8K by 4K or Octo HD - the real SUHDTV technology - Page 23 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #661 of 670 Old 02-13-2014, 10:44 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
irkuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 3,483
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 60
^True, but there is definitive gearing up towards 4K. Technology will soon make it cheap.

irkuck
irkuck is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #662 of 670 Old 02-20-2014, 12:16 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
irkuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 3,483
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 60
Where the 8K, 80K, 800K and higher resolutions will be a must.....in rollable wallpapers eek.gif

irkuck
irkuck is offline  
post #663 of 670 Old 02-23-2014, 01:12 PM
AVS Special Member
 
tgm1024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,087
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked: 645

 

Terrible idea.  For comfort reasons alone I want to move close to a window and look around.  Particularly in a sealed tube.  Imagine there's an electrical failure and you're completely blacked out on a runway.  Oh now THAT'LL be a great feeling.

 

I'm going to pass on buying that plane in 2018.


WARNING: You have now entered a no @#$%tard zone. Please gather your anti-vaccine propaganda nonsense and slowly back out the way you came in.
tgm1024 is online now  
post #664 of 670 Old 02-24-2014, 12:37 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Joe Bloggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Liked: 55
I think it's a good idea except it won't match what you're eyes would see. You'll be looking at and focusing at a screen very near you instead of through a window to something far away. And it will probably be in 2D and will have a lower frame rate than real life. It should look better the further you are from the screen/"window".
Joe Bloggs is offline  
post #665 of 670 Old 03-07-2014, 02:53 AM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
 
irkuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 3,483
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked: 60
irkuck is offline  
post #666 of 670 Old 03-07-2014, 04:04 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Chronoptimist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,559
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 203
Good - I'd rather skip 4K and go directly to 8K.
tgm1024 likes this.
Chronoptimist is offline  
post #667 of 670 Old 03-07-2014, 09:07 AM
AVS Special Member
 
tgm1024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,087
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronoptimist View Post

Good - I'd rather skip 4K and go directly to 8K.

 

I like the powers of 2 to be even. Computer scientists tend to be this way.  0 to 8191 is expressable in 13bits width.  Ick.  I want 2^2, 2^4, etc.  Give me true 16,384 across please.  I know, I know, it's not 8192, etc...


WARNING: You have now entered a no @#$%tard zone. Please gather your anti-vaccine propaganda nonsense and slowly back out the way you came in.
tgm1024 is online now  
post #668 of 670 Old 03-07-2014, 10:48 AM
Senior Member
 
Luke M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgm1024 View Post

I like the powers of 2 to be even. Computer scientists tend to be this way.  0 to 8191 is expressable in 13bits width.  Ick.  I want 2^2, 2^4, etc.  Give me true 16,384 across please.  I know, I know, it's not 8192, etc...

Even powers of 2 went out of style with the 128mb DRAM. :-)
Luke M is offline  
post #669 of 670 Old 03-07-2014, 11:27 AM
AVS Special Member
 
tgm1024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,087
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke M View Post
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgm1024 View Post

I like the powers of 2 to be even. Computer scientists tend to be this way.  0 to 8191 is expressable in 13bits width.  Ick.  I want 2^2, 2^4, etc.  Give me true 16,384 across please.  I know, I know, it's not 8192, etc...

Even powers of 2 went out of style with the 128mb DRAM. :-)

 

?


WARNING: You have now entered a no @#$%tard zone. Please gather your anti-vaccine propaganda nonsense and slowly back out the way you came in.
tgm1024 is online now  
post #670 of 670 Old 03-07-2014, 03:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Luke M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgm1024 View Post

?

DRAMs use multiplexed addressing (row/column) and the chip capacity increased by a factor of 4 (1K, 4K, 16K, 64K, 256K, 1M, 4M, 16M, 64M). "Even" powers of 2! Then somebody said - this is silly, screw it, and followed the 128M, 256M, 512M, 1G, 2G, 4G.
Luke M is offline  
Reply Flat Panels General and OLED Technology

Tags
Lcd Hdtv , Displays , Plasma Hdtv , Panasonic

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off