Need advice from NAS owners - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-06-2012, 04:46 PM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tgrinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Hey guys - had a question to those who have had a NAS for a few years now. I've filled up my conventional 2TB hard drive and I figured it's time I move on to something I can expand and offer more flexibility, long term.

From what I've read/researched thus far, Synology seems to be a solid performer. I'm currenty looking at the DS1812+ - close to pulling the trigger, that is. I then started to wonder if I should jump up to (perhaps) the DS2411 (DS2413 I think was just released...) so I have more potential storage over the long haul.

My question to you all is: do you tend to stick with the same nas for years+ or do you see yourself swapping out the nas for a new one relatively frequently? In other words, would you stick with a more modest nas (like the DS1812) and potentially replace it in 2-3 years or jump up to something larger with the intent of keeping for 5+ years? Do NAS offer longevity (unlike a conventional PC does)?

I guess another way to phrase the question is, do you ever regret not getting a bigger nas? I'm asking more from the pre-packaged/AIO NAS products and not really from the build your own crowd. Thanks in advance for any thoughts!
tgrinch is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-06-2012, 07:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
GusGus748s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Visalia, CA 93291
Posts: 6,443
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked: 602
I was thinking of buying a Synology since they are probably the best NAS out there, but I just couldn't spend that much money. I ended up building my own unRaid server, which can hold about 24 hard drives now. However, if I had the money I would of gone with the biggest and baddest Synology NAS I could afford.

Media Server: UnRaid Server: 15TB of storage and growing :).

http://www.avsforum.com/lists/display/view/id/8599

 

Home Theater Set Up:

http://www.avsforum.com/lists/display/view/id/8597

GusGus748s is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 03:01 AM
Advanced Member
 
bluewhale1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 756
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked: 20
I started off with a Synology ds1511. I now have a 1812. With the expansion units i can add a total of 18 hard drives(only have the main unit right now with all 8 drives filled with 3tb hard drives). With about 700 dvds and about 90 blu rays(just the main movie not the extras) I still have about 9TB available of storage. Only reason i upgraded was for more storage. If you can afford the 2413 go for it. I don't really see the need in you having to buy an new nas for a while once you get one. So basically yes i did regret not getting a bigger one at first. I dont see myself getting anything other than the expansion unit but that wont be for a long time. Still have plenty of space on my 1812.
bluewhale1 is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 08:45 AM
AVS Special Member
 
GusGus748s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Visalia, CA 93291
Posts: 6,443
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluewhale1 View Post

I started off with a Synology ds1511. I now have a 1812. With the expansion units i can add a total of 18 hard drives(only have the main unit right now with all 8 drives filled with 3tb hard drives). With about 700 dvds and about 90 blu rays(just the main movie not the extras) I still have about 9TB available of storage. Only reason i upgraded was for more storage. If you can afford the 2413 go for it. I don't really see the need in you having to buy an new nas for a while once you get one. So basically yes i did regret not getting a bigger one at first. I dont see myself getting anything other than the expansion unit but that wont be for a long time. Still have plenty of space on my 1812.

I agree. I would just buy whatever you can afford. However, you also have to remember this doesn't include hard drives. So, if you buy a 5 bay unit and use 3TB hard drives you can have at least 15 TB of storage. I am not sure how storage protection works with Synology so I am not sure if you will lost a hard drive for parity protection or not.

The great thing about Synology is that you can keep expanding and they've got awesome support and applications. I also believe Q-NAP is another excellent NAS from what I've been reading. In all honesty, I wish I would of waited a few months to save some $$ and bough a Synology. Overall it is more user friendly than unRaid. Don't get me wrong, Unraid is excellent too, but I'm afraid to install anything extra. I know nothing about Linux. I tried installing Crash Plan plugging, and my server pretty much Crashed lol. The good thing was that I saved all my previous settings so I got it back working.

Media Server: UnRaid Server: 15TB of storage and growing :).

http://www.avsforum.com/lists/display/view/id/8599

 

Home Theater Set Up:

http://www.avsforum.com/lists/display/view/id/8597

GusGus748s is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 11:12 AM
Advanced Member
 
bluewhale1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 756
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked: 20
I am using the Synology hybrid raid with a 2 disk fault tolerance. So basically 2 of my disks are used for back up. On the 1511 i had 3 disk for storage and 2 for backup. Now with the 1812 i have 6 disks for storage and 2 for back up.
bluewhale1 is offline  
Old 10-07-2012, 06:25 PM - Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tgrinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked: 17
Thanks for all the replies - this helps a lot, actually. I'm leaning towards the 2413+ now so we'll see how it goes. As bluewhale1 mentioned, I was planning on using SHR2 so the 2413+ will still allow me 10bays of space + 2 drives of redundancy which seems pretty convenient.

I'm still considering which drives to use... the WD RED series seem great in that they come in 3TB sizes (although scarce now); however they're not yet on the 2413+ compatibility list. I also don't know how those drives behave in a 5+ drive NAS since they're "rated" for NAS of 5 drives and under... could just be a marketing thing. If not those drives, i'd consider the WD RE4's, but they seem to only offer a 2TB variety (though are approved right now). I've emailed Synology to see if they have any info regarding support for WD Red drives.

The other thing I kind of wonder - there's a rated "maximum" of storage for each NAS which seems to be based ont 4TB * # drive bays. Is this a theoretical maximum since 4TB are the largest (that I know of, that is) drives available? Let's say in a couple of years 5 or even 6TB drives become the norm - would I still be limited on the original products' maximum, I wonder? I guess Synology would know for sure...
tgrinch is offline  
Old 10-08-2012, 02:58 AM
Advanced Member
 
bluewhale1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 756
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Liked: 20
Hard to guess that answer. i do know that when i got the 1511 i had 3tb drives in it. The next firmware version was the official support for 3tb. When i updated it i had to save my movies on a bunch of other hard drives update the firmware which wiped everything out and then add the movies back in.
bluewhale1 is offline  
Old 10-09-2012, 12:36 AM
Newbie
 
Andersss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
I believe that the biggest and newest Synology NAS is awesome, but it is insanely overkill. No need for all the power it has.
I have an old DS 409+ and it is more than fast enough for home use. I would go for the smallest possible with the possibility to use an expansion unit.
Just my 5 cents.
Andersss is offline  
 
Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off