I have a Panasonic plasma, the minimum MLL has risen and it's IR is horrible.
I have a Samsung plasma, that has very little IR, the minimum MLL hasn't risen a stitch in 3 years.
I have another Samsung plasma that shows zero IR, the minimum MLL hasn't risen a stitch in the 1 year I've had it.
Are the Samsung's perfect? No, Hockey can be annoying in some of the ice rinks with overhead Flash units slaved to the still photographer's camera. Put the Panasonics do the exact same thing.
If you like Panasonic and it's corporate liars, the minimum MLL that went up 3 years in a row, 2 of those that the Panasonic corporate Liars said it wouldn't, be my guest to believe in them now.
I have no hidden agenda other then to say why I like certain TVs, what I find a deal breaker and such.
Guess what? You have your own opinions that aren't the same as mine. Instead of not liking my opinion and disagreeing with them, you just want to say bad things about me. That's OK to. You are who you are. I'll never meet you, I'll never get to know you, and I sure don't care about your opinions. But you are, once again, welcome to them.
The OP was about which is better, for certain things which he spelled out. And IMHO, the LCD fit him better because of the issues I talked about.
Now, for the 3rd time, it's my opinion and instead of respectfully disagreeing you go off on personal attacks. The OP could read what I said, read what you say and make up his mind without your personal attacks on me. I'm glad he made his decision I hope it works out for him and the issues I've brought up don't cause him to regret the purchase.
Originally Posted by BillP
IMO, he's responding to David_B, who turned his anti-plasma posts to anti-Panny, hence the reference to his hidden agenda. As if Samsung displays don't have issues (there is no perfect display, unfortunately).