. 3 zones are hardwired over ethernet and 3 zones are WiFi. When I added the 3rd WiFi airport express in the master bedroom I started having glitches in the audio I never had before when driving all 3 WiFi Zones. This is most likely caused by the degrading of the channel due to the additional WiFi device and overall bandwidth on the channel. The 3 zones that are wifi are all remote. Master Bedroom (30ft, 1 ceiling and 1 wall away), Garage (60 ft 1 wall away and mounted inside an MDF cabinet), and the detached garage (100 Ft, ~4 walls away). I setup all the airport express's to use the 2.4 Ghz channel and have been testing.

RESULTS: No issues. Works perfectly. Glitches are gone with 3 Wifi zones playing lossless ALAC. No compatibility issues so far.


Video Streaming Test

I don't have much need to stream video but I thought I would try....

Plex media server served Bluray disc(BD) rips to the Ipad 3 with no issues over 5Ghz. This is under 10Mbps.

I also tried streaming a couple of BD rips in MKV format using VLC to the laptop using 5Ghz band.

First time I tried it continually re-buffered. It was late. I Decided to try it the next day again.

The next day I started with the site survey and realized I still had the ole WAP running so I took that down. Checked all my settings and
tried to play Cars2 which is a near 40Gigabyte file from my NAS. Worked fine. I was kinda surprised but then again it was 20 feet line of sight. So then I decided to get brave and unplugged the laptop and slowly wandered all around the house. Even spent 3-5 minutes in the remote 3rd floor bedroom and it was working flawlessly. I was streaming high bit rate 1080P video over WIFI. I then went downstairs and set the laptop on the kitchen counter and plugged it in to the AC and let the movie run in the background. I never heard it glitch.... Wow!

Get up the next day and went to repeat my success and it all went downhill. Can't get the video to play without buffering issues. I then play my local copy with VLC to test the player and it works. Plug in the ethernet and stream the file off the NAS via VLC and it works (as always). That's unfortunately why I've never trusted WiFi for anything critical. I've been trying to reproduce my success ever since despite many many more controlled tests. DVD's stream fine over 2.4Ghz or 5.0 Ghz. BD Rips stutter on both 2.5 and 5.0 (I even tried 5 feet apart) except for the one instance in which I was magically able to move everywhere in the house and watch an entire 2hour movie with no obvious issues. Its bizarre that when VLC would stutter I could stop VLC and then starting copying the file to the local SSD over SMB and get speeds 8-10 megabytes/second that would seem to indicate the required bandwidth was there. Try again with VLC it would stutter. Try the local copy in VLC (prove VLC is working) and it works. Plug in the ethernet and stream via VLC and it works. The moving target is the WiFi. Frustrating for sure. I always tell my non techie friends to just think of wifi like your cellphone. It works well for most things but is certainly subject to random glitches and disconnects due to plethora of invisible radio waves bouncing around our neighborhoods.

Summary
The RT-N53 is a cool little device. It has cool industrial design and doesn't look like a router at first glance. Asus really delivered a great feature set. Its performance exceed my expectations. Throughput and reliablility in my environment has been very strong so far. I have no noticed no issues or disconnects using my iPhone4, iPad3, Kindle Fire, Dell Laptop, Macbook Air and at least 2 different generations of Apples' airport express. Having a glitch free whole house audio system is important to me so that aspect is very very pleasing. Having the extra bandwidth available for the laptops to move data around on the 5Ghz network while having the whole house audio on its own network at 2.4 Ghz is very nice indeed. I have at least 3x the available bandwidth using the RT-N53 as my old WAP. Last year I bought a WNDR3600 which had a similar feature set and cost twice as much. The RT-N53 delivers good looks, strong features and solid performance at a very aggressive price of less than $70.

UPDATE: After the initial test period when I started using it for normal use the box would crash and hang every 24 hours. The latest firmware does not fix the issue. This issue is being reported by multiple users on the net. Its crashed on me dozens of times yet. Asus has asked the for unit back for diagnosis and hope they have some success. Its totally useless in its current form. I cannot recommend purchasing this product until this stability is addressed. My apple airport extreme for comparison has only been rebooted once in 3 years. The old buffalo router at the other house was also very stable (maybe reboot twice a year). I will continue to update this as things change.

ASUS RT-N53 Wireless Router/Acccess Pointer/Repeater at Newegg

Album with full size photos (Much easier to read the Graphs):
https://picasaweb.google.com/1147296...8936/AsusRTN53
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #9 of 19 Old 03-28-2012, 06:43 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
reserved for Part 2 of review.
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #10 of 19 Old 03-28-2012, 08:03 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Irishdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Can't wait to see your more professional estimation of the RT-N53. I know a bit about networking, but I'm no engineer by any stretch. I mostly just have to USE it and see, well, if it works!
Irishdoom is offline  
post #11 of 19 Old 03-28-2012, 06:09 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
OK I finished the review. need to proof read it with fresh eyes in the morning. Dinnertime.
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #12 of 19 Old 03-29-2012, 03:55 PM
Newbie
 
Brendan_L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Senior Smith,

It sounds like you have had a positive experience with this device. The data transfer rates are impressive.

Some of the Newegg reviews show some general unhappiness with the product but they are all dated from last year. Is there a newer firmware on your router that caused it to perform better?

