Star Trek 2 - AVS Forum
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 682 Old 09-14-2011, 06:46 PM - Thread Starter
 
lwright84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
After months of rumors that he would only produce, JJ Abrams has officially signed on to direct the sequel to the breakout hit of summer 2009. He has been spending that time developing the script with Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman, and Damon Lindelof. Filming is scheduled to begin this upcoming winter for a 2013 release.

http://www.slashfilm.com/jj-abrams-o...r-trek-sequel/

A recent interview with Abrams where he states that he will delay the film if he has to, in order to get the story and characters right.

http://www.slashfilm.com/jj-abrams-s...-release-date/
lwright84 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 682 Old 09-14-2011, 08:00 PM
Bass Enabler
 
Scott Simonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 14,054
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 692 Post(s)
Liked: 906
Bout time. I was wondering if they were just not going to make any more of what. Hope they keep the principle cast.

My Dual 18" LLT subs 120dB down to 10hz

 

Plan9Reloaded Co-host

Listen to the Plan9Reloaded Gaming and Technology Podcast (may contain NSFW language)

https://soundcloud.com/plan9reloaded/sets/podcast - direct pod link

http://plan9reloaded.com/site/ - main website

Scott Simonian is online now  
post #3 of 682 Old 09-14-2011, 10:02 PM
AVS Special Member
 
smudge981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 165
I ask only three things from Mr. Abrams. One, get rid of the lens glare gimmick. Two, no Deep Roy as the half-pint alien. Three, a better plot. I forgave him for some of the holes you could drive a truck through simply because the story moved right along. I won't give him a second chance.

"I am NOT suffering from insanity... I happen to be enjoying myself!"

smudge981 is offline  
post #4 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 12:42 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
oink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shuloch
Posts: 26,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by smudge981 View Post

I ask only three things from Mr. Abrams. One, get rid of the lens glare gimmick.

+1
It was silly and distracting.

Why on earth didn't Paramount box him in contractually to whip out a sequel quickly if the initial movie was successful?

This will cost them some $$$ from a marketing POV...

A.P.S. deserve our protection....join the cause today!
oink is offline  
post #5 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 12:50 AM
AVS Special Member
 
MovieSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gothenburg
Posts: 6,772
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Liked: 37
Lens glare works sometimes because it gives the illusion of location recording. But when you use it so much that the viewer starts to notice it, then it becomes a distraction.

What I on the other hand loved about the first film, was that they manage to create that epic star trek feel in the first scene. It got me in the right mode from start.
MovieSwede is offline  
post #6 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 01:00 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
oink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shuloch
Posts: 26,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieSwede View Post

Lens glare works sometimes because it gives the illusion of location recording. But when you use it so much that the viewer starts to notice it, then it becomes a distraction.

What I on the other hand loved about the first film, was that they manage to create that epic star trek feel in the first scene. It got me in the right mode from start.

Absolutely agree.

A.P.S. deserve our protection....join the cause today!
oink is offline  
post #7 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 07:41 AM
AVS Special Member
 
smudge981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 165
He did the same lens glare gimmick in Super 8 but fortunately, it was very little.

"I am NOT suffering from insanity... I happen to be enjoying myself!"

smudge981 is offline  
post #8 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 08:14 AM
AVS Special Member
 
Morpheo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal by day, Paris by night...
Posts: 6,619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked: 322
I really like the new crew. If done well a great chemistry could develop between them over the coming films. I'm looking forward to this one and will probably be there on day one.
Morpheo is online now  
post #9 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 08:32 AM - Thread Starter
 
lwright84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
It's not a "gimmick", it's a visual styling. Many directors have one (or many). Personally, I don't find them to be distracting and feel they often add to the atmosphere of the film. I think people find reasons to nitpick a film and complain. But for those that disagree, take a moment and read JJ's own thoughts on the matter:

http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/hey...-in-star-trek/

Excerpt: "I wanted a visual system that felt unique," Abrams says. "I know there are certain shots where even I watch and think, 'Oh that's ridiculous, that was too many.' But I love the idea that the future was so bright it couldn't be contained in the frame."

http://www.slashfilm.com/film-interv...g-mystery-box/

Excerpt: To me it’s such a cool beautiful image, the light through the glass. There are times that I feel like it sort of adds another kind of smart element, and it’s hard to define. But it is a visual taste that I do like. I think there are a couple shots in Super 8 where I just think I should definitely pull back here or there, but I can’t help myself sometimes.

