The Good, The Bad and The Ugly and the Dust. - AVS Forum | Home Theater Discussions And Reviews
Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2001, 02:04 AM - Thread Starter
Advanced Member
btmoore's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 10
Since I was just a youngen at the time when this was in theaters and after years of seeing it chopped up on commercial and cable TV, I really enjoyed seeing this movie uncut on my 110" FPTV wide screen. I have to say though I was a little disappointed in the transfer in regards to dust or fibers being caught in the transfer equipment. There were at least 2 times where I spotted strings of dust at the edges of the screen. Maybe this is not as noticeable on your standard TV set but it was disappointing on the big screen. I also noticed 2 parts when the movie combed. I am assuming this is due to flags set improperly on the DVD. I don't remember where the first one was but the second time was at the end of the movie when Clint is shooting the cannon.

Did anyone else notice these problems? Are my expectations off in regards to dust? Can't they clean the film and transfer equipment better to ensure that dust is eliminated prior to transfer? Don't you think that they would QA the transfer, especial on such a classic film, before the final transfer?

Other than these small issues, it was fantastic to see this classic movie as close as I could make it to the way it was suppose to be seen.


btmoore is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 06-18-2001, 01:14 PM
AVS Forum Special Member
RobertR's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California
Posts: 6,637
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 403 Post(s)
Liked: 563
As with many other things in life, it boils down to a question of money. Cleaning film itself is very expensive and time consuming. I was with a group of people from HTF who visited Paramount Studios, and they showed us an example of how it took 16 hours just to clean ONE frame of film. It's well known that MGM isn't well off financially, and they don't spend the money on restoration that others do.
RobertR is offline  
Sponsored Links
Thread Tools

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off