Also, I can't determine from searching on the web how many mW it outputs. I would be curious to know, as N devices generally output less than G devices but have the advantage of spread spectrum. That being said, some new devices are on the horizon that have G like power and N speed. They are pending FCC approval so may prove to be vaporware.

Furthermore, I would be really fired up if I could stream Blu-ray Iso's wirelessly. Do you think the recent solar flare had anything to do with it working? Case in point, I had a sick kid home from school and he wanted to watch a BR off the media server but it wouldn't stream. No such luck using my current solution.
Brendan_L is offline  
post #13 of 19 Old 03-29-2012, 04:44 PM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brendan_L View Post

Senior Smith,

It sounds like you have had a positive experience with this device. The data transfer rates are impressive.

Some of the Newegg reviews show some general unhappiness with the product but they are all dated from last year. Is there a newer firmware on your router that caused it to perform better?

Also, I can't determine from searching on the web how many mW it outputs. I would be curious to know, as N devices generally output less than G devices but have the advantage of spread spectrum. That being said, some new devices are on the horizon that have G like power and N speed. They are pending FCC approval so may prove to be vaporware.

Furthermore, I would be really fired up if I could stream Blu-ray Iso's wirelessly. Do you think the recent solar flare had anything to do with it working? Case in point, I had a sick kid home from school and he wanted to watch a BR off the media server but it wouldn't stream. No such luck using my current solution.

Yes there was some newer firmware issued. That said I also used the device as a WAP and did not use a lot of the router functions which are more software centric. I plan on deploying another such unit with GigE ports at the Cali loction and see how it performs there...

I don't know about the power output. good question.... will investigate.
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #14 of 19 Old 05-15-2012, 06:51 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
UPDATE: After the initial test period when I started using it for normal use, the box would crash and hang within 24 hours. The latest firmware does not fix the issue. This issue is being reported by multiple users on the net. Its crashed on me dozens of times yet. Asus has asked the for unit back for diagnosis and hope they have some success. Its totally useless in its current form. I cannot recommend purchasing this product until this stability is addressed. My apple airport extreme for comparison has only been rebooted once in 3 years. The old buffalo router at the other house was also very stable (maybe reboot twice a year). I will continue to update this as things change.

Sean
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #15 of 19 Old 05-15-2012, 07:33 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
 
Irishdoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 705
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean_w_smith View Post

UPDATE: After the initial test period when I started using it for normal use, the box would crash and hang within 24 hours. The latest firmware does not fix the issue. This issue is being reported by multiple users on the net. Its crashed on me dozens of times yet. Asus has asked the for unit back for diagnosis and hope they have some success. Its totally useless in its current form. I cannot recommend purchasing this product until this stability is addressed. My apple airport extreme for comparison has only been rebooted once in 3 years. The old buffalo router at the other house was also very stable (maybe reboot twice a year). I will continue to update this as things change.

Sean

That's too bad, Sean. It seems like a good, affordable router, but crashing issues are a problem. I haven't had any similar issues with my unit, and I've been using it as my main router for weeks.
Irishdoom is offline  
post #16 of 19 Old 05-15-2012, 09:02 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishdoom View Post

That's too bad, Sean. It seems like a good, affordable router, but crashing issues are a problem. I haven't had any similar issues with my unit, and I've been using it as my main router for weeks.

Thats great to hear. I never yet have used the router functions just as a WAP. The unit I am delivering back to them is configured and will reproduce the problem with only an Ipad connected to it from my testing. Hopefully they can figure this out.
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #17 of 19 Old 05-19-2012, 08:26 AM
AVS Special Member
 
sean_w_smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Altos, CA and Huntsville, UT
Posts: 4,292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
There has been a lot of debug going here over the last day. I received a replacement unit and began testing that. I was able to reproduce what asus thought was a hardware issue with the new unit. It was a software issue indeed. After tons of debug the issue came down to the new firmware attempts to reset the settings but doesn't and leaves the box in a weird state. Factory Reset gets the garbage cleared and back working again.

So now that is behind us I can start testing reliability again. So far the new firmware seems to have fix the previous crash issues that made the box useless. So far is been 36 hours and no crashes. Thats better than any of the earlier firmwares.

I also noticed some new features in the firmware that I am still testing.

Asus asked me to test out airplay functionality and I have no issues going from my ipad3 to asus RT-N53 and then to AppleTV. Listened to a podcast for an hour and not a single glitch. So airtunes DOES work just fine with the ASUS RT-N53.

I'll update this more after further reliability testing and write up some thoughts on the new firmware when they release it.

For the moment everything is working well.
sean_w_smith is offline  
post #18 of 19 Old 01-05-2013, 08:56 AM
Member
 
tso7036's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Hi Sean, it has been a while. Any comment about the RT-N53? There is a lot of complain about firmware 3.x. The best thing to do is flash it back to 1.1.1.1.52 or use Tomato or DD-WRT.
tso7036 is offline  
post #19 of 19 Old 03-03-2013, 11:25 PM
Member
 
Willie G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I am thinking of using this router as a repeater via Tomato USB to connect to an ASUS RT-N66U router, in lieu of shelling out for a ASUS EA-N66 Dual Band Wireless 3-In-1 Adapter.

Has anyone here done this, and how does it work with 5 GHz at 40 MHz as I get frequent disconnections and a weak signal?


Found out that the RT-53 will only repeat a signal at 2.4GHz and not on the 5 GHz band. mad.gif

-Willie
Willie G. is offline  
Reply Networking, Media Servers & Content Streaming

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off