And there are many more if you guys could be bothered to google it a bit.
lwright84 is offline  
post #10 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 08:52 AM
sb1
AVS Special Member
 
sb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked: 143
Just because Abrams likes it doesn't mean everyone else should.

I think it's pretty cool but could have been toned down a bit in ST.

Stephen.

Chances are very good that I was drinking when I posted the above.

sb1 is online now  
post #11 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 09:07 AM - Thread Starter
 
lwright84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post
Just because Abrams likes it doesn't mean everyone else should.
I'm not saying that, I'm simply saying before one dismisses it as a gimmick by a thoughtless director, one should see what said director has to say about it.
lwright84 is offline  
post #12 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 09:42 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
oink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shuloch
Posts: 26,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwright84 View Post
I'm not saying that, I'm simply saying before one dismisses it as a gimmick by a thoughtless director, one should see what said director has to say about it.
Whether or not one wants to call it a gimmick isn't really important IMO.

Watching the movie, it felt "gimmicky" or "silly" or "distracting" to me.
The bottom line, from my perspective, is it pulled me out of the movie somewhat.

A.P.S. deserve our protection....join the cause today!
oink is offline  
post #13 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 11:21 AM
AVS Special Member
 
smudge981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwright84 View Post

Excerpt: To me it's such a cool beautiful image, the light through the glass. There are times that I feel like it sort of adds another kind of smart element, and it's hard to define. But it is a visual taste that I do like. I think there are a couple shots in Super 8 where I just think I should definitely pull back here or there, but I can't help myself sometimes.

Methinks Abrams pretty much slapped his own directing hand right there. He KNEW he shouldn't have done it but he did it anyways. I'm not going to roast the guy over an open flame for something like that. It didn't bother me that much but it sure bothered the people who watched it with me. As one friend put it, "maybe next time, the bridge won't look like a Tiffany's store with the lights on."

"I am NOT suffering from insanity... I happen to be enjoying myself!"

smudge981 is offline  
post #14 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 11:37 AM
Moderator
 
PooperScooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Leominster MA
Posts: 19,879
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

+1
It was silly and distracting.

Why on earth didn't Paramount box him in contractually to whip out a sequel quickly if the initial movie was successful?

This will cost them some $$$ from a marketing POV...

Take your pick:
Shakey Cam
Teal and Orange
Lens Glare

I know what I'd pick.

larry

Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. -- Thomas Alva Edison
PooperScooper is offline  
post #15 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 12:31 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
LOL - I have always felt that Lens Flare was a mistake on the part of the camera operator. Like seeing a mike boom in the picture or the reflection of the camera crew in a highly polished surface.

They are flaws.
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #16 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 12:34 PM - Thread Starter
 
lwright84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,762
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post

LOL - I have always felt that Lens Flare was a mistake on the part of the camera operator. Like seeing a mike boom in the picture or the reflection of the camera crew in a highly polished surface.

They are flaws.

Read the interviews, they were calculated and intentional.
lwright84 is offline  
post #17 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 12:46 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Ron Temple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 8,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by PooperScooper View Post

Take your pick:
Shakey Cam
Teal and Orange
Lens Glare

I know what I'd pick.

larry

That's asking "Do you want to be shot in your right foot, left foot or other left foot. I find them all annoying when overdone...director's artistic choice or not.

I don't lurk as much as I used to and I NEVER listen. Comes from being old and cynical.

Ron Temple is offline  
post #18 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 01:11 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Tulpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwright84 View Post

Read the interviews, they were calculated and intentional.

I like that they were calculated. Maybe Abrams and his cronies had a computer program to run scenarios to get the right length, duration and intensity of the lens flare to achieve the proper emotional reaction so as to contribute to the overall arc of the story. Beats the old days when directors only had slide rules and punch card calculators to judge the impact of their iris wipes.

Come on, Abrams puts them in solely because he thinks they're cool and they're his films to do what he wants. That's it. And even he admits he does it too much.

But that doesn't at all take away from the fact that some people (a lot of people?) don't like them.

