A couple more tidbits for thought.
What is the difference in scale between 1080 HD and 2160 UHD? If I render an image at 1080, what relative factor of scale would I need to render at 2160? Would that be 400%, or 200%? The 2160 image is only twice as large in any single axis. And it is the single axis alone that defines the relative difference in sharpness, not the 2 dimensional factor of 4 that defines the difference in total image elements.
The only objective way to discern or compare the apparent sharpness of video or film, whether in display or projection, is through the use of linear resolution charts that effectively relate a single axis (dimension) for comparison. Under ideal conditions, with respect to the difference between 2160 UHD and 1080 HD, such charts reveal a difference in sharpness never greater than 2.
Again, as stated upfront in my first post: I agree that 2160 UHD has four times the pixel count of 1080 HD and (as loosely defined by some, but not all) can be referred to as having "four times the resolution." No debate there. What I've tried to illustrate through this and previous posts in this topic (through the use of several different examples and explanations provided with appropriate context) is the argument that it is at best misleading to then suggest, as most manufactures do in their overly-zealous marketing of UHD, that as a result of having "four times the resolution" it is also four times as clear or sharp. That's all.
My posts here have been to provide opinion, and to perhaps reopen a discussion of the topic with others. The purpose of a forum topic such as this is to exchange information: to learn or inform, and sometimes to argue and debate. Whenever I post in any forum setting, I am always mindful that the people I may be communicating with are just that - people. People with experience that is different from mine, and opinions that may not agree with mine. Above all, people that deserve my respect just for the very fact that they are people, not contingent upon what they say.
Have I offended you in some way, tgm1024? Is there really cause provoking your incessant, personally derogatory snarks, such as claiming I resort to " . . . the most childish of arguing techniques . . ." or that my future comments might " . . . pollute this thread any further . . .?"
Or how about other comments you've made that appear to be not-so-veiled attempts to intimidate or bully others into submission, such as "We go through this over and over and over" or "I have no more time for your line of reasoning" or "If you wish to hold your ground on this and fight the uphill battle against the world, be my guest. But you'll lose" or "You need to stop fighting this." And those are just excerpts from this one thread alone . . .
There's a not-so-fine line between commenting and trolling . . .
Last edited by bart.; 11-08-2014 at 07:13 PM.