Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Draguignan, Var, France
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's strange all these negative things about R2. I have the Dutch Gladiator -disc. Don't see anything really wrong with it, it's the best R2 I saw. For the sound I cannot tell, because my amp has to be reconnected.
It's possible that there's a 4 % speed up, but I never noticed it!
In the beginning it's true, most of the R2 were crap, but the last 6 months, most of the titles I viewed, from serious editors, looked really fine.
I put on after Gladiotor r2, the new terminator 2 RÃ©gion 1 disc. looked terriffic indeed, but I thought the "Gladiator"-disc looked sharper and that the terminator-disc had a few minor compression-faults.
One thing is sure, almost every decent R1 movie is well edited, in rÃ©gion 2 you can still find arwful dvd's. When they are both well made, I dont know! One thing I also noticed is that Non- anamorphic dvd's (like mMary Popins)are looking much better in pal. When I zoom in the lines are not that visible. On NTSC, the loss in quality is higher.