Don't believe everything on the Interwebz! A duck's quack DOES echo!
Tulpa is offline  
post #19 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 01:31 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Fredrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,925
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 16
I was not that distracted by the lens flares but I did notice it so in a sense it was too much.
But lens flares are kind of outdated after numerous of early CGI SciFi TV-series, e.g. Babylon5.
It kind of looks cool but you get sick of seeing it all the time

21:st century Karate Kid......Logon, Logoff, Logon, Logoff..
Fredrik is offline  
post #20 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 01:31 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Matt_Stevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 13,818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 48
I'm betting it will be minimized in the next film.

My issue is this... Eric Bana's part was poorly written. He played a lame villain. THAt has to change. And for the love of God, no more villains that say, "Helloooo" on the monitor. That was just painful.

And please, let the film breathe. Don't be in such a rush all of the damned time. The conversation or lecture from Pike to Kirk is a grand example. That was cut so quickly that it was as if Pike was running out of oxygen and had to speak quickly, without pauses.

Mi3 didn't suffer from that and neither did the JJ episodes of LOST.

Vimeo is the home of the Super8 Shooter...
http://vimeo.com/super8shooter
Matt_Stevens is offline  
post #21 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 01:46 PM
 
Lee Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 19,369
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwright84 View Post
Read the interviews, they were calculated and intentional.
I understand that - I just don't agree with his use of a flaw as a shooting technique.

Lens Flare is just one of the points that shows how inferior cameras are to the human eye.
Lee Stewart is offline  
post #22 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 01:56 PM
AVS Special Member
 
smudge981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,840
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 165
Then it's agreed. Mr Abrams has to touch base with us in this thread before shooting.

"I am NOT suffering from insanity... I happen to be enjoying myself!"

smudge981 is offline  
post #23 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 02:27 PM
AVS Special Member
 
rezzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 7,760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Liked: 39
Abram's reboot had bigger problems than the lens flaring effect..

"I knew you'd say that"...*BLAM!*
rezzy is offline  
post #24 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 03:21 PM
sb1
AVS Special Member
 
sb1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by rezzy View Post
Abram's reboot had bigger problems than the lens flaring effect..
It worked fine for me.

Stephen.

Chances are very good that I was drinking when I posted the above.

sb1 is online now  
post #25 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 05:39 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
sdurani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Monterey Park, CA
Posts: 19,620
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1217 Post(s)
Liked: 945
And here I was hoping for lens flares in 3-D next time. But seriously....

While both lens flare and shaky cam were over used for my tastes, I did think they helped to provide a visual consistency between interior practical shots and exterior special effects work. Some of the space ship scenes looked like they were filmed out there rather than generated in a computer. And they often cut seamlessly with interior live action shots.

Sanjay
sdurani is offline  
post #26 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 05:50 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Morpheo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal by day, Paris by night...
Posts: 6,619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 148 Post(s)
Liked: 322
Quote:
Originally Posted by rezzy View Post

Abram's reboot had bigger problems than the lens flaring effect..

like what?
Morpheo is online now  
post #27 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 07:39 PM
AVS Special Member
 
Osirus23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,220
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 180
Best Trek film since Undiscovered Country here, I don't have problems with it.
Osirus23 is offline  
post #28 of 682 Old 09-15-2011, 11:13 PM
AVS Addicted Member
 
oink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shuloch
Posts: 26,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by PooperScooper View Post

Take your pick:
Shakey Cam
Teal and Orange
Lens Glare

I know what I'd pick.

larry

OK....you have a point there.

A.P.S. deserve our protection....join the cause today!
oink is offline  
post #29 of 682 Old 09-16-2011, 06:20 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
archiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 18,260
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 358 Post(s)
Liked: 674
Little help here..... I hate to ask this question, but ask it I must: just what exactly is "lens flare"? I know what a "focus pull" is - they used it all the time in BSG and it added to the realism of CGI spaceship shots. They also used "shaky-cam" - I know what that is - but they were judicious about it to the point that it wasn't distracting (too many feature films and TV shows haven't learned that lesson yet, obviously). But I'm at a loss to describe what this "lens flare" is and how it's been overused. Thanks.
archiguy is online now  
post #30 of 682 Old 09-16-2011, 06:21 AM
AVS Addicted Member
 
Matt_Stevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 13,818
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 48
There were a few HUGE plot holes in the film. Just big giant plot holes.

Vimeo is the home of the Super8 Shooter...
http://vimeo.com/super8shooter
Matt_Stevens is offline  
Reply Movies, Concerts, and Music Discussion

Tags
Star Trek Ii The Wrath Of Khan Restored Blu Ray
Gear in this thread - Star by PriceGrabber.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off