Originally Posted by SEMIJim
Perhaps because the question was "Does anyone have a copy of the 108R software?"
"Nevermind"? When you try to make it look like I'm a dolt because you couldn't follow the conversation?
You're not getting it.
I was not trying to answer any question about 108R. If I was, that would be what I would have quoted.
If you'll look back, you'll see that I was responding to a conversation about a link to 111R, which I quoted in my post.
Try to follow the thread:
First cah95046 gave an incomplete link to the 111R software in post #4751
In post #4764
P Smith reported that the link given by cah95046 for 111R went to a missing page.
In post #4765
I gave the full (non-truncated) link that cah95046 meant to give for 111R.
In post #4771
you reported that all you see there is 111R, which was exactly what was supposed to be there.
Get it now?