Most people willing to sacrifice PQ for convenience? - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Baselworld is only a few weeks away. Getting the latest news is easy, Click Here for info on how to join the newsletter list. Follow our team for updates featuring event coverage, new product unveilings, watch industry news & more!

Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 Old 03-15-2002, 03:54 PM - Thread Starter
AVS Special Member
wco81's Avatar
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 4,935
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked: 151
There's a article on how the tide of copy-protection is turning. We're all familiar with the issues but the article has a pretty good historical perspective:

One thing that was interesting in the article was that one of the anti-copy-protection people they quoted said for most consumers, it won't matter, people will accept a degraded copy for timeshifting convenience or the ability to transfer audio and video content to other devices, like portable equipment or car equipment. People will record using a mike next to a speaker to capture the material if they have to.

Of course, that kind of mindset is not representative of people who post here, who are video and audiophiles. But will the market accept HDTV or DTV if you can at least timeshift at a level from 480p on down to VHS quality? Lets say the next-to-worst case scenario (worst case would be no timeshifting) is you have to use composite and tape on a cruddy VCR. So there is no recording at all at HDTV quality (so much for recording HDTV movies on HBO to Blue-ray discs).

But it's not clear the MPAA would allow even VHS-quality taping of HDTV. They try to block VHS recording of DVDs as it is.
wco81 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 Old 03-15-2002, 05:17 PM
AVS Special Member
tonyb100's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: minneapolis, mn
Posts: 3,733
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
That is pure specultaion I feel.

People if given a choice would not choose 480 timeshifting, given no chioce people would probably acceppt it as it is better then nothing, but to say people don't care is foolish. No one in my family or group of friends is content to watch the sd channel when the hd is aviliable...

People do care about pq and not just videophiles...

Pardon my spelling, the checker hangs my system.
tonyb100 is offline  
post #3 of 3 Old 03-17-2002, 08:06 AM
AVS Club Gold
Don Landis's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 11,125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 660 Post(s)
Liked: 214
Turning back the clock to the mid 70's as an example-
This was a time before VHS but Sony had just introduced a new top loading 3/4Umatic "HOME" VCR with stereo audio and a built in VHF/UHF tuner. I had one of these. It was a model VO1600 for those of you who know about such things. Obviously there were very few of us who owned one at that time and the community who had them did not have a WWW forum to compare and converse but we did have a telephone network and we used to record shows off TV for each other. The favorite was the Don Kirchner's rock concerts that were simulcast in stereo on the FM stations out of NYC. Usually on Sundays a few of us would get together with our huge, heavy top loading VCRs and run off copies we would share. One member of our small community was a projector op at a local theater. Along with another member who worked at a TV station in NYC would get together on Sunday mornings and record the weekly movie release using a video camera trained on the screen of the empty theater using microphones to pick up the sound. This was a real low quality recording and the only movies this theater had were porn stuff so while I did get a few, I did not find the genre as interesting to pay for the high cost of blank 3/4U media but the fact is, was that, yes people went out of their way to "pirate" movies even back then and quality was not so much an issue.
Today, I choose to archive for long term time shifting purposes the DVHS Tape because that is what we have today. I did back when 3/4U was the only thing out and I do today because DVHS is the only thing out for HDTV. I am not much of a collector of prerecorded media. This is why I can see the PVR technology of more interest to me as soon as it is out for HDTV. Program Content is most important to me but I do have my quality standards! Today, if I am to pay for blank media, I want the archive to be on HDTV with DD5.1 minimum. If I want a prerecorded media DVD is fine too.
Don Landis is online now  
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread HDTV Recorders

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off